Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Topology and Quantum-Spin-Classical-Spin Crossover of the Gapped Kondo Effect

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The gapped Kondo transition is topologically enforced: a local Chern number changes from -1 to 0, forcing a ground-state degeneracy at a critical coupling for every mass m>0 except m=2.

desk verdict The B-space Chern number idea is genuinely new and the enforcement argument holds; the overscreened quantum-classical discontinuity is the one load-bearing numerical claim that needs convergence evidence before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13065 v1 pith:6SIZOAFU submitted 2026-08-13 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

David Krüger , Michael Potthoff This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords gappedKondoeffectB-spaceChernnumberS-spacequantum-classicalcrossoverunderscreenedoverscreenedparticle-holesymmetrybreakinginsulator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the gapped Kondo effect—the screening of a spin-$1/2$ impurity coupled to a band insulator with a hard gap—is a transition enforced by local topology, not merely by energetics. The central object is the B-space Chern number $C^{(B)}$, computed over the sphere of directions of a fictitious local magnetic field that couples only to the impurity spin: it takes the value $-1$ when the impurity is decoupled and $0$ once a local Kondo singlet has formed, so the integer change forces a ground-state degeneracy at a critical coupling $J_K(m)$ for all $m>0$ with $m\neq 2$. Using a Krylov-space chain transformation combined with a self-consistent restricted active-space configuration-interaction solver, the authors construct the $m$–$J$ phase diagram and show that the same local-topology logic organizes the classical-spin limit, the underscreened $S>1/2$ case, and the two-channel overscreened case. The paper matters because it supplies a rigorous reason for the discontinuous nature of the gapped Kondo transition and identifies when classical-spin approximations to quantum impurity problems are topologically faithful—with the overscreened particle-hole-symmetric case as the notable exception.

What carries the argument

The B-space Chern number is the Chern number of the ground-state bundle over the two-sphere of directions $\boldsymbol{n}=\boldsymbol{B}/B$ of a fictitious local magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$ that couples only to the impurity spin, evaluated in the limit $B\to 0$; its integer value makes a level crossing unavoidable whenever it changes. The companion S-space Chern number is defined for a classical spin of fixed length over the sphere of spin directions. These invariants carry the argument because they connect the solvable limits $J=0$ and $J\to\infty$ and force the transition in between. The numerical machinery is a Krylov-space transformation that maps the lattice to a semi-infinite chain while preserving the impurity coupling, followed by a self-consistent restricted active-space configuration-interaction (RASCI) scheme in a natural-orbital basis; for the classical-spin problem the same critical couplings follow exactly from single-particle scattering theory.

