REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 265 references
LIGO A$^\sharp$: Detector Design and Science Prospects Beyond A+
T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The LIGO A♯ upgrade would roughly double gravitational-wave sensitivity beyond A+ and multiply compact-binary detection rates by four to eight, while adding minutes of neutron-star early warning.
desk verdict A thorough, transparent A# design study whose headline science is conditional on coating-thermal-noise R&D the paper itself flags as undemonstrated; worth serious refereeing despite that. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the A♯ noise budget, a frequency-separated budget of strain noise in which each band is assigned a specific engineering fix. Below 50 Hz the fix is a heavier 105 kg test mass, higher-stress fused-silica suspension fibers, lower-noise local interferometric sensors, upgraded seismic isolation, and a factor-of-two suppression of Rayleigh-wave Newtonian noise; from 50 to 300 Hz the fix is lower coating thermal noise, with a baseline target of half the Advanced LIGO level and an optimistic target of a quarter; above 300 Hz the fix is 1.5 MW arm power, 10 dB observed squeezing, and reduced optical loss. The wideband variant changes the signal-recycling mirror to broaden the high-frequency bandwidth to 3.4 kHz at the cost of mid-band sensitivity, and all projections are evaluated through this strain-noise-versus-frequency machinery plus population models that convert sensitivity into detection rates.
What would settle it
Run a direct measurement campaign on full-scale optics: take a 300 mm GaAs/AlGaAs coating through bonding onto a 105 kg fused-silica test mass and measure its mechanical loss and optical absorption at 1064 nm; if the loss is not low enough to reach the assumed factor-of-four reduction, or if the titania-germania coating cannot deliver the factor-of-two on both input and end masses, then the mid-band sensitivity curves and all forecasts resting on them must be revised downward.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the A♯ design—an upgrade package built around the existing 4 km facilities and room-temperature fused-silica technology—would approximately double the broadband strain sensitivity of LIGO relative to the projected A+ performance. Using the merger rates inferred from the first part of the fourth observing run, the paper projects that annual detection rates for binary mergers increase by roughly a factor of four to eight over A+, with the exact factor depending on the upgrade scenario. The paper further claims that the improved low-frequency sensitivity is what enables the headline multi-messenger gains: a 1.4+1.4 solar-mass binary neutron star at about 130 Mpc would be detectable roughly six to seven minutes before merger, compared with about 1.6 minutes for A+, and the number of neutron-star events localized to better than 100 square degrees would roughly double or triple. Because the gain is broadband, the same upgrade simultaneously improves measurements of black-hole populations, higher-order modes, intermediate-mass black holes, ringdowns, the neutron-star equation of state, continuous waves, and the stochastic background.
Load-bearing premise
The projections rest on the assumption that the mirror coatings can be made much quieter—half today's coating-induced thermal noise in the baseline design and a quarter in the optimistic design—even though no demonstrated path exists for the baseline amorphous coatings beyond the half level, and the quarter level requires 300 mm crystalline coatings that have not yet been made at that size.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Compact-binary catalogs grow by a factor of four to eight, yielding roughly 2,800 black-hole, 120 neutron-star–black-hole, and 69 binary-neutron-star detections per year in the baseline configuration, with the optimistic configuration reaching about 6,600 black-hole and 210 binary-neutron-star events per year.
- Low-frequency improvements move binary-neutron-star early warning from about 1.6 minutes (A+) to about 6–7 minutes for a 1.4+1.4 solar-mass system at z=0.03, and raise the number of events localized to better than 100 square degrees from roughly 14 to 26–43 per year.
- The A♯ network can measure the peak of the black-hole merger-rate redshift distribution, for example a peak near z=1.5, and roughly triple the annual number of detections with higher-order-mode SNR above 8 relative to A+ when the optimistic coatings are used.
- A♯ baseline yields a ringdown SNR of about 12 for a 20 solar-mass binary at 400 Mpc, enough for informative pure-ringdown measurements with an overtone, whereas O4 and A+ give SNRs of 3.8 and 6.0 and are largely uninformative.
- Any of the A♯ configurations provides enough sensitivity to ensure detection of the astrophysical stochastic background from compact binary mergers if it remains undetected after O5.
Reading between the lines
- If coating thermal noise stalls at the currently demonstrated 40% reduction rather than the assumed 50%, mid-band sensitivity and the equation-of-state, higher-order-mode, and detection-rate forecasts that depend on it would degrade, while the low-frequency early-warning and massive-black-hole gains would largely survive.
- The factor-of-four-to-eight rate increase is a volume-scaling projection built on O4a merger rates; if future catalogs revise local rates, the absolute event counts shift, but the relative improvement across A♯ configurations should remain close to the projected factor.
- The wideband-versus-baseline trade-off suggests a natural division of labor in a two-detector network, with one detector optimized for broadband reach and the other for kHz sensitivity, though the paper only notes the downtime cost of switching optics.
- The A♯ technology list—heavy test masses, low-loss or crystalline coatings, high power, advanced squeezing—is a de facto risk-reduction program for next-generation observatories, so even partial success on the coating front would leave a useful pathfinder role.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper presents the LIGO A♯ detector concept, a post-O5 upgrade of the LIGO observatories that retains room-temperature fused-silica technology and 1064 nm laser light. It proposes low-frequency upgrades (105 kg test masses, redesigned suspensions, improved seismic and angular sensors, factor-of-two Newtonian-noise suppression), mid-frequency coating scenarios (baseline reduction of coating thermal noise to 50% of the Advanced LIGO level, and an optimistic reduction to 25%), and high-frequency upgrades (1.5 MW arm power, 10 dB observed squeezing, and an optional wideband signal-recycling configuration). On the basis of these projected sensitivity curves, the paper forecasts a factor-of-four-to-eight increase in compact-binary detection rates relative to A+, improved BNS early warning and localization, better BBH population inference, higher-order-mode and ringdown measurements, EOS constraints, continuous-wave and stochastic-background prospects, and sensitivity to ultralight dark matter. The astrophysical forecasts are computed with standard tools (GWFish, Bilby, gwpopulation, NRSur7dq4) and are explicitly presented as conditional on the assumed sensitivity curves.
Significance. If the projected sensitivity is realized, A♯ would be a substantial scientific stepping stone between A+ and next-generation observatories, roughly doubling broadband strain sensitivity and enabling a wide range of compact-binary and multimessenger science. The paper's main strengths are its transparency and its use of standard, reproducible analysis tools: the scenarios are clearly labeled, the optimistic coating case is described as a limiting case, and the paper itself flags cases where the projected signal-to-noise ratios are marginal, notably the BNS post-merger signals in §3.3.2. The forecasts are conditional on the assumed noise curves and do not feed back into the design, so there is no circularity in the central argument. The significance is real but contingent on technology development that is unevenly mature across the three frequency bands: the low-frequency suspension and Newtonian-noise targets are backed by an engineering design, whereas the mid-frequency coating assumptions, especially the optimistic GaAs/AlGaAs scenario, are explicitly acknowledged as not yet demonstrated at the required scale.
major comments (2)
- [§2.2.1, §2.2.2, Tables 3–4, Fig. 17] The central science projections are computed from sensitivity curves in which the baseline coating thermal noise is set to 50% of the Advanced LIGO level and the optimistic scenario to 25%. However, §2.2.1 states that there is no clearly defined pathway to a significant further reduction with amorphous metal-oxide materials, and §2.2.2 lists unresolved items for the 300 mm GaAs/AlGaAs route, including diameter scale-up, sub-ppm absorption and scatter, birefringence noise, and generation-recombination noise. Because coating noise enters the total strain noise in quadrature in the 50–300 Hz band, a partial realization of the assumed reduction directly reduces the surveyed volume for BNS and low-mass BBH systems and weakens the EOS constraints that support the headline factor-of-four-to-eight rate increase. I request a sensitivity scan in which the coating-thermal-noise reduction is varied, for example 0%, 25%, 40%, and 50% relative to Advanced LIGO, with the resulting BNS and BBH ranges, annual detection counts, and tidal-deformability constraints reported for each case. Without this, the reader cannot tell how much of the advertised science is contingent on a single unproven technology.
