Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Measure-free Koopman-von Neumann Dynamics and Noncommutative Geometry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-step Hilbert-space dilation turns Koopman evolution into a unitary evolution, recoverable on a dense subalgebra of an RKHS.

desk verdict Genuinely new construction, but the central proof has a fixable gap; worth refereeing seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11591 v1 pith:KYNLLPYD submitted 2026-08-12 math.DS

Dimitrios Giannakis , Michael Montgomery This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DS MSC 37A3047B3246L8781R1537C10
keywords Koopman–vonNeumannreproducingkernelHilbertspaceweightedsymmetricFockfreederivationweakspectraltriplejointanalyticvectorsnoncommutativegeometrymeanembedding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a measure-free Koopman–von Neumann framework: instead of $L^2$ spaces built from a volume measure, it works in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) of continuous functions, so that pointwise values along trajectories are meaningful. The generator $V$ of the flow, together with its RKHS adjoint, is assumed to have a dense subspace of jointly analytic vectors. Under that assumption, the paper builds two successive Hilbert-space dilations—first into $\ell^2(\mathbb{N})\otimes\mathcal{H}$ with Fibonacci coefficients, then into a weighted symmetric Fock space—and proves that the unitary group generated by the resulting free derivation $D$ recovers the (generally non-unitary) Koopman evolution $U_t f=f\circ\Phi_t$ on a dense subalgebra, for times $|t|\le R/3$ with a uniform joint analyticity radius $R$. Iterating in time yields uniform-norm approximation over arbitrary finite intervals. The same Fock-space data yields weak spectral triples $(\mathcal{A}_n,\mathcal{F},-iD)$ whose Dirac operator induces pseudometrics on state space, and the construction extends to kernel mean embeddings of arbitrary Borel probability measures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is a two-step amplification. First, with $A=(V-V^*)/2$ and $S=(V+V^*)/2$, the Fibonacci embedding $E_n f=\sum_{i=1}^n F_i\,e_i\otimes f$ into $\ell^2(\mathbb{N})\otimes\mathcal{H}$ makes the tridiagonal skew-adjoint operator $L=\sum_i (e_{i,i+1}\otimes S + e_{i,i}\otimes A - e_{i+1,i}\otimes S)$ satisfy $(p_1\otimes\mathrm{Id})L^k E_n f = V^k f$ for $k<n$; the Fibonacci coefficients control the combinatorial growth of words in $A$ and $S$, providing analytic vectors and hence a unitary group $e^{tL}$. Second, $L$ is lifted to a free derivation $D$ on the weighted symmetric Fock space $\mathcal{F}_w(\mathcal{H})$ with subconvolutive weights, obeying $D(\eta\vee\xi)=D\eta\vee\xi+\eta\vee D\xi$, so the unitary group acts multiplicatively, matching the multiplicativity of Koopman operators. The multiplication map $m$ collapses Fock-space tensors back to functions, and the identity $m(F(p_1\otimes\mathrm{Id})e^{Dt}F(E_n)\tilde f)\to U_t m\tilde f$ is the content of Theorem 14. On the same space, creation and annihilation operators $a^*_u,a_u$ obey bounded weighted canonical commutation relations and generate the algebras $\mathcal{A}_n$ making $(\mathcal{A}_n,\mathcal{F},-iD)$ a weak spectral triple.

