Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 107 references

ATLAS. III. Dust Around Little Red Dots: Hydrogen Line Ratios beyond Dust-free Non-Case B Models

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that dust in the broad-line region of little red dots, revealed by combined Balmer and Paschen line ratios, is common and may be a low-column counterpart of AGN tori.

desk verdict Careful line measurements and a genuinely new Balmer-Paschen diagnostic, but the population-wide dust claim rests on a convention-dependent ceiling that the paper itself shows is fragile. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10832 v1 pith:BAZPRB43 submitted 2026-08-11 astro-ph.GA

Tomokazu Kiyota , Masami Ouchi , Hiroto Yanagisawa , Makoto Ando , Yuichi Harikane , Yuta Kageura , Minami Nakane , Yurina Nakazato
show 2 more authors
Yoshiaki Ono Yui Takeda
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords littlereddotsbroad-lineregionBalmerdecrementPaschenlinesdustattenuationnon-CaseBrecombinationphotoionizationmodelingactivegalacticnuclei
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Little red dots are compact, V-shaped objects whose broad Balmer lines often show $H\alpha/H\beta$ ratios far above the Case B recombination value. This paper assembles 20 LRDs with broad H $\beta$ detected above $5\sigma$, measures broad Balmer and, where available, Paschen lines, and compares them with dust-free photoionization grids. It finds that dense, optically thick gas alone can push $H\alpha/H\beta$ to about 13, but several objects exceed this, and the joint Balmer-Paschen fits require extra dust extinction of $E(B-V)\sim0.2$--$1.0$ toward the broad-line region. Because the narrow-line ratios stay near Case B, the dust must be associated with the broad-line region rather than the galaxy-scale interstellar medium. If correct, dust is common around LRD nuclei and may be a low-column-density counterpart of the AGN torus.

What carries the argument

The central tool is the joint plane of broad $H\alpha/H\beta$ versus $\mathrm{Pa}\beta/\mathrm{Pa}\gamma$ (and $\mathrm{Pa}\alpha/\mathrm{Pa}\beta$), compared with a grid of constant-density, plane-parallel Cloudy models computed with the 'total' line intensity (inward plus outward emission). The non-Case B mechanism is the combined effect of large line optical depths, radiative trapping, and collisional excitation at $\log n_{\rm H}\sim10$--$11\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$ and $\log \Phi({\rm H})\sim18\,{\rm photons\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$, which can raise $H\alpha/H\beta$ to about 13. The total-emission convention sets the dust-free ceiling; choosing only outward emission would raise the ceiling above 100 and remove the need for dust, which is why the convention is the load-bearing choice.

What would settle it

Measure the broad $\mathrm{Pa}\beta/\mathrm{Pa}\gamma$ and $\mathrm{Pa}\alpha/\mathrm{Pa}\beta$ ratios for the eight low-redshift LRDs with broad $H\alpha/H\beta>13$; if those ratios fall on the dust-free high-density model tracks, the dust inference for those objects fails. A single LRD with broad $H\alpha/H\beta$ of 5--10 and $\mathrm{Pa}\alpha/\mathrm{Pa}\beta$ below Case B, with narrow ratios at Case B, would confirm the non-Case B channel independent of dust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery claim is that the broad hydrogen line ratios of LRDs occupy a regime that dust-free non-Case B photoionization models cannot cover. Using plane-parallel Cloudy models with total two-sided line emission, the maximum dust-free $H\alpha/H\beta$ is about 13, reached near $\log n_{\rm H}\sim10\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$ and $\log \Phi({\rm H})\sim18\,{\rm photons\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$. Of the three LRDs with reliable broad Paschen lines, one (J1047+0739) is reproduced by dense, high-density gas with $\log n_{\rm H}\sim10$--$11$; the other two (J1022+0841 and the Rosetta Stone) require additional attenuation $E(B-V)\sim0.2$--$1.0$ even after these non-Case B effects. Since their narrow $H\alpha/H\beta$ ratios are close to Case B, the extra extinction applies specifically to the broad-line component. In the full sample, two high-redshift and eight low-redshift LRDs have broad $H\alpha/H\beta>13$, the dust-free ceiling, implying that dust obscuration is present in at least about half of the population.

Load-bearing premise

The dust requirement rests on the model convention that counts the total two-sided emission of a plane-parallel slab, which caps the dust-free $H\alpha/H\beta$ at about 13; counting only the outward-facing emission would let dust-free gas reach ratios above 100, removing the need for dust in objects with ratios between 13 and 100.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Broad $H\alpha/H\beta$ values above about 13 become a dust diagnostic: any LRD above this value needs attenuation toward its broad-line region, with $E(B-V)$ roughly 0.2 to 1.0.
  • The dust is not a galaxy-wide foreground screen, because narrow-line ratios remain close to Case B; it must sit close to the broad-line gas.
  • A substantial fraction of LRDs, at least about half of the studied sample, may contain a low-column-density dusty structure that behaves like a scaled-down AGN torus.
  • Weak hot-dust emission in many LRDs does not argue against nuclear dust, because modest column densities can produce the observed line ratios.
  • Objects like J1047+0739 show that some LRDs are consistent with dense dust-free gas, so the non-Case B channel must be included before attributing any Balmer excess to dust.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the outward-only emission convention is the better description of what observers see, the dust-free ceiling rises far above 100 and the dust inference for objects only slightly above 13 disappears; this is testable by computing observer-facing line ratios from the same grids and comparing them with the same data.
  • The same Balmer-Paschen decomposition predicts a population of Type-2-like LRDs, objects with similar continua but no detectable broad lines, and gives a quantitative expectation for how often such objects should appear if the dust column depends on viewing angle.
  • The proposed proto-torus would create a correlation between broad $H\alpha/H\beta$ and rest-frame 3--5 $\mu$m emission in a larger sample; measuring both for the same LRDs would test whether the attenuating dust is also the dust that glows in the mid-infrared.
  • Paschen-line spectroscopy of the eight low-redshift LRDs with $H\alpha/H\beta>13$ should be the quickest discriminator: if their $\mathrm{Pa}\beta/\mathrm{Pa}\gamma$ and $\mathrm{Pa}\alpha/\mathrm{Pa}\beta$ follow the high-density dust-free tracks, the dust interpretation for those objects would be wrong.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper measures broad Balmer and, where available, Paschen hydrogen line ratios in 20 little red dots (LRDs), combining five high-redshift JWST/NIRSpec sources with fifteen low-redshift sources from the literature. Using Cloudy plane-parallel models with the total (inward plus outward) line emission, the authors find that the dust-free non-Case B grid can reach Hα/Hβ at most ~13, and that two of the three LRDs with reliable broad Paschen measurements (J1022+0841 and the Rosetta Stone) require additional dust extinction E(B−V) ≳ 0.2–1.0 even after accounting for high-density, optically thick effects. They further argue that, because two high-z and eight low-z LRDs have Hα/Hβ > 13, dust obscuration may be common in the LRD population, potentially representing a low-column counterpart of the AGN torus.

Significance. If the central inference holds, this is one of the first joint Balmer–Paschen demonstrations that non-Case B physics is active in LRD broad-line regions and that some LRDs require dust that is spatially associated with the broad-line gas, with implications for the weak hot-dust emission and for torus-like geometries. The measurement side is carefully executed: the paper uses MCMC posteriors, an absorption-component treatment with a ΔBIC criterion, a wavelength-dependent LSF, and an external, non-fitted Cloudy grid, which are strengths. However, the population-level conclusion depends critically on the adopted line-output convention, and the paper itself acknowledges in Appendix B that the Balmer decrement alone cannot exclude dust-free outward-only models; this convention dependence is not fully resolved for the Balmer-only subsample.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.2, Appendix B, Section 5.1, Abstract] The central population claim—that LRDs with Hα/Hβ > 13 'cannot be reproduced' by dust-free non-Case B models—is convention-dependent. Appendix B explicitly shows that the outward-only (shielded-face) component reaches Hα/Hβ > 100 near log n_H ~ 8 and states that 'the Balmer decrement alone might not exclude a dust-free configuration dominated by shielded-face outward emission.' For an external observer of a spherical or quasi-spherical distribution of optically thick BLR clouds, the emergent radiation is the outward component, not the sum of inward and outward components; the paper's justification for adopting I_tot via the L_bol–L_Hα scaling (H. Yanagisawa et al. 2026a) constrains the total luminosity normalization, not the directional line-ratio convention. Therefore, the ten sources without Paschen constraints do not establish the abstract's statement that dust is present in at least about half of the LRD population, and the claim should be explicitly conditioned on the adopted geometry or supported with a direct test of the outward-only convention.
  2. [Section 5.1, Summary item 4, Appendix B] The robustness of the joint Balmer–Paschen dust detection for the Rosetta Stone to the line-output convention is not demonstrated. The Rosetta Stone has Hα/Hβ ≈ 13.9, only slightly above the total-emission ceiling, and Paβ/Paγ ≈ 2.2. The paper only shows that J1022+0841's Paβ/Paγ remains outside the dust-free range under the outward-only prescription; it does not present the outward-only grid on the Hα/Hβ–Paβ/Paγ plane or evaluate the Rosetta Stone under that convention. If the Rosetta Stone can be reproduced without dust in the outward-only prescription, the number of robust dust detections reduces from two to one, materially weakening the central conclusion; this should be checked explicitly and the abstract and summary revised accordingly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5.1] The phrase 'at least about half of the population' should be replaced by 'about half of the present sample' unless a statistical completeness argument is supplied, since Section 2 states that the sample is not intended to be statistically complete.
  2. [Figure 3] Adding a second horizontal line or shaded band showing the outward-only dust-free maximum would make the convention dependence of the Hα/Hβ > 13 threshold visible to the reader.
  3. [Section 3.2] When justifying the I_tot convention by the L_bol–L_Hα relation, state quantitatively how well the total-emission models reproduce that relation and note that a luminosity normalization provides no direct constraint on the line-ratio convention.
  4. [Appendix B] The comparison between the sphere-total and plane-parallel-total models is made only by visual inspection of Figure B4; a quantitative measure of the agreement (for example, the median offset or the fraction of grid points within a given ratio tolerance) would strengthen the claim that the two geometries give broadly similar results.
  5. [Section 5.4] The term 'proto-torus' is evocative and could be misread as implying an evolutionary connection to classical AGN tori; a footnote or explicit sentence clarifying that it is a purely descriptive term for a low-column dusty structure would avoid overinterpretation.
  6. [Section 5.1] There is a typo: 'maixmum' should be 'maximum' in the sentence following Figure 7.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Population claim rests on a self-cited total-emission convention; Paschen-based dust inference retains independent content.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.2 (Cloudy Modeling); see also Appendix B, Figures B1–B3.]
    "For the fiducial calculations, we adopt plane-parallel geometry and obtain the line ratios using the Cloudy “total” line intensity, Itotal = Iinward + Ioutward. This quantity represents the total two-sided line emission from the slab, usually used in AGN studies, rather than the directional line flux seen by an observer from one side. We adopt this convention because it provides an approximate reproduction of the observed Lbol–Lbroad,Hα scaling relation of LRDs (H. Yanagisawa et al. 2026a)."