What would settle it

Run an unbiased numerical method without the RASCI truncation on the same spin-$1/2$ Chern-insulator Kondo model at $m=1$, tracking the ground-state sector as $J$ increases: if the ground state does not switch discontinuously from $\Delta N=0$ to $\Delta N=+1$ with a level crossing at finite $J$, or if no in-gap pole fully traverses the band gap, the claim that B-space topology forces the transition for all $m>0$ with $m\neq 2$ is contradicted. A second, sharper test targets the classical-spin prediction $J_K\sim -1/(m\ln m)$ as $m\to 0$: measuring that divergence in the exactly solvable scattering problem would confirm or refute the analytic continuation of the topological picture to the gap-closing limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the paper's core is the claim that the unscreened-to-Kondo-screened transition in a gapped host is topologically enforced and discontinuous. For a spin-$1/2$ impurity, a fictitious field of infinitesimal strength $B\to 0$ defines the B-space Chern number $C^{(B)}$: $C^{(B)}=-1$ at $J=0$, where the decoupled spin realizes a magnetic-monopole problem, and $C^{(B)}=0$ at $J\to\infty$, where the local Kondo singlet cannot be polarized. Because a Chern number is an integer, the change from $-1$ to $0$ requires the ground state to become degenerate at some $J_K(m)$ for every $m>0$ with $m\neq 2$, and the paper identifies that degeneracy as a single-particle pole crossing the chemical potential with a particle-number change $\Delta N=+1$. For a classical impurity spin the parallel quantity is the S-space Chern number, $C^{(S)}=0$ at $J=0$ and $C^{(S)}=1$ at $J\to\infty$, linked to the quantum case by $C^{(B)}=C^{(S)}-1$. The quantum and classical phase diagrams deform continuously into each other for the single-channel and underscreened cases, but not in the particle-hole-symmetric two-channel overscreened case: there an intermediate $C^{(B)}=0$ phase with two degenerate ground states and spontaneous particle-hole symmetry breaking appears, and the quantum-to-classical deformation becomes discontinuous above a critical fictitious-field strength. Scattering theory provides exact critical couplings for the classical spin and controlled approximations for the quantum spin, and the $S\to\infty$ limit recovers the classical scaling law.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the approximate RASCI solver reproduces the true critical couplings for quantum impurity spins; Appendix A notes that exact diagonalization at the accessible chain lengths ($d\sim 16$) still shows considerable finite-size effects, so if the truncation threshold shifts $J_K(m)$ substantially, the quantitative phase boundaries and the claimed near-constant $J_K$ in the topological regime would be affected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Wherever $C^{(B)}$ changes from $-1$ to $0$, the gapped Kondo transition must occur as a discontinuous level crossing: a smooth crossover is topologically impossible for all $m>0$ with $m\neq 2$.
  • In the k-space topologically nontrivial regime, an in-gap bound state persists for $J\to\infty$ as a remnant of the chiral edge mode, so the impurity acts as a local detector of the host's band topology.
  • For underscreened impurities of spin $S>1/2$, the critical coupling in the strongly gapped regime follows $J_K(m)=2m/(S+1)$, and the rescaled coupling $J_K(S+1)$ approaches the classical-spin value $J_KS$ as $S\to\infty$.
  • In the overscreened particle-hole-symmetric case, the intermediate phase has $C^{(B)}=0$ and spontaneously broken particle-hole symmetry, with two degenerate ground states in the $\Delta N=\pm 1$ sectors; above a critical field the symmetry is restored and only then does the classical-spin Chern number $C^{(S)}=2$ become well defined.
  • Classical-spin phase diagrams are exact limits of the same local-topology description, so scattering-theory results for classical impurities can be used to benchmark and interpret quantum many-body calculations, as long as no topological obstruction intervenes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The B-space argument is not specific to the Chern insulator host: any gapped host whose decoupled and fully screened impurity limits carry different B-space Chern numbers should exhibit an enforced discontinuous Kondo transition, so the same logic could apply to impurities in superconductors or other gapped fermion systems once the appropriate invariant is defined.
  • The overscreened result suggests a general mechanism: when two equivalent screening channels compete, spontaneous particle-hole symmetry breaking can take the place of a topological transition, since a degenerate pair of symmetry-broken ground states can carry the same Chern number as the screened phase. This may help classify multi-channel and multi-impurity Kondo phase diagrams.
  • A concrete experimental signature follows from the strong-coupling ring state: in the topologically nontrivial regime the in-gap state has zero weight on the impurity orbital, so a site-resolved probe that sweeps coupling strength should see the bound state lose impurity-orbital weight as $J\to\infty$, distinguishing topological from trivial hosts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies a spin-1/2 Kondo impurity coupled to the gapped Qi-Wu-Zhang Chern insulator and related models. It introduces two local topological invariants: a B-space Chern number C(B) defined over the sphere of directions of a fictitious local field B→0 acting on the impurity spin, and an S-space Chern number C(S) defined for a classical impurity spin. The authors argue that the gapped Kondo transition is topologically enforced: C(B) changes from -1 at J=0 to 0 at J→∞, forcing a ground-state degeneracy for all m>0, m≠2. They compute phase diagrams with a Lanczos+RASCI solver for S=1/2, underscreened S=1 and higher, and overscreened two-channel couplings, and compare with exact scattering theory for classical spins and atomic-limit estimates. The main qualitative findings are that quantum and classical phase diagrams are continuously deformable except in the particle-hole-symmetric overscreened case, where spontaneous PH-symmetry breaking produces an intermediate ΔN=±1 phase that terminates at a critical point (B_c,J_c), making the quantum-classical crossover discontinuous.