- [§1, Table 4] The abstract and introduction state that detection rates increase by approximately a factor of four to eight relative to A+, depending on the upgrade scenario. Reduced to the median numbers in Table 4, the ratios are about 3.5 to 4 for the baseline configuration across classes and about 8 to 12 for the optimistic configuration, and the 90% credible intervals of the underlying rate estimates overlap substantially, for example the A+ BNS range of 3–61 per year versus the A♯ baseline range of 18–229 per year. The headline factor should be restated as a class- and scenario-dependent median ratio, with the rate-uncertainty caveat carried into the abstract, rather than as a single factor interval that suggests a precision the current rate measurements do not support.
minor comments (6)
- [§2.1 bullet list and §2.2.1] The A+ design is described in Section 2 as incorporating a 30% reduction in coating thermal noise, while §2.2.1 says the A+ target is now based on a 40% reduction for the end test masses and a 12% reduction for the input test masses; please reconcile these statements so the baseline A♯ improvement is unambiguously defined.
- [§3.2.2] The sentence stating that A♯ optimistic gives 'a factor-of-a-few increase in the fraction of events with detectable higher-order modes relative to the A+ or A♯ configurations without major improvements to the coating thermal noise' is ambiguous; please state explicitly which configuration is the reference and report the conditional fractions consistently for all four configurations.
- [§3.3.1] The EOS forecasts use zero-noise Bilby injections; the paper should state this assumption prominently and note that single-noise-realization credible intervals from zero-noise runs can be narrower than those obtained with realistic noise, which is relevant to the quoted 'approximately 40% improvement' in tidal-deformability constraints.
- [Table 3] The column header 'BBHz max' should be written as 'BBH z_max' for clarity.
- [§3.1.4 and §3.2.1] The simulated BNS and BBH populations both use the Madau–Dickinson star-formation model with an inverse-time-delay distribution, but the two sections quote different local rate densities (130 Gpc^-3 yr^-1 for the BNS full population and 19 Gpc^-3 yr^-1 for BBHs); please add a sentence explaining how these choices relate to the GWTC-4 rate constraints quoted in Table 4.
- [§3.3.2] The post-merger SNR analysis is a good example of honest reporting: the conclusion that A♯ baseline is unlikely to enable regular post-merger detections is clearly stated, and the wideband configuration is recommended only for exceptionally nearby events.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the science forecasts are explicit conditionals on clearly labeled sensitivity assumptions, with independent population inputs and external benchmarks.
full rationale
The paper's derivation chain is: (1) fix a set of detector parameters; (2) build strain-noise curves from physics-based component models; (3) compute detection ranges, rates, and parameter-estimation forecasts; (4) compare with A+ and O4. Each link is explicit and conditional. The coating-thermal-noise reductions are assumptions, not fitted values: Section 2.2.1 states 'we assume that the 50% reduction for titania-germania coatings suggested in Ref. [71] can be realized with further development and applied to both input and end test masses,' and Section 2.2.2 labels the optimistic case an 'optimistic limiting case' involving 300 mm GaAs/AlGaAs coatings with open items including birefringence noise and generation-recombination noise. The rate and EOS projections therefore inherit the coating assumption, but this is a documented sensitivity and risk, not a circular reduction of a prediction to its input. Population inputs come from external GWTC-4 analyses, and the paper's own injection-recovery exercises (e.g., figure 11 and figure 17) are self-consistency demonstrations rather than predictions of injected values as independent facts. Self-citations exist, notably the post-O5 study group report [13] defining the A# design, the wideband tuning reference [23], and the population-inference procedure [151], but they are contextual and corroborative; the central claims are supported by the paper's own modeling and by external benchmarks such as the A+ design curve and O4 data. No step reduces to its own input by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (5)
- Baseline coating thermal noise reduction =
50% relative to Advanced LIGO
- Optimistic coating thermal noise reduction =
75% relative to Advanced LIGO
- Observed squeezing level =
10 dB
- Arm cavity power =
1.5 MW
- Newtonian noise suppression =
6 dB (factor 2)
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption GWTC-4 merger rates and population models are correct
- domain assumption IMRPhenomXPHM and NRSur7dq4 waveform models are accurate for the simulated signals
- standard math Flat Lambda-CDM cosmology with H0=67.9 km/s/Mpc and Omega_m=0.3065
- domain assumption The design noise curves can be achieved
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of LIGO A$^\sharp$: Detector Design and Science Prospects Beyond A+." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SNZRNMDX
@misc{pith2026260811673,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: LIGO A$^\sharp$: Detector Design and Science Prospects Beyond A+},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SNZRNMDX}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11673}
}
abstract
We present the LIGO A$^\sharp$ detector concept, an upgrade for the LIGO observatories based on room-temperature interferometers beyond the fifth observing run (O5). Building on the A+ sensitivity, A$^\sharp$ targets broadband sensitivity improvements through heavier test masses, improved suspensions and seismic isolation, increased arm-cavity power, enhanced frequency-dependent squeezing, reduced coating thermal noise considering two scenarios, and improved control of mechanical motion and optical modes. We describe the principal design choices, projected noise performance, and corresponding astrophysical prospects. LIGO A$^\sharp$ substantially increases compact-binary detection rates, strengthens population inference, and improves both early-warning times and localization for binary neutron star mergers. The improved sensitivity enables more detailed studies of compact-binary coalescences, including higher-order multipoles, intermediate-mass black holes, remnant black hole ringdown, and the neutron star equation of state. It also broadens the discovery potential for new gravitational-wave sources such as continuous waves and bursts, should enable detection of the stochastic background from compact binary mergers if it remains undetected after O5, and strengthens the role of gravitational-wave detectors as probes of fundamental physics. We discuss key technical challenges and the role of A$^\sharp$ as both a major scientific upgrade for the 2030s and a technology pathfinder for next-generation gravitational-wave observatories, such as Cosmic Explorer.
Figures
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Aasi Jet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2015Classical Quantum Gravity32074001 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4547)
-
[2]
Acernese Fet al.(Virgo Collaboration) 2015Classical Quantum Gravity32024001 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3978)
-
[3]
Akutsu Tet al.(KAGRA Collaboration) 2021PTEP202105A101 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2005.05574)
arXiv 2005
-
[5]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2025arXiv e-prints(Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18082)
-
[6]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations) 2026 Gwtc-5.0: Observations from the second part of the fourth ligo-virgo-kagra observing run and updates to the gravitational-wave transient catalog (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2605.27225) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27225
arXiv 2026
-
[7]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration) 2025The Astrophysical Journal Letters995L18 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c06
-
[8]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2025 GWTC-4.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18081) URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2508.18081
arXiv 2025
-
[9]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations) 2026 Gwtc-5.0: An introduction to version 5.0 of the gravitational-wave transient catalog (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27223) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27223
arXiv 2026
Show all 265 references
-
[10]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations) 2026 Gwtc-5.0: Methods for identifying and characterizing gravitational-wave transients (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2605.27224) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27224
2026 arXiv
-
[11]
Fritschel P, Kabagoz B, Kuns K and Effler A 2025 A+/O5 strain curve projections Tech. Rep. LIGO-T2500310 LIGO URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2500310/public
2025
-
[12]
Shoemaker D, Arnaud N and Sawada T 2026 Observing Scenario Timeline Graphic, Post-O3 LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G2002127/public
2026
-
[13]
Fritschel P, Kuns K, Driggers J, Effler A, Lantz B, Ottaway D, Ballmer S, Dooley K, Adhikari R, Evans M, Farr B, Gonzalez G, Schmidt P and Raja S 2024 Report from the LSC post-O5 study group Tech. Rep. LIGO-T2200287-v3 LIGO Scientific Collaboration URL https://dcc.ligo.org/LIG...