    The dust-free ceiling Hα/Hβ ≈ 13 is an output of the total-emission convention. The paper uses this ceiling to classify ten LRDs with Hα/Hβ > 13 as 'cannot be reproduced by the non-Case B models' and hence as requiring dust (Abstract; Section 5.1). Appendix B shows that the alternative outward-only convention yields dust-free Hα/Hβ > 100 near log n_H ~ 8, which would remove the dust requirement for these ten sources. The choice between conventions is not fixed by the line-ratio data itself; in the main text it is justified by a scaling relation from the same group's prior ATLAS paper (Yanagisawa et al. 2026a). Thus the 'at least about half of the population' statement reduces to a self-cited modeling convention rather than to an independent prediction.

full rationale

Most of the derivation is self-contained: line fluxes are measured from spectra or adopted from external catalogs, and the Cloudy grid is an external photoionization code that is not fit to the target line ratios. The joint Balmer–Paschen comparison is not circular because Paα/Paβ below Case B is independent of a foreground screen and of the total-vs-outward convention, and the dust requirement for J1022+0841 and Rosetta Stone is supported by the joint plane rather than by the Balmer decrement alone. The circularity concern is confined to the population-level statement: the dust-free ceiling Hα/Hβ ≈ 13, used to classify ten sources as dust-requiring, is a property of the total-emission convention, and the main-text justification for that convention is a scaling relation from the same group's prior ATLAS paper. Because Appendix B shows an alternative convention reaches Hα/Hβ > 100, the 'at least about half' claim is not an independent prediction. I therefore score 4 rather than 6 because the core Paschen-based inference retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central inference of dust in the broad-line region depends on the maximum dust-free H-alpha/H-beta of about 13 from a specific Cloudy grid, on the choice of total versus outward line emission, and on E(B-V) values added to match the data. These are the effective free parameters and assumptions the reader does not get independently. The Pa-alpha/Pa-beta ratio below Case B provides some independent support for non-Case B physics, but the dust column estimates remain model-dependent.

free parameters (4)
  • Additional broad-line E(B-V) for J1022+0841 = ~1
    Inferred so that the observed H-alpha/H-beta, Pa-alpha/Pa-beta, and Pa-beta/Pa-gamma match the Cloudy grid; a model-dependent lower limit.
  • Additional broad-line E(B-V) for Rosetta Stone = ~0.2
    Inferred from the H-alpha/H-beta versus Pa-beta/Pa-gamma position near the log n_H = 9, log Phi(H) = 18, log N_H = 25 grid models.
  • Broad-line gas density log n_H for J1047+0739 = 10 to 11
    Chosen within the grid to reproduce the Balmer and Paschen ratios of this object without dust.
  • Ionizing photon flux log Phi(H) for the favored grid = ~18
    The specific grid location quoted for J1047+0739 and J1022+0841; effectively a fitted parameter of the interpretation, though it is a grid coordinate rather than a continuous fit.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Case B recombination values (H-alpha/H-beta = 2.87, Pa-alpha/Pa-beta = 2.0) are the appropriate dust-free low-density reference.
    Used throughout as the null hypothesis for the intrinsic narrow-line ratios and as the baseline for broad-line departures.
  • ad hoc to paper Plane-parallel slab with total two-sided line emission is the fiducial geometry for broad-line-region gas.
    Adopted in Section 3.2 and justified by reproducing the L_bol to L_H-alpha scaling from Yanagisawa et al. 2026a, not by the line-ratio data itself. Appendix B shows the choice matters.
  • domain assumption The dust-free Cloudy grid (no grains, AGN continuum, Z = 0.01 to 1.0, log n_H = 5 to 16, log Phi = 16 to 24, log N_H = 21 to 26) covers the physically relevant broad-line-region parameter space.
    The maximum H-alpha/H-beta of about 13 is derived from this grid; models outside this grid, for example with different SEDs, microturbulence, or clumpy geometry, could change the threshold.
  • domain assumption Observed broad-line fluxes are intrinsic line emission modified only by the modeled absorption and a foreground screen of dust.
    Used when interpreting ratios as reddening; scattering, outflows, or blended iron emission are treated as negligible or explicitly modeled.
invented entities (1)
  • Proto-torus
    purpose: A low-column-density circumnuclear dust structure that attenuates the broad-line region but not the narrow-line region, reconciling weak hot-dust emission.
    The paper proposes this as the interpretation of the differential attenuation. MIR excesses and absorption features are circumstantial, but the entity itself is not independently detected and the paper notes the MIR-emitting dust need not be the same as the attenuating dust.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ATLAS. III. Dust Around Little Red Dots: Hydrogen Line Ratios beyond Dust-free Non-Case B Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BAZPRB43

