Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 125 references

Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cepheid radii and pulsation periods point to different stars

desk verdict A careful, transparent modeling study showing a systematic period-radius tension in Cepheid DLEBs; the pattern is real, but the headline sigmas are softer than advertised because theoretical period and nonlinear radius uncertainties are not propagated into them. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10909 v1 pith:S7TASPNW submitted 2026-08-11 astro-ph.SR

O. Zió{l}kowska , R. Smolec , R. Singh Rathour , V. Hocdé This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR MSC 85A15 PACS 97.30.Gj97.80.Hn
keywords classicalCepheidseclipsingbinariespulsationperiodsperiod-meandensityrelationstellarradiusnonlinearmodelsMESARSPLargeMagellanicCloud
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Eclipsing binaries give the most precise masses and radii we have for classical Cepheids, and those radii are usually the anchor for testing stellar evolution models. This paper asks what happens if you instead anchor the matching to the pulsation period, the single most precisely measured Cepheid observable. The answer is that the two anchors disagree: models that match the observed period systematically predict radii too small by 3 to 12σ_R for fundamental-mode Cepheids, while models that match the observed radius predict periods too long. The paper finds that part of the offset comes from a neglected nonlinear effect, the small but measureable increase in the mean radius of a star pulsating at full amplitude, and concludes that the radius should not be used as the primary constraint until that effect is systematically mapped.

What carries the argument

The central object is the period–mean density relation, $P \propto \bar{\rho}^{-1/2}$, which links the pulsation period to the star's radius and mean density. The paper exploits the fact that the period and the radius encode overlapping but observationally independent information, and compares the constant-period locus and the constant-radius locus along MESA evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram; the gap between these nearly parallel loci is the measured tension. A second load-bearing piece of machinery is the RSP nonlinear pulsation model, whose full-amplitude solution supplies both a nonlinear period correction (≤0.28% in this sample) and a nonlinear radius correction (the zeroth-order Fourier term of the time-dependent radius, up to ~1.1% larger than the static radius), which is applied when comparing model radii to observed radii.

What would settle it

If a single fundamental-mode Cepheid in an eclipsing binary could be fitted by one MESA+gyre (or MESA+RSP) model that simultaneously matches the observed period and the observed radius within 1σ, with a fully self-consistent nonlinear pulsation-on-evolution calculation including the radius definition used by the eclipse solution, the claimed incompatibility would be refuted; conversely, extending the sample to more F-mode systems with sub-percent radii and confirming the same 3–12σ_R systematic offset would strengthen it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For classical Cepheids in detached eclipsing binaries, the evolutionary model that reproduces the observed pulsation period does not reproduce the observed radius, and the model that reproduces the observed radius does not reproduce the period. Using χ² matching on grids of MESA evolutionary tracks supplemented with RSP pulsation periods, the paper finds that period-selected solutions place the star at radii 3 to 12σ_R too small for the three fundamental-mode Cepheids (CEP-0227, CEP-4506, CEP-1812), while radius-selected solutions give periods too long by roughly 3 to 8σ under a 1% theoretical period uncertainty. The two constraints trace nearly parallel lines in the HR diagram, so the disagreement cannot be erased by adjusting mass, metallicity, or overshooting. The paper traces part of the effect to a nonlinear radius increase in full-amplitude pulsators: the RSP full-amplitude models have mean radii larger than the static evolutionary radii, up to 1.1% for CEP-0227 (3.2σ_R), and applying this correction reduces but does not eliminate the tension. It recommends treating the pulsation period as the primary constraint and calls for a systematic study of nonlinear radius corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that the RSP-computed pulsation periods, after a small nonlinear correction and with a 1% uncertainty, are accurate enough across the relevant part of the HR diagram to be compared with radii at the few-sigma level; if the period calculation carries a systematic error tied to the evolutionary track, the tension could be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, radii of Cepheids in eclipsing binaries should no longer be used as the primary matching constraint in evolutionary-model fits; the pulsation period, with its orders-of-magnitude better observational precision, should be preferred.
  • Period–radius relations built from static evolutionary models carry a small but real systematic offset relative to observed full-amplitude pulsators, and should be corrected for the nonlinear radius shift before comparisons at sub-percent radius precision.
  • The known Cepheid mass-discrepancy problem is entangled with a radius discrepancy: part of what looks like a mass problem in eclipsing-binary Cepheids may instead be a mismatch between static model radii and the time-averaged radii of pulsating stars.
  • First-overtone Cepheids should show the same period–radius tension, but current radius measurements are about ten times less precise; the prediction is that better radii for 1O Cepheids will reveal the same systematic offset.
  • Systematic uncertainties in computed pulsation periods (up to ~1.4% from RSP–gyre comparison, or a 1.5% period uncertainty) reduce the tension by only a few σ_R, so the discrepancy is robust against period-scale systematics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable corollary not pursued in the paper: Cepheids observed at higher pulsation amplitude should show a proportionally larger nonlinear radius inflation relative to their static models, so a sample spanning a range of amplitudes could directly verify the proposed mechanism.
  • The paper's nonlinear radius correction suggests that radius determinations of any radially pulsating star from eclipse light curves are subtly biased if static model radii are used as priors; the same correction logic could apply to RR Lyrae stars in eclipsing binaries.
  • If the tension persists after a systematic nonlinear-radius study, the remaining offset in CEP-0227 would point to an independent physics shortfall, possibly rotationally induced radius inflation, which the paper flags but does not model.
  • The degeneracy the paper highlights between lower metallicity and stronger core overshooting means that spectroscopic metallicities for these systems would do more to settle the radius question than additional period measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper models four LMC eclipsing binary systems containing classical Cepheids (CEP-0227, CEP-4506, CEP-2532, CEP-1718) and uses CEP-1812 as an additional single-star probe, combining MESA evolutionary tracks with RSP linear pulsation periods and per-star nonlinear period corrections. The central exercise is a chi-square comparison of two families of solutions: those selected using {Teff, log L, R} and those selected using {Teff, log L, P}. The authors find that the two families are mutually inconsistent: models that match the observed pulsation period predict radii that are too small by 3 to 12 sigma_R for the F-mode Cepheids, while models that match the observed radius predict periods that are too long. Part of the offset is attributed to a nonlinear increase in the mean radius of full-amplitude pulsation models, and the paper recommends using the pulsation period rather than the radius as the primary constraint for future modeling.