2024
-
[15]
Evans Met al.2023 Cosmic Explorer: A submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW subcommittee (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13745)
2023 arXiv
-
[16]
Maggiore M, Broeck C V D, Bartolo N, Belgacem E, Bertacca D, Bizouard M A, Branchesi M, Clesse S, Foffa S, Garc´ ıa-Bellido J, Grimm S, Harms J, Hinderer T, Matarrese S, Palomba C, Peloso M, Ricciardone A and Sakellariadou M 2020Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics20...
-
[17]
Abac Aet al.(Einstein Telescope Collaboration) 2026Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2026081 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/081
2026 doi
-
[18]
Helmling-Cornell A 2025 O4b Reference Sensitivity Technical Note LIGO-T2500363 LIGO Scientific Collaboration
2025
-
[19]
Helmling-Cornell A 2025 O4c Reference Sensitivity Technical Note LIGO-T2500364 LIGO Scientific Collaboration
2025
-
[20]
LIGO Scientific Collaboration Post-O5 Sensitivity Curveshttps://git.ligo.org/ post-o5/sensitivity-curves
-
[21]
Express224224–4234 URLhttps://opg
Fritschel P, Evans M and Frolov V 2014Opt. Express224224–4234 URLhttps://opg. optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-22-4-4224
-
[22]
Heinze J, Danzmann K, Willke B and Vahlbruch H 2022Phys. Rev. Lett.129031101 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.031101
-
[23]
Ganapathy D, McCuller L, Graef Rollins J, Hall E D, Barsotti L and Evans M 2021Phys. Rev. D103022002 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15735)
2010 arXiv
-
[24]
Capote Eet al.2025Phys. Rev. D111(6) 062002 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.111.062002
-
[25]
Cumming A V, Bell A S, Barsotti L, Barton M A, Cagnoli G, Cook D, Cunningham L, Evans M, Hammond G D, Harry G M, Heptonstall A, Hough J, Jones R, Kumar R, Mittleman R, Robertson N A, Rowan S, Shapiro B, Strain K A, Tokmakov K, Torrie C and van Veggel A A 2012Classical and Quan...
-
[26]
Cumming A V, Sorazu B, Daw E, Hammond G D, Hough J, Jones R, Martin I W, Rowan S, Strain K A and Williams D 2020Classical and Quantum Gravity37195019 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abac42
-
[27]
Bonilla E and Lantz B 2026 Lowering the BHQS Roll Mode with Feedback from Ear Design LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/G2600209
2026
-
[28]
Cagnoli G and Willems P A 2002Phys. Rev. B65(17) 174111 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.174111
-
[29]
Cumming A V, Jones R, Hammond G D, Hough J, Martin I W and Rowan S 2022Phys. Rev. Applied17(2) 024044 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17. 024044
-
[30]
thesis University of Glasgow URLhttps://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/81461
Toland K W 2020Aspects of fused silica fibres for use in gravitational waves researchPh.D. thesis University of Glasgow URLhttps://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/81461
-
[31]
thesis University of Glasgow URLhttps://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/40954
Lee K H 2019Suspension upgrades for future gravitational wave detectorsPh.D. thesis University of Glasgow URLhttps://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/40954
-
[32]
Deshmukh V, Toland K, Hammond G, Bell A, Lacaille G, Haughian K, Cumming A, Rowan S, Hough J, Jones R and Barton M 2026 Stress Corrosion Tests of High-Stressed Fused Silica Fibres LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/T2500387
2026
-
[33]
Toland K, Barton M, Bell A, Cumming A, Deshmukh V, Hammond G, Haughian K, Hough J, Jones R, Lacaille G, Martin I and Rowan S 2026 Research Towards Current and Next Generation Suspension Systems at Glasgow LIGO Document Control Center URL https://dcc.ligo.org/G2600366 66
2026
-
[34]
Deshmukh V, Toland K, Hammond G, Bell A, Cumming A, Barton M, Lacaille G, Haughian K, Rowan S and Hough J 2025 Static Fatigue in Fused Silica Fibres LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/G2500474
2025
-
[35]
Bonilla E 2025 BHQS conceptual design (Workshop #3) LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/G2402461
2025
-
[36]
Heyns J 2024 Schematic layout and renders of A# BHQS, A# BHQS Prototype and A+ Quadruple Suspension Tech. Rep. LIGO-G2401599 LIGO URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-G2401599
2024
-
[37]
Lantz B 2024 A# Reaction Chain update LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps: //dcc.ligo.org/G2402448
2024
-
[38]
Dolesi R, Hueller M, Nicolodi D, Tombolato D, Vitale S, Wass P J, Weber W J, Evans M, Fritschel P, Weiss R, Gundlach J H, Hagedorn C A, Schlamminger S, Ciani G and Cavalleri A 2011Phys. Rev. D84(6) 063007 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.84.063007
-
[39]
Barsotti L, Evans M and Fritschel P 2010Classical and Quantum Gravity27084026 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084026
-
[40]
Sidles J A and Sigg D 2006Physics Letters A354167–172 ISSN 0375-9601 URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960106001381
-
[41]
Cooper S J, Mow-Lowry C M, Hoyland D, Bryant J, Ubhi A, O’Dell J, Huddart A, Aston S and Vecchio A 2023Review of Scientific Instruments94014502 ISSN 0034-6748 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117605
-
[42]
Roocke T 2026 QOSEM: A low noise suspension displacement sensor and actuator (Hotel Hermitage, La Biodola, Isola d’Elba: GWADW2026 - Gravitational-Wave Advanced Detector Workshop) URLhttps://agenda.infn.it/event/48986/contributions/ 293809/
2026
-
[43]
Roocke T Jet al.2026in preparation
-
[44]
Cooper S J, Collins C J, Green A C, Hoyland D, Speake C C, Freise A and Mow-Lowry C M 2018Classical and Quantum Gravity35095007 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6382/aab2e9
-
[45]
Express2314753–14762 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/oe/ abstract.cfm?URI=oe-23-11-14753
Gerberding O 2015Opt. Express2314753–14762 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/oe/ abstract.cfm?URI=oe-23-11-14753
-
[46]
Isleif K S, Heinzel G, Mehmet M and Gerberding O 2019Phys. Rev. Appl.12(3) 034025 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.034025
-
[47]
Smetana J, Walters R, Bauchinger S, Ubhi A S, Cooper S, Hoyland D, Abbott R, Baune C, Fritchel P, Gerberding O, K¨ ohnke S, Miao H, Rode S and Martynov D 2022Phys. Rev. Appl.18(3) 034040 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied. 18.034040
-
[48]
(Workshop #4) LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/G2502605
Bonilla E 2025 BHQS Parameters,Noise budgets, and other considerations. (Workshop #4) LIGO Document Control Center URLhttps://dcc.ligo.org/G2502605
2025
-
[49]
Matichard F, Lantz B, Mason K, Mittleman R, Abbott B, Abbott S, Allwine E, Barnum S, Birch J, Biscans S, Clark D, Coyne D, DeBra D, DeRosa R, Foley S, Fritschel P, Giaime J, Gray C, Grabeel G, Hanson J, Hillard M, Kissel J, Kucharczyk C, Le Roux A, Lhuillier V, Macinnis M, O’R...
-
[50]
Matichard F, Lantz B, Mason K, Mittleman R, Abbott B, Abbott S, Allwine E, Barnum S, Birch J, Biscans S, Clark D, Coyne D, DeBra D, DeRosa R, Foley S, Fritschel P, Giaime J, Gray C, Grabeel G, Hanson J, Hillard M, Kissel J, Kucharczyk C, Le Roux A, Lhuillier V, Macinnis M, O’R...
-
[51]
Yu H, Martynov D, Vitale S, Evans M, Shoemaker D, Barr B, Hammond G, Hild S, Hough J, Huttner S, Rowan S, Sorazu B, Carbone L, Freise A, Mow-Lowry C, Dooley K L, Fulda P, Grote H and Sigg D 2018Phys. Rev. Lett.120(14) 141102 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.141102
-
[52]
1063/5.0167283
Ross M P, van Dongen J, Huang Y, Zhou H, Chowdhury Y, Apple S K, Mow-Lowry C M, Mitchell A L, Holland N A, Lantz B, Bonilla E, Engl A, Pele A, Griffith D, Sanchez E, Shaw E A, Gettings C and Gundlach J 2023Review of Scientific Instruments94 094503 ISSN 0034-6748 (Preprinthttps...