@misc{pith2026260810832,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ATLAS. III. Dust Around Little Red Dots: Hydrogen Line Ratios beyond Dust-free Non-Case B Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BAZPRB43}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10832}
}
abstract

We investigate broad hydrogen line ratios in little red dots (LRDs) using five high-redshift ($z>2$) sources from JWST/NIRSpec medium/high-resolution spectra in the DAWN JWST Archive and fifteen low-redshift sources ($z=0.1$--$0.9$) from the literature, all with broad H$\beta$ detected at $>5\sigma$. After carefully measuring the broad-line fluxes while accounting for absorption features and neighboring emission lines, we find that the broad H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ ratios are very high, ranging from 6 to 30, well above the Case B recombination value. Using plane-parallel \textsc{Cloudy} photoionization models with the total line emission from both sides of the slab, we investigate the physical origin of the broad hydrogen line ratios beyond Case B, jointly modeling the Balmer and Paschen line ratios for the subset of one high-$z$ and two low-$z$ LRDs with detected broad Paschen lines. We find that one low-$z$ LRD is reproduced by a high gas number density ($\log (n_{\mathrm H}/{\rm cm^{-3}})\sim10$--11) on the broad-line H$\alpha$/H$\beta$--Pa$\beta$/Pa$\gamma$ plane, whereas the remaining two LRDs additionally require substantial dust extinction of $E(B-V)\gtrsim0.2$--$1.0$, even after accounting for non-Case B effects. Since the narrow H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ ratios do not indicate such large dust extinction, these results demonstrate that the obscuring dust is spatially associated with the broad-line region. Even without Paschen-line measurements, two and eight LRDs in the high- and low-redshift samples, respectively, exhibit H$\alpha$/H$\beta>13$, which cannot be reproduced by the non-Case B models, suggesting that dust obscuration might be common among LRDs, occurring in at least about half of the population. Such dust may represent a lower-column-density counterpart of the dusty torus in AGNs, reconciling the weak hot-dust emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10832 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Relation between the rest-frame 5100 ˚A lumi￾nosity and the spectroscopic redshift for the primary sample and the auxiliary high-redshift lower-limit sources. The red and orange symbols show high- and low-redshift LRDs, re￾spectively. The circles indicate sources with both Hα and Hβ detected at S/N ≥ 5, while crosses indicate sources for which the Hβ line has S/N < 5. The black circles and la￾bels highlight the thre… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of the spectral fitting. The JWST/NIRSpec spectra around Hβ+[O iii]λ4959, 5007 (left) and Hα+[N ii]λ6548, 6584 (right) for JADES-GN-28074. The top, middle, and bottom panels show the two-dimensional spectrum, the one-dimensional spectrum, and the residuals between the observed spectrum and the best-fit model normalized by the 1σ uncertainties, respectively. In the middle panel, the black histogram and the gr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the relation between the broad Hα/Hβ ratio and the broad Hα luminosity (LHα, broad). The red and orange circles show high- and low-redshift LRDs, respectively, with both broad Hα and broad Hβ detected at S/N ≥ 5. The red arrows indicate lower limits on the broad Hα/Hβ ratio for high-redshift LRDs with broad Hβ to have S/N < 5. The gray points show a comparison sample of SDSS AGNs (z < 0.35; H.-Y. Liu et al. 20… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relation between the broad Hα/Hβ ratio and the narrow Hα/Hβ ratio. The red and orange circles show high-redshift and low-redshift LRDs with both Hα and Hβ S/N ≥ 5, respectively. The arrows show the E(B − V ) val￾ues (0.2, 0.5, and 1.0) assuming the Small Magellanic Clo…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relation between the broad Hα/Hβ ratio and the broad Paβ/Paγ ratio. The red diamond and orange circles show the high-redshift and low-redshift LRDs, respectively. The orange line shows the Hα/Hβ of J1025+1402, which has no reliable Paβ flux. The gray circles show local…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relation between the broad Paβ/Paγ ratio and the broad Paα/Paβ. The symbols and the dust-free Cloudy model grids are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relation between the Hα/Hβ ratio and the hydrogen number density (log nH) obtained from the Cloudy modeling. The different lines show the different hydrogen column densities (log(NH/cm−2 ) = 22–25). In this figure, we fix the ionizing photon flux Φ(H) indicated by the …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relation between the Hα/Hβ ratio and the hy￾drogen column density (log NH) obtained from the Cloudy models. At each column density, we plot the maximum Hα/Hβ value obtained among the model grids. The color of each data point indicates the hydrogen number density that y…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: Relation between the dust luminosity normalized by the pseudo-blackbody luminosity, Ldust/Lpseudo−BB, and the dust-template temperature for the local LRDs studied by X. Lin et al. (2026a). Ldust denotes the luminosity assigned to each fixed-temperature dust templ…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Simplified schematic view of a classical Type-1 AGN (left) and an LRD (right). The blue, green, and brown clouds denote dense ionized gas, cooler low-ionization/atomic gas, and possible molecular and dusty gas, respectively. In the LRD schematic, dust along the illust…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  2. [2]

