Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Three-dimensional TQFTs from Argyres--Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted circle reduction of Argyres–Douglas theories is captured by an abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory on a lens space, with the choice of conical edge deciding whether the infrared is a non-unitary TQFT or a rank-0 3d N=4 SCFT.

desk verdict A strong, mostly credible construction paper: the TQFT branch is thoroughly checked, while the general SCFT branch leans on geometry plus a thinner dynamical test. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20308 v1 pith:DWWWLWCF submitted 2026-07-22 hep-th

Cyril Closset , Adam Keyes , Sungjoon Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T6081T4557K16 PACS 11.25.Hf11.30.Pb
keywords Argyres-Douglastheory3d/3dcorrespondenceDimofte-Gaiotto-Gukovconstructionlensspacerank-0SCFTnon-unitaryTQFTvertexoperatoralgebratwistedcirclereduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the twisted dimensional reduction of the (A1, A2n) Argyres–Douglas theory is exactly described by a 3d abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory constructed from a lens space L(2n+3, 2k), with the triangulation of that lens space dictated by the 4d BPS spectrum. The same DGG theory flows to two very different infrared phases depending on the superpotential: keeping all monopole terms gives a non-unitary 3d TQFT (the A-twist), while dropping exactly one term — the one associated with an internal edge isotopic to the core circle — gives the non-trivial 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT. The geometric location of the conical singularity on the triangulation therefore predicts the infrared phase, and for k=±(n+1) the SCFT degenerates into a unitary TQFT. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a concrete, testable 3d/3d mechanism that ties the elusive rank-0 SCFTs and their boundary vertex operator algebras directly to the BPS geometry of 4d SCFTs.

What carries the argument

The central object is the DGG abelian Chern–Simons-matter (ACSM) theory T[M_3^{(k)}] associated to a triangulated lens space M_3^{(k)} = L(2n+3, 2k). The triangulation is produced by foliating the Gaiotto curve over the circle with twist k, one tetrahedron per BPS flip, and the ACSM data (CS level matrix K, chiral matter, and monopole superpotential) is read off from the Neumann–Zagier matrices of the gluing. The load-bearing identity is the isotopy condition s_I = ±2k (mod 2n+3) between an internal edge C_I of the triangulation and the core circle C_0 of the Heegaard splitting: this condition alone selects whether removing one superpotential term lands on the rank-0 SCFT or on a torus-knot-

What would settle it

For a specific (n,k) not already checked (e.g. n=3, k=2), compute the Heegaard splitting of the triangulated manifold M_3^{(k)} given by the paper's explicit gluing rules: if M_3^{(k)} minus a tubular neighbourhood of the edge with s_I = ±2k is not a solid torus, or if the three-manifold itself is not isometric to L(2n+3, 2k) as a triangulated manifold, the central claim is false. A field-theoretic falsifier would be to compute the superconformal index of the ACSM theory with one superpotential term dropped for that edge and find a result inconsistent with the known index of the Gang–Yamazaki

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the twisted circle reduction of the (A1, A2n) Argyres–Douglas theory, with U(1)_r holonomy e^{πik}, produces a 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT that is the infrared fixed point of the DGG abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory T[M_3^{(k)}] for the lens space M_3^{(k)} = L(2n+3, 2k). The triangulation of M_3^{(k)} is built from 4n|k| tetrahedra, one per BPS flip in the minimal chamber, and the same ACSM data with maximal monopole superpotential flows to the non-unitary TQFT T_A[M_3^{(k)}]. The paper's key geometric insight is that whether the unavoidable conical singularity sits at the external edge C_∞ or at an internal edge C_I — which happens precisely when the chord distance s_I ≡

Load-bearing premise

The whole identification of the SCFT point rests on the claim that the triangulated three-manifold built from the BPS flips is exactly the lens space L(2n+3, 2k) and that an internal edge C_I of chord distance s_I is isotopic to the core circle C_0 exactly when s_I = ±2k; if that isotopy were wrong, the one-fewer-superpotential theory would flow to a different SCFT (a torus-knot complement) and the central correspondence would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT arising from each (A1, A2n) theory is now explicitly realized by a UV 3d N=2 abelian gauge theory with a specific superpotential, enabling direct computation of its superconformal index, F-function, and boundary VOA data.
  • For k=1, the TQFT T_A[M_3^{(1)}] reproduces the modular data of the Virasoro minimal model M(2,2n+3) and its half-index reproduces the vacuum character, confirming the SCFT/VOA correspondence from the 3d/3d perspective.
  • For k=-1, the construction yields the affine osp(1|2n)_1 VOA on the holomorphic boundary, and for n=1, k=-2 it yields the (G2)_1 VOA, matching earlier conjectures from the quantum monodromy trace.
  • The Galois-orbits statement, that distinct k give Galois-conjugate TQFTs with the same fusion algebra, is proven for the modular data and used to determine the central charge c_{2d} mod 8 including the gravitational Chern–Simons level.
  • If an internal edge with s_I ≠ ±2k is drilled instead, the resulting DGG theory flows to a new 3d N=2 SCFT associated with a torus knot complement inside the lens space, opening a new family of SCFTs predicted by the same geometric mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's geometric criterion s_I = ±2k suggests a more general principle: the infrared phase of any class-S twisted reduction is determined by which edge of the triangulation carries the conical deficit, not merely by the topology of the three-manifold; this could extend to (A1, A2n+1) theories and to higher-rank AD theories, where a Higgs branch and flavour symmetries are present.
  • If the conjecture that F-maximisation dynamically drives ν_A to 1 at the SCFT point holds generally, then the same triangulation data would predict the exact R-charges at the fixed point for all n and k, allowing an analytic check of the k-independence of the F-function and of the unitary-TQFT cases k=±(n+1).
  • A testable extension is to compute the partition function of T[M_3^{(k)}] on a Seifert manifold with the one-fewer-superpotential theory and compare the result to the universal SCFT prediction (2.40); agreement would provide a quantitative check of the 'isotopy implies SCFT' rule beyond the low-n examples already checked.
  • The relation between the conical edge and the torus-knot complement suggests that the same BPS-spectrum-to-triangulation construction may generate a zoo of 3d N=2 SCFTs labelled by torus knots in lens spaces, which could be explored computationally using the explicit CS level matrices given in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the twisted circle compactification of the (A1, A2n) Argyres–Douglas theory via the 3d/3d correspondence. The authors construct a triangulated lens space M_3^(k) = L(2n+3, 2k) from the BPS spectrum of the 4d theory and propose that the associated Dimofte–Gaiotto–Gukov (DGG) abelian Chern–Simons-matter theory flows, with maximal monopole superpotential, to a non-unitary 3d TQFT T_A[M_3^(k)]; removing exactly one superpotential term associated to an internal edge C_I with chord distance s_I = ±2k is argued to produce the rank-0 3d N=4 SCFT T[M_3^(k)]. Extensive checks are presented for low n and |k|: modular S and T matrices matching Virasoro minimal models and affine VOAs, half-indices reproducing known vacuum characters (e.g., M(2,5), osp(1|2)_1, (G2)_1), superconformal indices truncating to 1 at TQFT points, and agreement across many polarisations. The paper also discusses Galois orbits of the modular data, the F-function, and the geometric distribution of conical defects.

Significance. If the central proposal is correct, it gives a geometric and 3d/3d interpretation of 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFTs and of the relation between such SCFTs and their (generally non-unitary) A-twists. The criterion (1.5) — that the location of the conical defect (at the external edge C∞ or an internal edge isotopic to C0) determines whether the IR theory is a TQFT or a non-trivial SCFT — is elegant and testable. The paper's strengths are its explicit constructions and many exact checks: the half-index identities for osp(1|2)_1 and (G2)_1 are non-trivial and impressive, as is the systematic modular-data matching over 43 polarisations for L(5,2) and the Galois-orbit analysis of the k-family. The main weakness is that the SCFT branch of (1.5) is not established for general n and |k|; the dynamical statement that removing one superpotential term drives the flow to the rank-0 N=4 point is verified by F-maximisation only in the n=1 examples.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.3.1, Eqs. (4.59)–(4.60), §3.2 Eq. (3.23)] The paper states that it 'determines c_2d mod 8 from the 3d N=2 ACSM data,' but in the worked examples c_2d is not an independent output. The gravitational Chern–Simons level K_g is tuned (e.g., K_g=4 for k=1, K_g=8 for k=-2) so that the phase of the Seifert fibering operator reproduces the central charge of the conjectured boundary VOA, and the closed-form expression (2.31) is imported from [9]. What is demonstrated is consistency — that integer K_g exists and that the phases agree over 43 polarisations — not a derivation of c_2d from first principles. The text should state this more carefully and avoid the impression that c_2d is determined rather than matched.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Acknowledgements] Typos: 'wrok' should be 'work', 'Universty' should be 'University'.
  2. [§4.3.1, Eq. (4.55)] The notation 'eη' and 'η' is confusing; please define or rename the fugacity for the decoupled symmetry ~A.
  3. [Abstract and §4.2] The term 'near-maximal superpotential' is used in the abstract but only defined later; consider defining it explicitly in the introduction.
  4. [§2.4, Eq. (2.63)] The relation ν_A = 1 + ν̂_A is introduced without a derivation; a brief comment connecting it to (2.63) would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central TQFT/SCFT derivation is independent; the c2d matching is partially circular because the gravitational CS level is chosen to reproduce known central charges.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and §4.3.1, around eqs. (4.59)–(4.60)]
    "To match the fibering operator with the T matrix as in (4.57), we have set the gravitational CS level to be: Kg = 4. ... we simply computed the needed Kg for each choice of σ such that (3.22) holds true for c2d = −22/5 (4.60) and for any Seifert fibering operator."