What would settle it

A decisive test is numerical: for the circle flow $V=\sin\theta\,\partial_\theta$ with the subexponential-weight RKHA from Section 2.3 and $f=e^{i\theta}$, compute the norm in Theorem 14 at $t=R/3$ for increasing $n$; convergence to zero is the paper's prediction, and any saturation above zero would disprove the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the unitary evolution group $e^{tD}$ on the weighted symmetric Fock space consistently recovers the Koopman evolution $U_t=e^{tV}$ on observables. Theorem 14 states that for every lift $\tilde f\in T(S)$ and every $|t|\le R/3$, $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\left\|m\left(F(p_1\otimes\mathrm{Id})$e^{{Dt}}$F(E_n)\tilde f\right)-U_t\,m\tilde f\right\|_{\mathcal{H}}=0.$$ Here $E_n$ is the Fibonacci embedding into $\ell^2(\mathbb{N})\otimes\mathcal{H}$, $F(-)$ is the induced Fock-space lift, and $m$ multiplies symmetric tensors back to functions in $\mathcal{H}$. This is a genuine dilation: $D$ is essentially skew-adjoint and generates unitaries, while $U_t$ need not be unitary or even densely defined for all times. The paper further shows that the same data form weak spectral triples $(\mathcal{A}_n,\mathcal{F},-iD)$ with bounded creation and annihilation generators satisfying weighted canonical commutation relations, and that the induced pseudometric along a dynamical orbit is bounded by the travel time between points. A state-space embedding $\Psi$ extends to Borel probability measures, so that expectation values of observables under arbitrary measures—including singular ones—evolve consistently with the flow.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the generator and its adjoint act on a dense subspace of functions whose iterated applications grow no faster than factorially, which many smooth flows fail to satisfy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the dense subalgebra $\mathrm{Alg}(S)$ of the RKHA, Koopman evolution is recovered uniformly over the fixed interval $|t|\le R/3$ by a unitary group, so spectral tools for unitary groups become available for non-unitary dynamics.
  • Iterating the approximation (Corollary 15) gives uniform-norm agreement with $U_t f$ on any finite time interval for every $f\in\mathcal{H}$, and for all continuous observables vanishing at infinity when $\mathcal{H}$ is dense in $C_0(X)$.
  • The family $(\mathcal{A}_n,\mathcal{F},-iD)$ consists of weak spectral triples: commutators $[D,a]$ are bounded for $a\in\mathcal{A}_n$, and the induced extended pseudometric satisfies $d_n(\Psi_x,\Psi_y)\le \tau(x,y)$, where $\tau$ is the minimal travel time between $x,y$ along an orbit (Corollary 26).
  • Quantum expectations in the states $\Psi_x$ reproduce pointwise Koopman evolution: $\Psi_x(\mathrm{Ad}_{e^{tD}} a^*_{F(E_n)\tilde f})\to (U_t f)(x)$ uniformly in $x$ for $|t|\le R/3$ (Theorem 27).
  • The embedding $\Psi$ extends to Borel probability measures, so expectation values of observables with respect to arbitrary measures—including singular measures not representable in $L^2$—evolve consistently with the flow (Section 6).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the Fibonacci coefficients are only one admissible dilation (Appendix C gives a $q$-parametrized variant with different growth constants), one could search for dilations with a larger effective radius than $R/3$; the paper does not address this optimization.
  • The joint analyticity assumption is a strong regularity link between the dynamics and the kernel; relaxing it to milder growth conditions (e.g., Gevrey-type bounds) could widen the class of admissible flows, at the cost of weaker convergence guarantees.
  • The boundedness of creation and annihilation operators on the weighted Fock space suggests a concrete finite-dimensional truncation scheme for numerical spectral computation; the paper's convergence statements are asymptotic and do not quantify truncation error.
  • The pseudometric is only bounded above by orbit travel time; whether the bound is sharp or computable from the spectrum of $D$ is an open question raised by the construction but not answered in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a measure-free Koopman--von Neumann framework for continuous-time dynamical systems. Starting from an RKHS H of continuous functions on the state space, the authors assume that the generator V and its adjoint V* are jointly analytic on a dense subspace. They first dilate the antisymmetric part of V to an essentially skew-adjoint tridiagonal operator L on ℓ²(N)⊗H using Fibonacci-weighted embeddings E_n, and then dilate L to a free derivation D on a weighted symmetric Fock space. The central claim is that the unitary evolution e^{Dt}, after applying a suitable projection and multiplication map, recovers the Koopman evolution U_t on a dense subalgebra over a uniform time interval |t|≤R/3. The second half of the paper builds weak spectral triples (A_n, F, -iD), studies embeddings of X into state spaces, and derives bounds on the associated quantum pseudometrics, with applications to kernel mean embeddings of probability measures.