-
[53]
Smetana J, Ubhi A S, Chick E, Prokhorov L, Bryant J, Dmitriev A, Gill A, Koponen L, Martynov D, Miao H, Cumming A V, Hammond G, Frolov V, Mittleman R and Fritchel P 2025Phys. Rev. Appl.23(2) 024013 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevApplied.23.024013
-
[54]
1063/5.0047069
McCann J J, Winterflood J, Ju L and Zhao C 2021Review of Scientific Instruments 92064503 ISSN 0034-6748 (Preprinthttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article-pdf/ doi/10.1063/5.0047069/15926151/064503_1_online.pdf) URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0047069
-
[55]
McCann J J, Winterflood J, Ju L and Zhao C 2019Review of Scientific Instruments90045005 (Preprinthttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088733) URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1. 5088733
-
[56]
Ubhi A S, Koponen L, Smetana J, Xia Y, Miao H, Chick E, Bryant J, Pratten G, Zhang T, Mittleman R, Fritschel P, Cumming A V, Hammond G and Martynov D 2026 Extending ground-based gravitational-wave sensitivity to 5 hz (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2602.23531) URLhttps://arxiv...
2026 arXiv
-
[57]
1063/5.0142108
Hines A, Nelson A, Zhang Y, Valdes G, Sanjuan J and Guzman F 2023Applied Physics Letters 122094101 ISSN 0003-6951 (Preprinthttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/ doi/10.1063/5.0142108/16785675/094101_1_online.pdf) URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0142108
-
[58]
Heinzel G, Wand V, Garc´ ıa A, Jennrich O, Braxmaier C, Robertson D, Middleton K, Hoyland D, R¨ udiger A, Schilling R, Johann U and Danzmann K 2004Classical and Quantum Gravity 21S581 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/5/029
-
[59]
Koehlenbeck S M, Mow-Lowry C M, Bergmann G, Kirchoff R, Koch P, K¨ uhn G, Lehmann J, Oppermann P, W¨ ohler J and Wu D S 2023Scientific Reports132388 ISSN 2045-2322 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29418-x
-
[60]
Driggers J C, Harms J and Adhikari R X 2012Phys. Rev. D86(10) 102001 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1207.0275) URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. 86.102001
-
[61]
Coughlin M W, Harms J, Driggers J, McManus D J, Mukund N, Ross M P, Slagmolen B J J and Venkateswara K 2018Phys. Rev. Lett.121(22) 221104 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.221104
-
[62]
Ophardt P, Badaracco F and Isleif K S 2026Classical and Quantum Gravity43125001 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ae76b7
-
[63]
Rading R, Badaracco F, Beis S, Isleif K S, Ophardt P, Vossius W and the WAVE Collaboration 2025 Distributed acoustic sensing for environmental monitoring, and newtonian noise mitigation:comparable sensitivity to seismometers (Preprint2507.13523) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13523
2025 arXiv
-
[64]
1063/5.0145092
Chua S S Y, Holland N A, Forsyth P W F, Kulur Ramamohan A, Zhang Y, Wright J, Shaddock D A, McClelland D E and Slagmolen B J J 2023Applied Physics Letters122 68 ISSN 0003-6951 201102 (Preprinthttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/ 10.1063/5.0145092/17496023/201102_1_5.0...
-
[65]
Granata M, Amato A, Balzarini L, Canepa M, Degallaix J, Forest D, Dolique V, Mereni L, Michel C, Pinard L, Sassolas B, Teillon J and Cagnoli G 2020Classical and Quantum Gravity37095004 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab77e9
-
[66]
Penn S D, Sneddon P H, Armandula H, Betzwieser J C, Cagnoli G, Camp J, Crooks D R M, Fejer M M, Gretarsson A M, Harry G M, Hough J, Kittelberger S E, Mortonson M J, Route R, Rowan S and Vassiliou C C 2003Classical and Quantum Gravity202917 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381...
-
[67]
Crooks D R M, Cagnoli G, Fejer M M, Gretarsson A, Harry G, Hough J, Nakagawa N, Penn S, Route R, Rowan S and Sneddon P H 2004Classical and Quantum Gravity21S1059 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/5/101
-
[68]
Harry G M, Abernathy M R, Becerra-Toledo A E, Armandula H, Black E, Dooley K, Eichenfield M, Nwabugwu C, Villar A, Crooks D R M, Cagnoli G, Hough J, How C R, MacLaren I, Murray P, Reid S, Rowan S, Sneddon P H, Fejer M M, Route R, Penn S D, Ganau P, Mackowski J M, Michel C, Pin...
-
[69]
Levin Y 1998Phys. Rev. D57(2) 659–663 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.57.659
-
[70]
Yang L, Vajente G, Fazio M, Ananyeva A, Billingsley G, Markosyan A, Bassiri R, Prasai K, Fejer M M, Chicoine M, Schiettekatte F and Menoni C S 2021Science Advances 7eabh1117 (Preprinthttps://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abh1117) URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/10....
-
[71]
Vajente G, Yang L, Davenport A, Fazio M, Ananyeva A, Zhang L, Billingsley G, Prasai K, Markosyan A, Bassiri R, Fejer M M, Chicoine M, Schiettekatte F m c and Menoni C S 2021Phys. Rev. Lett.127(7) 071101 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.127.071101
-
[72]
cfm?URI=LS-2024-JTu4A.2
Davenport A, Vajente G, Demos N, Billingsley G, Markosyan A, Bassiri R, Fejer M M, Gras S, Evans M and Menoni C S 2024 Low thermal noise tio2:geo2 and sio2 high reflector stacks for gravitational wave detectorsFrontiers in Optics+Laser Science 2024 (FiO, LS)(Optica Publishing ...
2024
-
[73]
McGhee G I, Spagnuolo V, Demos N, Tait S C, Murray P G, Chicoine M, Dabadie P, Gras S, Hough J, Iandolo G A, Johnston R, Martinez V, Patane O, Rowan S, Schiettekatte F m c, Smith J R, Terkowski L, Zhang L, Evans M, Martin I W and Steinlechner J 2023Phys. Rev. Lett.131(17) 1714...
-
[74]
Steinlechner J and Martin I W 2021Phys. Rev. D103(4) 042001 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.042001
-
[75]
Molina-Ruiz M, Markosyan A, Bassiri R, Fejer M M, Abernathy M, Metcalf T H, Liu X, Vajente G, Ananyeva A and Hellman F 2023Phys. Rev. Lett.131(25) 256902 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.256902
-
[76]
Wallace G S, Ben Yaala M, Tait S C, Vajente G, McCanny T, Clark C, Gibson D, Hough J, Martin I W, Rowan S and Reid S 2024Classical and Quantum Gravity41095005 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad35a1
-
[77]
Amato A, Bazzan M, Cagnoli G, Canepa M, Coulon M, Degallaix J, Demos N, Di Michele A, Evans M, Fabrizi F, Favaro G, Forest D, Gras S, Hofman D, Lemaˆ ıtre A, Maggioni G, Magnozzi M, Martinez V, Mereni L, Michel C, Milotti V, Montani M, Paolone A, Pereira A, Piergiovanni F, Pie...
