REVIEW
Comparative Study of Language Models on Cross-Domain Data with Model Agnostic Explainability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Comparative Study of Language Models on Cross-Domain Data with Model Agnostic Explainability
read the original abstract
With the recent influx of bidirectional contextualized transformer language models in the NLP, it becomes a necessity to have a systematic comparative study of these models on variety of datasets. Also, the performance of these language models has not been explored on non-GLUE datasets. The study presented in paper compares the state-of-the-art language models - BERT, ELECTRA and its derivatives which include RoBERTa, ALBERT and DistilBERT. We conducted experiments by finetuning these models for cross domain and disparate data and penned an in-depth analysis of model's performances. Moreover, an explainability of language models coherent with pretraining is presented which verifies the context capturing capabilities of these models through a model agnostic approach. The experimental results establish new state-of-the-art for Yelp 2013 rating classification task and Financial Phrasebank sentiment detection task with 69% accuracy and 88.2% accuracy respectively. Finally, the study conferred here can greatly assist industry researchers in choosing the language model effectively in terms of performance or compute efficiency.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.