    The reported 'determination' of c2d mod 8 from the ACSM data is reverse-engineered: the target value c2d = −22/5 is taken as input (the known M(2,5) central charge, also the value predicted in [9]), and the free gravitational contact term Kg is then chosen so that the fibering-operator phase relation (3.22) yields exactly that value. The same maneuver is repeated for osp(1|2)_1 and (G2)_1, where Kg = 4 and Kg = 8 are selected to recover c2d = 2/5 and c2d = 14/5. Thus the overall T-matrix phase / c2d is not an independent prediction of the ACSM computation; it is fixed by construction. The S-matrix entries and T-matrix ratios are Kg-independent and remain genuine checks, so the circularity is partial.

full rationale

Most of the paper's derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. The identification M3^(k) = L(2n+3,2k) is obtained from explicit tetrahedron gluings and corroborated by Regina spot checks; the isotopy criterion s_I = ±2k for an internal edge to be C0 is proved by a direct Heegaard-splitting calculation, not assumed from the target SCFT. The one-fewer-superpotential prescription for reaching the 3d N=4 rank-0 SCFT is tested for n=1 by F-maximization (F ≈ 0.642965), by matching the Gang–Yamazaki superconformal index, and by low-order checks for larger nk. The half-index q-series (4.61), (4.77), and (4.88) are computed term-by-term from the ACSM data and match the known vacuum characters of M(2,5), osp(1|2)_1, and (G2)_1 without feeding in the central charge as an input to the series. The modular S-matrices and T-matrix ratios also match nontrivially. The clearest circular ingredient is the overall c2d phase: the gravitational Chern–Simons level Kg is a free UV contact term, and the paper calibrates it to reproduce already-known central charges before reporting those central charges as determined from the ACSM data. This is a scheme-calibration rather than a prediction, and it does not infect the central lens-space or SCFT/TQFT identification, so a moderate score of 4 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central construction's bookkeeping: the physical input is the 3d/3d conjecture plus the BPS spectrum; the output is a one-parameter family of ACSM theories. The gravitational CS level is fitted per polarisation to the expected central charge, which is the main free parameter. The polarisation choice is a gauge-like freedom with verified IR-independence in examples. No new entities are posited.

free parameters (2)
  • Gravitational Chern-Simons level K_g = K_g=4 (n=1,k=1,σ=(1,1,0,0)); 26 (GK σ=(0,0,0,0)); 4 (k=-1); 8 (k=-2)
    Chosen by hand per triangulation/polarisation so that the Seifert-fibering relation (3.22) reproduces the assumed c2d; the paper states the 'correct' value from 6d is not known (§4.3.1, p.42 and similar passages).
  • Tetrahedron polarisations σ_i = σ ∈ {0,1,2}^L; examples: (1,1,0,0), (0,0,0,0), (1,1,2,2), ...
    The DGG gauge theory depends on a polarisation choice per tetrahedron; the paper checks IR-duality of the resulting ACSM theories in explicit examples but does not derive a canonical choice from 6d.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption 3d/3d correspondence: T[M3^(k)] on R^3 is IR-equivalent to T[C] on R^3 × S1_r (eq. (1.3)), with the DGG theory associated to the triangulation of M3^(k)
    The paper is built on this conjecture; it provides consistency checks rather than a proof.
  • domain assumption The twisted product S1_r ⋉_k C is the lens space L(2n+3,2k) with singular edge C∞ (eq. (1.4))
    Stated as derived from the mutation sequence; verified with Regina in examples, assumed in general.
  • domain assumption An internal edge C_I of chord distance s_I is isotopic to C0 iff s_I=±2k mod N (eq. (2.62))
    Topological argument based on the Heegaard splitting; checked case-by-case with Regina.
  • domain assumption The minimal BPS chamber of T_A2n has exactly 2n hypermultiplets with charges ordered as in fig. 5, and the mutation method produces the 4n|k| tetrahedra
    Taken from the complete SQFT/BPS quiver literature [21,67,28]; used to build the triangulation.
  • standard math The Coulomb branch index data (2.12)-(2.13) from fixed points of the wild Hitchin moduli space
    From [34,35]; the paper re-derives the Casimir prefactor and connects it to VOA quantities.
  • domain assumption c2d(k) = -12k c4d + 2n(k-1) mod 8 (eq. (2.31)) and the Galois-conjugate S-matrix (2.28)
    Borrowed as conjectured in [9]; the paper verifies the SL(2,Z) relations and Seifert partition functions against it.
  • domain assumption F-maximization determines the superconformal R-symmetry, and axial mixing ν_A=1 corresponds to the 3d N=4 fixed point (eqs. (4.31)-(4.33))
    Standard 3d N=2 to N=4 enhancement logic; the paper checks F(ν_A) has the expected maximum in examples.
invented entities (1)
  • None (empty list)
    purpose: No new physical entities are introduced
    The 'conical singularity' and the axial symmetry U(1)_A(I) are geometric/labeling features of the construction, not new entities with independent falsifiable handles beyond the paper itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional TQFTs from Argyres--Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DWWWLWCF