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a clean topological characterization of a genuinely many-body transition and a novel way of thinking about quantum-to-classical crossover in impurity models. The B-space and S-space Chern numbers are computed from the Hamiltonian, not fitted; the classical-spin scattering theory is exact and parameter-free; and the atomic-limit estimates (J_K=4m/3, J_K=2m/(S+1), J_c1=4m/3, J_c2=4m) are transparent and match the large-m numerical boundaries. The predicted non-deformability of the overscreened phase diagram under B is falsifiable and would be a significant result if confirmed. The main limitation is that the quantum-spin phase diagrams, and in particular the overscreened exception, rest on the approximate RASCI solver without reported convergence control.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III H, Fig. 10; Appendix A] The central exception to continuous quantum-classical deformation rests on the RASCI determination of J_c1(B), J_c2(B), and their coalescence at the critical point (B_c,J_c). Appendix A states that exact diagonalization at chain length d~16 still shows considerable finite-size effects and that the active space contains only 12-14 natural orbitals, but the active-space threshold δ and the self-consistency stopping criterion are not reported. Please provide a convergence study of the two critical lines and of B_c and J_c with respect to δ, active-space dimension, and Lanczos order d. If truncation shifts J_c1 and J_c2 by different amounts, the critical point could move substantially or disappear; this is the only numerical result that supports the claimed discontinuous quantum-classical crossover in the overscreened case.
  2. [§III A, Fig. 1; §III F, Fig. 7] The quantitative behavior of J_K(m) in the topologically nontrivial regime 0<m<2, in particular the near-constant plateau and its comparison with the projected scattering-theory curve of Eq. (20), depends on the RASCI phase boundary. The main text reports only that typical active-space dimensions range from 12 to 14 and that d=O(100), without the parameter values used for Fig. 1 or any convergence test. Please state δ, the active-space dimension, d, and the convergence tolerance used for Fig. 1, and show representative convergence checks for J_K at m=1 and m=3. This is needed to separate physical flattening of J_K(m) from truncation error.
  3. [§III B] The topological-enforcement statement that there must be a critical coupling J_K(m) at which the ground-state energy becomes degenerate would benefit from an explicit argument about the B→0 limit. A change of C(B) on the two-sphere at infinitesimal B guarantees a gap closure on that sphere for some finite-B Hamiltonian; to conclude that the degeneracy occurs at B=0 and that the particle number changes, one should invoke continuity of the level flow and the spin-rotation symmetry of the B=0 Hamiltonian. The numerical spectral flow and the atomic-limit estimates independently support the conclusion, so this is a rigor/presentation issue rather than a reason to doubt the result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figs. 4 and 10] The horizontal axes in Figs. 4 and 10 show log10 B from 0.0 to 5.0, so the smallest field strength shown is B=1, not the B→0 quantum limit. Please state explicitly how the B=0 endpoints are inferred from Figs. 1, 3, and 9, or extend the axis to smaller B, so that the claimed continuous connection from the quantum limit is directly visible.
  2. [Notation throughout] The symbol J_K is used both for the quantum-spin critical coupling (e.g., Fig. 1) and for the classical-spin scattering-theory coupling in Eq. (15), while J_c is used for the classical-spin boundary in Fig. 3 and later for the overscreened critical lines. Please unify the notation or explicitly state the equivalence to avoid confusion.
  3. [Appendix A] The statement that results no longer depend on d 'as we have checked regularly' is too vague for a quantitative phase-boundary paper. A brief table listing d, active-space size, δ, and the self-consistency criterion for each figure would make the numerical claims reproducible.
  4. [§III B, text near 'm≠2'] The exclusion of m=2 in the topological-enforcement statement is not explained in the text. Since m=2 is a gap-closing semimetal point, please state explicitly that the B-space Chern number is not defined there because the host ground state is gapless.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the topological-enforcement argument and scattering-theory critical couplings are derived from the model Hamiltonian, not fitted to the target phase boundaries.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained. The B-space topological argument computes the Chern number analytically at the two endpoints: C(B)=-1 at J=0 from the Dirac-monopole effective model, and C(B)=0 at J->infinity from the local Kondo singlet; the required gap closure is then a mathematical consequence of a change of an integer invariant over S^2, not an input to the calculation. The classical-spin S-space argument is analogous, with C(S)=0 at J=0 and C(S)=1 at J->infinity from the quantum-classical two-spin model. The atomic-limit estimates J_K=4m/3 (S=1/2) and J_K=2m/(S+1) are derived from explicit energy comparisons rather than adjusted to numerics. The scattering-theory critical coupling for a classical spin, Eq. (15), follows from the single-particle T-matrix condition, and the projected quantum-spin variant, Eq. (20), is an independent approximation that the paper explicitly notes underestimates the many-body J_K by about 20%, which precludes its being a fit to the RASCI data. The phase diagrams are numerical outputs of the RASCI solver; the lack of reported truncation/convergence thresholds is a numerical-reliability and correctness concern, not a circularity, because no target result is used as an input to the solver. The only relevant self-citation, Ref. [43], credits the prior definition of S-space local topology for classical spins, but every Chern number used here is recomputed directly from the present Hamiltonian, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from that citation. The overscreened exception to continuous quantum-classical deformation rests on a numerical phase diagram, so its reliability is a convergence issue rather than a definitional or fitted-input circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No physical constants are fitted to target outputs; model parameters m, J, B, and S are scanned to map phase diagrams. The central numerical results depend on hand-chosen truncations (Lanczos chain length and RASCI active-space threshold), which are listed as free parameters. No new physical entities are introduced; B space and S space are mathematical manifolds, not new degrees of freedom, and the fictitious field couples to an existing spin degree of freedom.

free parameters (2)
  • RASCI active-space threshold and dimension = not specified (typical active space 12 to 14 orbitals)
    The self-consistent CI loop defines active natural orbitals by |n_i - 1/2| < delta; delta is not quoted, and the quantum phase boundaries in Figs. 1, 5, and 9 depend on this truncation.
  • Lanczos chain truncation order d = O(100)
    The Krylov chain is truncated at d=O(100); the paper states the results are d-independent after checking but gives no quantitative convergence data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption RASCI approximation: weakly correlated natural orbitals can be treated by perturbative particle-hole excitations while strongly correlated active orbitals are diagonalized exactly.
    Appendix A defines the active space by a threshold delta and truncates higher-order particle-hole sectors; all quantum-spin phase diagrams rely on this approximation.
  • domain assumption Lanczos chain truncation at d=O(100) captures the relevant thermodynamic limit for gapped systems.
    Sec. II states that results are d-independent 'as checked regularly' but provides no quantitative convergence data.
  • domain assumption A fictitious magnetic field strength B approaching infinity fully suppresses quantum spin fluctuations so that the impurity becomes a classical vector.
    Sec. III C uses B=10^4 for numerical convergence; the identification is physically standard but is the key interpolation assumption for the quantum-classical deformation.
  • standard math A change of integer Chern number over a closed parameter manifold requires the ground-state energy to become degenerate at some parameter value.
    Sec. III B states that 'B-space topology thus enforces a gapless flow'; this relies on quantization and continuity of the Chern number.
  • domain assumption The transition is captured by a single-particle pole crossing mu; no two-particle pole or excitonic bound state crosses first.
    Footnote [56] acknowledges the possibility of a two-particle pole and states it was numerically verified not to occur, but no data are shown.
  • standard math The particle-hole transformation P defined in Sec. III G is a symmetry of the symmetric overscreened Hamiltonian.
    The spontaneous particle-hole symmetry breaking claim rests on the exactness of this transformation and on the degeneracy of the Delta N = +1 and Delta N = -1 ground states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topology and Quantum-Spin-Classical-Spin Crossover of the Gapped Kondo Effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6SIZOAFU

