Pith. sign in

REVIEW 66 references

Holistic Semantic Representation for Navigational Trajectory Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.02737 v2 pith:27HUBNKT submitted 2025-01-06 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords trajectorygenerationsemanticholisticrepresentationdestination-orientedencoderfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Trajectory generation has garnered significant attention from researchers in the field of spatio-temporal analysis, as it can generate substantial synthesized human mobility trajectories that enhance user privacy and alleviate data scarcity. However, existing trajectory generation methods often focus on improving trajectory generation quality from a singular perspective, lacking a comprehensive semantic understanding across various scales. Consequently, we are inspired to develop a HOlistic SEmantic Representation (HOSER) framework for navigational trajectory generation. Given an origin-and-destination (OD) pair and the starting time point of a latent trajectory, we first propose a Road Network Encoder to expand the receptive field of road- and zone-level semantics. Second, we design a Multi-Granularity Trajectory Encoder to integrate the spatio-temporal semantics of the generated trajectory at both the point and trajectory levels. Finally, we employ a Destination-Oriented Navigator to seamlessly integrate destination-oriented guidance. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that HOSER outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by a significant margin. Moreover, the model's performance in few-shot learning and zero-shot learning scenarios further verifies the effectiveness of our holistic semantic representation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.a...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Bahdanau, D.; Cho, K.; and Bengio, Y. 2015. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In ICLR

  4. [4]

    Bao, J.; He, T.; Ruan, S.; Li, Y.; and Zheng, Y. 2017. Planning bike lanes based on sharing-bikes' trajectories. In SIGKDD

  5. [5]

    Brody, S.; Alon, U.; and Yahav, E. 2022. How attentive are graph attention networks? In ICLR

  6. [6]

    Cao, C.; and Li, M. 2021. Generating mobility trajectories with retained data utility. In SIGKDD

  7. [7]

    Chang, Y.; Qi, J.; Liang, Y.; and Tanin, E. 2023. Contrastive trajectory similarity learning with dual-feature attention. In ICDE

  8. [8]

    T.; and Oria, V

    Chen, L.; \"O zsu, M. T.; and Oria, V. 2005. Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories. In SIGMOD

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Chen, W.; Liang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Luo, K.; Wen, H.; Li, L.; Yu, Y.; Wen, Q.; Chen, C.; et al. 2024 a . Deep learning for trajectory data management and mining: A survey and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14151

  2. [10]

    Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Cong, G.; Bao, Z.; and Long, C. 2024 b . Semantic-enhanced representation learning for road networks with temporal dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11495

  3. [11]

    K.; and Ellison, R

    Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Cong, G.; Bao, Z.; Long, C.; Liu, Y.; Chandran, A. K.; and Ellison, R. 2021. Robust road network representation learning: When traffic patterns meet traveling semantics. In CIKM

  4. [12]

    Dijkstra, E. W. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. , 1: 269--271

  5. [13]

    Feng, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Sun, F.; Meng, F.; Guo, A.; and Jin, D. 2018. Deepmove: Predicting human mobility with attentional recurrent networks. In WWW

  6. [14]

    Feng, J.; Yang, Z.; Xu, F.; Yu, H.; Wang, M.; and Li, Y. 2020. Learning to simulate human mobility. In SIGKDD

  7. [15]

    Gambs, S.; Killijian, M.-O.; and del Prado Cortez, M. N. 2012. Next place prediction using mobility Markov chains. In Proceedings of the first workshop on measurement, privacy, and mobility

  8. [16]

    C.; Hidalgo, C

    Gonzalez, M. C.; Hidalgo, C. A.; and Barabasi, A.-L. 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature , 453(7196): 779--782

  9. [17]

    Goodfellow, I.; Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; Xu, B.; Warde-Farley, D.; Ozair, S.; Courville, A.; and Bengio, Y. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS

  10. [18]

    Guo, S.; Lin, Y.; Wan, H.; Li, X.; and Cong, G. 2021. Learning dynamics and heterogeneity of spatial-temporal graph data for traffic forecasting. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. , 34(11): 5415--5428

  11. [19]

    Han, P.; Wang, J.; Yao, D.; Shang, S.; and Zhang, X. 2021. A graph-based approach for trajectory similarity computation in spatial networks. In SIGKDD

  12. [20]

    Ho, J.; Jain, A.; and Abbeel, P. 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In NeurIPS

  13. [21]