Significance. If the technical gaps are repaired, this would be a genuinely novel contribution: it replaces the L² measure-dependent Koopman--von Neumann formalism by a pointwise RKHS-based construction, connects it with weighted Fock-space geometry, and produces a family of weak spectral triples adapted to classical dynamics. The paper is self-contained against standard operator theory and prior published work on RKHAs and weighted Fock spaces, and the main constructions are explicit rather than fitted. The detailed treatment of examples on tori and the inclusion of an alternative amplification in Appendix C are strengths. However, the proof of the central recovery theorem currently depends on a tail estimate in Proposition 11 that is not correct as written, so the significance can only be assessed after that gap is fixed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Proposition 11] The displayed tail estimate in the proof of Proposition 11 is not an upper bound as written, because it omits the Fibonacci weights in the definition of E_n. Since E_n f = Σ_{i=1}^n F_i e_i ⊗ f, the coefficient of the first component of L^k E_n f is Σ_{i=1}^{min(n,k+1)} F_i |Γ^k(1,i)|, not Σ_{l=1}^k |Γ^k(1,l)|. The omitted factors F_i grow exponentially, so the subsequent bound k(3|t|)^k does not follow. For a scalar model with A=0, S=1, the left-hand coefficient is strictly larger than the printed bound, showing the displayed inequality is false as a universal estimate. Consequently the asserted convergence for |t| ≤ R_f/3 is not established. Since Proposition 11 is invoked in Theorem 14 and in equation (16), the main recovery theorem lacks a complete proof as it stands. A corrected combinatorial estimate, or a different treatment of the tail, is needed.
  2. [Section 5, Theorem 19] The proof of Theorem 19 is explicitly deferred: the text says 'We omit an explicit presentation in the interest of brevity.' The cited Theorem 27 is proved later, but it concerns the embedding Ψ rather than the vector states φ_x used in Theorem 19, and the uniform-in-x convergence asserted in Theorem 19 does not follow verbatim from the proof of Theorem 27. Either a full proof should be supplied, or Theorem 19 should be reformulated as a corollary of Theorem 27 with the necessary identifications written out.
  3. [Section 5.1, Eq. (26)] The weighted commutation relations (26a)-(26e) are asserted without derivation. These relations are load-bearing: they justify the standard form in Proposition 22, the limit computation in Proposition 23, and hence the well-posedness of Definition 20 and the homomorphism property in Theorem 24. In particular, the normalizations involving M_{q/S(q)} and M_{1/q} in (26e) are not immediate and should be verified explicitly or supported by a precise reference.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1.1] The phrase 'Sine the foundational works' should read 'Since the foundational works'.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eq. (9)] In the definition of the vector field, the notation 'e^{±θ_d}' should read 'e^{±iθ_d}' to match the Fourier variables; the same typo appears in the surrounding paragraph.
  3. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 10] The displayed adjacency graph Γ appears as an empty object in the manuscript; the actual graph should be included so that the reader can check the combinatorial counts.
  4. [Appendix C, Eq. (33)] The definitions of α_k and β_k in (33) depend on q but the dependence is not restated in the displayed formulas; writing q explicitly would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central recovery theorem is a genuine dilation result, and the self-citations to prior RKHA/Fock-space work are technical ingredients rather than the target claim.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 14, is a genuine derivation rather than a repackaging of assumptions. Its proof uses Proposition 11 to pass from the unitary evolution e^{Dt} on the weighted Fock space to the Taylor series of e^{Vt}f, and Proposition 5 to lift e^{Vt} multiplicatively to the tensor algebra; no fitted parameter appears and the recovered object U_t m f̃ is not among the inputs to the construction. The self-citations [22,23] supply standing definitions and structural facts about RKHAs and weighted Fock spaces, for example 'As shown in [23], if w is inverse square-summable and subconvolutive, F_w(H) supports a bounded coproduct', but these are independently stated results with assumptions that do not include the present recovery theorem, so they do not create circularity. The paper also explicitly flags the limitation that the time interval t_f may be arbitrarily small for general analytic vectors and then addresses it with the Fock-space amplification, which is a substantive extension rather than a circular move. The skeptic's complaint about Proposition 11, that the tail bound appears to omit the Fibonacci weights F_i in E_n f, is a correctness and completeness concern rather than an equivalence between input and output; the same holds for the omitted proof of Theorem 19, which states 'We omit an explicit presentation in the interest of brevity'. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained apart from minor self-citations to prior technical framework papers, warranting only a minimal circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on three domain assumptions about the dynamics and the RKHS (joint analyticity, finite generation, normalized kernels) and on standard operator theory. No numbers are fitted to data; the free parameters (weights w(n), parameter q) are chosen by hand to satisfy structural conditions.

