Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Continuous-time directed polymers to the Critical SHF via moments

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that diffusively rescaled partition functions of a broad class of two-dimensional continuous-time directed polymers converge in law to the Critical Stochastic Heat Flow SHF(θ*), with the parameter θ* given explicitly in…

desk verdict A credible moment-based path-space convergence result for critical 2D polymers, but the proof of the diagonal resolvent bound contains an admitted heuristic inequality that must be repaired before the paper is complete. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11603 v1 pith:FJUQXI53 submitted 2026-08-12 math.PR

Sudheesh Surendranath This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60K3560H1582B4460F17
keywords directedpolymerscriticalstochasticheatflowtwo-dimensionalequationdelta-Bosegasresolventmethodmomentconvergencetightnesswindow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper takes a class of two-dimensional continuous-time directed polymers in a correlated Brownian environment and shows that, in the critical window of couplings, their rescaled point-to-point partition functions converge in law to the Critical Stochastic Heat Flow (SHF), the conjectural solution object of the two-dimensional stochastic heat equation. The proof goes through moments: all n-point correlation functions of the polymer converge to the delta-Bose semigroup of the SHF, the family is tight on the space of continuous measure-valued processes, and the resulting limit points satisfy the four axioms of the flow's moment-based characterization. Because that characterization is unique, the whole family converges, not just along a subsequence. A sympathetic reader should care because this transfers a limit theorem previously available for mollified equations to a genuine discrete polymer model with non-compactly supported spatial correlations.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The first is the resolvent expansion of the delta-Bose gas: the $n$-th moment semigroup is written as the free heat semigroup plus a diagram sum over all sequences of collisions, with incoming, outgoing, off-diagonal, and diagonal operators, following [33]; the paper's discrete version uses $\varepsilon$-scaled center-of-mass and relative coordinates and proves the resolvents converge in norm, using the uniform symbol lower bound of Lemma 3.2 to control the lattice Green's function. The second is the axiomatic characterization of the SHF [46]: continuity, Chapman–Kolmogorov, independent increments, and the delta-Bose moment identity for $n = 1,2,3,4$ determine the law uniquely, so moment convergence plus tightness replaces the traditional finite-dimensional distribution proof. The critical coupling $\beta_{\varepsilon} \approx 2\pi/|\log \varepsilon|$ exactly cancels the logarithmic divergence of the diagonal resolvent, and tracking that cancellation produces the explicit fine-tuning constant $\theta^{*}$.