-
[78]
Molina-Ruiz M, Zhou R, Markosyan A, Bassiri R, Fejer M M, Ananyeva A, Tait S C, Vajente G, Davenport A, Menoni C S and Hellman F 2025Phys. Rev. Mater.9(10) 105602 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/5n1c-tjhq
-
[79]
Yam W, Gras S and Evans M 2015Phys. Rev. D91(4) 042002 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042002
-
[80]
Steinlechner J, Martin I W, Hough J, Kr¨ uger C, Rowan S and Schnabel R 2015Phys. Rev. D91(4) 042001 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042001
-
[81]
Tait S C, Steinlechner J, Kinley-Hanlon M M, Murray P G, Hough J, McGhee G, Pein F, Rowan S, Schnabel R, Smith C, Terkowski L and Martin I W 2020Phys. Rev. Lett.125(1) 011102 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.011102
-
[82]
Pierro V, Avallone G, Steinlechner J, Bazzan M, Chiadini F, De Simone R, Fazio M, Granata M, Granata V, Iannone G, McGhee G, Menoni C S, Michel C and Fiumara V 2025Phys. Rev. D112(10) 102006 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/76xz-q8k1
-
[83]
Pierro V, Granata M, Michel C, Pinard L, Sassolas B, Forest D, Demos N, Gras S, Evans M, Pinto I, Avallone G and Granata V 2026Phys. Rev. Appl.25(6) 064019 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/8mhb-mmtz
-
[84]
Cole G D, Zhang W, Martin M J, Ye J and Aspelmeyer M 2013Nature Photonics7644–650 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.174
2013 doi
-
[85]
1063/5.0140663
Cole G D, Ballmer S W, Billingsley G, Cata˜ no-Lopez S B, Fejer M, Fritschel P, Gretarsson A M, Harry G M, Kedar D, Legero T, Makarem C, Penn S D, Reitze D H, Steinlechner J, Sterr U, Tanioka S, Truong G W, Ye J and Yu J 2023Applied Physics Letters122 110502 ISSN 0003-6951 (Pr...
-
[86]
Cole G, Legero T, Sterr U, Lee D, Ye J, Gretarsson A, Harry G, Penn S, Pinard L, Menoni C, Fejer M, Wittwer V, Fleisher A, Demos S and Heckl O 2026OPTICAURL https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.601572
-
[87]
Chalermsongsak T, Hall E D, Cole G D, Follman D, Seifert F, Arai K, Gustafson E K, Smith J R, Aspelmeyer M and Adhikari R X 2016Metrologia53860–868
-
[88]
Cole G D, Brunelli S S, Shi B and Klamkin J 2026 Scalable integration of AlGaAs on 200 mm Ø Si for quantum photonic circuitsIntegrated Optics: Devices, Materials, and Technologies XXXvol PC13900 ed Garc´ ıa-Blanco S M and Cheben P International Society for Optics and Photonics...
2026 doi
-
[89]
Gretarsson A M, Juston A L M, Nicolai B, Borg N, Meagher B N, Cole G D, Billingsley G, Makarem C N, Gretarsson E M, Harry G M and Penn S D 2026Phys. Rev. Res.8(1) 013103 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/xtsf-t8y4
-
[90]
Johnson A, Lim S W, Joel A, Clark A, Geen M, Wang W and Pelzel R 2023 First demonstration of high performance 940 nm vcsels grown on 200 mm diameter substrates CS MANTECH Conference(Compound Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology Conference (CS MANTECH)) available at https://c...
2023
-
[91]
Grainhttps://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/zYYNCEKLJEtklzlZ3fNflc7CMec? domain=phys.umontreal.ca/accessed: 2026-06-23
2026
-
[92]
Lee D, Hu Z Z, Lewis B, Aeppli A, Kim K, Yao Z, Legero T, Nicolodi D, Riehle F, Sterr U and Ye J 2026Phys. Rev. Lett.136(3) 033801 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/zgrm-cjbb
-
[93]
Wu B, Goswami S, Tanioka S and Ballmer S 2025 Birefringence of algaas/gaas coatings under above-band-gap illumination, gr noise and photo-optic transfer function (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00594) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00594
2025 arXiv
-
[94]
Ma C Y, Yu J, Sauer S, Legero T, Nicolodi D, Kempkes M, Herbers S, Riehle F and Sterr U 2026 Laser stabilized to a room temperature cavity with AlGaAs coatings reaching 4.2× 70 10−17 fractional frequency instability (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01406) URLhttps://arxiv.o...
2026 arXiv
-
[95]
Express2081–89 URLhttps://opg
Mullavey A J, Slagmolen B J J, Miller J, Evans M, Fritschel P, Sigg D, Waldman S J, Shaddock D A and McClelland D E 2012Opt. Express2081–89 URLhttps://opg. optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-1-81
-
[96]
Lett.495763–5766 URLhttps://opg.optica
Tanioka S, Wu B and Ballmer S W 2024Opt. Lett.495763–5766 URLhttps://opg.optica. org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-49-20-5763
-
[97]
24149) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24149
Liu J, Pan J, Blair C, Fronzo C D, Ju L, Zhao C, Chua S S Y, Slagmolen B J J, Kijbunchoo N and Ottaway D 2026 A novel arm-length stabilization scheme for gravitational- wave detectors with algaas/gaas coated mirrors (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606. 24149) URLhttps://arxiv....
2026 arXiv
-
[98]
Phys.616
Dickmann J, Sauer S, Meyer J, Gaedtke M, Siefke T, Br¨ uckner U, Plentz J and Kroker S 2023Commun. Phys.616
-
[99]
Opt.322606–2613 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-32-14-2606
Wang S S and Magnusson R 1993Appl. Opt.322606–2613 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-32-14-2606
-
[100]
Dickmann J and Kroker S 2018Phys. Rev. D98(8) 082003 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.082003
-
[101]
Kroker S, Dickmann J, Rojas Hurtado C B, Heinert D, Nawrodt R, Levin Y and Vyatchanin S P 2017Phys. Rev. D96(2) 022002 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.022002
-
[102]
Atikian H A, Sinclair N, Latawiec P, Xiong X, Meesala S, Gauthier S, Wintz D, Randi J, Bernot D, DeFrances S, Thomas J, Roman M, Durrant S, Capasso F and Lonˇ car M 2022Nature Communications13ISSN 2041-1723 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-022-30335-2
-
[103]
Martynov D, Miao H, Yang H, Vivanco F H, Thrane E, Smith R, Lasky P, East W E, Adhikari R, Bauswein A, Brooks A, Chen Y, Corbitt T, Freise A, Grote H, Levin Y, Zhao C and Vecchio A 2019Phys. Rev. D99(10) 102004 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.99.102004
-
[104]
Evans M, Adhikari R X, Afle C, Ballmer S W, Biscoveanu S, Borhanian S, Brown D A, Chen Y, Eisenstein R, Gruson A, Gupta A, Hall E D, Huxford R, Kamai B, Kashyap R, Kissel J S, Kuns K, Landry P, Lenon A, Lovelace G, McCuller L, Ng K K Y, Nitz A H, Read J, Sathyaprakash B S, Sho...
