Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

Graph Prompt Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Beyond

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16534 v1 pith:2LZ6NPGM submitted 2023-11-28 cs.AI

Xiangguo Sun , Jiawen Zhang , Xixi Wu , Hong Cheng , Yun Xiong , Jia Li This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords graphdatasurveyapplicationschallengescomprehensiveprogprompt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has revolutionized numerous fields, yet its integration with graph data, a cornerstone in our interconnected world, remains nascent. This paper presents a pioneering survey on the emerging domain of graph prompts in AGI, addressing key challenges and opportunities in harnessing graph data for AGI applications. Despite substantial advancements in AGI across natural language processing and computer vision, the application to graph data is relatively underexplored. This survey critically evaluates the current landscape of AGI in handling graph data, highlighting the distinct challenges in cross-modality, cross-domain, and cross-task applications specific to graphs. Our work is the first to propose a unified framework for understanding graph prompt learning, offering clarity on prompt tokens, token structures, and insertion patterns in the graph domain. We delve into the intrinsic properties of graph prompts, exploring their flexibility, expressiveness, and interplay with existing graph models. A comprehensive taxonomy categorizes over 100 works in this field, aligning them with pre-training tasks across node-level, edge-level, and graph-level objectives. Additionally, we present, ProG, a Python library, and an accompanying website, to support and advance research in graph prompting. The survey culminates in a discussion of current challenges and future directions, offering a roadmap for research in graph prompting within AGI. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to catalyze further exploration and practical applications of AGI in graph data, underlining its potential to reshape AGI fields and beyond. ProG and the website can be accessed by \url{https://github.com/WxxShirley/Awesome-Graph-Prompt}, and \url{https://github.com/sheldonresearch/ProG}, respectively.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GILT: An LLM-Free, Tuning-Free Graph Foundational Model for In-Context Learning

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    GILT turns few-shot node, edge, and graph classification into a token-reasoning problem and reaches competitive accuracy on held-out benchmarks with no per-graph tuning and no LLM.

  2. Towards Fair Graph Prompting: A Dual-Prompt Mechanism for Mitigating Attribute and Structural Bias

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ADPrompt adds per-node feature gating and layer-wise edge message calibration to frozen pre-trained GNNs, reducing attribute and structural bias while keeping node-classification accuracy competitive.

  3. CoEvoT: Co-Evolving Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Graph-LLM Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Intermediate LLM thoughts are fed back to rewrite graph token embeddings each step, improving cross-dataset graph-LLM classification and link prediction.

  4. Unified Multi-Domain Graph Pre-training for Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Graphs via Domain-Specific Expert Encoding

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GPH^2 pre-trains one expert per graph on edge-dropped or meta-path views and fuses frozen experts with class-wise attention, outperforming type-specific graph pre-training baselines.

  5. GSTBench: A Benchmark Study on the Transferability of Graph Self-Supervised Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GSTBench finds that masked feature reconstruction (GraphMAE) is the only one of five graph self-supervised pretraining objectives that consistently transfers across eight datasets, while contrastive methods often perf...

  6. Heterogeneous Graph Prompt Learning via Adaptive Weight Pruning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GPAWP prunes low-importance graph prompts using gradient-based importance masks and retunes the remaining prompts, improving few-shot node classification over HGPrompt on ACM, DBLP, and Freebase.

  7. HGMP:Heterogeneous Graph Multi-Task Prompt Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HGMP combines graph-level contrastive pre-training, type-aware graph augmentation, and per-node-type multiplicative prompts to improve few-shot node, edge, and graph classification on heterogeneous graphs.

  8. GCAL: Adapting Graph Models to Evolving Domain Shifts

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GCAL combines information-maximization adaptation with variational memory graph generation to prevent catastrophic forgetting in unsupervised continual graph domain adaptation.

  9. Graph Prompting for Graph Learning Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of graph prompting methods that categorizes them by the stage at which prompts are applied: data, representation, or task.

Pith tools