Significance. If correct, the result is significant for Cepheid modeling: it would imply that static evolutionary radii and RSP-based pulsation periods cannot be simultaneously reconciled for the most precisely measured Cepheids, with consequences for period-radius relations, mass-discrepancy studies, and the use of eclipsing binaries as calibrators. The paper has clear strengths: it uses homogeneous P18 data, presents a detailed sensitivity study of RSP periods (Fig. 1), explicitly tests robustness against a 1.5% period uncertainty and a constant 1.4% period shift (Appendix C), and transparently discusses mass-loss treatment, metallicity degeneracies, and radius definition issues. The period comparison is not circular: periods come from RSP calculations at fixed model parameters, and the nonlinear correction is computed at the observed central parameters rather than tuned to remove the tension. The main weakness is that the headline sigma values assume the RSP periods are accurate at the 1% level and that any remaining period error is approximately constant along the relevant tracks; neither assumption is fully demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 2.4, Fig. 5, Appendix C] The headline offsets (e.g., -12.0 sigma_R for CEP-0227) are essentially the separation between the period-matched and radius-matched loci, which the paper states are nearly parallel. A period error that varies with effective temperature along the blue loop would rotate the period locus relative to the radius locus and directly change these offsets. The validation in Sect. 2.4 consists of grid-parameter variations up to 0.6%, a gyre comparison at 'a few evolutionary tracks' yielding periods shorter by 0.7-1.4%, and an Appendix C test that applies a constant 1.4% shift with 1.5% uncertainty. None of these tests constrains a Teff-dependent or crossing-dependent period error. Please either compute RSP and gyre periods along the same tracks at several points spanning the observed error boxes, or provide a conservative model for a Teff-dependent period error and show that the tension survives. Without this, the quantitative tension could be partly an artifact of the period computation.
  2. [Sect. 3.2, Fig. 5] The reported significance is expressed in units of the observational radius uncertainty sigma_R only. The assumed 1% theoretical period uncertainty maps into an uncertainty in the model radius at the period-matched location; through the period-mean-density relation this is roughly (2/3)x1% ~ 0.7% in radius, which is larger than sigma_R for CEP-0227 (0.34%) and comparable to sigma_R for CEP-4506 (0.7%). The quoted deviations (-12.0, -3.2, -6.2 sigma_R for the F-mode stars) therefore overstate the confidence with which the period-selected radius is excluded unless the period-induced radius uncertainty is propagated into the comparison. Appendix C enlarges the period uncertainty to 1.5% and applies a constant 1.4% shift, but it still reports residuals only in units of sigma_R and does not combine the period-induced radius error with the observational radius error. Please report the residuals together with their combined uncertainties.
  3. [Sect. 3.2, Table 1] The attribution of part of the tension to a nonlinear radius increase is provisional in a way that matters for the quantitative message. The nonlinear radius correction is computed at one reference model with the observed central parameters and is then applied as a constant along the track, without a direct check that it is slowly varying along the relevant tracks. The correction itself varies by almost a factor of two among convective parameter sets for CEP-4506 (0.8-1.5%), and the paper notes that Farag et al. (2026) suggest sensitivity to the numerical solver. Since the post-correction tension for CEP-4506 is only 1.4 sigma_R, the statement that a nonlinear radius increase explains part of the tension should be presented as an estimate with an unquantified systematic error rather than as a firm accounting. For CEP-0227 the residual remains large (8.8 sigma_R after correction), so the main inconsistency does not depend on this correction, but the two situations should be clearly separated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sect. 4] The text says 'we modeled five classical Cepheids in DLEBs', while the paper actually analyzes six Cepheids in five systems (with CEP-1812 used only as a single-star probe). Please state the counts more precisely to avoid confusion.
  2. [Appendix C] The text describes the 1.5% period uncertainty as 'nearly three times' the 1% value estimated in Sect. 2.4; 1.5% is 1.5 times 1%, not three times. Please correct this.
  3. [Sect. 3.3] In the paragraph discussing CEP-0227, the star is referred to as 'CEP-227'; use the consistent identifier CEP-0227.
  4. [Table A.1] The mass ratio q for CEP-1718 is listed only in the row of CEP-1718B; it would be clearer to state explicitly that q refers to the binary mass ratio of the system and to give it once for the system or in both rows.
  5. [Sect. 2.4] The gyre comparison is described only in prose; a small table or figure listing the tracks and the RSP/gyre periods would make the 0.7-1.4% difference auditable and would also help the reader assess whether the difference depends on Teff.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pulsation periods and nonlinear radius corrections are computed from RSP models, not fitted to the observed periods or radii, and the period-radius tension is an independent model prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that models selected by matching the observed pulsation period predict radii systematically too small, while models selected by matching the observed radius predict periods too long. The relevant quantities are not defined in terms of each other: the pulsation periods are linear RSP periods along evolutionary tracks, supplemented by a nonlinear period correction computed from full-amplitude RSP models at the observed central parameters. The observed period and radius enter only through the chi-square comparison, and the period is not used to calibrate the RSP periods or the nonlinear corrections. Similarly, the nonlinear radius correction is a theoretical output of the same RSP model, not a parameter fitted to the observed radii; the paper explicitly reports that applying it reduces but does not eliminate the tension, which is the opposite of a circularly forced agreement. The acknowledged near-parallelism of the constant-period and constant-radius loci follows from the period-mean density relation, but the reported offset between them is the new, non-constructed result. The paper's reliance on the authors' previous work (Ziółkowska et al. 2024, 2026; Smolec et al. 2026b) concerns the adopted reference evolutionary setup, the instability-strip definition, and general loop-extent behavior; these are stated modeling assumptions rather than an imported uniqueness theorem or ansatz that itself contains the target conclusion. The independent gyre comparison and the Appendix C robustness tests provide external checks, even if sparse. Concerns about a track-dependent systematic error in RSP periods, or about the accuracy of the nonlinear radius correction, are correctness risks, not circularity: they do not reduce the prediction to its input data by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model grids rely on standard MESA physics calibrated in the authors' prior papers, plus per-system choices of metallicity and core overshooting that are degenerate with each other. The pulsation periods carry an assumed 1% theoretical uncertainty, and the nonlinear radius correction is computed from RSP at each star's observed parameters rather than fitted. No new physical entities are introduced; the nonlinear radius shift is a predicted effect, not an independently falsifiable object.

free parameters (5)
  • Metallicity Z = 0.002 to 0.007 depending on system (e.g., 0.0045 for CEP-0227, 0.0025 for CEP-4506)
    Explored over a grid and selected per system to match HRD positions; the paper notes a degeneracy with core overshooting efficiency.
  • Core overshooting efficiency f_H = 0.016 to 0.02 in final grids (grid range 0.00 to 0.03)
    Selected per system; higher f_H brightens blue loops, mimicking lower metallicity.
  • Envelope overshooting efficiency f_env = fixed at 0.04
    Fixed after initial exploration because solutions depend weakly on it for f_env >= 0.04.
  • Initial stellar masses = central observed value plus 0, +-0.5 sigma, +-1 sigma (five values per star)
    Varied within observational uncertainties to improve the fit; final solutions use offsets up to 1 sigma.
  • Theoretical pulsation period uncertainty = assumed 1% (1.5% in robustness check)
    Chosen by hand as an estimate of RSP accuracy; used in chi^2 and in the sigma quotes for period mismatches.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Both components of a binary system formed from the same material and have the same age.
    Stated in Sect. 2.1 as a basic assumption for stellar binaries; used to constrain the joint fit.
  • domain assumption MESA r-21.12.1 with the adopted microphysics (OPAL opacities, A09 mixture, alpha_MLT=1.77, Schwarzschild criterion, exponential overshooting) adequately models Cepheid evolution.
    Adopted from Ziolkowska et al. (2024) and Smolec et al. (2026b); invoked throughout Sect. 2.2.
  • domain assumption RSP linear pulsation periods with a constant nonlinear period correction are accurate to about 1% for the modeled stars.
    Assumed in Sect. 2.4 and used in all chi^2 calculations and sigma quotes; robustness is tested but the assumption remains load-bearing.
  • domain assumption The observed radius from eclipsing-binary modeling is comparable to the static model radius after applying the computed nonlinear correction.
    Discussed in Sect. 3.2; the paper notes the radius definition is not unique and that rotation and the numerical solver may affect this comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S7TASPNW

