Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring and Modeling Uncertainty Degree for Monocular Depth Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.09929 v1 pith:27VE3LSL submitted 2023-07-19 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords uncertaintymodeldepthestimationmeasuringmethodsmodelingmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Effectively measuring and modeling the reliability of a trained model is essential to the real-world deployment of monocular depth estimation (MDE) models. However, the intrinsic ill-posedness and ordinal-sensitive nature of MDE pose major challenges to the estimation of uncertainty degree of the trained models. On the one hand, utilizing current uncertainty modeling methods may increase memory consumption and are usually time-consuming. On the other hand, measuring the uncertainty based on model accuracy can also be problematic, where uncertainty reliability and prediction accuracy are not well decoupled. In this paper, we propose to model the uncertainty of MDE models from the perspective of the inherent probability distributions originating from the depth probability volume and its extensions, and to assess it more fairly with more comprehensive metrics. By simply introducing additional training regularization terms, our model, with surprisingly simple formations and without requiring extra modules or multiple inferences, can provide uncertainty estimations with state-of-the-art reliability, and can be further improved when combined with ensemble or sampling methods. A series of experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools