Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Non-unitary Haagerup-like TQFTs and RCFTs from generalized S-fold SCFTs

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted generalized S-fold SCFTs are proposed to realize non-unitary Haagerup-like TQFTs and boundary RCFTs.

desk verdict A solid, honest extension of the S-fold program with genuinely new explicit data; the unproven simple-line completeness is the main gap, honestly flagged, and the external Haagerup-Izumi matches carry real weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11946 v1 pith:FA6S25TC submitted 2026-08-12 hep-th

Kibok Jeong , Huijoon Sohn This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords non-unitaryTQFTrationalconformalfieldtheoryS-foldSCFTHaagerup-IzumimodulardataGaloisconjugationBethevacuasimplelines3d-3dcorrespondence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Generalized S-fold SCFTs—3d N=4 rank-0 theories built from chains of $T[SU(2)]$ blocks gauged at nonzero Chern–Simons levels—are proposed to become non-unitary three-dimensional TQFTs after a topological A-twist. For the monodromy families $\varphi=LR^n$ and $\varphi=L^2R^n$, the paper gives complete sets of simple lines and derives the characters and modular $S$ matrices of the associated two-dimensional boundary RCFTs, with central charges $c=-6n+1$ and $c=-6n+2$. For the broader family $\varphi=ST^{k_1}ST^{k_2}$ with $k_1,k_2$ odd, it proposes explicit modular $S$ and $T$ matrices that satisfy the $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ relations, contain a positive row, and yield integral Verlinde fusion coefficients. For the parameter choices in Table 1, those matrices agree, up to Galois conjugation, with the generalized Haagerup-Izumi modular data $D^\omega H_{g_{2n+1}}$ previously studied axiomatically. If the proposal is right, twisted generalized S-fold SCFTs give a physical construction of those exotic modular data and of the non-unitary TQFTs and boundary RCFTs they describe.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Bethe-vacuum/HF-data dictionary for A-twisted rank-0 theories: one evaluates the squashed 3-sphere partition function in the $b^2\to 0$ saddle-point limit, and the solutions of the modified saddle equations—the Bethe vacua—each yield a Handle-gluing $H$ and Fibering $F$. These give the absolute values of the first-row $S$-matrix entries through $H^{-1}=|S_{0a}|^{-2}$ and the phases of $T$, and the vacuum-to-simple-line map fixes the full $S$ matrix. For the $\varphi=ST^{k_1}ST^{k_2}$ family with odd $k_1,k_2$, the global linear, local linear, and global square root ansätze produce the HF data; the $s=-1$ sector of the square-root ansatz reproduces the 3-sphere partition function and is identified with the residual theory $S_{\{\varphi\}}|_A$. The modular matrices are then pinned down by requiring $S^2=(ST)^3=C$, a positive row, and integral Verlinde fusion coefficients.