    T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-38...

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  3. [3]

    2026, ApJ, 1005, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae6fa8

    Bao, L., Tsai, C.-W., Wu, J., & Wang, J. 2026, ApJ, 1005, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae6fa8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae6fa8 2026

  4. [4]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0704

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0704 2026

  5. [5]

    1987, ApJ, 320, 537, doi: 10.1086/165571

    Barvainis, R. 1987, ApJ, 320, 537, doi: 10.1086/165571

    doi:10.1086/165571 1987

  6. [6]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 1970, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2850

    Baskin, A., & Laor, A. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1970, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2850

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2850 2018

  7. [7]

    O., et al

    Bouchet, P., Garc ´ ıa-Mar ´ ın, M., Lagage, P. O., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 612, doi: 10.1086/682254

    doi:10.1086/682254 2015

  8. [8]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    Brammer, G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596 2023

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    2025, The DA WN JWST Archive: Compilation of Public NIRSpec Spectra, 4.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15472354

    Brammer, G., & Valentino, F. 2025, The DA WN JWST Archive: Compilation of Public NIRSpec Spectra, 4.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15472354

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, L167, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf116

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, L167, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf116

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.22214, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.22214

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.22214, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.22214

    2026 doi

  4. [12]

    C., Trump, J

    Brooks, M., Simons, R. C., Trump, J. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 177, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addac4

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F

    Burke, C. J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F. 2026, ApJ, 1004, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae6b89

    2026 doi

  6. [14]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L61, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfa91

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    2026 doi

  9. [17]

    C., et al

    Chen, C.-H., Shangguan, J., Ho, L. C., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.04711, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.04711 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Carniani, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, A&A...

    2026 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    2025, A&A, 704, A313, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557164 den Brok, J

    Delvecchio, I., Daddi, E., Magnelli, B., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A313, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557164 den Brok, J. S., Koss, M. J., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5b66 DESI Collaboration, Adame, A. G., Aguilar, J., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, ...

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    2026, A&A, 709, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557889

    Ding, W., Kong, X., Guo, W.-J., et al. 2026, A&A, 709, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557889

    2026 doi

  12. [20]

    2008, MNRAS, 383, 581, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12560.x

    Dong, X., Wang, T., Wang, J., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 581, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12560.x

    2008

  13. [21]

    A., & Ulrich, R

    Drake, S. A., & Ulrich, R. K. 1980, ApJS, 42, 351, doi: 10.1086/190654

    1980 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Korista, K

    Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761, doi: 10.1086/316190

    1998 doi

  15. [23]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Gaskell, C. M. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 226, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx094

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.21614

    Geris, S., Maiolino, R., Ji, X., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.21614. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21614 Dust Around Little Red Dots25