@misc{pith2026260810909,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S7TASPNW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10909}
}
abstract

Context. With their precisely determined physical parameters, classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems are often used to constrain stellar evolution and pulsation theories. To this end, their position in the HR diagram, effective temperature and luminosity, and radius are commonly used when matching best-fitting evolutionary models. However, the pulsation period of Cepheids, the most precise observable, is rarely used in such studies. Aims. We explore how including the pulsation period as a constraint in matching evolutionary models affects the best-fitting solution. As the pulsation period follows the period-mean density relation, we examine whether it provides information consistent with that based on the stellar radius. Methods. We modeled four eclipsing binary systems with Cepheids from the LMC. We used $\chi^2$ minimization to find the best-matching evolutionary model from a grid of models computed with MESA. The evolutionary models are supplemented with pulsation periods computed with RSP, with nonlinear period corrections taken into account. Results. Depending on whether the radius or the pulsation period is used to select the best-fitting model, discrepant solutions are obtained. In solutions selected based on the pulsation period, the stellar radius is systematically too low compared with observations. Conversely, for solutions based on the radius, the pulsation period is systematically too long. The tension amounts to a few sigma for stars with precisely determined radii and part of it is traced to a nonlinear increase in radius for large-amplitude pulsators, which has not been studied in detail in the literature. Conclusions. When using Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems to constrain stellar models, we recommend using the pulsation period instead of the radius. A systematic study of nonlinear effects on stellar radius in large-amplitude pulsators is needed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10909 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Linear pulsation periods computed by varying different parameters in the reference model (first point and horizontal dashed lines): con￾vective parameter set (A–D; see tab. 4 in Paxton et al. 2019), solar metal mixture (Grevesse & Sauval (1998), GS98, Grevesse & Noels (1993), GN93), and envelope grid parameters (T_anch, T_in, nz, and nzouter see Sect. 2.2). The last points represent the nonlinear periods assuming th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Solutions for initial model grid with a fixed Z=0.006 and common overshooting parameters for the system’s components. The name of the system and the values of Z, fH, and fenv are given above each panel. Primary (more massive) component is marked in blue, the secondary in orange. Crosses correspond to observations, and filled circles correspond to the best-matching solution. In the colored boxes some of the best-matc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effects of changing fenv on evolutionary tracks with Z=0.004 and fH=0.02, aimed at matching CEP-0227 (error bars). Cepheid tracks are shown in shades of blue, and companion tracks (shifted by −0.15 in log L, for clarity) are in shades of orange. The colors correspond t…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Loci where the pulsation period is matched within 1% (orange asterisk and thick line segment) and where the stellar radius is consistent within its observational uncertainty (purple asterisk and thick line segment), shown along evolutionary tracks in the vicinity of th…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Best-matching solution for CEP-0227 in the final grid. Tab. A.1. In the χ 2 , log L, Teff, P are included for the Cepheid, and log L, Teff, R, for the non-pulsating stars. Additional obser￾vational constrains are also taken into account. While the composition of the χ …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Best-matching solution for CEP-4506 in the final grid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Best-matching solution for CEP-2532 in the final grid. For CEP-2532 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30304-3 , adsurl =

    Stellar Structure and Evolution. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30304-3 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30304-3

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    The Dependence of Convective Core Overshooting on Stellar Mass: Reality Check and Additional Evidence. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1589 , archivePrefix =. 1904.02714 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 1904

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Significant uncertainties from calibrating overshooting with eclipsing binary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833568 , archivePrefix =. 1808.03523 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Cepheids with Giant Companions. I. Revealing a Numerous Population of Double-lined Binary Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe7e9 , archivePrefix =. 2102.11302 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Pilecki, Bogumil and Thompson, Ian B. and Espinoza-Arancibia, Felipe and Hajdu, Gergely and Gieren, Wolfgang and Taormina, Monica and Pietrzynski, Grzegorz and Narloch, Weronika and Bono, Giuseppe and Gallenne, Alexandre and Kervella, Pierre and Wielgorski, Piotr and Zgirski, Bartlomiej and Graczyk, Dariusz and Karczmarek, Paulina and Evans, Nancy R. , ti...