What would settle it

Compute the superconformal index with a general linear combination of BPS Wilson lines and check whether any operator perpendicular to the sets (3.12) or (3.17) satisfies the simple-line criterion (3.4); finding one would make the proposed modular $S$ matrices and character sets incomplete, falsifying the completeness claim. Independently, derive the full modular $S$ matrix of $S(\vec{k})|_A$ from all Bethe vacua through the vacuum-to-simple-line map (4.8); unless it factorizes with the $S_{\{\varphi\}}|_A$ block equal to (4.29), the Section 4.2 proposal is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the A-twisted generalized S-fold SCFT $S(\vec{k})$ carries non-unitary Haagerup-like modular data. For $\varphi=LR^n$ with $n\ge 2$, the operators (3.12) are proposed as a complete set of $(2n+6)$ simple lines in $T_{DGG}[\varphi]|_A$; the associated boundary RCFT has central charge $c=-6n+1$, the characters are Nahm sums whose expansions match the earlier Haagerup RCFT characters, and the modular $S$ matrix is (3.15). For $\varphi=L^2R^n$ with $n\ge 1$, the analogous complete set (3.17) of $(2n+4)$ lines gives $c=-6n+2$ and modular $S$ matrix (3.20), with half-integer powers of $q$ signaling fermionic RCFTs. For $\varphi=ST^{k_1}ST^{k_2}$ with $k_1,k_2$ odd and $p_\pm=\operatorname{tr}\varphi\pm 2$, the paper proposes the modular matrices (4.29)–(4.32) and verifies $S^2=(ST)^3=C$, $C^2=1$, the existence of a positive row, and non-negative integer fusion coefficients. After the Galois conjugation (4.33), these matrices are identified with the generalized Haagerup-Izumi data $D^\omega H_{g_{2n+1}}$ of [61] for the choices in Table 1, including $\omega=3,\,n=4$ for $(p;k_1,k_2)=(31;-3,27)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the proposed line sets in (3.12) and (3.17) are complete lists of simple lines in the A-twisted TQFT; the paper checks their orthonormality but does not prove that no other simple lines exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $\varphi=LR^n$, the proposed $(2n+6)$-line set makes the boundary RCFT data concrete: central charge $c=-6n+1$, explicit conformal weights, and a modular $S$ matrix whose $q$-series passes the modularity checks.
  • For $\varphi=L^2R^n$, the $(2n+4)$-line set yields $c=-6n+2$ and fermionic RCFT characters, because the $q$-series contain half-integer powers after the factor $q^{h-c/24}$ is removed.
  • For $\varphi=ST^{k_1}ST^{k_2}$ with odd levels, the proposed $S$ and $T$ matrices satisfy the standard consistency conditions one demands of modular data: the group relations, a positive row, and non-negative integer fusion coefficients.
  • For the parameter values in Table 1, the residual modular data of $S_{\{\varphi\}}|_A$ equal the generalized Haagerup-Izumi data $D^\omega H_{g_{2n+1}}$ up to Galois conjugation, so these SCFTs give a physical realization of data previously known only from operator-algebra constructions.
  • For odd $p_\pm$, the full TQFT factorizes as $S(\vec{k})|_A = S_{\{\varphi\}}|_A \otimes TFT[\vec{k}]$, with the decoupled unitary factor of dimension $2^n$ matching the anomaly-based prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: if the line sets (3.12) and (3.17) are complete, the corresponding Nahm-sum characters are explicit vector-valued modular forms whose $q$-series could be compared with dilogarithm identities, providing an independent arithmetic check on the bulk-boundary dictionary.
  • My inference: the Galois-conjugation identification suggests that for each pair $(k_1,k_2)$ in Table 1 there is a whole Galois orbit of RCFT data; one could test whether the full character vector transforms covariantly under the Galois group, which would confirm these are genuine RCFTs rather than only modular data.
  • My inference: the obstruction to $\operatorname{tr}\varphi$ even and to $n\ge 3$ is the lack of a suitable Bethe ansatz; finding one would extend the proposal to arbitrary $n$ and would make the modular $S$ matrix (3.20) a consistency check for the even-trace cases, as the paper notes.
  • My inference: completeness of simple lines is the sharpest testable assumption—computing the line-operator OPE or the index with all BPS line insertions would either confirm that no line is missing or expose a new primary absent from the proposed characters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFTs obtained by gauging multiple T[SU(2)] blocks, called generalized S-fold SCFTs S(k-vector), and their topologically A-twisted TQFTs. It uses two complementary descriptions: abelian Chern-Simons-matter DGG theories for φ=LR^n and L^2R^n, and duality-wall S(k-vector) theories for φ=ST^{k1}ST^{k2}...ST^{kn}. In §3 it proposes complete sets of simple lines, RCFT characters, conformal weights, central charges, and modular S matrices for the LR^n and L^2R^n families, with numerical checks of modularity. In §4, via Bethe-vacuum analysis (global linear, local linear, and global square root ansätze), it derives HF data and proposes modular S and T matrices for n=2 with odd k1,k2. For the parameter choices in Table 1 these are claimed, up to Galois conjugation, to agree with the generalized Haagerup-Izumi modular data D^ω H_{g_{2n+1}} of Evans-Gannon. The Discussion lists several open problems, including the absence of a proof that the proposed simple lines are complete and that the Bethe-vacuum ansätze exhaust the solution set.