@misc{pith2026260813065,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topology and Quantum-Spin-Classical-Spin Crossover of the Gapped Kondo Effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6SIZOAFU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13065}
}
abstract

The gapped Kondo effect describes the screening of an $S=\frac12$ impurity spin locally coupled via an antiferromagnetic exchange interaction to a conduction-electron system exhibiting a finite hard gap. Using a combination of a Lanczos transformation and a self-consistent configuration-interaction scheme, we numerically investigate the local phase diagram. Furthermore, we show that the different phases can be characterized by several topological invariants: the conventional momentum-space Chern number of the underlying two-dimensional host system, corresponding to a Chern insulator; the B-space Chern number, defined by coupling the impurity spin to a fictitious local magnetic field $\boldsymbol B$, in the limit $B \to 0$; and the S-space Chern number, defined for a classical impurity spin, i.e., a vector of fixed length. The classical-spin limit is obtained for $B \to \infty$. By varying the field strength, we can therefore continuously interpolate between quantum-impurity-spin and classical-impurity-spin Hamiltonians and investigate whether the corresponding phase diagrams are likewise continuously connected. The gapped underscreened Kondo effect is studied for an impurity spin $S>\frac12$ as well as in the classical-spin limit approached via $B \to \infty$ or $S \to \infty$. Different variants of scattering theory are employed to interpret the resulting phases. Finally, the gapped two-channel overscreened Kondo effect, realized by coupling a quantum impurity spin equally to the local electron spins of both orbitals within a unit cell, is shown to be characterized by spontaneous particle-hole symmetry breaking. This leads to a highly nontrivial quantum-classical phase diagram.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13065 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. shows the dependence of the critical coupling on B (white lines) for two different mass parameters, m = 1 (left) and m = 3 (right), as obtained numerically. In both cases, we see that the quantum-spin C (B) = −1 phase for J < JK(m) continuously connects with the classical-spin C (S) = 0 phase for J < Jc(m) and, for strong J, the quantum C (B) = 0 phase connects to the classical C (S) = 1 phase. Therefore, both the q… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Integrand [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows that the intermediate ∆N = ±1 phase for moderate m smoothly connects to the one for large m. However, one finds qualitatively different correla￾tions: Consider the spin correlation ⟨sˆ·Sˆ⟩ ≡ ⟨sˆi0A ·Sˆ⟩ = ⟨sˆi0B · Sˆ⟩ that is obtained by arithmetically averaging …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (top). When tracing its fate for B → ∞, it turns out to end exactly at the transition point Jc(∞) that separates the C (S) = 0 phase from the C (S) = 2 phase of the classical-spin case. All in all, this demonstrates that the quantum-classical crossover is not continuo…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kondo, Resistance Minimum in Dilute Magnetic Al- loys, Prog

    J. Kondo, Resistance Minimum in Dilute Magnetic Al- loys, Prog. Theor. Phys.32, 37 (1964)

    1964

  2. [2]

    A. C. Hewson,The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993)

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    Withoff and E

    D. Withoff and E. Fradkin, Phase transitions in gapless Fermi systems with magnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1835 (1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Comparing withE 3e this yieldsJ c2 = 4m

    Hence, the ∆N= 0 ground-state energy is now given byE 2e =−⟨ ˆsi0A· ˆS⟩J−⟨ ˆsi0B· ˆS⟩J=−2J/2 = −J. Comparing withE 3e this yieldsJ c2 = 4m. In Fig. 9, the critical couplingsJ c1 = 4/3mandJ c2 = 4mare in- dicated as dashed white lines. We see that these almost perfectly describe the numerically obtained boundaries of the intermediate phase in the strong-ml...

    work page

  5. [5]

    underscreened Kondo hole

    The discussion is in many respects analogous to the one forS= 1/2and Fig. 1. However, for weakJthe ground state is a spin triplet withC (B) =−2. It changes discontinuously atJ=J K(m) (white line) and is a spin doublet withC (B) =−1 forJ > J K(m). No further screening of theS= 1 impurity spin takes place such that it remains underscreened. As compared toS=...

    work page

  6. [6]

    L¨ u, H.-Z

    H.-F. L¨ u, H.-Z. Lu, S.-Q. Shen, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum impurity in the bulk of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B87, 195122 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    In them <2 regime,J K(m) is roughly constant and thus in nice qualitative agreement with the fullS= 1/2phase diagram shown in Fig

    The dashed line indicates theJ K ≃ 4 3mtrend. In them <2 regime,J K(m) is roughly constant and thus in nice qualitative agreement with the fullS= 1/2phase diagram shown in Fig. 1. Form→0, the critical coupling remains finite. However, it does show a slight upturn in this limit that is also seen in the many-body approach (Fig. 1). Quantitatively, differenc...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Bulla, T

    R. Bulla, T. Pruschke, and A. C. Hewson, Anderson im- purity in pseudo-gap Fermi systems, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter9, 10463 (1997)

    1997

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Fritz and M

    L. Fritz and M. Vojta, The physics of Kondo impurities in graphene, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 032501 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    bottom-right

    We first discuss the particle-hole symmetric model withJ=J A =J B, see the top panel of the figure. In the classical-spin case, i.e., in theB→∞limit, we trivially haveC (S) = 0 ifJ= 0. ForJ→∞, the classical “field” JSaligns ˆsi0A and ˆsi0B ferromagnetically. The equiva- lent e...