  6. [6]

    u ber die H \

    Untersuchungen \"u ber die H \"o he der Atmosph \"a re und die Constitution gasf \"o rmiger Weltk \"o rper. Annalen der Physik , year = 1879, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1002/andp.18792440910 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.18792440910

  7. [7]

    Testing Mass Loss in Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheids using Infrared and Optical Observations. II. Predictions and Tests of the OGLE-III Fundamental-mode Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1136 , archivePrefix =. 1005.0622 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    On the Enhancement of Mass Loss in Cepheids due to Radial Pulsation. II. The Effect of Metallicity. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1829 , archivePrefix =. 0809.2793 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

Show all 125 references
  1. [9]

    , keywords =

    Testing Mass Loss in Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheids Using Infrared and Optical Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/81 , archivePrefix =. 0810.3001 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    , keywords =

    On the Enhancement of Mass Loss in Cepheids Due to Radial Pulsation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/588650 , archivePrefix =. 0803.4198 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    , keywords =

    The Cepheid mass discrepancy and pulsation-driven mass loss. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116920 , archivePrefix =. 1104.1638 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Stellar Pulsation and Evolution: A Combined Theoretical Renewal and Updated Models (SPECTRUM). I. Updating Radiative Opacities for Pulsation Models of Classical Cepheid and RR-Lyrae. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8eb2 , archivePrefix =. 2411.01183 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Models fitted to evolutionary tracks

    Cepheid pulsation-II. Models fitted to evolutionary tracks. , year = 1969, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/144.4.485 , adsurl =

    1969 doi

  6. [14]

    Models fitted to a new mass-luminosity relation

    Cepheid pulsation-III. Models fitted to a new mass-luminosity relation. , year = 1969, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/144.4.511 , adsurl =

    1969 doi

  7. [15]

    Classical Cepheid Pulsation Models. I. Physical Structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/313207 , adsurl =

    doi

  8. [16]

    Using classical Cepheids to study the far side of the Milky Way disk. II. The spiral structure in the first and fourth Galactic quadrants. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039512 , archivePrefix =. 2107.03464 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    , keywords =

    OGLE-ing the Magellanic System: Cepheids in the Bridge. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab61f1 , archivePrefix =. 1904.08220 , primaryClass =

    1904 arXiv

  10. [18]

    , keywords =

    OGLE-ing the Magellanic System: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Clouds and the Bridge Using Classical Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1602.09141 , archivePrefix =. 1602.09141 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    , keywords =

    Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/320638 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0012376 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    , keywords =

    Cepheids as distance indicators and stellar tracers. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00153-0 , archivePrefix =. 2405.04893 , primaryClass =

  13. [21]

    , keywords =

    Standard Solar Composition. , keywords =. doi:10.1023/A:1005161325181 , adsurl =

    doi

  14. [22]

    Origin and Evolution of the Elements , year = 1993, editor =

    Cosmic abundances of the elements. Origin and Evolution of the Elements , year = 1993, editor =

    1993

  15. [23]

    , keywords =

    A model for time-dependent turbulent convection. , keywords =

  16. [24]

    Physical and Numerical Formulation

    Convective Hydrocodes for Radial Stellar Pulsation. Physical and Numerical Formulation. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.0809.1979 , archivePrefix =. 0809.1979 , primaryClass =

    1979 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    Toward a Comprehensive Grid of Cepheid Models with MESA. II. Impact of Physical and Numerical Assumptions on Elemental Abundances. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae27d0 , archivePrefix =. 2602.08109 , primaryClass =

  18. [26]

    Studies in Stellar Evolution. III. The Calculation of Model Envelopes. , year = 1965, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1086/148357 , adsurl =

    1965 doi

  19. [27]

    The NEXTGEN Model Atmosphere Grid. II. Spherically Symmetric Model Atmospheres for Giant Stars with Effective Temperatures between 3000 and 6800 K. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/307954 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9907194 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    , keywords =

    The NextGen Model Atmosphere Grid for 3000<=T _ eff <=10,000 K. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/306745 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9807286 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    , keywords =

    An Equation of State for Low-Mass Stars and Giant Planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/192204 , adsurl =

    doi

  22. [30]

    , keywords =

    Updated and Expanded OPAL Equation-of-State Tables: Implications for Helioseismology. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/341894 , adsurl =

    doi

  23. [31]

    , keywords =

    The Accuracy, Consistency, and Speed of an Electron-Positron Equation of State Based on Table Interpolation of the Helmholtz Free Energy. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/313304 , adsurl =

    doi

  24. [32]

    Equation of state of fully ionized electron-ion plasmas. II. Extension to relativistic densities and to the solid phase. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.62.8554 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0009261 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Contributions to Plasma Physics , keywords =

    Thermodynamic Functions of Dense Plasmas: Analytic Approximations for Astrophysical Applications. Contributions to Plasma Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1002/ctpp.201010017 , archivePrefix =. 1001.0690 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    , keywords =

    A New Equation of State for Dense Hydrogen-Helium Mixtures. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf99f , archivePrefix =. 1902.01852 , primaryClass =

    1902 arXiv

  27. [35]

    , keywords =

    Skye: A Differentiable Equation of State. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf48e , archivePrefix =. 2104.00691 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    , keywords =

    Low-Temperature Opacities. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/428642 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0502045 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    , keywords =

    Updated Opal Opacities. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/177381 , adsurl =

    doi

  30. [38]