@misc{pith2026260720308,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional TQFTs from Argyres--Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DWWWLWCF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20308}
}
abstract

We study the twisted dimensional reduction of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ Argyres--Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence, focussing on $(A_1, A_{2n})$ theories realised as the class-$\mathcal{S}$ theory $T[\mathcal{C}]$ for a curve $\mathcal{C}$ with one irregular puncture. We argue the resulting 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ rank-0 superconformal field theory (SCFT) arises as the IR fixed point of a Dimofte--Gaiotto--Gukov (DGG) abelian Chern--Simons-matter (ACSM) theory $T[M_3^{(k)}]$ for the lens space $M_3^{(k)}=L(2n+3,2k)$, obtained by fibering $\mathcal{C}$ over the circle with twist $k \in \mathbb{Z}_{2n+3}^\times$. The triangulation of $M_3^{(k)}$, derived from the 4d BPS spectrum, determines the ACSM theory including its superpotential. $T[M_3^{(k)}]$ flows to the expected SCFT when the monopole superpotential is near-maximal in a precise sense, while the maximal superpotential gives $T_A[M_3^{(k)}]$, which flows directly to a non-unitary TQFT, the topological $A$-twist of the SCFT. Geometrically, the SCFT and TQFT points are related by shifting conical singularities between edges of the triangulation, and we propose a correspondence between singular edges and SCFT points predicting when the SCFT is a unitary TQFT. The TQFTs from $M_3^{(k)}$ can support 2d vertex operator algebras (VOAs) on their holomorphic boundary, including the Schur-sector VOA of the 4d SCFT for $k=1$. For $n=k=1$, our construction reproduces the minimal 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ SCFT of Gang and Yamazaki from $L(5,2)$, where $T_A[M_3^{(k)}]$ is the Yang--Lee TQFT supporting $M(2,5)$ on its boundary. We check our proposals in detail, reconstructing the modular structure of the IR TQFTs from partition functions on Seifert manifolds, and matching phases to determine VOA central charges $c_{\text{2d}} \bmod 8$ from the ACSM data, including the gravitational Chern--Simons level.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 3d $\mathcal{N}=$ 4 rank-0 SCFT from punctured lens space

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Gang-Kim-Stubbs rank-0 SCFT is derived from the Dimofte-Gaiotto-Gukov construction on a punctured lens space, and a new family of theories plus a self-mirror conjecture are proposed from other lens spaces.

  2. Non-unitary Haagerup-like TQFTs and RCFTs from generalized S-fold SCFTs

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors propose modular S and T matrices and boundary RCFT characters for non-unitary TQFTs from generalized S-fold SCFTs, matching Haagerup-Izumi data for special parameter values.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 90 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [9]

    Kim and J

    H. Kim and J. Song,A family of vertex algebras from Argyres-Douglas theory,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 144 [2412.20015]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [2]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys.325(2014) 367 [1108.4389]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [3]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,3-Manifolds and 3d Indices,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17(2013) 975 [1112.5179]

    arXiv 2013

  5. [4]

    Dedushenko, S

    M. Dedushenko, S. Gukov, H. Nakajima, D. Pei and K. Ye,3d TQFTs from Argyres–Douglas theories,J. Phys. A53(2020) 43LT01 [1809.04638]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    Dedushenko,On the 4d/3d/2d view of the SCFT/VOA correspondence,2312.17747

    M. Dedushenko,On the 4d/3d/2d view of the SCFT/VOA correspondence,2312.17747

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    Arabi Ardehali, M

    A. Arabi Ardehali, M. Dedushenko, D. Gang and M. Litvinov,Bridging 4D QFTs and 2D VOAs via 3D high-temperature EFTs,2409.18130

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    Gaiotto and H

    D. Gaiotto and H. Kim,3D TFTs from 4dN= 2 BPS particles,JHEP03(2025) 173 [2409.20393]

    arXiv 2025

Show all 116 references
  1. [8]