free parameters (2)
  • Fock space weights w(n) = τ > 0, p ∈ (0,1), w(n) = e^{τ n^p}
    Chosen by hand to satisfy subconvolutivity (28); no fitting to data. The main theorems work for any admissible weights; Section 5 needs the subexponential family.
  • Amplification parameter q = q ∈ (0,1)
    Appears in the alternative first amplification (Appendix C) as a free parameter. It is illustrative and does not affect the main Fibonacci scheme.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1: joint analyticity of V and V* on a dense invariant subspace H∞
    Needed to exponentiate V and V* and to apply Nelson's analytic vector theorem. Not generic; the paper's examples are torus vector fields with polynomial coefficients (Proposition 6).
  • domain assumption Assumption 2: H is a finitely generated unital RKHA, H = Alg(S) for finite-dimensional S ⊂ H∞
    Ensures a uniform joint radius R > 0 for S, hence a uniformly bounded time interval in Theorem 14.
  • domain assumption Assumption 3: unit-normalized kernel sections, ∥k_x∥_H = 1
    Required for Definition 20 and Proposition 23; satisfied by examples but is an extra constraint.
  • domain assumption Subconvolutive weights yield a Banach algebra/RKHA structure on the weighted Fock space (result of [23])
    Borrowed from prior work by the same group; needed to define the symmetric tensor product, bounded creation operators, and the algebra A.
  • standard math Nelson's analytic vector theorem and Stone's theorem for unitary groups
    Standard operator theory used in Theorem 10 and the construction of unitary evolution groups.
  • standard math Gelfand duality for abelian Banach algebras and Fock space second quantization
    Used to identify F with functions on the character spectrum and to construct e^{Dt}.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Measure-free Koopman-von Neumann Dynamics and Noncommutative Geometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KYNLLPYD

@misc{pith2026260811591,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Measure-free Koopman-von Neumann Dynamics and Noncommutative Geometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KYNLLPYD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11591}
}
abstract

The Koopman-von Neumann formulation of classical statistical dynamics maps the isometric evolution of probability densities in $L^1$ under the Liouville equation to a unitary evolution of quantum mechanical wavefunctions in $L^2$ generated by the antisymmetric part of the Liouville operator. This approach enables the use of Hilbert space techniques to model the statistical evolution of observables. However, being an $L^2$ method, it is not suitable for representing pointwise evolution along dynamical trajectories. We propose a Koopman-von Neumann framework that replaces the $L^p$ spaces associated with a volume measure on the state space manifold, $X$, by a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), $\mathcal H$, of continuous functions on $X$ that satisfy joint analyticity conditions with respect to the generator (vector field), $V$, of the dynamics and its RKHS adjoint. Our scheme employs a dilation of the antisymmetric part of $V$ to an essentially skew-adjoint operator, $L$, on the tensor product Hilbert space $\mathfrak H = \ell^2(\mathbb N) \otimes \mathcal H$, followed by a dilation of $L$ to an essentially skew-adjoint, free derivation, $\mathcal D$, acting on a weighted symmetric Fock space $\mathfrak F$ generated by $\mathfrak H$. We show that the unitary evolution generated by $\mathcal D$ consistently recovers the (generally, non-unitary) Koopman evolution of observables in a dense subalgebra of $\mathcal H$ generated by jointly analytic vectors, over a time interval that is uniformly bounded away from zero. We then build a family of weak spectral triples $(\mathcal A_n, \mathfrak F, -i \mathcal D)$, $n \in \mathbb N$, wherein $\mathcal A_n$ are non-abelian $*$-subalgebras of $B(\mathfrak F)$ generated by creation and annihilation operators and $-i \mathcal D$ plays the role of a Dirac operator inducing extended pseudometrics on the state spaces of $\mathcal A_n$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Theory of Reproducing Kernels

    N. Aronszajn. “Theory of Reproducing Kernels”.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.68.3 (1950), pp. 337–404

    work page 1950

  2. [2]