    , keywords =

    Radiative Opacities for Carbon- and Oxygen-rich Mixtures. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172958 , adsurl =

    doi

  31. [39]

    , keywords =

    The Chemical Composition of the Sun. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , archivePrefix =. 0909.0948 , primaryClass =

  32. [40]

    , keywords =

    The VMC survey - XLIV: mapping metallicity trends in the large magellanic cloud using near-infrared passbands. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2446 , archivePrefix =. 2108.10529 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    EAS Publications Series , year = 2009, editor =

    On the Cepheid Metallicity Dichotomy. EAS Publications Series , year = 2009, editor =. doi:10.1051/eas/0938009 , archivePrefix =. 0802.4166 , primaryClass =

    2009

  34. [42]

    , keywords =

    The Araucaria Project: the First-overtone Classical Cepheid in the Eclipsing System OGLE-LMC-CEP-2532. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/29 , archivePrefix =. 1504.04611 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    , keywords =

    Rotation, Convective Core Overshooting, and Period Changes in Classical Cepheid Stellar Evolution Models. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab90fb , adsurl =

    doi

  36. [44]

    , keywords =

    A Classical Cepheid in a Large Magellanic Cloud Eclipsing Binary: Evidence Of Shortcomings in Current Stellar Evolutionary Models?. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/728/2/L43 , archivePrefix =. 1101.0394 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Science , keywords =

    A three-dimensional map of the Milky Way using classical Cepheid variable stars. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.aau3181 , archivePrefix =. 1806.10653 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    , keywords =

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1\. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422 , archivePrefix =. 1903.07603 , primaryClass =

    1903 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Harvard College Observatory Circular , year = 1912, month = mar, volume =

    Periods of 25 Variable Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Harvard College Observatory Circular , year = 1912, month = mar, volume =

    1912

  40. [48]

    Annals of Harvard College Observatory , year = 1907, month = jan, volume =

    1777 variables in the Magellanic Clouds. Annals of Harvard College Observatory , year = 1907, month = jan, volume =

    1907

  41. [49]

    OGLE-LMC-CEP-1718: An Exotic Eclipsing Binary System Composed of Two Classical Overtone Cepheids in a 413 Day Orbit

    The Araucaria Project. OGLE-LMC-CEP-1718: An Exotic Eclipsing Binary System Composed of Two Classical Overtone Cepheids in a 413 Day Orbit. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/80 , archivePrefix =. 1403.3617 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    , keywords =

    Is there a mass discrepancy in the Cepheid binary OGLE-LMC-CEP0227?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117829 , archivePrefix =. 1110.6657 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of a Binary-origin Classical Cepheid in a Binary System with a 59 day Orbital Period. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9fcc , archivePrefix =. 2212.04518 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    , keywords =

    A Novel q-PED Method: Precise Physical Properties of a Merger-origin Binary Cepheid OGLE-LMC-CEP-1347. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb96b , archivePrefix =. 2501.09076 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    , keywords =

    The strange evolution of the Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid OGLE-LMC-CEP1812. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526716 , archivePrefix =. 1508.02725 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    , keywords =

    The Araucaria Project: Accurate Determination of the Dynamical Mass of the Classical Cepheid in the Eclipsing System OGLE-LMC-CEP-1812. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L20 , archivePrefix =. 1109.5414 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    , keywords =

    Physical parameters and the projection factor of the classical Cepheid in the binary system OGLE-LMC-CEP-0227. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1529 , archivePrefix =. 1308.5023 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Classical Cepheids in the Magellanic System

    The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars. Classical Cepheids in the Magellanic System. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1601.01318 , archivePrefix =. 1601.01318 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    , keywords =

    Multi-Mode and Non-Standard Classical Cepheids in the Magellanic System. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1601.02020 , archivePrefix =. 1601.02020 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    On the effect of rotation on populations of classical Cepheids. II. Pulsation analysis for metallicities 0.014, 0.006, and 0.002. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528031 , archivePrefix =. 1604.05691 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    On the effect of rotation on populations of classical Cepheids. I. Predictions at solar metallicity. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322988 , archivePrefix =. 1403.0809 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    , keywords =

    Cepheid Mass Loss and the Pulsation-Evolutionary Mass Discrepancy. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/529366 , archivePrefix =. 0801.1342 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    , keywords =

    Toward a Resolution of the Bump and Beat Cepheid Mass Discrepancies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/170975 , adsurl =

    doi

  54. [62]

    , keywords =

    Opacities for the Solar Radiative Interior. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/169902 , adsurl =

    doi

  55. [63]

    , keywords =

    The masses of Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.000311 , adsurl =

  56. [64]

    , year = 1968, month = mar, volume =

    The Theory of Cepheid Variability. , year = 1968, month = mar, volume =

    1968

  57. [65]

    On the Evolutionary and Pulsation Mass of Classical Cepheids. III. The Case of the Eclipsing Binary Cepheid CEP0227 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/108 , archivePrefix =. 1202.2855 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    , keywords =