    Arabi Ardehali, D

    A. Arabi Ardehali, D. Gang, N.J. Rajappa and M. Sacchi,3d SUSY enhancement and non-semisimple TQFTs from four dimensions,JHEP09(2025) 179 [2411.00766]

    2025

  2. [10]

    B. Go, Q. Jia, H. Kim and S. Kim,From BPS spectra of Argyres-Douglas theories to families of 3d TFTs,JHEP08(2025) 012 [2502.15133]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    H. Kim, H. Kim and J. Song,Macdonald index from 3d TQFT,JHEP03(2026) 213 [2511.11186]

    2026

  4. [12]

    Kim and S

    M. Kim and S. Kim,3D TFTs and boundary VOAs from BPS spectra of(G, G′) Argyres-Douglas theories,2511.23194

  5. [13]

    Nishinaka and Y

    T. Nishinaka and Y. Yoshida,3d Chern–Simons matter theories from generalized Argyres–Douglas theories,2512.15201

  6. [14]

    Hamachika, T

    R. Hamachika, T. Nishinaka, S. Tanigawa and Y. Yoshida,3d SUSY enhancement with non-trivial Coulomb branch via 4dN= 2SCFT,2607.19021

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees,Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.336(2015) 1359 [1312.5344]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Cordova and S.-H

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao,Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories, JHEP01(2016) 040 [1506.00265]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Argyres and M.R

    P.C. Argyres and M.R. Douglas,New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B448(1995) 93 [hep-th/9505062]

    1995 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Argyres, M.R

    P.C. Argyres, M.R. Plesser, N. Seiberg and E. Witten,New N=2 superconformal field theories in four-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B461(1996) 71 [hep-th/9511154]

    1996 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Eguchi, K

    T. Eguchi, K. Hori, K. Ito and S.-K. Yang,Study of N=2 superconformal field theories in four-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 430 [hep-th/9603002]

    1996 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Cecotti, A

    S. Cecotti, A. Neitzke and C. Vafa,R-Twisting and 4d/2d Correspondences,1006.3435

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gaiotto, G.W

    D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke,Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,Adv. Math.234(2013) 239 [0907.3987]. – 65 –

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Xie,General Argyres-Douglas Theory,JHEP01(2013) 100 [1204.2270]

    D. Xie,General Argyres-Douglas Theory,JHEP01(2013) 100 [1204.2270]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Chiral symmetry algebras from superconformal symmetry in four dimensions

    C. Beem, “Chiral symmetry algebras from superconformal symmetry in four dimensions.” Seminar at Crete Center for Theoretical Physics, July, 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    Infinite chiral symmetry in four and six dimensions

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli, “Infinite chiral symmetry in four and six dimensions.” Seminar at Harvard University, November, 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Beem and L

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli,Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations,JHEP08(2018) 114 [1707.07679]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gang and M

    D. Gang and M. Yamazaki,Three-dimensional gauge theories with supersymmetry enhancement,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 121701 [1806.07714]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    D. Gang, S. Kim, K. Lee, M. Shim and M. Yamazaki,Non-unitary TQFTs from 3DN= 4 rank 0 SCFTs,JHEP08(2021) 158 [2103.09283]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Cecotti, C

    S. Cecotti, C. Cordova and C. Vafa,Braids, Walls, and Mirrors,1110.2115

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    G.Y. Cho, D. Gang and H.-C. Kim,M-theoretic Genesis of Topological Phases,JHEP11 (2020) 115 [2007.01532]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. Choi, D. Gang and H.-C. Kim,Infrared phases of 3D class R theories,JHEP11(2022) 151 [2206.11982]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. Gang, H. Kang and S. Kim,Non-hyperbolic 3-manifolds and 3D field theories for 2D Virasoro minimal models,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 075 [2405.16377]

    2026

  24. [32]

    Bonetti, S

    F. Bonetti, S. Schafer-Nameki and J. Wu,MTC[M3, G]: 3d Topological Order Labeled by Seifert Manifolds,2403.03973

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    D. Gang, B. Park and H. Sohn,Torus Knots and Minimal Models Revisited : Rational VOA characters from non-hyperbolic knots,2512.23122

  26. [34]

    Fredrickson and A

    L. Fredrickson and A. Neitzke,FromS1-fixed points toW-algebra representations, 1709.06142

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Fredrickson, D

    L. Fredrickson, D. Pei, W. Yan and K. Ye,Argyres-Douglas Theories, Chiral Algebras and Wild Hitchin Characters,JHEP01(2018) 150 [1701.08782]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. Gang, K. Jeong, T. Kim and S. Lee,Refined 3D index,2604.17449