  3. [11]

    Kuzmenko, Y

    I. Kuzmenko, Y. Avishai, and T. K. Ng, Anderson im- purity in the bulk of topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 89, 035125 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    ˇZitko, M

    R. ˇZitko, M. Lee, R. L´ opez, R. Aguado, and M.-S. Choi, Josephson current in strongly correlated double quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 116803 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    ˇZitko, O

    R. ˇZitko, O. Bodensiek, and T. Pruschke, Effects of mag- netic anisotropy on the subgap excitations induced by quantum impurities in a superconducting host, Phys. Rev. B83, 054512 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    N. Y. Yao, C. P. Moca, I. Weymann, J. D. Sau, M. D. Lukin, E. A. Demler, and G. Zar´ and, Phase diagram and excitations of a Shiba molecule, Phys. Rev. B90, 241108 (2014). 18

    2014

  7. [15]

    Plorin and M

    C. Plorin and M. Potthoff, Kondo screening and indirect magnetic exchange through a conventional superconduc- tor studied by the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B110, 085119 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    W. B. Thimm, J. Kroha, and J. von Delft, Kondo box: A magnetic impurity in an ultrasmall metallic grain, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2143 (1999)

    1999

  9. [17]

    Schlottmann, Magnetic and thermal properties of nanoscale heavy-fermion particles, Phys

    P. Schlottmann, Magnetic and thermal properties of nanoscale heavy-fermion particles, Phys. Rev. B65, 024431 (2001)

    2001

  10. [18]

    Schlottmann, Charge- and spin-excitation gaps for a magnetic Anderson impurity embedded in a nanoscale metallic sphere, Phys

    P. Schlottmann, Charge- and spin-excitation gaps for a magnetic Anderson impurity embedded in a nanoscale metallic sphere, Phys. Rev. B65, 174407 (2002)

    2002

  11. [19]

    Simon and I

    P. Simon and I. Affleck, Finite-size effects in conductance measurements on quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 206602 (2002)

    2002

  12. [20]

    P. S. Cornaglia and C. A. Balseiro, Kondo impurities in nanoscopic systems: Confinement-induced regimes, Phys. Rev. B66, 115303 (2002)

    2002

  13. [21]

    Lett.62, 264 (2003)

    Franzese, G., Raimondi, R., and Fazio, R., Parity- dependent Kondo effect in ultrasmall metallic grains, Eu- rophys. Lett.62, 264 (2003)

    2003

  14. [22]

    Rossi and D

    E. Rossi and D. K. Morr, Spatially dependent Kondo effect in quantum corrals, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 236602 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    T. Hand, J. Kroha, and H. Monien, Spin correlations and finite-size effects in the one-dimensional Kondo box, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 136604 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Bedrich, S

    R. Bedrich, S. Burdin, and M. Hentschel, Mesoscopic Kondo box: A mean-field approach, Phys. Rev. B81, 174406 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Schwabe, D

    A. Schwabe, D. G¨ utersloh, and M. Potthoff, Competition between Kondo screening and indirect magnetic exchange in a quantum box, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 257202 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Schwabe, M

    A. Schwabe, M. H¨ ansel, and M. Potthoff, Cooperation of different exchange mechanisms in confined magnetic systems, Phys. Rev. A90, 033615 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Schwabe, M

    A. Schwabe, M. H¨ ansel, M. Potthoff, and A. K. Mitchell, Screening mechanisms in magnetic nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B92, 155104 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Schmid, J

    H. Schmid, J. F. Steiner, K. J. Franke, and F. von Oppen, Quantum Yu-Shiba-Rusinov dimers, Phys. Rev. B105, 235406 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Schneider, S

    L. Schneider, S. Brinker, M. Steinbrecher, J. Hermenau, T. Posske, M. dos Santos Dias, S. Lounis, R. Wiesendan- ger, and J. Wiebe, Controlling in-gap end states by link- ing nonmagnetic atoms and artificially-constructed spin chains on superconductors,11, 4707 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Kamlapure, L

    A. Kamlapure, L. Cornils, R. ˇZitko, M. Valentyuk, R. Mozara, S. Pradhan, J. Fransson, A. I. Lichtenstein, J. Wiebe, and R. Wiesendanger, Correlation of Yu-Shiba- Rusinov states and Kondo resonances in artificial spin arrays on an s-wave superconductor, Nano Letters21, 6748 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    von Oppen and K

    F. von Oppen and K. J. Franke, Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in real metals, Phys. Rev. B103, 205424 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Friedrich, R

    F. Friedrich, R. Boshuis, M. Bode, and A. Odobesko, Coupling of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in one-dimensional chains of Fe atoms on Nb(110), Phys. Rev. B103, 235437 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    O. Deb, S. Hoffman, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Yu-Shiba- Rusinov states and ordering of magnetic impurities near the boundary of a superconducting nanowire, Phys. Rev. B103, 165403 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Mier, D.-J