    Huang, D.; Song, X.; Fan, Z.; Jiang, R.; Shibasaki, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; and Kato, Y. 2019. A variational autoencoder based generative model of urban human mobility. In MIPR

  14. [22]

    Huang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, T.; and Li, G. 2021. A learning-based method for computing shortest path distances on road networks. In ICDE

  15. [23]

    S.; Jensen, C

    Jepsen, T. S.; Jensen, C. S.; and Nielsen, T. D. 2019. Graph convolutional networks for road networks. In SIGSPATIAL

  16. [24]

    S.; Jensen, C

    Jepsen, T. S.; Jensen, C. S.; Nielsen, T. D.; and Torp, K. 2018. On network embedding for machine learning on road networks: A case study on the danish road network. In Big Data

  17. [25]

    Jiang, S.; Yang, Y.; Gupta, S.; Veneziano, D.; Athavale, S.; and Gonz \'a lez, M. C. 2016. The TimeGeo modeling framework for urban mobility without travel surveys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 113(37): E5370--E5378

  18. [26]

    X.; Wang, J.; and Jiang, J

    Jiang, W.; Zhao, W. X.; Wang, J.; and Jiang, J. 2023. Continuous trajectory generation based on two-stage GAN. In AAAI

  19. [27]

    Keogh, E.; and Ratanamahatana, C. A. 2005. Exact indexing of dynamic time warping. Knowl. Inf. Syst. , 7: 358--386

  20. [28]

    Kingma, D. P. 2014. Auto-encoding variational bayes. In ICLR

  21. [29]

    N.; and Welling, M

    Kipf, T. N.; and Welling, M. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR

  22. [30]

    Lesty \'a n, S.; \'A cs, G.; and Bicz \'o k, G. 2022. In search of lost utility: Private location data. In PETS

  23. [31]

    Li, Y.; Bao, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Gong, Z.; and Zheng, Y. 2016. Mining the Most Influential k-Location Set from Massive Trajectories. In SIGSPATIAL

  24. [32]

    Liu, S.; Song, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, N.; Chen, K.; Feng, Z.; and Song, M. 2024. Interaction pattern disentangling for multi-agent reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , 46(12): 8157--8172

  25. [33]

    Mao, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, D.; Bai, L.; and Zhao, R. 2022. Jointly contrastive representation learning on road network and trajectory. In CIKM

  26. [34]

    S.; and Yang, W

    Ouyang, K.; Shokri, R.; Rosenblum, D. S.; and Yang, W. 2018. A non-parametric generative model for human trajectories. In IJCAI

  27. [35]

    Radford, A.; Narasimhan, K.; Salimans, T.; Sutskever, I.; et al. 2018. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. OpenAI blog

  28. [36]

    Reich, T.; Budka, M.; Robbins, D.; and Hulbert, D. 2019. Survey of ETA prediction methods in public transport networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05037

  29. [37]

    Sanders, P.; and Schulz, C. 2013. Think locally, act globally: Highly balanced graph partitioning. In International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms

  30. [38]

    Schestakov, S.; Heinemeyer, P.; and Demidova, E. 2023. Road network representation learning with vehicle trajectories. In PAKDD

  31. [39]

    Shaw, P.; Uszkoreit, J.; and Vaswani, A. 2018. Self-attention with relative position representations. In NAACL

  32. [40]

    Song, C.; Koren, T.; Wang, P.; and Barab \'a si, A.-L. 2010. Modelling the scaling properties of human mobility. Nat. Phys. , 6(10): 818--823

  33. [41]

    Sun, K.; Qian, T.; Chen, T.; Liang, Y.; Nguyen, Q. V. H.; and Yin, H. 2020. Where to go next: Modeling long-and short-term user preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In AAAI

  34. [42]

    Veli c kovi \'c , P.; Cucurull, G.; Casanova, A.; Romero, A.; Lio, P.; and Bengio, Y. 2018. Graph attention networks. In ICLR

  35. [43]

    Wang, D.; Wu, L.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, J.; Sun, L.; and Fu, Y. 2023. Human-instructed deep hierarchical generative learning for automated urban planning. In AAAI

  36. [44]

    Wang, M.-x.; Lee, W.-C.; Fu, T.-y.; and Yu, G. 2019. Learning embeddings of intersections on road networks. In SIGSPATIAL

  37. [45]

    Wang, M.-X.; Lee, W.-C.; Fu, T.-Y.; and Yu, G. 2020. On representation learning for road networks. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. , 12(1): 1--27