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M., et al

    Glenn, J., Meixner, M., Bradford, C. M., et al. 2025, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11, 031628, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.11.3.031628

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    J., & White, R

    Glikman, E., Helfand, D. J., & White, R. L. 2006, ApJ, 640, 579, doi: 10.1086/500098

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    Gordon, K. D. 2024, Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7023, doi: 10.21105/joss.07023

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279, doi: 10.1086/376774

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Ferland, G. J. 2023, Research Notes of the AAS, 7, 246, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad0e75

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890, doi: 10.1126/science.adj0343

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  29. [37]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555816 Ili´ c, D., Popovi´ c, L.ˇC., La Mura, G., Ciroi, S., & Rafanelli, P. 2012, A&A, 543, A142, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219299

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03130, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03130

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al

    Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367

    2026 doi

  34. [42]

    2018, A&A, 610, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731963

    Kim, D., & Im, M. 2018, A&A, 610, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731963

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18149, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18149

    Kiyota, T., Ouchi, M., Iono, D., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18149, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18149

    2026 doi

  36. [44]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    P., et al

    Kokorev, V., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1004, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4ed7

    2026 doi

  38. [46]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    2025 doi

  39. [47]

    T., & Goad, M

    Korista, K. T., & Goad, M. R. 2004, ApJ, 606, 749, doi: 10.1086/383193

    2004 doi

  40. [48]

    Kwan, J., & Krolik, J. H. 1981, ApJ, 250, 478, doi: 10.1086/159395

    1981 doi

  41. [49]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    2025 doi

  42. [50]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx055

    Lamperti, I., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx055

    2017 doi

  43. [51]

    C., Ward, M

    Landt, H., Bentz, M. C., Ward, M. J., et al. 2008, ApJS, 174, 282, doi: 10.1086/522373

    2008 doi

  44. [52]

    Leung, G. C. K., Finkelstein, S. L., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfcce

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    2026a, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026a, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    doi

  46. [54]

    2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21574, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.21574

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21574, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.21574

    doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02317

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02317

    2026 doi

  48. [56]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab298b

    Liu, H.-Y., Liu, W.-J., Dong, X.-B., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab298b

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    2015 doi

  50. [58]

    Lyu, J., & Rieke, G. H. 2021, ApJ, 912, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abee14

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    2025 doi

  53. [61]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1, doi: 10.1086/426387

    2005 doi

  54. [62]

    G., & Ferland, G

    Mathews, W. G., & Ferland, G. J. 1987, ApJ, 323, 456, doi: 10.1086/165843

    1987 doi

  55. [63]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    2026 doi

  57. [65]

    2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed

    McKinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed. S. van der Walt & J. Millman, 56 – 61, doi: 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a Mej ´ ıa-Restrepo, J. E., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M. J., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6602

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    2025 doi arXiv

  59. [67]

    P., Matthee, J., de Graaff, A., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., de Graaff, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.30711, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.30711 26Kiyota et al

    2026 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    2025, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Squares Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python, 1.3.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16175987

    Newville, M., Otten, R., Nelson, A., et al. 2025, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Squares Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python, 1.3.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16175987

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    P., Watson, D., Sneppen, A., et al

    Nikopoulos, G. P., Watson, D., Sneppen, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 710, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557604

    2026 doi

  62. [70]

    2022, ApJ, 941, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca403

    Noboriguchi, A., Nagao, T., Toba, Y., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca403

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  64. [72]

    Pacucci, F., Ferrara, A., & Kocevski, D. D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14368, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14368 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.20247, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.20247 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N...