Significance. If the main proposals hold, the paper provides a physical construction of generalized Haagerup-Izumi modular data and of associated non-unitary TQFTs and boundary RCFTs, extending earlier S-fold constructions. The strengths are the concreteness of the proposal: the modular data contain no fitted parameters, the fusion coefficients (4.28) are checked to be non-negative integers, the characters are given in closed Nahm-sum form, and the identification with the independent Evans-Gannon data [61] in Table 1 is an external benchmark. The paper is also careful to separate what is checked from what is assumed, and the Discussion explicitly flags the main open problems. However, the load-bearing completeness and exhaustiveness assumptions are not proved, and the modularity checks are numerical; the central identification is therefore conditional rather than established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.12) and (3.17)] The paper asserts that the listed line operators form a complete set of simple lines, but only the orthonormality condition (3.4) is checked. Since the modular S matrices (3.15) and (3.20) and the character set are defined on exactly this set, the completeness assertion is load-bearing: any additional simple line would change the dimension of the modular representation and the RCFT characters. The Discussion (Section 5) itself states that finding the complete set of simple lines is a highly nontrivial task. I would like to see either a proof of completeness (for example, through the Bethe-vacuum/simple-line map or an independent counting argument) or an explicit statement that the characters and S matrices are conditional on this assumption.
  2. [Section 4.1 and Appendix A] The enumeration of Bethe vacua is based on the global linear ansatz (A.7), the local linear ansatz (A.18), and the global square root ansatz (A.28), but no argument is given that every solution of the exact Bethe equations (A.3) in the ϵ→0 limit falls into one of these classes. The modular data (4.29)–(4.32) are built from exactly this inventory and are only checked against necessary conditions: the SL(2,Z) relations (4.27), a positive row, and integral fusion coefficients (4.28). These conditions do not uniquely determine modular data. If additional Bethe vacua exist in the odd-p± cases, the proposed S matrix is a truncation of the true one. The authors should either prove exhaustiveness of the ansatz classes or provide an independent check, for example by constructing the full S matrix from the Bethe-vacuum/simple-line map once the complete line set is known.
  3. [Section 4.2 and Table 1] The identification of S{φ}|A with D^ω H_{g_{2n+1}} is performed only for the specific pairs (p;k1,k2) listed in Table 1, and it is a Galois-conjugation match of data that are themselves produced by the unproven Bethe-vacuum truncation discussed above. Section 5 concedes that the proposed matrices cannot yet be checked through complete simple lines. The match is therefore a consistency test of the proposal rather than a derivation. This should be stated plainly in the main text, and the claim that the generalized S-fold SCFT realizes the Haagerup-Izumi data should be explicitly flagged as conditional on the completeness and exhaustiveness assumptions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2 heading] The heading contains a typo: 'Simplie lines' should be 'Simple lines'.
  2. [Equations (3.15), (3.20), and (4.29)] The displayed modular matrices are difficult to read in the compiled text, especially the block structures and the repeated row/column labels. Please add explicit dimension labels to each block and ensure the submatrix entries are typeset unambiguously (e.g., the entry '2a112a1D(1)' in (4.29) appears to be missing a subscript or separator).
  3. [Section 3.2] The numerical modularity checks are described only as checks 'for various values of q'. Please state the range of q, the number of terms checked, and the achieved precision, or move the details to an appendix, so that the reader can assess the strength of the numerical evidence.
  4. [Equations (3.13) and (3.18)] The lists of conformal weights should be explicitly matched, element by element, to the line operators in (3.12) and (3.17); the current notation with ranges and repeated entries is ambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No constructional circularity: the proposed modular data are parameter-free and are checked against external Evans–Gannon Haagerup data; unproven completeness of simple lines is a gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. In Section 3.2, the line sets (3.12) and (3.17) are explicitly proposed, not derived from the target characters, and are required only to satisfy the orthonormality condition (3.4). The resulting q-series are checked against the independent earlier characters of [21], and the modular S matrices (3.15), (3.20) are checked against the modularity condition (3.11). No constants are fitted to the target data. In Section 4.2, the modular matrices (4.29)–(4.32) are proposed from the Bethe-vacuum HF data plus physical consistency conditions (4.27), a positive row, and integral fusion coefficients (4.28); the parameters are fixed integer labels k1, k2, p±, and the comparison with the generalized Haagerup–Izumi modular data of [61] through Galois conjugation (4.33) is an external benchmark, not a fit. The main weaknesses are genuine gaps rather than circularity: the completeness of the proposed simple-line sets is not proven, and the three Bethe-vacuum ansätze in Appendix A are not shown to exhaust all solutions of (A.3). The paper itself concedes this: 'Identifying the complete set of simple lines of the S(k) theory would allow us to check whether the modular matrices proposed in section 4.2 are correct.' That is an admission of an unverified truncation, not a demonstration that the output was inserted as input. The only author-overlap citation is [3] (Jeong and Lee) for the global linear ansatz; this is a calculational tool imported from prior work, used with independent consistency checks (the direct partition-function integral in Appendix B and the external match to [61]), so it is not load-bearing in the sense of forcing the claimed identification. Overall, no step satisfies the standard of quoted equation-level reduction, and the paper's derivation chain is self-contained enough that the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No continuous or hand-fitted constants appear in the central results; the entries of S and T are fixed by the integer labels n, k1, k2, p+/-. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced: the generalized S-fold SCFTs are built from repeated T[SU(2)] blocks and SU(2) gauging, and the decoupled TFT[k-vector] is inherited from the earlier S-fold framework. The main epistemic cost lies in the domain assumptions and in the unproven exhaustiveness of the ansatze.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption 3d-3d correspondence: T[M3] from 6d A1 (2,0) theory compactified on M3 has IR fixed point T[Sigma_{1,1} x_phi S1].
    Used in Section 2 to identify the two UV descriptions, TDGG[phi] and S(k-vector), with the same IR SCFT up to a decoupled unitary TQFT.
  • domain assumption DGG ideal triangulation yields abelian Chern-Simons-matter theories with the stated level matrices (2.8), (2.12) and superpotentials.
    Section 2.1. The characters and conformal weights in Section 3 are computed from these abelian descriptions.
  • domain assumption Topological A-twist of an N=4 rank-0 SCFT defines a generally non-unitary TQFT, and BPS lines flow to simple lines.
    Section 3.1-3.2, based on [2,20,25,39]. This is the mechanism that turns the physical SCFT into the TQFT whose modular data are extracted.
  • domain assumption Bulk-boundary correspondence: simple lines of the bulk TQFT map to chiral primaries of a boundary RCFT, and the half-index (3.7) computes characters via (3.8).
    Section 3.2, used to derive the character formulas (3.9)-(3.14) and (3.19).
  • domain assumption Bethe/Gauge dictionary: HF data from Bethe vacua give |S0a| and Taa; with the Bethe vacuum-simple line map, the full S matrix is S_ab = zeta O_b[Va].
    Section 4.1, eqs (4.7)-(4.8), following [2]. This is how modular matrices in Section 4 are proposed.
  • ad hoc to paper The global linear, local linear, and global square root ansatze exhaust the Bethe vacua of S(k-vector)|A in the epsilon to 0 limit for odd k1,k2.
    Appendix A and Section 4.1. The paper gives no proof of exhaustiveness and notes in Section 5 that even tr(phi) cases remain unsolved.
  • domain assumption The decoupled unitary TQFT TFT[k-vector] factorizes from S{phi}|A, with dimension 2^n when p+/- is odd.
    Section 2.2, eqs (2.19)-(2.21) and (4.24). The factorization (4.26) of modular matrices relies on this.
  • standard math Modular matrices must satisfy S^2 = (ST)^3 = C, C^2 = 1, contain a positive row, and give integer non-negative fusion coefficients via (4.28).
    Section 4.2, eqs (4.27)-(4.28). These constraints are used to pin down the proposed S and T matrices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-unitary Haagerup-like TQFTs and RCFTs from generalized S-fold SCFTs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FA6S25TC

@misc{pith2026260811946,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-unitary Haagerup-like TQFTs and RCFTs from generalized S-fold SCFTs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FA6S25TC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11946}
}
abstract

Building on earlier work by Gang, Kim, and Lee, we extend the known class of 3-dimensional non-unitary topological quantum field theories (TQFTs) and 2-dimensional non-unitary rational conformal field theories (RCFTs). The TQFTs are obtained by applying topological twist to generalized S-fold superconformal field theories (SCFTs). They are related to the RCFTs through the bulk-boundary correspondence. For certain families, we propose simple lines in the TQFTs, together with expressions for the characters and modular $S$ matrices of their associated boundary RCFTs. For broader family, we propose modular $S$ and $T$ matrices for the TQFTs. For particular members of this family, the resulting modular matrices are identified with the generalized Haagerup-Izumi modular matrices up to Galois conjugation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 3d $\mathcal{N}=$ 4 rank-0 SCFT from punctured lens space

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Gang-Kim-Stubbs rank-0 SCFT is derived from the Dimofte-Gaiotto-Gukov construction on a punctured lens space, and a new family of theories plus a self-mirror conjecture are proposed from other lens spaces.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [21]

    D. Gang, D. Kim and S. Lee,A non-unitary bulk-boundary correspondence: Non-unitary Haagerup RCFTs from S-fold SCFTs,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 064 [2310.14877]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [61]

    Evans and T

    D.E. Evans and T. Gannon,The exoticness and realisability of twisted Haagerup-Izumi modular data,Commun. Math. Phys.307(2011) 463 [1006.1326]

    arXiv 2011

  3. [1]

    Closset, A

    C. Closset, A. Keyes and S. Kim,Three-dimensional TQFTs from Argyres–Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence,2607.20308

    arXiv

  4. [2]

    D. Gang, S. Kim, K. Lee, M. Shim and M. Yamazaki,Non-unitary TQFTs from 3DN= 4 rank 0 SCFTs,JHEP08(2021) 158 [2103.09283]. – 30 –

    arXiv 2021

  5. [3]

    Jeong and S

    K. Jeong and S. Lee,QFT Realization of Non-Unitarysl(2,C)WRT Invariants and Their Galois Conjugations,2511.16380

    arXiv

  6. [4]

    D. Gang, H. Kim, B. Park and S. Stubbs,Three dimensional topological field theories and Nahm sum formulas,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 128 [2411.06081]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [5]

    D. Gang, H. Kim and S. Stubbs,Three-Dimensional Topological Field Theories and Nonunitary Minimal Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 131601 [2310.09080]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [6]

    Kim and S

    M. Kim and S. Kim,3D TFTs and boundary VOAs from BPS spectra of(G,G ′) Argyres-Douglas theories,JHEP05(2026) 203 [2511.23194]

    arXiv 2026

Show all 88 references
  1. [7]

    B. Go, Q. Jia, H. Kim and S. Kim,From BPS spectra of Argyres-Douglas theories to families of 3d TFTs,JHEP08(2025) 012 [2502.15133]

    2025 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Atiyah,Topological quantum field theories,Inst

    M. Atiyah,Topological quantum field theories,Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math.68 (1989) 175

    1989

  3. [9]

    Reshetikhin and V.G

    N.Y. Reshetikhin and V.G. Turaev,Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups,Commun. Math. Phys.127(1990) 1

    1990

  4. [10]

    Reshetikhin and V.G

    N. Reshetikhin and V.G. Turaev,Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,Invent. Math.103(1991) 547

    1991

  5. [11]

    Turaev,Quantum invariants of knots and three manifolds, vol

    V.G. Turaev,Quantum invariants of knots and three manifolds, vol. 18 (1994)

    1994

  6. [12]

    Gang and M

    D. Gang and M. Yamazaki,Three-dimensional gauge theories with supersymmetry enhancement,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 121701 [1806.07714]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Creutzig, N

    T. Creutzig, N. Garner and H. Kim,Mirror symmetry and level-rank duality for 3dN= 4 rank 0 SCFTs,Lett. Math. Phys.115(2025) 123 [2406.00138]

    2025

  8. [14]

    Arabi Ardehali, M

    A. Arabi Ardehali, M. Dedushenko, D. Gang and M. Litvinov,Bridging 4D QFTs and 2D VOAs via 3D high-temperature EFTs,JHEP02(2026) 038 [2409.18130]

    2026 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Creutzig, N

    T. Creutzig, N. Garner, B. Go and H. Kim,W-algebras of the Deligne-Cvitanovi´ c Exceptional series and the minimal 3dN= 4SCFT,2603.17394

  10. [16]

    Baek and D

    S. Baek and D. Gang,3D bulk field theories for 2D non-unitaryN= 1 supersymmetric minimal models,JHEP01(2025) 027 [2405.05746]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Gukov, P.-S