-
[105]
Express2829469–29478 URLhttps://opg
Bode N, Meylahn F and Willke B 2020Opt. Express2829469–29478 URLhttps://opg. optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-28-20-29469
-
[106]
Express2910140–10149 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI= oe-29-7-10140
Wellmann F, Bode N, Wessels P, Overmeyer L, Neumann J, Willke B and Kracht D 2021 Opt. Express2910140–10149 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI= oe-29-7-10140
2021
-
[107]
Opt.493474–3484 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-49-18-3474
Hirose E, Kawabe K, Sigg D, Adhikari R and Saulson P R 2010Appl. Opt.493474–3484 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-49-18-3474
-
[108]
Braginsky V, Strigin S and Vyatchanin S 2001Physics Letters A287331–338 ISSN 0375-9601 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960101005102
-
[109]
Evans M, Barsotti L and Fritschel P 2010Physics Letters A374665–671 ISSN 0375-9601 URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960109014558
-
[110]
Evans Met al.2015Phys. Rev. Lett.114(16) 161102 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.114.161102
-
[111]
Biscans S, Gras S, Blair C D, Driggers J, Evans M, Fritschel P, Hardwick T and Mansell G 2019Phys. Rev. D100(12) 122003 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.100.122003
-
[112]
Blair Cet al.(LSC Instrument Authors) 2017Phys. Rev. Lett.118(15) 151102 URL 71 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.151102
-
[113]
Bossilkov V, Liu J, Blair C, Zhao C and Ju L 2024Phys. Rev. D109(10) 102006 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.102006
-
[114]
Opt.604047–4063 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/ abstract.cfm?URI=ao-60-13-4047
Brooks A Fet al.2021Appl. Opt.604047–4063 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/ abstract.cfm?URI=ao-60-13-4047
-
[115]
Maga˜ na Sandoval F, Vo T, Vander-Hyde D, Sanders J R and Ballmer S W 2019Phys. Rev. D100(10) 102001 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.102001
-
[116]
Express3135068–35085 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm? URI=oe-31-21-35068
Goodwin-Jones A W, Zhu H, Blair C, Brown D D, van Heijningen J, Ju L and Zhao C 2023Opt. Express3135068–35085 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm? URI=oe-31-21-35068
-
[117]
Goodwin-Jones A W, Cabrita R, Korobko M, Beuzekom M V, Brown D D, Fafone V, Heijningen J V, Rocchi A, Schiworski M G and Tacca M 2024Optica11273–290 URL https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-11-2-273
-
[118]
Opt.558256–8265 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/ abstract.cfm?URI=ao-55-29-8256
Brooks A Fet al.2016Appl. Opt.558256–8265 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/ abstract.cfm?URI=ao-55-29-8256
-
[119]
Jaberian Hamedan V, Zhao C, Ju L, Blair C and Blair D G 2018Classical and Quantum Gravity35115006 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aabceb
-
[120]
Tao L, Bhattacharya M, Carney P, Gutierrez L M, Johnson L, Levin S, Liang C, Ma X, Padilla M, Rosauer T, Wilkin A and Richardson J W 2025Phys. Rev. Lett.134(5) 051401 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.051401
-
[121]
Rosauer T, Cao H T, Bhattacharya M, Carney P, Johnson L, Levin S, Liang C, Ma X, Gutierrez L M, Padilla M, Tao L, Wilkin A, Brooks A and Richardson J W 2025Optica121569–1577 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI= optica-12-10-1569
-
[122]
Oelker E, Mansell G, Tse M, Miller J, Matichard F, Barsotti L, Fritschel P, McClelland D E, Evans M and Mavalvala N 2016Optica3682–685 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-3-7-682
-
[123]
Ganapathy Det al.(LIGO O4 Detector Collaboration) 2023Phys. Rev. X13(4) 041021 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041021
-
[124]
Opt.579705–9713 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI= ao-57-32-9705
Genin E, Mantovani M, Pillant G, Rossi C D, Pinard L, Michel C, Gosselin M and Casanueva J 2018Appl. Opt.579705–9713 URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI= ao-57-32-9705
-
[125]
McCuller Let al.2021Phys. Rev. D104062006 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2105. 12052)
-
[126]
Kuns K and Brown D 2026 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23835)
2026 arXiv
-
[127]
Kwee P, Miller J, Isogai T, Barsotti L and Evans M 2014Phys. Rev. D90062006 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03531)
-
[128]
Express3010491–10501 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2110.00674)
Srivastava Vet al.2022Opt. Express3010491–10501 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2110.00674)
-
[129]
Cao H T, Ng S W S, Noh M, Brooks A, Matichard F and Veitch P J 2020Optics Express 2838480
-
[130]
Miao H, Smith N D and Evans M 2019Phys. Rev. X9(1) 011053 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011053
-
[131]
Astrophys.594A13 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01589)
Planck Collaboration, Ade P A Ret al.2016Astron. Astrophys.594A13 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01589)
-
[132]
Chen H Y, Holz D E, Miller J, Evans M, Vitale S and Creighton J 2021Classical and Quantum Gravity38055010 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abd594
-
[133]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2025 GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.18083) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18083
2025 arXiv
-
[134]
Branchesi Met al.2023JCAP07068 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15923) 72
-
[135]
Rel.213 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0670)
Abbott B Pet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2018Living Rev. Rel.213 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0670)
-
[136]
Madau P and Dickinson M 2014Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52415–486 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.0007)
-
[137]
Farr W M, Fishbach M, Ye J and Holz D 2019Astrophys. J. Lett.883L42 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09084)
1908 arXiv
-
[138]
J.6111005–1020 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0405233)
Gehrels N, Chincarini G, Giommi P, Mason K O, Nousek J A, Wells A A, White N E, Barthelmy S D, Burrows D N, Cominsky L Ret al.2004Astrophys. J.6111005–1020 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0405233)
-
[139]
J.702791–804 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0450)
Meegan C, Lichti G, Bhat P N, Bissaldi E, Briggs M S, Connaughton V, Diehl R, Fishman G, Greiner J, Hoover A Set al.2009Astrophys. J.702791–804 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0450)
-
[140]
Soares-Santos M, Holz D E, Annis J, Chornock R, Herner K, Berger E, Brout D, Chen H Y, Kessler R, Sako Met al.2017Astrophys. J. Lett.848L16 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1710.05459)
-
[141]
Bellm E C, Kulkarni S R, Graham M J, Dekany R, Smith R M, Riddle R, Masci F J, Helou G, Prince T A, Adams S Met al.2019Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.131018002 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01932)
1902 arXiv
-
[142]
Rubin Observatory: Telescope and Site Status Ground-Based and Airborne Telescopes VIII(Proc
Thomas S J, Barr J, Callahan S, Clements A W, Daruich F, Fabrega J, Ingraham P, Gressler W, Mu˜ noz F, Neill Det al.2020 Vera C. Rubin Observatory: Telescope and Site Status Ground-Based and Airborne Telescopes VIII(Proc. SPIEvol 11445) ed Marshall H K, Spyromilio J and Usuda ...
2020
-
[143]
Fairhurst S 2018Class. Quant. Grav.35105002 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1712. 04724)
-
[144]
Fairhurst S, Hoy C, Green R, Mills C and Usman S A 2023Phys. Rev. D108082006 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03731)
-
[145]
virgo-gw.eu/?r=25900
Rocchi A 2026 Public expected O5 Virgo ranges and sensitivity curves Virgo Technical Documentation System, VIR-0797B-25 latest release: 20 March 2026 URLhttps://tds. virgo-gw.eu/?r=25900
2026
-
[146]
Acernese Fet al.2026 Advanced virgo plus for o5 – design report overview (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20342) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20342
2026
-
[147]
Abbott B Pet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2017Phys. Rev. Lett.119161101 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05832)
-
[148]
rubin observatory: telescope and site status Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VIIIvol 11445 (SPIE) pp 68–82
Thomas S J, Barr J, Callahan S, Clements A W, Daruich F, Fabrega J, Ingraham P, Gressler W, Munoz F, Neill Det al.2020 Vera c. rubin observatory: telescope and site status Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VIIIvol 11445 (SPIE) pp 68–82
2020
-
[149]
Fishbach M, Holz D E and Farr W M 2018Astrophys. J. Lett.863L41 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1805.10270)
-
[150]
Vitale S, Farr W M, Ng K and Rodriguez C L 2019Astrophys. J. Lett.886L1 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00901)
-
[151]
Divyajyoti, Fairhurst S, Hannam M and Singh M K 2026 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2606.05151)
2026 arXiv
-
[152]
Comput.42100671 (Preprinthttps://arxiv
Dupletsa U, Harms J, Banerjee B, Branchesi M, Goncharov B, Maselli A, Oliveira A C S, Ronchini S and Tissino J 2023Astron. Comput.42100671 (Preprinthttps://arxiv. org/abs/2205.02499)
-
[153]
Open Source Softw.107753 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14143)
Talbot C, Farah A, Galaudage S, Golomb J and Tong H 2025J. Open Source Softw.107753 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14143)
-
[154]
Cutler C and Flanagan E E 1994Phys. Rev. D492658–2697 (Preprinthttps://arxiv. org/abs/gr-qc/9402014)
-
[155]