    C. Mier, D.-J. Choi, and N. Lorente, Calculations of in- gap states of ferromagnetic spin chains ons-wave wide- band superconductors, Phys. Rev. B104, 245415 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Liebhaber, L

    E. Liebhaber, L. M. R¨ utten, G. Reecht, J. F. Steiner, S. Rohlf, K. Rossnagel, F. von Oppen, and K. J. Franke, Quantum spins and hybridization in artificially- constructed chains of magnetic adatoms on a supercon- ductor,13, 2160 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Majek, G

    P. Majek, G. G´ orski, T. Doma´ nski, and I. Weymann, Hallmarks of Majorana mode leaking into a hybrid dou- ble quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B106, 155123 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    J. F. Steiner, C. Mora, K. J. Franke, and F. von Op- pen, Quantum magnetism and topological superconduc- tivity in Yu-Shiba-Rusinov chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 036801 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    ˇZonda, P

    M. ˇZonda, P. Zalom, T. Novotn´ y, G. Loukeris, J. B¨ atge, and V. Pokorn´ y, Generalized atomic limit of a double quantum dot coupled to superconducting leads, Phys. Rev. B107, 115407 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Yu, Acta Phys

    L. Yu, Acta Phys. Sin.21, 75 (1965)

    1965

  32. [40]

    Shiba, Classical Spins in Superconductors, Prog

    H. Shiba, Classical Spins in Superconductors, Prog. Theor. Phys.40, 435 (1968)

    1968

  33. [41]

    A. I. Rusinov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.56, 2047 (1969)

    1969

  34. [42]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane, Topological defects and gapless modes in insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Michel, A

    S. Michel, A. F¨ unfhaus, R. Quade, R. Valent´ ı, and M. Potthoff, Bound states and local topological phase diagram of classical impurity spins coupled to a Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B109, 155116 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Nozi` eres and A

    P. Nozi` eres and A. Blandin, Kondo effect in real metals, J. Phys. France41, 193 (1980)

    1980

  41. [49]

    C. A. B¨ usser, G. B. Martins, and A. E. Feiguin, Lanc- zos transformation for quantum impurity problems ind- dimensional lattices: Application to graphene nanorib- bons, Phys. Rev. B88, 245113 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Haydock, The recursive solution of the Schr¨ odinger equation, inSolid State Physics, Vol

    R. Haydock, The recursive solution of the Schr¨ odinger equation, inSolid State Physics, Vol. 35, edited by H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, New York, 1980) pp. 215–294

    1980

  43. [51]

    Y. Lu, X. Cao, P. Hansmann, and M. W. Haverkort, Natural-orbital impurity solver and projection approach for green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B100, 115134 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Qi, Y.-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quan- tization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional param- agnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B74, 085308 (2006)

    2006

  45. [53]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  46. [54]

    W.-Y. Shan, J. Lu, H.-Z. Lu, and S.-Q. Shen, Vacancy- induced bound states in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B84, 035307 (2011). 19

    2011

  47. [55]

    Slager, L

    R.-J. Slager, L. Rademaker, J. Zaanen, and L. Balents, Impurity-bound states and green’s function zeros as local signatures of topology, Phys. Rev. B92, 085126 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    S.-S. Diop, L. Fritz, M. Vojta, and S. Rachel, Impurity bound states as detectors of topological band structures revisited, Phys. Rev. B101, 245132 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singularities in the electro- magnetic field, Proc. R. Soc. London A133, 60 (1931)

    1931

  50. [58]

    Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys

    B. Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2167 (1983)

    1983

  51. [59]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. London A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  52. [60]

    In principle, the transition and gapless flow could be en- forced via a pole of a two-particle Green’s function, i.e., through a two-electron or through an excitonic bound state. This could create an obstacle to the quantum- classical deformation since, in the case of a classi...

  53. [61]

    R. G. Grimes, J. G. Lewis, and H. D. Simon, A shifted block Lanczos algorithm for solving sparse symmetric generalized eigenproblems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 15, 228 (1994)

    1994

  54. [62]

    Y. Lu, M. H¨ oppner, O. Gunnarsson, and M. W. Haverkort, Efficient real-frequency solver for dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B90, 085102 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    G. W. Semenoff, Condensed-matter simulation of a three- dimensional anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 2449 (1984)

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.