    The dynamical mass of a classical Cepheid variable star in an eclipsing binary system. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature09598 , archivePrefix =. 1012.0231 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    , keywords =

    Luminosities and mass-loss rates of SMC and LMC AGB stars and red supergiants. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912678 , archivePrefix =. 0908.3087 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    , keywords =

    Connecting integrated red giant branch mass loss from asteroseismology and globular clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452033 , archivePrefix =. 2410.08330 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    , keywords =

    Asteroseismic study of subgiants and giants of the open cluster M67 using Kepler/K2: expanded sample and precise masses. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf353 , archivePrefix =. 2502.18714 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    , keywords =

    Theoretical investigation on the mass loss impact on asteroseismic grid-based estimates of mass, radius, and age for RGB stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730880 , archivePrefix =. 1711.03753 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Stellar evolution of low and intermediate-mass stars. I. Mass loss on the AGB and its consequences for stellar evolution. , keywords =

  64. [72]

    Memoires of the Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege , keywords =

    Circumstellar absorption lines and mass loss from red giants. Memoires of the Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege , keywords =

  65. [73]

    , keywords =

    The evolution of AGB stars with convective overshoot. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0007139 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0007139 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres , year = 2003, editor =

    New Grids of ATLAS9 Model Atmospheres. Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres , year = 2003, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0405087 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0405087 , primaryClass =

    2003 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    , keywords =

    Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 , archivePrefix =. 1001.4538 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    , keywords =

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Time-dependent Convection, Energy Conservation, Automatic Differentiation, and Infrastructure. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acae8d , archivePrefix =. 2208.03651 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    , keywords =

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241 , archivePrefix =. 1903.01426 , primaryClass =

    1903 arXiv

  70. [78]

    , keywords =

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8 , archivePrefix =. 1710.08424 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    , year = 2016, month = mar, volume =

    Erratum: Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions <A href=``/abs/2015ApJS..220...15P''>(2015, ApJS, 220, 15)</A>. , year = 2016, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/223/1/18 , adsurl =

    2015 doi

  72. [80]

    , keywords =

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 , archivePrefix =. 1506.03146 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    , keywords =

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 , archivePrefix =. 1301.0319 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    , keywords =

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA). , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 , archivePrefix =. 1009.1622 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Toward a Comprehensive Grid of Cepheid Models with MESA. I. Uncertainties of the Evolutionary Tracks of Intermediate-mass Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad614d , archivePrefix =. 2408.07136 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    , keywords =

    Binarity among Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21872.x , archivePrefix =. 1210.5064 , primaryClass =

    2012

  77. [85]

    The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars

    The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. I. Classical Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.0808.2210 , archivePrefix =. 0808.2210 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    , keywords =

    Non-radial modes in classical Cepheids: what to look for in spectroscopy?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2829 , archivePrefix =. 2111.03104 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    , keywords =

    Candidates for non-pulsating stars located in the Cepheid instability strip in the Large Magellanic Cloud based on Str \"o mgren photometry. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2112 , archivePrefix =. 1908.00447 , primaryClass =

    1908 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Stellar Populations and the Distance Scale , year = 2018, editor =

    The Impact of Eclipsing Binaries with Pulsating Components on the Distance Scale and Stellar Evolution. Stellar Populations and the Distance Scale , year = 2018, editor =

    2018

  81. [89]

    , keywords =

    Eclipsing Binaries with Classical Cepheid Component in the Magellanic System. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1601.01683 , archivePrefix =. 1601.01683 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    Observational calibration of the projection factor of Cepheids. IV. Period-projection factor relation of Galactic and Magellanic Cloud Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731589 , archivePrefix =. 1708.09851 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    , keywords =

    The Influential Effect of Blending, Bump, Changing Period, and Eclipsing Cepheids on the Leavitt Law. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/74 , archivePrefix =. 1604.04814 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Gaia South Ecliptic Pole Field as Seen by OGLE-IV

    The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Gaia South Ecliptic Pole Field as Seen by OGLE-IV. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1210.1219 , archivePrefix =. 1210.1219 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  85. [93]

    , keywords =

    The Araucaria Project: A Study of the Classical Cepheid in the Eclipsing Binary System OGLE LMC562.05.9009 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/28 , archivePrefix =. 1511.02826 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    , keywords =

    Period-change rates in Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheids revisited. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3246 , archivePrefix =. 2111.03503 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    Empirical constraints on non-linear period changes

    Non-evolutionary effects on period change in Magellanic Cepheids: II. Empirical constraints on non-linear period changes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453392 , archivePrefix =. 2503.00661 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    Non-evolutionary effects on period change in Magellanic Cepheids. I. New binary systems revealed from light travel time effect. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349117 , archivePrefix =. 2403.14039 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    Equivalent width analysis with Kurucz stellar atmosphere models