What would settle it

Compute the two-point function of the rescaled polymer for a concrete choice of $\kappa$ and $\nu$ and compare it with the explicit two-particle delta-Bose semigroup with the paper's $\theta^{*}$: the two-particle semigroup is explicit in center-of-mass and relative coordinates, so a mismatch beyond numerical error would falsify Theorem 1.1. A cheaper check is to verify the stated value of the constant $\theta_4 = \log 2/(2\pi) - G/\pi^{2}$ by direct numerical integration of $\int_{\hat{T}^{2}\setminus B(0;\pi)} \|\eta\|^{-2}\, d\eta$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated as Proposition 1.2, is that the rescaled partition functions $Z^{\theta,\varepsilon}_{s,t}$, extended piecewise constantly, converge in law in $C(R^{2}_{<}, M_{+}(R^{2} \times R^{2}))$ to $\mathrm{SHF}(\theta^{*})$. The explicit constant $\theta^{*}$ is assembled from the environment correlation $\kappa$, the jump measure $\nu$ of the underlying compound Poisson walk, and universal constants such as $\log 2$ and the constant $G$. The proof identifies the limit without constructing it pathwise: Theorem 1.1 proves strong convergence of the semigroups $Q^{[n],\theta}_{\varepsilon}(t)$ to the delta-Bose semigroup $Q^{[n],\theta^{*}}(t)$ for every $n$, Lemma 4.1 supplies weighted norm bounds that yield tightness, and Lemma 4.2 verifies the Chapman–Kolmogorov property. Then every subsequential limit satisfies Definition 1.1, so the uniqueness result [46] forces all limits to share the law of $\mathrm{SHF}(\theta^{*})$.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the limit depends on the uniqueness characterization of [46]: if two processes satisfying the four axioms with the same $\theta^{*}$ could differ in law, or if a subsequential limit turned out to satisfy the moment identities of orders one through four but fail continuity or Chapman–Kolmogorov, the argument would not force convergence to $\mathrm{SHF}(\theta^{*})$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every pair of test functions $h, h'$, the real-valued processes $\langle h, Z^{\theta,\varepsilon}_{s,t} h' \rangle$ converge in law on compact time intervals to the corresponding marginals of $\mathrm{SHF}(\theta^{*})$.
  • All moments of all orders converge: the $n$-point correlation functions converge to the delta-Bose semigroup for every $n$, not only for the orders needed by the characterization.
  • The class of models with SHF as scaling limit now includes continuous-time random-walk polymers with a spatially correlated, non-compactly supported noise, and not only mollified stochastic heat equations.
  • The limit is unique: tightness plus the axioms leave no room for a different subsequential limit, so convergence in law holds for the entire family as $\varepsilon \to 0$.
  • Any model in this class with the same $\theta^{*}$ has the same asymptotic statistics, making $\theta^{*}$ the only model-dependent information that survives scaling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same strategy should transfer to other two-dimensional polymer models whose first four moment functions match the delta-Bose semigroup: only the orders $1$ to $4$ are used for identification, while Theorem 1.1 supplies the higher moments for free.
  • The explicit dependence of $\theta^{*}$ on $\kappa$ and $\nu$ suggests that the SHF parameter is not universal, and comparisons across different correlation functions could check whether two models with equal $\theta^{*}$ are statistically indistinguishable at the critical scale.
  • Tracking the resolvent error terms, which are polynomial in $\varepsilon R$, $R^{-1/2}$, and $\sqrt{\varepsilon}$, could upgrade the qualitative convergence to explicit rates at which finite-dimensional distributions approach the SHF; the paper does not pursue that refinement.
  • The lattice-correction estimates indicate that convergence should persist for any symmetric finite-variance jump measure with aperiodic support, so the standing assumption on $\nu$ is likely flexible.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a class of two-dimensional continuous-time directed polymers in a correlated Brownian environment. It defines the diffusively rescaled point-to-point partition functions and shows, via a resolvent argument adapted from Gu–Quastel–Tsai, that all moment semigroups converge to the delta-Bose semigroup with an explicitly computed parameter θ*. It then verifies tightness and the axioms of Tsai's moment-based characterization of the critical Stochastic Heat Flow, concluding that the partition functions converge in law to SHF(θ*) in C(R²_<, M_+(R²×R²)). The main results are Theorem 1.1 (semigroup/resolvent convergence with explicit θ*) and Proposition 1.2 (path-space convergence to the SHF).

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a substantial contribution: it enlarges the class of discrete/semi-discrete polymer models known to converge to the critical Stochastic Heat Flow, gives an explicit formula for the limiting parameter θ*, and demonstrates the power of the moment-based axiomatic route. The paper is not circular: the delta-Bose semigroup and the uniqueness of the SHF are taken as external inputs from [33] and [46], and θ* is derived rather than fitted. The argument is detailed and the operator-norm framework is appropriate. However, several load-bearing estimates are either labeled heuristic or deferred to previous works, and the constant in Theorem 1.1 appears to contain a factor error; these issues need to be repaired before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3.1, around Eq. (3.39)] The convergence of the diagonal resolvent, and hence of the full resolvent in Theorem 1.1, rests on the bound h(x)=x tan^{-1}(1/x)-C log(1+x)≤0 for large x. The paper explicitly labels this bound 'purely heuristic' and uses it to obtain the logarithmic factor displayed in (3.39), whose square-integrability against κ(y_r)κ(y'_r) under assumption (1.3) is essential for the dominated convergence argument. As written, the proof of this key inequality is missing; please supply a rigorous proof or an alternative bound before the diagonal convergence can be accepted.
  2. [Theorem 1.1] The printed formula for θ* appears inconsistent with the derivation in §3.3.2. There the author obtains θ⋆=2θ+4π(θ1+θ2+θ3+θ4)+2logπ, with θ4=log2/(2π)−G/π^2, so the constant term should be 2log2−4G/π rather than log2/(2π)−G/π^2 as written in the theorem. Unless the notation θ4 is being used differently in the two places, the theorem statement needs correction. Since θ* is the explicit parameter identifying the limit, this is load-bearing.
  3. [§3.2] The norm convergence of the off-diagonal resolvents (3.1c) is asserted with the sentence 'We skip the details.' This is one of the four convergence statements in Lemma 3.1 that feed directly into the resolvent convergence of Theorem 1.1, so the omission is load-bearing. Please provide the full argument, or a precise reduction showing exactly how each error term O_r(R,ε) is bounded using Lemma 2.2.
  4. [§4, after Lemma 4.1] The Kolmogorov-type estimate E|⟨h,(Zθ,ε_{s,t}-Zθ,ε_{s',t'})h'⟩|^{2m}≤c(...) is stated and its proof is deferred with 'the proof for the above inequality is the same as in [46]. We skip this part.' This estimate is the basis of tightness and hence of Proposition 1.2. If the proof is genuinely identical, a precise statement with the required parameter mapping should be given; otherwise this is a gap in the main convergence argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1.1, Eq. (1.3)] The same letter K is used for the integer cutoff in the summation and for the value of the double sum; please disambiguate the two uses.
  2. [§4, Lemma 4.2 proof] The displayed identity writes the last term as Zθ,ε_{s,u}(⌊x′⌋ε,⌊x′⌋ε), which appears to be a typo for Zθ,ε_{s,u}(⌊x⌋ε,⌊x′⌋ε).
  3. [§2, display after (2.2)] The definition of the simplex Σ(t) is written as {τ_k/2 ...}, but the notation is inconsistent with the subsequent use of τ_k as the integration variables; please clarify.
  4. [§2, Lemma 2.2] Lemma 2.2 is quoted from [33, Lemma 5.1] without proof; since it is used repeatedly in the off-diagonal estimates, a short proof or a more precise statement of the cited lemma would improve self-containedness.
  5. [§3.3.1] The operator D2 is introduced in several forms (D2(ε), D2(ε,η_{c∪[n]\α}), D2,1, D2,2) without a uniform convention; please make the dependencies explicit throughout the subsection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the convergence proof derives Theorem 1.1 explicitly, uses Tsai's characterization as an external benchmark, and does not fit any 'predicted' quantity from the data.

full rationale

The convergence proof is not circular. Theorem 1.1 gives an explicit formula for the critical strength θ*, expressed in terms of the fine-tuning parameter θ, the covariance kernel κ, and the random-walk symbol bL_{1,n}; θ* is derived, not fitted from the partition functions whose convergence is the target result. The moment convergence is proved internally in Section 3 by comparing discrete and continuous resolvents, with the limiting delta-Bose semigroup taken from [33] and [44] as external benchmarks. The identification of subsequential limits in Section 4 invokes Tsai's uniqueness theorem [46], whose assumptions in Definition 1.1 do not involve the present model's partition functions, so the conclusion is not built into the input. The self-citation [44] (Surendranath-Tsai, 'Two-dimensional delta Bose gas in a weighted space') supplies a weighted-norm bound used in Lemma 4.1; it is a published, parameter-free external result rather than an assumption of the proposition being proved, so it does not make the argument circular. No step was found in which a claimed 'prediction' equals a fitted input by construction, nor does the moment-based axiom (iv) define away the target. Two admitted gaps are correctness risks rather than circularity: in Section 3.3.1 the inequality h(x) ≤ 0 leading to (3.39) is labeled 'purely heuristic,' and the proofs of the off-diagonal error bounds (Section 3.2) and the Kolmogorov inequality (Section 4) are skipped with 'the same as' references. These omissions affect completeness of the proof as written, but they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of modeling assumptions and external theorems: the critical scaling (1.4) with a tuning parameter theta; the correlation kernel kappa satisfying (1.3) and summing to 1; the jump measure nu satisfying symmetric, aperiodic and moment conditions; the known limiting resolvent and semigroup formula from [33]; and Tsai's uniqueness theorem [46]. No free constants are fitted to data; theta is the only hand-chosen parameter, and it enters the explicit formula for theta*. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • theta = arbitrary real input
    Fine-tuning constant in beta_epsilon = 2*pi/|log epsilon| * (1 + theta/|log epsilon|), equation (1.4). It parameterizes the family of critical scalings and flows into theta* through formula (1.7). It is not fitted to data, but it is a hand-chosen parameter of the model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Tsai's uniqueness theorem: two SHF(theta*) processes with the same moments are equal in law.
    Used in the final step of Section 4 to identify all subsequential limits. This is an external theorem from [46], not proved in the present paper.
  • domain assumption The delta-Bose semigroup formula and resolvent expansion of Gu, Quastel and Tsai [33] are valid for the limiting semigroup Q^{[n],theta*}.
    Theorem 1.1 compares the discrete resolvent to this known expansion, and the paper uses Lemma 2.2 from [33] as a black box.
  • domain assumption The jump measure nu is symmetric, aperiodic, has finite 2+delta moment, and covariance identity I_1.
    Section 1.1; these conditions ensure the generator symbol converges to the Laplacian with rate epsilon^delta and is bounded below by the Laplacian symbol.
  • domain assumption The correlation kernel kappa is non-negative, symmetric, non-negative definite, satisfies the log-moment condition (1.3), and sums to 1 after normalization.
    Used throughout for L^1 integrability against logarithmic kernels and for dominated convergence arguments; the normalization fixes the coefficient of the limiting white noise.
  • standard math Trotter-Kato theorem and standard functional analysis facts for passing from resolvent convergence to semigroup convergence.
    Invoked after equation (1.6) and in Lemma 3.1 to conclude strong convergence of semigroups from the resolvent bounds.
  • standard math Kolmogorov tightness criterion and Mitoma's theorem for measure-valued processes.
    Used in Section 4 to obtain tightness in C(R^2_<, M_+(R^2 x R^2)) from the weighted moment bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Continuous-time directed polymers to the Critical SHF via moments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FJUQXI53