    Anisotropic H¨ older and Sobolev Spaces for Hyperbolic Diffeomorphisms

    V. Baladi and M. Tsujii. “Anisotropic H¨ older and Sobolev Spaces for Hyperbolic Diffeomorphisms”.Ann. Inst. Fourier57.1 (2008).doi:10.5802/aif.2253

    work page doi:10.5802/aif.2253 2008

  3. [3]

    J. A. Barandes.The History of Hilbert-Space Formulations of Classical Physics. 2025.url:https://philsci- archive.pitt.edu/26043/

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Berlinet and C

    A. Berlinet and C. Thomas–Agnan.Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces in Probability and Statistics. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2004.doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9096-9

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9096-9 2004

  5. [5]

    Egodic Averaging With and Without Invariant Measures

    M. Blank. “Egodic Averaging With and Without Invariant Measures”.Nonlinearity30 (2017), pp. 4649–4664. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aa8fe8

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aa8fe8 2017

  6. [6]

    Ruelle–Perron–Frobenius Spectrum for Anosov Maps

    M. Blank, G. Keller, and C. Liverani. “Ruelle–Perron–Frobenius Spectrum for Anosov Maps”.Nonlinearity 15.6 (2002), pp. 1905–1973.doi:10.1088/0951-7715/15/6/309

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/15/6/309 2002

  7. [7]

    Koopman Wavefunctions and Classical–Quantum Correlation Dynamics

    D. I. Bondar, F. Gay-Balmaz, and C. Tronci. “Koopman Wavefunctions and Classical–Quantum Correlation Dynamics”.Proc. Roy. Soc. A475 (2019), p. 20180879.doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0879

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Operational Dynamic Modeling Transcending Quantum and Classical Mechanics

    D. I. Bondar et al. “Operational Dynamic Modeling Transcending Quantum and Classical Mechanics”.Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012), p. 190403.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.190403

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.190403 2012

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Boull´ e, M

    N. Boull´ e, M. J. Colbrook, and G. Conradie.Convergent Methods for Koopman Operators on Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces. 2025.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15782

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The Local Index Formula in Semifinite Von Neumann Algebras I: Spectral Flow

    A. L. Carey et al. “The Local Index Formula in Semifinite Von Neumann Algebras I: Spectral Flow”.Adv. Math.202.2 (2006), pp. 451–516.doi:10.1016/j.aim.2005.03.011

    2006 doi

  3. [11]

    The Local Index Formula in Semifinite Von Neumann Algebras II: The Even Case

    “The Local Index Formula in Semifinite Von Neumann Algebras II: The Even Case”.Adv. Math.2 (2006), pp. 517–554.doi:10.1016/j.aim.2005.03.010

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    Compact Metric Spaces, Fredholm Modules, and Hyperfiniteness

    A. Connes. “Compact Metric Spaces, Fredholm Modules, and Hyperfiniteness”.Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst.9.2 (1989), pp. 207–220.doi:10.1017/s0143385700004934

    1989 doi

  5. [13]

    New York: Academic Press, 1994

    Noncommutative Geometry. New York: Academic Press, 1994

    1994

  6. [14]

    Weighted Composition Operators on Hardy Spaces

    M. D. Contreras and A. G. Hern´ andez-Diaz. “Weighted Composition Operators on Hardy Spaces”.J. Math. Anal. Appl.263 (2001), pp. 224–233.doi:10.1006/jmaa.2001.7610

    2001

  7. [15]

    Composition operators onH 2

    C. C. Cowen. “Composition operators onH 2”.J. Operator Theory9.1 (1983), pp. 77–106.url:https://www. jstor.org/stable/24714040

    1983

  8. [16]

    On Harmonic Hilbert Spaces on Compact Abelian Groups

    S. Das and D. Giannakis. “On Harmonic Hilbert Spaces on Compact Abelian Groups”.J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 29.1, 12 (2023), p. 12.doi:10.1007/s00041-023-09992-4

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Correction to: On Harmonic Hilbert Spaces on Compact Abelian Groups

    S. Das, D. Giannakis, and M. Montgomery. “Correction to: On Harmonic Hilbert Spaces on Compact Abelian Groups”.J. Fourier Anal. Appl.29.6, 67 (2023), p. 67.doi:10.1007/s00041-023-10043-1

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Wave Mechanics in Classical Phase Space, Brownian Motion, and Quantum Theory