    S. Gukov, P.-S. Hsin, H. Nakajima, S. Park, D. Pei and N. Sopenko,Rozansky-Witten geometry of Coulomb branches and logarithmic knot invariants,J. Geom. Phys.168(2021) 104311 [2005.05347]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Garner,Vertex operator algebras and topologically twisted Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP08(2023) 025 [2204.02991]

    N. Garner,Vertex operator algebras and topologically twisted Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP08(2023) 025 [2204.02991]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Creutzig, T

    T. Creutzig, T. Dimofte, N. Garner and N. Geer,A QFT for non-semisimple TQFT,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.28(2024) 161 [2112.01559]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Rozansky and E

    L. Rozansky and E. Witten,HyperKahler geometry and invariants of three manifolds,Selecta Math.3(1997) 401 [hep-th/9612216]

    1997 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Ferrari, N

    A.E.V. Ferrari, N. Garner and H. Kim,Boundary vertex algebras for 3dN= 4rank-0 SCFTs,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 057 [2311.05087]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Dedushenko,On the 4d/3d/2d view of the SCFT/VOA correspondence,2312.17747

    M. Dedushenko,On the 4d/3d/2d view of the SCFT/VOA correspondence,2312.17747. – 31 –

    arXiv

  17. [24]

    D. Gang, B. Park and H. Sohn,Torus Knots and Minimal Models Revisited : Rational VOA characters from non-hyperbolic knots,2512.23122

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121 (1989) 351

    1989

  19. [26]

    Mathur, S

    S.D. Mathur, S. Mukhi and A. Sen,On the Classification of Rational Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Lett. B213(1988) 303

    1988

  20. [27]

    Zhu,Modular invariance of characters of vertex operator algebras,J

    Y. Zhu,Modular invariance of characters of vertex operator algebras,J. Am. Math. Soc.9 (1996) 237

    1996

  21. [28]

    Chandra and S

    A.R. Chandra and S. Mukhi,Towards a Classification of Two-Character Rational Conformal Field Theories,JHEP04(2019) 153 [1810.09472]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [29]

    S. Mukhi,Classification of RCFT from Holomorphic Modular Bootstrap: A Status Report, in Pollica Summer Workshop 2019: Mathematical and Geometric Tools for Conformal Field Theories, 10, 2019 [1910.02973]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Z. Duan, K. Lee and K. Sun,Hecke relations, cosets and the classification of 2d RCFTs, JHEP09(2022) 202 [2206.07478]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee and L. Li,On classification of fermionic rational conformal field theories,JHEP02(2023) 079 [2210.06805]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Kim,The Complete superconformal index for N=6 Chern-Simons theory,Nucl

    S. Kim,The Complete superconformal index for N=6 Chern-Simons theory,Nucl. Phys. B 821(2009) 241 [0903.4172]

    2009 arXiv

  26. [33]

    N. Hama, K. Hosomichi and S. Lee,Notes on SUSY Gauge Theories on Three-Sphere,JHEP 03(2011) 127 [1012.3512]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [34]

    N. Hama, K. Hosomichi and S. Lee,SUSY Gauge Theories on Squashed Three-Spheres, JHEP05(2011) 014 [1102.4716]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Benini and A

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni,A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories,JHEP07(2015) 127 [1504.03698]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Pestun et al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories,J

    V. Pestun et al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories,J. Phys. A50(2017) 440301 [1608.02952]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and N.M. Paquette,Dual boundary conditions in 3d SCFT’s,JHEP 05(2018) 060 [1712.07654]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Gang,Chern-Simons Theory onL(p,q)Lens Spaces and Localization,J

    D. Gang,Chern-Simons Theory onL(p,q)Lens Spaces and Localization,J. Korean Phys. Soc.74(2019) 1119 [0912.4664]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Gang and D

    D. Gang and D. Kim,Generalized non-unitary Haagerup-Izumi modular data from 3D S-fold SCFTs,JHEP03(2023) 185 [2211.13561]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Assel and A

    B. Assel and A. Tomasiello,Holographic duals of 3d S-fold CFTs,JHEP06(2018) 019 [1804.06419]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Garozzo, G

    I. Garozzo, G. Lo Monaco and N. Mekareeya,The moduli spaces ofS-fold CFTs,JHEP01 (2019) 046 [1810.12323]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Garozzo, G