    2026 doi

  65. [73]

    E., et al

    Ricci, F., Treister, E., Bauer, F. E., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5b67

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    H., Wright, G

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., B¨ oker, T., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 584, doi: 10.1086/682252

    2015 doi

  67. [75]

    J., Kelly, D

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D. M., Misselt, K., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 028001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    2026, ApJ, 1003, 234, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e6b

    Ronayne, K., Papovich, C., Kirkpatrick, A., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1003, 234, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e6b

    2026 doi

  69. [77]

    J., Floyd, D

    Ruff, A. J., Floyd, D. J. E., Webster, R. L., Korista, K. T., & Landt, H. 2012, ApJ, 754, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/18

    2012 doi

  70. [78]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4

    2026 doi

  71. [79]

    2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8 Schnorr-M¨ uller, A., Davies, R

    Sacchi, A., & Bogd´ an,´A. 2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8 Schnorr-M¨ uller, A., Davies, R. I., Korista, K. T., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 3570, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1865

    2025 doi

  72. [80]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.22277

    Scholtz, J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.22277

    2026 doi

  73. [81]

    1978, The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461 , doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136

    Schwarz, G. 1978, The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461 , doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136

    1978

  74. [82]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025, ApJL, 991, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b

    2025 doi

  75. [83]

    Seyberlich, L., & Bosman, S. E. I. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2608.05267. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05267

    2026 arXiv

  76. [84]

    D., Temim, T., et al

    Shahbandeh, M., Fox, O. D., Temim, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adce77

    2025 doi

  77. [85]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  78. [86]

    H., et al

    Sneppen, A., Watson, D., Matthews, J. H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18864, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18864

    2026 doi

  79. [87]

    T., Charmandaris, V., Brandl, B

    Soifer, B. T., Charmandaris, V., Brandl, B. R., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 151, doi: 10.1086/421977

    2004 doi

  80. [88]

    C., & Li, R

    Son, S., Kim, M., Ho, L. C., & Li, R. 2025, ApJ, 995, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1ef1

    2025 doi

  81. [89]

    J., & Hummer, D

    Storey, P. J., & Hummer, D. G. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 41, doi: 10.1093/mnras/272.1.41

    1995 doi

  82. [90]

    J., & Zeippen, C

    Storey, P. J., & Zeippen, C. J. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 813, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03184.x

    2000

  83. [91]

    2026, A&A, 707, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557537

    Torralba, A., Matthee, J., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557537

    2026 doi

  84. [92]

    M., & Padovani, P

    Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803, doi: 10.1086/133630

    1995 doi

  85. [93]

    E., Brammer, G., et al

    Valentino, F., Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A358, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553908

    2025 doi

  86. [94]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  87. [95]

    L., et al

    Wang, B., de Graaff, A., Davies, R. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc1ca

    2025 doi

  88. [96]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.06024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.06024

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Labbe, I., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.06024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.06024

    2026 doi

  89. [97]

    J., Netzer, H., & Wills, D

    Wills, B. J., Netzer, H., & Wills, D. 1985, ApJ, 288, 94, doi: 10.1086/162767

    1985 doi

  90. [98]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  91. [99]

    S., Rieke, G

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66

    2023 doi

  92. [100]

    2023, ApJ, 950, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acce9e

    Wu, J., Wu, Q., Xue, H., Lei, W., & Lyu, B. 2023, ApJ, 950, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acce9e

    2023 doi

  93. [101]

    2026, ApJ, 1002, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5dbd

    Yan, Z., Inayoshi, K., Chen, K., & Guo, J. 2026, ApJ, 1002, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5dbd

    2026 doi

  94. [102]

    2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.09726, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.09726

    Yanagisawa, H., Ouchi, M., Kiyota, T., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.09726, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.09726

    doi arXiv

  95. [103]

    2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2607.26269, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2607.26269

    Yanagisawa, H., Ouchi, M., Kiyota, T., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2607.26269, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2607.26269

    doi arXiv

  96. [104]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., J

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., J. E., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

  97. [105]

    T., et al

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Ananna, T. T., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba

    2024 doi

  98. [106]

    C., & Inayoshi, K

    Zhang, Z., Jiang, L., Liu, W., Ho, L. C., & Inayoshi, K. 2026, ApJ, 998, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae33c4

    2026 doi

  99. [107]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.05180, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.05180

    Zhang, Z., Li, M., Oguri, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.05180, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.05180

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.