    The iron and oxygen content of LMC Classical Cepheids and its implications for the extragalactic distance scale and Hubble constant. Equivalent width analysis with Kurucz stellar atmosphere models. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142441 , archivePrefix =. 2110.08860 , p...

    arXiv

  90. [98]

    , keywords =

    Metallicity estimations of MW, SMC, and LMC classical Cepheids from the shape of the V- and I-band light curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245038 , archivePrefix =. 2301.00229 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  91. [99]

    , keywords =

    Implications of a turbulent convection model for classical Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554292 , archivePrefix =. 2506.04759 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  92. [100]

    , keywords =

    The Araucaria Project: High-precision Cepheid Astrophysics from the Analysis of Variables in Double-lined Eclipsing Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacb32 , archivePrefix =. 1806.01391 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  93. [101]

    Toward a Comprehensive Grid of Cepheid Models with MESA. III. Evolutionary and Pulsation Relations for Models with Core and Envelope Overshooting. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae6073 , archivePrefix =. 2603.26111 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    Toward a Comprehensive Grid of Cepheid Models with MESA. IV. Modest Effects of Rotation on Blue Loops. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae6ef3 , archivePrefix =. 2605.14128 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  95. [103]

    Stellar evolution models with overshooting based on 3-equation non-local theories. II. Main-sequence models of A- and B-type stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243126 , archivePrefix =. 2207.12512 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  96. [104]

    , keywords =

    Spatial Age Distribution of Classical Cepheids in Spiral Galaxies: The Cases of M31 and M33. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adcf92 , archivePrefix =. 2504.12638 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    , keywords =

    Seismology of triple-mode classical Cepheids of the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042116 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0501417 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    , keywords =

    The Eclipsing Binary Cepheid OGLE-LMC-CEP-0227 in the Large Magellanic Cloud: Pulsation Modeling of Light and Radial Velocity Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/768/1/L6 , archivePrefix =. 1304.0860 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    , keywords =

    OGLE-IV: Fourth Phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1504.05966 , archivePrefix =. 1504.05966 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  100. [108]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Self-Consistent Nonlinear Classical Cepheid Pulsations During Stellar Evolution with MESA. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.15766 , archivePrefix =. 2603.15766 , primaryClass =

    doi

  101. [109]

    I - The formalism

    Amplitude equations for nonadiabatic nonlinear stellar pulsators. I - The formalism. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/161900 , adsurl =

    doi

  102. [110]

    High resolution spectroscopy for Cepheids distance determination. I. Line asymmetry. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054333 , archivePrefix =. 0804.1321 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  103. [111]

    Classical Cepheids: High-precision Velocimetry, Cluster Membership, and the Effect of Rotation

  104. [112]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    IAU 2015 Resolution B3 on Recommended Nominal Conversion Constants for Selected Solar and Planetary Properties. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1510.07674 , archivePrefix =. 1510.07674 , primaryClass =

    2015 doi arXiv

  105. [113]

    , keywords =

    The parameters R and Teff in stellar models and observations. , keywords =

  106. [114]

    , keywords =

    The Radius Discrepancy in Low-mass Stars: Single versus Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/87 , archivePrefix =. 1308.5558 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  107. [115]

    , keywords =

    Accurate masses and radii of normal stars: modern results and applications. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1 , archivePrefix =. 0908.2624 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  108. [116]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of low-mass star and brown dwarf eclipsing binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077702 , archivePrefix =. 0707.1792 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  109. [117]

    , keywords =

    On the Theoretical Period-Radius Relation of Classical Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/311270 , adsurl =

    doi

  110. [118]

    , keywords =

    Magellanic Clouds elemental abundances from F supergiants: Revisited results for the Large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000407 , adsurl =

    doi

  111. [119]

    , keywords =

    LMC Blue Supergiant Stars and the Calibration of the Flux-weighted Gravity-Luminosity Relationship. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa79a8 , archivePrefix =. 1706.03967 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    Chemical evolution of the Magellanic Clouds. VI. Chemical composition of nine F supergiants from different regions of the large Magellanic Cloud. , keywords =

  113. [121]

    Abundances of Heavy Elements in the Magellanic Clouds. I. Metal Abundances of F-Type Supergiants. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/191360 , adsurl =

    doi

  114. [122]

    , keywords =

    First overtone Cepheids of the OGLE Magellanic Cloud Collection - beyond radial modes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3706 , archivePrefix =. 2212.06732 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  115. [123]

    2013 , month =

    , archivePrefix =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1533 , adsurl =. 1308.2965 , primaryClass =

    2013 arXiv

  116. [124]

    , keywords =

    An Updated Metal-dependent Theoretical Scenario for Classical Cepheids. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac7f3b , archivePrefix =. 2206.11154 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    , keywords =

    Surface brightness─colour relations of Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds classical Cepheids based on Gaia magnitudes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557995 , archivePrefix =. 2602.11994 , primaryClass =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.