    G. Della Ricia and N. Wiener. “Wave Mechanics in Classical Phase Space, Brownian Motion, and Quantum Theory”.J. Math. Phys.7.8 (1966), pp. 1732–1383.doi:10.1063/1.1705047

    1966 doi

  11. [19]

    Eisner et al.Operator Theoretic Aspects of Ergodic Theory

    T. Eisner et al.Operator Theoretic Aspects of Ergodic Theory. Vol. 272. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Cham: Springer, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Gewichtsfunktionen auf Lokalkompakten Gruppen

    H. G. Feichtinger. “Gewichtsfunktionen auf Lokalkompakten Gruppen”. ¨Osterreich. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Natur. Kl. Sitzungsber. II188.8–10 (1979), pp. 451–471

    1979

  13. [21]

    Positive Definiteness, Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, and Beyond

    J. C. Ferreira and V. A. Menegatto. “Positive Definiteness, Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, and Beyond”. Ann. Funct. Anal.4 (2013), pp. 64–88

    2013

  14. [22]

    An Algebra Structure for Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces

    D. Giannakis and M. Montgomery. “An Algebra Structure for Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces”.Banach J. Math. Anal.19, 11 (2025).doi:10.1007/s43037-024-00398-y

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    Giannakis et al.Second quantization for classical nonlinear dynamics

    D. Giannakis et al.Second quantization for classical nonlinear dynamics. 2025.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2501.07419v1

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    2024.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407

    Tensor Network Approximation of Koopman Operators. 2024.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407. 07242

    2024

  17. [25]

    Anosov Flows and Dynamical Zeta Functions

    P. Giulietti, C. Liverani, and M. Pollicott. “Anosov Flows and Dynamical Zeta Functions”.Ann. Math.(2013), pp. 687–773.doi:annals.2013.178.2.6

    2013

  18. [26]

    Banach Spaces Adapted to Anosov Systems

    S. Gou¨ ezel and C. Liverani. “Banach Spaces Adapted to Anosov Systems”.Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst.26 (2006), pp. 189–217.doi:10.1017/s0143385705000374

    2006 doi

  19. [27]

    A Kernel Method for the Two-Sample-Problem

    A. Gretton et al. “A Kernel Method for the Two-Sample-Problem”. In:Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems. Ed. by B. Sch¨ olkopf, J. Platt, and T. Hoffman. Vol. 19. MIT Press, 2006.url:https : / / proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2006/file/e9fb2eda3d9c55a0...

    2006

  20. [28]

    Weight Functions in Time-Frequency Analysis

    K. Gr¨ ochenig. “Weight Functions in Time-Frequency Analysis”. In:Pseudodifferential Operators: Partial Dif- ferential Equations and Time-Frequency Analysis. Ed. by L. Rodino et al. Vol. 52. Fields Inst. Commun. Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 343–366

    2007

  21. [29]

    A Sharp Formula for the Essential Spectral Radius of the Ruelle Transfer Operator on Smooth and H¨ older Spaces

    V. M. Gundlach and Y. Latushkin. “A Sharp Formula for the Essential Spectral Radius of the Ruelle Transfer Operator on Smooth and H¨ older Spaces”.Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst.23 (2003), pp. 175–191.doi:10.1017/ s0143385702000962

    2003

  22. [30]

    B. C. Hall.Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Vol. 267. Graduate Text in Mathematics. New York: Springer, 2013

    2013

  23. [31]

    Weighted Composition Operators on Hilbert Function Spaces on the Ball

    M. Hartz and M. Tornes. “Weighted Composition Operators on Hilbert Function Spaces on the Ball”.Results Math.80, 5 (2025).doi:10.1007/s00025-025-02496-1

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    Boundedness of Composition Operators on Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with Analytic Positive Definite Functions

    M. Ikeda, I. Ishikawa, and Y. Sawano. “Boundedness of Composition Operators on Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with Analytic Positive Definite Functions”.J. Math. Anal. Appl.511.1, 126048 (2022).doi:10.1016/ j.jmaa.2022.126048

    2022

  25. [33]

    Koopman and Perron–Frobenius Operators on Reproducing Kernel Banach Spaces

    M. Ikeda, I. Ishikawa, and C. Schlosser. “Koopman and Perron–Frobenius Operators on Reproducing Kernel Banach Spaces”.Chaos32, 123143 (2022).doi:10.1063/5.0094889

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Koopman-von Neumann approach to quantum simulation of nonlinear classical dynamics

    I. Joseph. “Koopman-von Neumann approach to quantum simulation of nonlinear classical dynamics”.Phys. Rev. Research2 (2020), p. 043102.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043102

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Quantum Computing for Fusion Energy Science Applications

    I. Joseph et al. “Quantum Computing for Fusion Energy Science Applications”.Phys. Plasmas30.1, 010501 (2023).doi:10.1063/5.0123765

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Khalkhali and M

    M. Khalkhali and M. Marcolli, eds.An Invitation to Noncommutative Geometry. World Scientific, 2008.doi: 10.1142/6422

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    L∞-Error Bounds for Approximations of the Koopman Operator by Kernel Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition

    F. K¨ ohne et al. “L∞-Error Bounds for Approximations of the Koopman Operator by Kernel Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition”.SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.24.1 (2025), pp. 501–529.doi:10.1137/24m1650120

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space

    B. O. Koopman. “Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space”.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.17.5 (1931), pp. 315–318.doi:10.1073/pnas.17.5.315

    1931 doi

  31. [39]

    Dynamical systems of continuous spectra

    B. O. Koopman and J. von Neumann. “Dynamical systems of continuous spectra”.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.18.3 (1932), pp. 255–263.doi:10.1073/pnas.18.3.255

    1932 doi

  32. [40]

    Quantum Locally Compact Metric Spaces

    F. Latr´ emoli` ere. “Quantum Locally Compact Metric Spaces”.J. Funct. Anal.264 (2013), pp. 362–402.doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2012.10.016

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    Composition Operators Between Segal–Bargmann Spaces

    T. Le. “Composition Operators Between Segal–Bargmann Spaces”.J. Operator Theory78.1 (2017), pp. 135– 158.url:https://www.jstor.org/stable/26432293

    2017

  34. [42]

    Lehmann.Mathematical Methods of Many-Body Quantum Field Theory

    D. Lehmann.Mathematical Methods of Many-Body Quantum Field Theory. Vol. 436. Research Notes in Math- ematics. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004

    2004

  35. [43]

    Y. T. Lin et al.Challenges for Quantum Computation of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Using Linear Repre- sentations. 2022.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02188

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Galilei Group and Liouville Equation

    A. Loinger. “Galilei Group and Liouville Equation”.Ann. Phys.20.1 (1962), pp. 132–144.doi:10.1016/0003- 4916(62)90119-7

    1962 doi

  37. [45]

    On Koopman–von Neumann waves

    D. Mauro. “On Koopman–von Neumann waves”.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A17 (2002), pp. 1301–1325.doi:10.1142/ s0217751x02009680

    2002

  38. [46]

    A Transfer Operator Approach to Relativistic Quantum Wavefunction

    I. Mezi´ c. “A Transfer Operator Approach to Relativistic Quantum Wavefunction”.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 094001 (2023).doi:10.1088/1751-8121/acb675

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Universal Kernels

    C. A. Micchelli, Y. Xu, and H. Zhang. “Universal Kernels”.J. Mach. Learn. Res.7 (2006), pp. 2651–2667

    2006

  40. [48]

    Analytic Vectors

    E. Nelson. “Analytic Vectors”.Ann. Math.56.3 (1959), pp. 55–76.doi:10.2307/1970331

    1959 doi

  41. [49]

    Quantum Algorithm for the Advection-diffusion Equation and the Koopman-von Neumann Approach to Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

    I. Novikau and I. Joseph. “Quantum Algorithm for the Advection-diffusion Equation and the Koopman-von Neumann Approach to Nonlinear Dynamical Systems”.Comput. Phys. Commun.309, 109498 (2025).doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109498

    2025

  42. [50]

    V. I. Paulsen and M. Raghupathi.An Introduction to the Theory of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces. Vol. 152. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1980

    1980

  44. [52]

    New York: Academic Press, 1975

    Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness. New York: Academic Press, 1975

    1975

  45. [53]

