Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Agent-S: LLM Agentic workflow to automate Standard Operating Procedures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.15520 v1 pith:2CNCLREM submitted 2025-02-03 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords actionagentmemoryagenticllmslogicaluserworkflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI agents using Large Language Models (LLMs) as foundations have shown promise in solving complex real-world tasks. In this paper, we propose an LLM-based agentic workflow for automating Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). For customer care operations, an SOP defines a logical step-by-step process for human agents to resolve customer issues. We observe that any step in the SOP can be categorized as user interaction or API call, while the logical flow in the SOP defines the navigation. We use LLMs augmented with memory and environments (API tools, user interface, external knowledge source) for SOP automation. Our agentic architecture consists of three task-specific LLMs, a Global Action Repository (GAR), execution memory, and multiple environments. SOP workflow is written as a simple logical block of text. Based on the current execution memory and the SOP, the agent chooses the action to execute; it interacts with an appropriate environment (user/API) to collect observations and feedback, which are, in turn, inputted to memory to decide the next action. The agent is designed to be fault-tolerant, where it dynamically decides to repeat an action or seek input from an external knowledge source. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed agent on the three SOPs from the e-commerce seller domain. The experimental results validate the agent's performance under complex real-world scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Eluna: An Agentic LLM System for Automating Warehouse Operations with Reasoning and Task Execution

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A graph-guided multi-agent framework plus asymmetric episodic distillation lets fine-tuned 32B models match larger teachers on warehouse SOP execution and hit 94% expert agreement on ticket processing.

  2. How Many Instructions Can LLMs Follow at Once?

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IFScale measures instruction-following at densities from 10 to 500 constraints and finds that even top frontier models satisfy only about two-thirds of 500 simultaneous keyword instructions.

  3. Email as the Interface to Generative AI Models: Seamless Administrative Automation

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An email-based workflow using OCR and an LLM can automate part of administrative form filling, with the best tested model filling 16 of 29 fields correctly and reducing estimated per-form cost by 64 percent.

  4. Entity Resolution in Practice: Lessons from a Self-Serve Pipeline

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On six public benchmarks, the paper shows no single entity-matching algorithm dominates and recommends an automatic matcher tournament, separate precision/recall mechanisms, and verified-merge clustering to stop casca...

Pith tools