@misc{pith2026260811603,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Continuous-time directed polymers to the Critical SHF via moments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FJUQXI53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11603}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a class of two-dimensional continuous-time directed random polymers in a correlated Brownian environment. The partition functions of these polymers form a discrete approximation of the Critical Stochastic Heat Flow (SHF), constructed by Caravenna, Sun and Zygouras (2023). Using a recent moment based axiomatic characterization of the SHF by Tsai (2024), we prove that the point-to-point partition functions, viewed as random measures, converge to the critical SHF. The proof proceeds by first establishing convergence of all moments through the resolvent method introduced by Gu, Quastel and Tsai (2021) and based on Rajeev (1999) and Dimock and Rajeev (2004). This is followed by establishing tightness and verifying the remaining axioms in the characterization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [46]

    Li-Cheng Tsai.Stochastic heat flow by moments. 2025. arXiv:2410 . 14657 [math.PR]. url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14657

    arXiv 2025

  2. [44]

    In:Electron

    Sudheesh Surendranath and Li-Cheng Tsai.Two-dimensional delta Bose gas in a weighted space. In:Electron. Commun. Probab.30 (2025), Paper No. 35, 10.issn: 1083-589X.doi:10. 1214/25-ecp685.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/25-ecp685

    work page doi:10.1214/25-ecp685 2025

  3. [26]

    Hindy Drillick, Jonathan Hou, and Shalin Parekh.A universality result for the critical 2d stochastic heat flow. 2026. 59

    work page 2026

  4. [33]

    In:Probab

    Yu Gu, Jeremy Quastel, and Li-Cheng Tsai.Moments of the 2D SHE at criticality. In:Probab. Math. Phys.2.1 (2021), pp. 179–219.issn: 2690-0998,2690-1005.doi:10.2140/pmp.2021. 2.179.url:https://doi.org/10.2140/pmp.2021.2.179

    work page doi:10.2140/pmp.2021 2021

  5. [1]

    Tom Alberts, Konstantin Khanin, and Jeremy Quastel.The continuum directed random poly- mer. In:J. Stat. Phys.154.1-2 (2014), pp. 305–326.issn: 0022-4715,1572-9613.doi:10.1007/ s10955-013-0872-z.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0872-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-013-0872-z 2014

  6. [2]

    Tom Alberts, Konstantin Khanin, and Jeremy Quastel.The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension1+1. In:Ann. Probab.42.3 (2014), pp. 1212–1256.issn: 0091- 1798,2168-894X.doi:10.1214/13- AOP858.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/13- AOP858

    work page doi:10.1214/13- 2014

  7. [3]

    Texts and Monographs in Physics

    Sergio Albeverio et al.Solvable models in quantum mechanics. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988, pp. xiv+452.isbn: 0-387-17841-4.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-642-88201-2.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88201-2. 57

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-88201-2 1988

  8. [4]

    In:Probab

    Guillaume Barraquand, Ivan Corwin, and Evgeni Dimitrov.Fluctuations of the log-gamma polymer free energy with general parameters and slopes. In:Probab. Theory Related Fields 181.1-3 (2021), pp. 113–195.issn: 0178-8051,1432-2064.doi:10 . 1007 / s00440 - 021 - 01073-1.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-021-01073-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-021-01073-1 2021

Show all 51 references
  1. [5]

    Lorenzo Bertini and Nicoletta Cancrini.The two-dimensional stochastic heat equation: renor- malizing a multiplicative noise. In:J. Phys. A31.2 (1998), pp. 615–622.issn: 0305-4470,1751- 8121.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/2/019.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/0305- 4470/31/2/019

    1998 doi

  2. [6]

    Erwin Bolthausen.A note on the diffusion of directed polymers in a random environment. In:Comm. Math. Phys.123.4 (1989), pp. 529–534.issn: 0010-3616,1432-0916.url:http : //projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104178982

    1989

  3. [7]

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras.On the moments of the(2 + 1)- dimensional directed polymer and stochastic heat equation in the critical window. In:Comm. Math. Phys.372.2 (2019), pp. 385–440.issn: 0010-3616,1432-0916.doi:10.1007/s00220- 019-03527-z.url:htt...

    2019 doi

  4. [8]

    In:Invent

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras.The critical 2d stochastic heat flow. In:Invent. Math.233.1 (2023), pp. 325–460.issn: 0020-9910,1432-1297.doi:10.1007/ s00222-023-01184-7.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-023-01184-7

    2023 doi

  5. [9]

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras.The two-dimensional KPZ equa- tion in the entire subcritical regime. In:Ann. Probab.48.3 (2020), pp. 1086–1127.issn: 0091- 1798,2168-894X.doi:10.1214/19-AOP1383.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/19- AOP1383

    2020 doi

  6. [10]

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras.Universality in marginally rel- evant disordered systems. In:Ann. Appl. Probab.27.5 (2017), pp. 3050–3112.issn: 1050- 5164,2168-8737.doi:10.1214/17- AAP1276.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/17- AAP1276

    2017 doi

  7. [11]

    In:Probab

    Philippe Carmona and Yueyun Hu.On the partition function of a directed polymer in a Gaussian random environment. In:Probab. Theory Related Fields124.3 (2002), pp. 431–457. issn: 0178-8051,1432-2064.doi:10.1007/s004400200213.url:https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s004400200213

    2002 doi

  8. [12]

    Dalang.Hölder-continuity for the nonlinear stochastic heat equation with rough initial conditions

    Le Chen and Robert C. Dalang.Hölder-continuity for the nonlinear stochastic heat equation with rough initial conditions. In:Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.2.3 (2014), pp. 316– 352.issn: 2194-0401,2194-041X.doi:10 . 1007 / s40072 - 014 - 0034 - 6.url:https : //doi.org...

    2014 doi

  9. [13]

    Dalang.Moments and growth indices for the nonlinear stochastic heat equation with rough initial conditions

    Le Chen and Robert C. Dalang.Moments and growth indices for the nonlinear stochastic heat equation with rough initial conditions. In:Ann. Probab.43.6 (2015), pp. 3006–3051.issn: 0091- 1798,2168-894X.doi:10.1214/14- AOP954.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/14- AOP954

    2015 doi

  10. [14]

    Yu-Ting Chen.Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-Bose gas, I: One-δ motions. 2025. arXiv:2505.01703 [math.PR].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 01703. 58

    2025 arXiv

  11. [15]

    Yu-Ting Chen.Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-Bose gas, II: Many- δmotions. 2025. arXiv:2505 . 01704 [math.PR].url:https : / / arxiv . org / abs / 2505.01704

    2025 arXiv

  12. [16]

    Yu-Ting Chen.Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-Bose gas, III: Path integrals. 2025. arXiv:2505.03006 [math.PR].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 03006

    2025 arXiv

  13. [17]

    In:Electron

    Yu-Ting Chen.Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-Bose gas, IV: Transformations of relative motions. In:Electron. Commun. Probab.31 (2026), Paper No. 25, 9.issn: 1083-589X.doi:10.1214/26-ecp771.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/26- ecp771

    2026 doi

  14. [18]

    Yu-Ting Chen.Two-dimensional delta-Bose gas: skew-product relative motions. In:Ann. Appl. Probab.35.5 (2025), pp. 3150–3214.issn: 1050-5164,2168-8737.doi:10.1214/25-aap2179. url:https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aap2179