    Compact Quantum Metric Spaces

    M. A. Rieffel. “Compact Quantum Metric Spaces”. In:Operator Algebras, Quantization, and Noncommutative Geometry. Ed. by R. S. Doran and R. V. Kadison. Vol. 365. Contemporary Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2004, pp. 315–330.doi:10.1090/conm/365/06709

    2004 doi

  46. [54]

    Metrics on State Spaces

    “Metrics on State Spaces”.Doc. Math.4 (1999), pp. 559–600

    1999

  47. [55]

    The Thermodynamic Formalism for Expanding Maps

    D. Ruelle. “The Thermodynamic Formalism for Expanding Maps”.Commun. Math. Phys.125 (1989), pp. 239– 262.doi:10.1007/bf01217908. REFERENCES 37

    1989 doi

  48. [56]

    Application of Second Quantization Methods to the Classical Statistical Mechanics (I)

    M. Sch¨ onberg. “Application of Second Quantization Methods to the Classical Statistical Mechanics (I)”.Nuovo Cim.9 (1952), pp. 1139–1182.doi:10.1007/bf02782925

    1952 doi

  49. [57]

    Application of Second Quantization Methods to the Classical Statistical Mechanics (II)

    “Application of Second Quantization Methods to the Classical Statistical Mechanics (II)”.Nuovo Cim. 10 (1953), pp. 419–472.doi:10.1007/bf02781980

    1953 doi

  50. [58]

    A Hilbert space embedding for distributions

    A. Smola et al. “A Hilbert space embedding for distributions”. In:In Algorithmic Learning Theory: 18th International Conference. Berlin: Springer, 2007, pp. 13–31.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75225-7_5

    2007 doi

  51. [59]

    Universality, Characteristic Kernels and RKHS Embedding of Measures

    B. K. Sriperumbudur, K. Fukumizu, and G. R. Lanckriet. “Universality, Characteristic Kernels and RKHS Embedding of Measures”.J. Mach. Learn. Res.12 (2011), pp. 2389–2410

    2011

  52. [60]

    Hilbert Space Embeddings and Metrics on Probability Measures

    B. K. Sriperumbudur et al. “Hilbert Space Embeddings and Metrics on Probability Measures”.J. Mach. Learn. Res.11 (2010), pp. 1517–1561

    2010

  53. [61]

    Steinwart and A

    I. Steinwart and A. Christmann.Support Vector Machines. Information Science and Statistics. New York: Springer, 2008

    2008

  54. [62]

    Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of the Koopman–von Neumann Equation on Bounded Domains

    M. Stengl et al. “Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of the Koopman–von Neumann Equation on Bounded Domains”.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 395302 (2024).doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad6f7d

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    On One-Parameter Unitary Groups in Hilbert Space

    M. H. Stone. “On One-Parameter Unitary Groups in Hilbert Space”.Ann. Math33.3 (1932), pp. 643–648.doi: doi.org/10.2307/1968538

    1932 doi

  56. [64]

    Interaction between Classical and Quantum Systems and the Measurement of Quantum Observables

    E. C. G. Sudarshan. “Interaction between Classical and Quantum Systems and the Measurement of Quantum Observables”.Pramana6.3 (1976), pp. 117–126.doi:10.1007/bf02847120

    1976 doi

  57. [65]

    Coherent States and their Generalizations: A Mathematical Review

    S. Twareque Ali et al. “Coherent States and their Generalizations: A Mathematical Review”.Rev. Math. Phys. 7.7 (1995), pp. 1013–1104.doi:10.1142/s0129055x95000396

    1995 doi

  58. [66]

    Walters.An Introduction to Ergodic Theory

    P. Walters.An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Vol. 79. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York: Springer- Verlag, 1981

    1981

  59. [67]

    What are SRB measures, and which dynamical systems have them?

    L.-S. Young. “What are SRB measures, and which dynamical systems have them?”J. Stat. Phys.108 (5 2002), pp. 733–754.doi:10.1023/a:1019762724717

    2002 doi

  60. [68]

    Isometric Weighted Composition Operators on Weighted Bergman Spaces

    N. Zorboska. “Isometric Weighted Composition Operators on Weighted Bergman Spaces”.J. Math. Anal. Appl. 461.1 (2018), pp. 657–675.doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.01.036. Department of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Email address:dimitrios.giannakis@dartmouth.e...

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.