REVIEW 3 cited by
Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in pre-trained language models have enabled convenient methods for generating human-like text at a large scale. Though these generation capabilities hold great potential for breakthrough applications, it can also be a tool for an adversary to generate misinformation. In particular, social media platforms like Twitter are highly susceptible to AI-generated misinformation. A potential threat scenario is when an adversary hijacks a credible user account and incorporates a natural language generator to generate misinformation. Such threats necessitate automated detectors for AI-generated tweets in a given user's Twitter timeline. However, tweets are inherently short, thus making it difficult for current state-of-the-art pre-trained language model-based detectors to accurately detect at what point the AI starts to generate tweets in a given Twitter timeline. In this paper, we present a novel algorithm using stylometric signals to aid detecting AI-generated tweets. We propose models corresponding to quantifying stylistic changes in human and AI tweets in two related tasks: Task 1 - discriminate between human and AI-generated tweets, and Task 2 - detect if and when an AI starts to generate tweets in a given Twitter timeline. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the stylometric features are effective in augmenting the state-of-the-art AI-generated text detectors.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
When Detection Fails: The Power of Fine-Tuned Models to Generate Human-Like Social Media Text
Fine-tuned LLMs generate social media text that evades state-of-the-art detectors and human readers, dropping detection accuracy from up to 99.9% to near chance.
-
The Arabic AI Fingerprint: Stylometric Analysis and Detection of Large Language Models Text
Arabic text written by LLMs carries detectable stylometric signatures, and fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa detectors reach near-perfect F1 on academic abstracts but degrade on social media.
-
Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samples
Stylometric features and tree-based classifiers separate human-written Wikipedia summaries from LLM-generated texts with high cross-validated accuracy on a new seven-class benchmark, though performance drops on other ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.