  38. [46]

    Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Lu, Z.; and Yang, H. 2021. Large scale GPS trajectory generation using map based on two stage GAN. J. Data Sci. , 19(1): 126--141

  39. [47]

    Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Huang, W.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, T.; and Song, M. 2024 a . Spatiotemporal gated traffic trajectory simulation with semantic-aware graph learning. Inf. Fusion , 108: 102404

  40. [48]

    Wang, Y.; Zheng, T.; Liang, Y.; Liu, S.; and Song, M. 2024 b . Cola: Cross-city mobility transformer for human trajectory simulation. In WWW

  41. [49]

    Wang, Y.; Zheng, T.; Liu, S.; Feng, Z.; Chen, K.; Hao, Y.; and Song, M. 2024 c . Spatiotemporal-augmented graph neural networks for human mobility simulation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. , 36(11): 7074–7086

  42. [50]

    Wen, H.; Lin, Y.; Wu, L.; Mao, X.; Cai, T.; Hou, Y.; Guo, S.; Liang, Y.; Jin, G.; Zhao, Y.; Zimmermann, R.; Ye, J.; and Wan, H. 2024. A survey on service route and time prediction in instant delivery: Taxonomy, progress, and prospects. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. , 36(12): 7516--7535

  43. [51]

    W.; Wang, J.; and Pan, D

    Wu, N.; Zhao, X. W.; Wang, J.; and Pan, D. 2020. Learning effective road network representation with hierarchical graph neural networks. In SIGKDD

  44. [52]

    Xie, D.; Li, F.; and Phillips, J. M. 2017. Distributed trajectory similarity search. In VLDB

  45. [53]

    Xu, D.; Ruan, C.; Korpeoglu, E.; Kumar, S.; and Achan, K. 2020. Inductive representation learning on temporal graphs. In ICLR

  46. [54]

    Yang, C.; and Gidofalvi, G. 2018. Fast map matching, an algorithm integrating hidden Markov model with precomputation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. , 32(3): 547--570

  47. [55]

    Yang, D.; Fankhauser, B.; Rosso, P.; and Cudre-Mauroux, P. 2020. Location prediction over sparse user mobility traces using RNNs: Flashback in hidden states! In IJCAI

  48. [56]

    Yu, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; and Yu, Y. 2017. Seqgan: Sequence generative adversarial nets with policy gradient. In AAAI

  49. [57]

    Yuan, H.; Li, G.; and Bao, Z. 2022. Route travel time estimation on a road network revisited: Heterogeneity, proximity, periodicity and dynamicity. In VLDB

  50. [58]

    Yuan, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xie, W.; Xie, X.; Sun, G.; and Huang, Y. 2010. T-drive: Driving directions based on taxi trajectories. In SIGSPATIAL

  51. [59]

    Zhang, L.; and Long, C. 2023. Road network representation learning: A dual graph-based approach. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data , 17(9): 1--25

  52. [60]

    Zhao, T.; Huang, S.; Wang, Y.; Chai, C.; and Li, G. 2022. RNE: Computing shortest paths using road network embedding. VLDB J. , 31(3): 507--528

  53. [61]

    Zheng, T.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, T.; Hao, Y.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; and Chen, C. 2022. Transition propagation graph neural networks for temporal networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. , 35(4): 4567--4579

  54. [62]

    Zheng, T.; Wang, X.; Feng, Z.; Song, J.; Hao, Y.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; and Chen, C. 2023. Temporal aggregation and propagation graph neural networks for dynamic representation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. , 35(10): 10151--10165

  55. [63]

    Zheng, Y. 2015. Trajectory data mining: An overview. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. , 6(3): 1--41

  56. [64]

    Zhu, Y.; Ye, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, X.; and Yu, J. 2023 a . SynMob: creating high-fidelity synthetic GPS trajectory dataset for urban mobility analysis. In NeurIPS

  57. [65]

    Zhu, Y.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, X.; and Yu, J. 2023 b . DiffTraj: generating GPS trajectory with diffusion probabilistic model. In NeurIPS

  58. [66]

    J.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Q.; Ye, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, X.; and Liang, Y

    Zhu, Y.; Yu, J. J.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Q.; Ye, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, X.; and Liang, Y. 2024. Controltraj: Controllable trajectory generation with topology-constrained diffusion model. In SIGKDD

Pith tools