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett,Seifert fibering operators in 3dN= 2theories,JHEP 11(2018) 004 [1807.02328]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Three-dimensionalN= 2 supersymmetric gauge theories and partition functions on Seifert manifolds: A review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34(2019) 1930011 [1908.08875]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121 (1989) 351

    1989

  32. [40]

    Closset, T.T

    C. Closset, T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg,Comments on Chern-Simons Contact Terms in Three Dimensions,JHEP09(2012) 091 [1206.5218]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Closset, E

    C. Closset, E. Furrer, A. Keyes and O. Khlaif,The 3dA-model and generalised symmetries, part I: Bosonic Chern-Simons theories,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 106 [2501.11665]

    2025

  34. [42]

    Jafferis, I.R

    D.L. Jafferis, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and B.R. Safdi,Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere,JHEP06(2011) 102 [1103.1181]. – 66 –

    2011 arXiv

  35. [43]

    D. Gang, H. Kim and S. Stubbs,Three-Dimensional Topological Field Theories and Nonunitary Minimal Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 131601 [2310.09080]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Ferrari, N

    A.E.V. Ferrari, N. Garner and H. Kim,Boundary vertex algebras for 3dN= 4rank-0 SCFTs,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 057 [2311.05087]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    3dNrank-0 SCFT from punctured lens space

    S. Kim, “3dNrank-0 SCFT from punctured lens space.” 2026

    2026

  38. [46]

    Matveev,Complexity theory of three-dimensional manifolds,Acta Appl

    S.V. Matveev,Complexity theory of three-dimensional manifolds,Acta Appl. Math.19 (1990) 101

    1990

  39. [47]

    Jaco and J.H

    W. Jaco and J.H. Rubinstein,Layered-triangulations of 3-manifolds,math/0603601

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Jaco, J.H

    W. Jaco, J.H. Rubinstein and S. Tillmann,Minimal triangulations for an infinite family of lens spaces,J. Topol.2(2009) 157 [0805.2425]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Caorsi and S

    M. Caorsi and S. Cecotti,Geometric classification of 4dN= 2SCFTs,JHEP07(2018) 138 [1801.04542]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Benini, T

    F. Benini, T. Nishioka and M. Yamazaki,4d Index to 3d Index and 2d TQFT,Phys. Rev. D 86(2012) 065015 [1109.0283]

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Kinney, J.M

    J. Kinney, J.M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209 [hep-th/0510251]

    2007 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S.S. Razamat and W. Yan,Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,Commun. Math. Phys.319(2013) 147 [1110.3740]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Gukov, D

    S. Gukov, D. Pei, W. Yan and K. Ye,Equivariant Verlinde Algebra from Superconformal Index and Argyres–Seiberg Duality,Commun. Math. Phys.357(2018) 1215 [1605.06528]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gukov and D

    S. Gukov and D. Pei,Equivariant Verlinde formula from fivebranes and vortices,Commun. Math. Phys.355(2017) 1 [1501.01310]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Dimofte,Complex Chern–Simons Theory at Level k via the 3d–3d Correspondence, Commun

    T. Dimofte,Complex Chern–Simons Theory at Level k via the 3d–3d Correspondence, Commun. Math. Phys.339(2015) 619 [1409.0857]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Biquard and P

    O. Biquard and P. Boalch,Wild non-abelian hodge theory on curves,Compositio Mathematica140(2004) 179

    2004

  49. [57]

    Maruyoshi and J

    K. Maruyoshi and J. Song,N= 1deformations and RG flows ofN= 2SCFTs,JHEP02 (2017) 075 [1607.04281]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer (1997), 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

    1997 doi

  51. [59]

    Bobev, M

    N. Bobev, M. Bullimore and H.-C. Kim,Supersymmetric Casimir Energy and the Anomaly Polynomial,JHEP09(2015) 142 [1507.08553]

    2015 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Shapere and Y

    A.D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa,Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,JHEP09(2008) 109 [0804.1957]

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Xie and S.-T

    D. Xie and S.-T. Yau,4d N=2 SCFT and singularity theory Part I: Classification, 1510.01324

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Imamura,Relation between the 4d superconformal index and theS3 partition function, JHEP09(2011) 133 [1104.4482]

    Y. Imamura,Relation between the 4d superconformal index and theS3 partition function, JHEP09(2011) 133 [1104.4482]

    2011 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Closset, T.T

    C. Closset, T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia and Z. Komargodski,The Geometry of Supersymmetric Partition Functions,JHEP01(2014) 124 [1309.5876]. – 67 –

    2014 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Closset, T.T

    C. Closset, T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg,Contact Terms, Unitarity, and F-Maximization in Three-Dimensional Superconformal Theories,JHEP10 (2012) 053 [1205.4142]