    2025 doi

  15. [19]

    Jeremy Clark and Barkat Mian.Continuum polymer measures corresponding to the critical 2d stochastic heat flow. 2024. arXiv:2409 . 01510 [math.PR].url:https : / / arxiv . org/abs/2409.01510

    2024 arXiv

  16. [20]

    Jeremy Clark and Li-Cheng Tsai.Conditional GMC within the stochastic heat flow. 2025. arXiv:2507.16056 [math.PR].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16056

    2025 arXiv

  17. [21]

    Francis Comets.Directed polymers in random environments. Vol. 2175. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Lecture notes from the 46th Probability Summer School held in Saint-Flour,

  18. [22]

    In:Bernoulli9.4 (2003), pp

    Francis Comets, Tokuzo Shiga, and Nobuo Yoshida.Directed polymers in a random envi- ronment: path localization and strong disorder. In:Bernoulli9.4 (2003), pp. 705–723.issn: 1350-7265,1573-9759.doi:10 . 3150 / bj / 1066223275.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 3150/bj/1066223275

    2003

  19. [23]

    Francis Comets and Nobuo Yoshida.Directed polymers in random environment are diffu- sive at weak disorder. In:Ann. Probab.34.5 (2006), pp. 1746–1770.issn: 0091-1798,2168- 894X.doi:10 . 1214 / 009117905000000828.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1214 / 009117905000000828

    2006

  20. [24]

    In:Random Matri- ces Theory Appl.1.1 (2012), pp

    Ivan Corwin.The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class. In:Random Matri- ces Theory Appl.1.1 (2012), pp. 1130001, 76.issn: 2010-3263,2010-3271.doi:10 . 1142 / S2010326311300014.url:https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010326311300014

    2012 doi

  21. [25]

    Dimock and S

    J. Dimock and S. G. Rajeev.Multi-particle Schrödinger operators with point interactions in the plane. In:J. Phys. A37.39 (2004), pp. 9157–9173.issn: 0305-4470,1751-8121.doi:10.1088/ 0305-4470/37/39/008.url:https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/37/39/008

    2004 doi

  22. [27]

    In:Electron

    Alexander Dunlap and Cole Graham.Edwards-Wilkinson fluctuations in subcritical 2D stochas- tic heat equations. In:Electron. Commun. Probab.30 (2025), Paper No. 96, 11.issn: 1083-589X. doi:10.1214/25-ecp735.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/25-ecp735

    2025 doi

  23. [28]

    Alexander Dunlap and Cole Graham.Renormalization flow for the 2D nonlinear stochastic heat equation: pointwise statistics and universality. 2026. arXiv:2308.11850 [math.PR]. url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11850

    2026

  24. [29]

    Alexander Dunlap and Yu Gu.A forward-backward SDE from the 2D nonlinear stochastic heat equation. In:Ann. Probab.50.3 (2022), pp. 1204–1253.issn: 0091-1798,2168-894X.doi: 10.1214/21-aop1563.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/21-aop1563

    2022 doi

  25. [30]

    Shirshendu Ganguly and Kyeongsik Nam.Sharp moment and upper tail asymptotics for the critical2dStochastic Heat Flow. 2025. arXiv:2507.22029 [math.PR].url:https: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.22029

    2025 arXiv

  26. [31]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik.Table of integrals, series, and products. Seventh. Else- vier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2007, pp. xlviii+1171.isbn: 978-0-12-373637-6; 0-12-373637- 4

    2007

  27. [32]

    In:Stoch

    Yu Gu.Gaussian fluctuations from the 2D KPZ equation. In:Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.8.1 (2020), pp. 150–185.issn: 2194-0401,2194-041X.doi:10.1007/s40072-019- 00144-8.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-019-00144-8

    2020 doi

  28. [34]

    Yu Gu and Li-Cheng Tsai.Log Log Fluctuations of the Stochastic Heat Flow. 2026. arXiv: 2603.03246 [math.PR].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03246

    2026

  29. [35]

    Yu Gu and Li-Cheng Tsai.Stochastic heat flow is a black noise. 2025. arXiv:2506.16484 [math.PR].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16484

    2025 arXiv

  30. [36]