Van Den Broeck C and Sengupta A S 2007Class. Quant. Grav.241089–1114 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0610126) 73
-
[156]
Callister T, Fishbach M, Holz D and Farr W 2020Astrophys. J. Lett.896L32 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12152)
2003 arXiv
-
[157]
Abbott B Pet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2019Phys. Rev. X9031040 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1811.12907)
-
[158]
Pratten Get al.2021Phys. Rev. D103104056 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2004. 06503)
2004
-
[159]
Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os C, Colleoni M, Husa S, Estell´ es H, Pratten G, Ramos-Buades A, Mateu-Lucena M and Jaume R 2020Phys. Rev. D102064002 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2001. 10914)
2001
-
[160]
Pratten G, Husa S, Garcia-Quiros C, Colleoni M, Ramos-Buades A, Estelles H and Jaume R 2020Phys. Rev. D102064001 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11412)
2001 arXiv
-
[161]
Christodoulou D 1991Phys. Rev. Lett.671486–1489
-
[162]
Lasky P D, Thrane E, Levin Y, Blackman J and Chen Y 2016Phys. Rev. Lett.117061102 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01415)
-
[163]
Boersma O M, Nichols D A and Schmidt P 2020Phys. Rev. D101083026 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01821)
2002 arXiv
-
[164]
Mitman K, Isi M and Farr W M 2026 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27500)
2026 arXiv
-
[165]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA) 2025Astrophys. J. Lett.993L25 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08219)
-
[166]
Apostolatos T A, Cutler C, Sussman G J and Thorne K S 1994Phys. Rev. D496274–6297
-
[167]
Woosley S E and Heger A 2021Astrophys. J. Lett.912L31 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2103.07933)
-
[168]
Gerosa D and Fishbach M 2021Nature Astron.5749–760 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2105.03439)
-
[169]
Collaboration L S, Collaboration V and Collaboration K 2025 Gw231123: a binary black hole merger with total mass 190-265 msun URLhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17437902
2025 doi
-
[170]
Varma V, Field S E, Scheel M A, Blackman J, Gerosa D, Stein L C, Kidder L E and Pfeiffer H P 2019Phys. Rev. Research.1033015 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1905.09300)
1905 arXiv
-
[171]
Schmidt P, Ohme F and Hannam M 2015Phys. Rev. D91024043 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1408.1810)
-
[172]
Rodriguez C L, Chatterjee S and Rasio F A 2016Phys. Rev. D93084029 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02444)
-
[173]
Gerosa D and Berti E 2017Phys. Rev. D95124046 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 1703.06223)
-
[174]
Miller M C and Hamilton D P 2002Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.330232 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0106188)
-
[175]
J.86666 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1702
Mckernan Bet al.2018Astrophys. J.86666 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1702. 07818)
-
[176]
Teukolsky S A 1973The Astrophysical Journal185635–648
-
[177]
Berti E, Cardoso V, Carullo Get al.2025 Black hole spectroscopy: From theory to experiment (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23895)
2025 arXiv
-
[178]
Carter B 1971Phys. Rev. Lett.26331–333
-
[179]
Robinson D C 1975Phys. Rev. Lett.34905–906
-
[180]
Rel.157 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6112)
Chrusciel P T, Lopes Costa J and Heusler M 2012Living Rev. Rel.157 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6112)
-
[181]
Abac A Get al.2025Physical Review Letters135111403 ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114
-
[182]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA) 2026Phys. Rev. Lett.136041403
-
[183]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA) 2026 GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. III. Tests of the Remnants (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19021)
2026 arXiv
-
[184]
org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/24/244002
Lovelace G, Lousto C O, Healy J, Scheel M A, Garcia A, O’Shaughnessy R, Boyle M, Campanelli M, Hemberger D A, Kidder L E, Pfeiffer H P, Szil´ agyi B, Teukolsky S A 74 and Zlochower Y 2016Classical and Quantum Gravity33244002 URLhttps://doi. org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/24/244002
-
[185]
1103/gzrj-mwv3
Abac A Get al.2026Physical Review LettersISSN 1079-7114 URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1103/gzrj-mwv3
-
[186]
Ma S, Mitman K, Sun Let al.2022Physical Review D106084036 ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10870)
-
[187]
Ma S, Sun L and Chen Y 2023Physical Review Letters130141401 ISSN 0031-9007, 1079- 7114 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06705)
-
[188]
Ma S, Sun L and Chen Y 2023Physical Review D107084010 ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029
-
[189]
Lu N, Ma S, Piccinni O J, Sun L and Finch E 2025Phys. Rev. D112064047 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18560)
-
[190]
Isi M and Farr W M 2021 Analyzing black-hole ringdowns (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2107.05609) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2107.05609
2021 arXiv
-
[191]
Carullo G, Del Pozzo W and Veitch J 2019Phys. Rev. D99123029 [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 100, 089903 (2019)] (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07527)
2019 arXiv
-
[192]
Bustillo J C, Lasky P D and Thrane E 2021Physical Review D103024041 ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029
-
[193]
Ghosh A, Brito R and Buonanno A 2021Phys. Rev. D103124041 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2104.01906)
-
[194]
Finch E and Moore C J 2022Phys. Rev. D106043005 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2205.07809)
-
[195]
Wang Y F, Capano C D, Abedi J, Kastha S, Krishnan B, Nielsen A B, Nitz A H and Westerweck J 2025Phys. Rev. D112(8) 083023 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/3gqn-297f
-
[196]
Correia A, Wang Y F, Westerweck Jet al.2024 Low evidence for ringdown overtone in GW150914 when marginalizing over time and sky location uncertainty (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2312.14118)
2024 arXiv
-
[197]
Capano C D, Cabero M, Westerweck J, Abedi J, Kastha S, Nitz A H, Wang Y F, Nielsen A B and Krishnan B 2023Phys. Rev. Lett.131221402 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2105.05238)
-
[198]
Chandra K and Bustillo J C 2025 Black-hole ringdown analysis with inspiral-merger informed templates and limitations of classical spectroscopy (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2509.17315) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17315
2025
-
[199]
Chung A K W, Lam K K H and Yunes N 2025Phys. Rev. D111(12) 124052 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/g83n-rrlj
-
[200]
Flanagan E E and Hinderer T 2008Phys. Rev. D77021502 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/0709.1915)
1915 arXiv
-
[201]
Raaijmakers Get al.2019Astrophys. J. Lett.887L22 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 1912.05703)
1912 arXiv
-
[202]
Reed B T, Fattoyev F J, Horowitz C J and Piekarewicz J 2021Phys. Rev. Lett.126172503 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03193)
-
[203]
Rev.C581804–1828 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9804027)
Akmal A, Pandharipande V R and Ravenhall D G 1998Phys. Rev.C581804–1828 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/9804027)
-
[204]
Ashton Get al.2019Astrophys. J. Suppl.24127 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1811. 02042)
-
[205]
Romero-Shaw I Met al.2020Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.4993295–3319 (Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.00714)
2006 arXiv
-
[206]
Abac A, Dietrich T, Buonanno A, Steinhoff J and Ujevic M 2024Phys. Rev. D109024062 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07456)
-
[207]
Rept.6811–72 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1608
Yagi K and Yunes N 2017Phys. Rept.6811–72 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1608. 02582) 75
-
[208]
Chatziioannou K 2022Phys. Rev. D105084021 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2108. 12368)
-
[209]
Takami K, Rezzolla L and Baiotti L 2015Phys. Rev. D91(6) 064001 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.064001
-
[210]
Bauswein A, Bastian N U F, Blaschke D, Chatziioannou K, Clark J A, Fischer T, Janka H T, Just O, Oertel M and Stergioulas N 2019 Equation-of-state constraints and the QCD phase transition in the era of gravitational-wave astronomyXIAMEN-CUSTIPEN Workshop on the Equation of Sta...
2019
-
[211]
Ackley Ket al.2020Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37e047 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2007.03128)
2007
-
[212]
Dietrich T, Radice D, Bernuzzi S, Zappa F, Perego A, Br¨ ugmann B, Chaurasia S V, Dudi R, Tichy W and Ujevic M 2018Classical and Quantum Gravity3524LT01 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aaebc0
-
[213]
Rel.263 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06447)
Riles K 2023Living Rev. Rel.263 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06447)
-
[214]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2025The Astrophysical Journal98399 ISSN 1538-4357 URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/adb3a0
-
[215]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2026 Narrowband searches for continuous gravitational waves from known pulsars in the first two parts of the fourth LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA observing run (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2603.25938...