    I. Garozzo, G. Lo Monaco, N. Mekareeya and M. Sacchi,Supersymmetric Indices of 3d S-fold SCFTs,JHEP08(2019) 008 [1905.07183]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Garozzo, G

    I. Garozzo, G. Lo Monaco and N. Mekareeya,Variations onS-fold CFTs,JHEP03(2019) 171 [1901.10493]. – 32 –

    2019 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Beratto, N

    E. Beratto, N. Mekareeya and M. Sacchi,Marginal operators and supersymmetry enhancement in 3dS-fold SCFTs,JHEP12(2020) 017 [2009.10123]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Arav, J.P

    I. Arav, J.P. Gauntlett, M.M. Roberts and C. Rosen,Marginal deformations and RG flows for type IIB S-folds,JHEP07(2021) 151 [2103.15201]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Bobev, F.F

    N. Bobev, F.F. Gautason and J. van Muiden,The holographic conformal manifold of 3dN= 2 S-fold SCFTs,JHEP07(2021) 221 [2104.00977]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Bobev, F.F

    N. Bobev, F.F. Gautason and J. van Muiden,The conformal manifold of S-folds in string theory,JHEP03(2024) 167 [2312.13370]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Imamura, M

    Y. Imamura, M. Inoue and A. Sei,Line operator indices of S-fold theories,2607.29067

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten,S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13(2009) 721 [0807.3720]

    2009 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Terashima and M

    Y. Terashima and M. Yamazaki,SL(2,R) Chern-Simons, Liouville, and Gauge Theory on Duality Walls,JHEP08(2011) 135 [1103.5748]

    2011 arXiv

  44. [51]

    S. Choi, D. Gang and N. Kim,Black holes and large N complex saddles in 3D-3D correspondence,JHEP06(2021) 078 [2012.10944]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Gang and K

    D. Gang and K. Yonekura,Symmetry enhancement and closing of knots in 3d/3d correspondence,JHEP07(2018) 145 [1803.04009]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Baek and H

    S. Baek and H. Kang,Non-hyperbolic 3-manifolds and bulk field theories for supersymmetric/WN minimal models,JHEP03(2026) 066 [2511.04524]

    2026

  47. [54]

    D. Gang, H. Kang and S. Kim,Non-hyperbolic 3-manifolds and 3D field theories for 2D Virasoro minimal models,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 075 [2405.16377]

    2026

  48. [55]

    D. Gang, K. Jeong, T. Kim and S. Lee,Refined 3D index,2604.17449

    arXiv

  49. [56]

    S. Choi, D. Gang and H.-C. Kim,Infrared phases of 3D class R theories,JHEP11(2022) 151 [2206.11982]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,3-Manifolds and 3d Indices,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17(2013) 975 [1112.5179]

    2013 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys.325(2014) 367 [1108.4389]

    2014 arXiv

  52. [59]

    D. Gang, E. Koh, S. Lee and J. Park,Superconformal Index and 3d-3d Correspondence for Mapping Cylinder/Torus,JHEP01(2014) 063 [1305.0937]

    2014 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Asaeda and U

    M. Asaeda and U. Haagerup,Exotic subfactors of finite depth with jones indices(5 + √ 13)/2 and(5 + √ 17)/2,Communications in Mathematical Physics202(1999) 1–63

    1999

  54. [62]

    Evans and T

    D.E. Evans and T. Gannon,Non-unitary fusion categories and their doubles via endomorphisms,Adv. Math.310(2017) 1 [1506.03546]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Izumi,The structure of sectors associated with Longo-Rehren inclusions

    M. Izumi,The structure of sectors associated with Longo-Rehren inclusions. I: General theory,Commun. Math. Phys.213(2000) 127

    2000

  56. [64]

    Gu´ eritaud,On canonical triangulations of once-punctured torus bundles and two-bridge link complements,Geometry & Topology10(2006) 1239–1284

    F. Gu´ eritaud,On canonical triangulations of once-punctured torus bundles and two-bridge link complements,Geometry & Topology10(2006) 1239–1284. – 33 –

    2006

  57. [65]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten,Supersymmetric Boundary Conditions in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,J. Statist. Phys.135(2009) 789 [0804.2902]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten,Janus Configurations, Chern-Simons Couplings, And The theta-Angle in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,JHEP06(2010) 097 [0804.2907]