    2012 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett,Supersymmetric partition functions and the three-dimensional A-twist,JHEP03(2017) 074 [1701.03171]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Buican and R

    M. Buican and R. Radhakrishnan,Galois orbits of TQFTs: symmetries and unitarity, JHEP01(2022) 004 [2109.02766]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    M. Alim, S. Cecotti, C. Cordova, S. Espahbodi, A. Rastogi and C. Vafa,BPS Quivers and Spectra of Complete N=2 Quantum Field Theories,Commun. Math. Phys.323(2013) 1185 [1109.4941]

    2013 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Fomin, M

    S. Fomin, M. Shapiro and D. Thurston,Cluster algebras and triangulated surfaces. Part I: Cluster complexes,math/0608367

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Seifert and W

    H. Seifert and W. Threlfall,Lehrbuch der topologie, vol. 31, American Mathematical Soc. (2004)

    2004

  62. [70]

    Regina: Software for low-dimensional topology

    B.A. Burton, R. Budney, W. Pettersson et al., “Regina: Software for low-dimensional topology.”http://regina-normal.github.io/, 1999–2025

    1999

  63. [71]

    Burton,Introducing Regina, The 3-Manifold Topology Software,Experimental Mathematics13(2004) 267

    B.A. Burton,Introducing Regina, The 3-Manifold Topology Software,Experimental Mathematics13(2004) 267

    2004

  64. [72]

    Bonahon and J.-P

    F. Bonahon and J.-P. Otal,Scindements de heegaard des espaces lenticulaires,Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure16(1983) 451

    1983

  65. [73]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories, JHEP08(2016) 059 [1605.06531]

    2016 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Jafferis,The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,JHEP05(2012) 159 [1012.3210]

    D.L. Jafferis,The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z,JHEP05(2012) 159 [1012.3210]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Gang and K

    D. Gang and K. Yonekura,Symmetry enhancement and closing of knots in 3d/3d correspondence,JHEP07(2018) 145 [1803.04009]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gukov and C

    S. Gukov and C. Manolescu,A two-variable series for knot complements,Quantum Topol. 12(2021) 1 [1904.06057]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Chung,BPS invariants for a Knot in Seifert manifolds,JHEP12(2022) 122 [2201.08351]

    H.-J. Chung,BPS invariants for a Knot in Seifert manifolds,JHEP12(2022) 122 [2201.08351]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Chung,3d-3d correspondence and abelian flat connection,JHEP07(2026) 080 [2603.05236]

    H.-J. Chung,3d-3d correspondence and abelian flat connection,JHEP07(2026) 080 [2603.05236]

    2026 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Rozansky,A largekasymptotics of witten’s invariant of seifert manifolds,Commun

    L. Rozansky,A largekasymptotics of witten’s invariant of seifert manifolds,Commun. Math. Phys.171(1995) 279

    1995

  72. [80]

    Reidemeister,Homotopieringe und linsenräume,Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg11(1935) 102

    K. Reidemeister,Homotopieringe und linsenräume,Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg11(1935) 102

    1935

  73. [81]

    Eckhard, H

    J. Eckhard, H. Kim, S. Schafer-Nameki and B. Willett,Higher-Form Symmetries, Bethe Vacua, and the 3d-3d Correspondence,JHEP01(2020) 101 [1910.14086]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Nekrasov and S.L

    N.A. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili,Bethe/Gauge correspondence on curved spaces,JHEP 01(2015) 100 [1405.6046]

    2015 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Benini and A

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni,A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional – 68 – supersymmetric theories,JHEP07(2015) 127 [1504.03698]

    2015 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Benini and A

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni,Supersymmetric partition functions on Riemann surfaces,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.96(2017) 13 [1605.06120]

    2017 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,Twisted indices, Bethe ideals and 3dN= 2 infrared dualities, JHEP05(2023) 148 [2301.10753]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,On the Witten index of 3dN= 2unitary SQCD with general CS levels,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 085 [2305.00534]

    2023 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,Grothendieck lines in 3dN= 2 SQCD and the quantum K-theory of the Grassmannian,JHEP12(2023) 082 [2309.06980]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,New results on 3dN=2 SQCD and its 3d GLSM interpretation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2446011 [2312.05076]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Closset, E

    C. Closset, E. Furrer and O. Khlaif,One-form symmetries and the 3dN= 2A-model: Topologically twisted indices and CS theories,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 066 [2405.18141]

    2025 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Nekrasov and S.L

    N.A. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili,Supersymmetric vacua and Bethe ansatz,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.192-193(2009) 91 [0901.4744]

    2009 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Closset, T.T

    C. Closset, T.T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia and Z. Komargodski,From Rigid Supersymmetry to Twisted Holomorphic Theories,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 085006 [1407.2598]

    2014 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Kim,The Complete superconformal index for N=6 Chern-Simons theory,Nucl

    S. Kim,The Complete superconformal index for N=6 Chern-Simons theory,Nucl. Phys. B 821(2009) 241 [0903.4172]

    2009 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Imamura and S

    Y. Imamura and S. Yokoyama,Index for three dimensional superconformal field theories with general R-charge assignments,JHEP04(2011) 007 [1101.0557]

    2011 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Kapustin and B

    A. Kapustin and B. Willett,Generalized Superconformal Index for Three Dimensional Field Theories,1106.2484

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Gukov and P. Putrov,Fivebranes and 4-manifolds,Prog. Math.319(2016) 155 [1306.4320]

    2016 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Gukov and P. Putrov,Walls, Lines, and Spectral Dualities in 3d Gauge Theories,JHEP05(2014) 047 [1302.0015]

    2014 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Yoshida and K

    Y. Yoshida and K. Sugiyama,Localization of three-dimensionalN= 2supersymmetric theories onS 1 ×D 2,PTEP2020(2020) 113B02 [1409.6713]

    2020 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and N.M. Paquette,Dual boundary conditions in 3d SCFT’s,JHEP 05(2018) 060 [1712.07654]

    2018 arXiv

  91. [99]

    D. Gang, D. Kim and S. Lee,A non-unitary bulk-boundary correspondence: Non-unitary Haagerup RCFTs from S-fold SCFTs,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 064 [2310.14877]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    D. Gang, H. Kim, B. Park and S. Stubbs,Three dimensional topological field theories and Nahm sum formulas,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 128 [2411.06081]

    2025

  93. [101]

    Dimofte,Quantum Riemann Surfaces in Chern-Simons Theory,Adv

    T. Dimofte,Quantum Riemann Surfaces in Chern-Simons Theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.17(2013) 479 [1102.4847]

    2013 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Neumann and D

    W.D. Neumann and D. Zagier,Volumes of hyperbolic three-manifolds,Topology24(1985) 307

    1985

  95. [103]

    Dimofte and S

    T.D. Dimofte and S. Garoufalidis,The Quantum content of the gluing equations,Geom. Topol.17(2013) 1253 [1202.6268]. – 69 –

    2013 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Bashkirov and A

    D. Bashkirov and A. Kapustin,Supersymmetry enhancement by monopole operators,JHEP 05(2011) 015 [1007.4861]

    2011 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Closset and S. Cremonesi,Quantum moduli space of Chern-Simons quivers, wrapped D6-branes and AdS4/CFT3,JHEP09(2011) 005 [1105.2299]

    2011 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Dimofte, S

    T. Dimofte, S. Gukov and L. Hollands,Vortex Counting and Lagrangian 3-manifolds,Lett. Math. Phys.98(2011) 225 [1006.0977]

    2011 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Terashima and M

    Y. Terashima and M. Yamazaki,SL(2,R) Chern-Simons, Liouville, and Gauge Theory on Duality Walls,JHEP08(2011) 135 [1103.5748]

    2011 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Dimofte,3d superconformal theories from three-manifolds., inNew Dualities of Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, J

    T. Dimofte,3d superconformal theories from three-manifolds., inNew Dualities of Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, J. Teschner, ed., pp. 339–373 (2016), DOI [1412.7129]

    2016 arXiv

  101. [109]

    D. Gang, N. Kim and S. Lee,Holography of 3d-3d correspondence at Large N,JHEP04 (2015) 091 [1409.6206]

    2015 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Cecotti, J

    S. Cecotti, J. Song, C. Vafa and W. Yan,Superconformal Index, BPS Monodromy and Chiral Algebras,JHEP11(2017) 013 [1511.01516]

    2017 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Kucharski, P

    P. Kucharski, P. Longhi, D. Noshchenko, S. Park and P. Sulkowski,Quivers and BPS states in 3d and 4d,2508.09729

    arXiv

  104. [112]

    Creutzig, N

    T. Creutzig, N. Garner and H. Kim,Mirror symmetry and level-rank duality for 3dN= 4 rank 0 SCFTs,Lett. Math. Phys.115(2025) 123 [2406.00138]

    2025

  105. [113]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B426(1994) 19 [hep-th/9407087]

    1994 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,Nucl. Phys. B431(1994) 484 [hep-th/9408099]

    1994 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Coste and T

    A. Coste and T. Gannon,Remarks on Galois symmetry in rational conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B323(1994) 316

    1994

  108. [116]

    Bakalov, A.A

    B. Bakalov, A.A. Kirillov et al.,Lectures on tensor categories and modular functors, vol. 21, American Mathematical Society Providence, RI (2001). – 70 –

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.