    In:Forum Math

    Massimiliano Gubinelli, Peter Imkeller, and Nicolas Perkowski.Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDEs. In:Forum Math. Pi3 (2015), e6, 75.issn: 2050-5086.doi:10.1017/fmp. 2015.2.url:https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2015.2

    2015 doi

  31. [37]

    Hairer.A theory of regularity structures

    M. Hairer.A theory of regularity structures. In:Invent. Math.198.2 (2014), pp. 269–504.issn: 0020-9910,1432-1297.doi:10.1007/s00222- 014- 0505- 4.url:https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00222-014-0505-4

    2014 doi

  32. [38]

    Martin Hairer.Solving the KPZ equation. In:Ann. of Math. (2)178.2 (2013), pp. 559–664. issn: 0003-486X,1939-8980.doi:10 . 4007 / annals . 2013 . 178 . 2 . 4.url:https : / / doi.org/10.4007/annals.2013.178.2.4

    2013 doi

  33. [39]

    Huse and Christopher L

    David A. Huse and Christopher L. Henley.Pinning and Roughening of Domain Walls in Ising Systems Due to Random Impurities. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.54 (25 June 1985), pp. 2708–2711.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.2708.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.54.2708

    1985 doi

  34. [40]

    In:ALEA Lat

    Stefan Junk.Stability of weak disorder phase for directed polymer with applications to limit theorems. In:ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.20.1 (2023), pp. 861–883.issn: 1980-0436. doi:10.30757/alea.v20-31.url:https://doi.org/10.30757/alea.v20-31. 60

    2023 doi

  35. [41]

    Itaru Mitoma.Tightness of probabilities onC([0,1];S ′)andD([0,1];S ′). In:Ann. Probab. 11.4 (1983), pp. 989–999.issn: 0091-1798,2168-894X.url:http://links.jstor.org/ sici?sici=0091- 1798(198311)11:4%3C989:TOPOA%3E2.0.CO;2- P&origin= MSN

    1983

  36. [42]

    S. G. Rajeev.A Condensation of interacting bosons in two-dimensional space. In: (May 1999). arXiv:hep-th/9905120

    1999 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Timo Seppäläinen.Scaling for a one-dimensional directed polymer with boundary conditions. In:Ann. Probab.40.1 (2012), pp. 19–73.issn: 0091-1798,2168-894X.doi:10 . 1214 / 10 - AOP617.url:https://doi.org/10.1214/10-AOP617

    2012 doi

  38. [45]

    In: Stoch

    Ran Tao.Gaussian fluctuations of a nonlinear stochastic heat equation in dimension two. In: Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.12.1 (2024), pp. 220–246.issn: 2194-0401,2194-041X. doi:10.1007/s40072-022-00282-6.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072- 022-00282-6

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    In:Probab

    Vincent Vargas.Strong localization and macroscopic atoms for directed polymers. In:Probab. Theory Related Fields138.3-4 (2007), pp. 391–410.issn: 0178-8051,1432-2064.doi:10.1007/ s00440-006-0030-5.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-006-0030-5

    2007 doi

  40. [48]

    An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations

    John B. Walsh. “An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations”. In:École d’été de probabilités de Saint-Flour, XIV—1984. Vol. 1180. Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, Berlin, 1986, pp. 265–439.isbn: 3-540-16441-3.doi:10.1007/BFb0074920.url:https://doi. org/10.1007...

    1984 doi

  41. [49]

    In:Stochastic Process

    Nikos Zygouras.Directed polymers in a random environment: a review of the phase transi- tions. In:Stochastic Process. Appl.177 (2024), Paper No. 104431, 34.issn: 0304-4149,1879- 209X.doi:10.1016/j.spa.2024.104431.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. spa.2024.104431

    2024

  42. [50]

    In:Probab

    Nikos Zygouras.Some algebraic structures in KPZ universality. In:Probab. Surv.19 (2022), pp. 590–700.issn: 1549-5787.doi:10.1214/19- ps335.url:https://doi.org/10. 1214/19-ps335. 61

    2022 doi

  43. [2016]

    xv+199.isbn: 978-3-319-50486-5; 978-3-319-50487-2.doi: 10.1007/978- 3- 319- 50487- 2.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 319- 50487-2

    Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. xv+199.isbn: 978-3-319-50486-5; 978-3-319-50487-2.doi: 10.1007/978- 3- 319- 50487- 2.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 319- 50487-2

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.