    2010 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Hsin, H.T

    P.-S. Hsin, H.T. Lam and N. Seiberg,Comments on One-Form Global Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d,SciPost Phys.6(2019) 039 [1812.04716]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Jafferis,The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,JHEP05(2012) 159 [1012.3210]

    D.L. Jafferis,The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,JHEP05(2012) 159 [1012.3210]

    2012 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Dijkgraaf and E

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

    1990

  62. [70]

    Kapustin, B

    A. Kapustin, B. Willett and I. Yaakov,Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter,JHEP03(2010) 089 [0909.4559]

    2010 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Three-dimensionalN= 2 supersymmetric gauge theories and partition functions on Seifert manifolds: A review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34(2019) 1930011 [1908.08875]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Zagier,The Dilogarithm Function, inLes Houches School of Physics: Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics and Geometry, pp

    D. Zagier,The Dilogarithm Function, inLes Houches School of Physics: Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics and Geometry, pp. 3–65, 2007, DOI

    2007

  65. [73]

    W. Nahm, A. Recknagel and M. Terhoeven,Dilogarithm identities in conformal field theory, Mod. Phys. Lett. A8(1993) 1835 [hep-th/9211034]

    1993 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Nahm,Conformal field theory, dilogarithms, and three-dimensional manifolds,Adv

    W. Nahm,Conformal field theory, dilogarithms, and three-dimensional manifolds,Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras4(1994) 179

    1994

  67. [75]

    Nahm,Conformal field theory and torsion elements of the Bloch group, inLes Houches School of Physics: Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics and Geometry, pp

    W. Nahm,Conformal field theory and torsion elements of the Bloch group, inLes Houches School of Physics: Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics and Geometry, pp. 67–132, 2007, DOI [hep-th/0404120]

    2007 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Berkovich and B.M

    A. Berkovich and B.M. McCoy,Continued fractions and Fermionic representations for characters of M(p,p-prime) minimal models,Lett. Math. Phys.37(1996) 49 [hep-th/9412030]

    1996 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Yoshida and K

    Y. Yoshida and K. Sugiyama,Localization of three-dimensionalN= 2supersymmetric theories onS 1×D 2,PTEP2020(2020) 113B02 [1409.6713]

    2020 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Cho, H.-c

    G.Y. Cho, H.-c. Kim, D. Seo and M. You,Classification of fermionic topological orders from congruence representations,Phys. Rev. B108(2023) 115103 [2210.03681]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Nekrasov and S.L

    N.A. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili,Bethe/Gauge correspondence on curved spaces,JHEP 01(2015) 100 [1405.6046]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Wen,A theory of 2+1D bosonic topological orders,Natl

    X.-G. Wen,A theory of 2+1D bosonic topological orders,Natl. Sci. Rev.3(2016) 68 [1506.05768]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Gannon,Comments on nonunitary conformal field theories,Nucl

    T. Gannon,Comments on nonunitary conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B670(2003) 335 [hep-th/0305070]

    2003 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Verlinde,Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory, Nucl

    E.P. Verlinde,Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 360

    1988

  75. [83]

    Harvey and Y

    J.A. Harvey and Y. Wu,Hecke Relations in Rational Conformal Field Theory,JHEP09 (2018) 032 [1804.06860]. – 34 –

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Bantay and T

    P. Bantay and T. Gannon,Conformal characters and the modular representation,JHEP02 (2006) 005 [hep-th/0512011]

    2006 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Bantay and T

    P. Bantay and T. Gannon,Vector-valued modular functions for the modular group and the hypergeometric equation,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1(2007) 651

    2007

  78. [86]

    Gannon,The theory of vector-modular forms for the modular group,Contrib

    T. Gannon,The theory of vector-modular forms for the modular group,Contrib. Math. Comput. Sci.8(2014) 247 [1310.4458]

    2014 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Cheng, T

    M.C.N. Cheng, T. Gannon and G. Lockhart,Modular Exercises for Four-Point Blocks - I, SIGMA21(2025) 013 [2002.11125]

    2025 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Faddeev and R.M

    L.D. Faddeev and R.M. Kashaev,Quantum Dilogarithm,Mod. Phys. Lett. A9(1994) 427 [hep-th/9310070]. – 35 –

    1994 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.