2026 arXiv
-
[216]
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration and the KAGRA Collaboration 2022Phys. Rev. D106042003 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04523)
-
[217]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2026 Searches for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Supernova Remnants in the first part of the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Fourth Observing run (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2603.25808) URLhttps:...
2026 arXiv
-
[218]
Abac A Get al.(The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration) 2026 Sub-Torque-Balance Upper Limits on Continuous Gravitational Waves from Scorpius X-1 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07765) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07765
2026 arXiv
-
[220]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2025 All-sky search for continuous gravitational-wave signals from unknown neutron stars in binary systems in the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run (Preprinthttps://ar...
2025
-
[221]
3847/1538-4357/ae225a
McGloughlin B, Martins J, Steltner B, Papa M A, Eggenstein H B, Machenschalk B, Prix R and Bensch M 2026The Astrophysical Journal997149 URLhttps://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/ae225a
-
[222]
McGloughlin B, Steltner B, Martins J, Papa M A, Eggenstein H B, Ming J, Machenschalk B, Prix R and Bensch M 2026The Astrophysical Journal998205 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2ed8
-
[223]
Astone P, D’Antonio S, Frasca S and Palomba C 2010Classical and Quantum Gravity27 194016
-
[224]
Morales J A and Horowitz C J 2022arXiv e-printsarXiv:2209.03222 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2209.03222) 76
-
[225]
Journal Lett
Woan G, Pitkin M D, Haskell B, Jones D I and Lasky P D 2018Astrophys. Journal Lett. 863L40 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02822)
-
[226]
Owen B J 2026Rev. Mod. Phys.98011002 (Preprint2512.22945)
-
[227]
Owen B J and Rajbhandari B 2025 (Preprint2512.22938)
2025
-
[228]
Astone P, Colla A, D’Antonio S, Frasca S and Palomba C 2014Phys. Rev. D90042002 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/1407.8333)
-
[229]
Palomba, Cristiano 2025 On the sensitivity of peakmap-based methods for the search of continuous gravitational wave signalshttps://tds.virgo-gw.eu/?r=25138virgo Technical Document VIR-0724B-25
2025
-
[230]
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration and the KAGRA Collaboration 2026 All-sky searches for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars in the data from the first part of the fourth ligo-virgo-kagra observing run (Preprint https://arxiv.org/...
2026
-
[231]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, KAGRA Collaboration) 2025 Upper Limits on the Isotropic Gravitational-Wave Background from the first part of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA’s fourth Observing Run (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2508.20721) URLhttps://...
2025 arXiv
-
[232]
Arvanitaki A, Dimopoulos S, Dubovsky S, Kaloper N and March-Russell J 2010Phys. Rev. D81(12) 123530 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123530
-
[233]
Arvanitaki A and Dubovsky S 2011Phys. Rev. D83(4) 044026 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044026
-
[234]
Notes Phys.906pp.1–237 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1501.06570)
Brito R, Cardoso V and Pani P 2020Lect. Notes Phys.906pp.1–237 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/1501.06570)
-
[235]
Abbott Ret al.(The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collaboration) 2022Phys. Rev. D105(10) 102001 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.102001
-
[236]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA) 2025 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2509.07352)
2025 arXiv
-
[237]
Sun L, Brito R and Isi M 2020Phys. Rev. D101(6) 063020 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063020
-
[238]
Collaviti S, Sun L, Galanis M and Baryakhtar M 2024Classical and Quantum Gravity42 025006 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad96ff
-
[239]
Arvanitaki A, Baryakhtar M and Huang X 2015Phys. Rev. D91(8) 084011 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084011
-
[240]
Ng K K Y, Vitale S, Hannuksela O A and Li T G F 2021Phys. Rev. Lett.126(15) 151102 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.151102
-
[241]
1088/1475-7516/2018/03/043
Cardoso V, ´Oscar JC Dias, Hartnett G S, Middleton M, Pani P and Santos J E 2018 Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2018043 URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1088/1475-7516/2018/03/043
2018
-
[242]
Brito R, Ghosh S, Barausse E, Berti E, Cardoso V, Dvorkin I, Klein A and Pani P 2017Phys. Rev. D96(6) 064050 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064050
-
[243]
Aswathi P S, East W E, Siemonsen N, Sun L and Jones D 2025Phys. Rev. D112(12) 123048 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/n5hr-zljn
-
[244]
Baryakhtar M, Lasenby R and Teo M 2017Phys. Rev. D96(3) 035019 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035019
-
[245]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration) 2025The Astrophysical Journal Letters993L21 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54
-
[246]
Tsukada L, Callister T, Matas A and Meyers P 2019Phys. Rev. D99(10) 103015 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103015
-
[247]
Yuan C, Jiang Y and Huang Q G 2022Phys. Rev. D106(2) 023020 URLhttps://link. 77 aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.023020
-
[248]
Tsukada L, Brito R, East W E and Siemonsen N 2021Phys. Rev. D103(8) 083005
-
[249]
Arvanitaki A, Baryakhtar M, Dimopoulos S, Dubovsky S and Lasenby R 2017Phys. Rev. D 95(4) 043001 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043001
-
[250]
Isi M, Sun L, Brito R and Melatos A 2019Phys. Rev. D99(8) 084042 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.084042
-
[251]
East W E and Pretorius F 2017Phys. Rev. Lett.119(4) 041101 URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.041101
-
[252]
East W E 2018Phys. Rev. Lett.121(13) 131104 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.121.131104
-
[253]
Jones D, Sun L, Siemonsen N, East W E, Scott S M and Wette K 2023Phys. Rev. D108(6) 064001 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064001
-
[254]
Jones D, Siemonsen N, Sun L, East W E, Miller A L, Wette K and Piccinni O J 2025 Phys. Rev. D111(6) 063028 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.111. 063028
2025 doi
-
[255]
Miller A L 2026Int. J. Mod. Phys. D352530005 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503. 02607)
-
[256]
Piccinni O J 2022Galaxies1072 ISSN 2075-4434 URLhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ galaxies10030072
-
[257]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA) 2025 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2510.27022)
2025
-
[258]
Vermeulen S, Relton P, Grote H, Raymond V, Affeldt C, Bergamin F, Bisht A, Brinkmann M, Danzmann K, Doravari S, Kringel V, Lough J, L¨ uck H, Mehmet M, Mukund Menon N, Nadji S, Schreiber E, Sorazu B, Strain K and Wittel H 2021Nature600424–428
-
[259]
G¨ ottel A S, Ejlli A, Karan K, Vermeulen S M, Aiello L, Raymond V and Grote H 2024Phys. Rev. Lett.133(10) 101001 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 133.101001
-
[260]
Aiello L, Richardson J W, Vermeulen S M, Grote H, Hogan C, Kwon O and Stoughton C 2022Phys. Rev. Lett.128(12) 121101 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.121101
-
[261]
Abbott Ret al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration) 2022Phys. Rev. D105(6) 063030 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.105.063030
-
[262]
Abac A Get al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations) 2024Phys. Rev. D 110(4) 042001 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.042001
-
[263]
Nagano K, Fujita T, Michimura Y and Obata I 2019Phys. Rev. Lett.123(11) 111301 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.111301
-
[264]
Nagano K, Nakatsuka H, Morisaki S, Fujita T, Michimura Y and Obata I 2021Phys. Rev. D104(6) 062008 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.062008
-
[265]
Manita Y, Takeda H, Aoki K, Fujita T and Mukohyama S 2024Phys. Rev. D109095012 (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10646)
-
[266]
Armaleo J M, L´ opez Nacir D and Urban F R 2021JCAP04053 (Preprinthttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2012.13997)
2012 arXiv
-
[267]
Delgado P C M, Piccinni O J and Urban F R 2026 Optimising ultra-light dark matter searches with ground-based interferometers (Preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09210) URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09210
2026 arXiv
-
[268]
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2022 SFT Data Format Version 2–3 Specification URL https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T040164/public 78
2022
Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.