Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

The paper constructs explicit analytic eigenfunctions for a solvable deformation of quantum mechanics with arbitrary polynomial potentials, covering both bound and resonant states.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:21 UTC pith:2QNZU4CJ

load-bearing objection Explicit entire eigenfunctions for the deformed Schrödinger operator with arbitrary polynomial potentials, with the caveat that the key pole-cancellation/entireness claim is stated without proof and only tested to low order in Λ. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.10636 v2 pith:2QNZU4CJ submitted 2025-11-13 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.SP

Eigenfunctions of deformed Schr\"odinger equations

Matijn Fran\c{c}ois , Alba Grassi , Tommaso Pedroni This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.SP
keywords difference equationseigenfunctionsNekrasov-Shatashvilitopological stringToda pointsresonancesexact solvabilitydeformed Schrödinger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the finite-difference operators H_N = 2Λ^N cosh(p) + V_N(x) with arbitrary polynomial potentials of degree N, a solvable deformation of the standard Schrödinger operator p^2 + V_N(x). The central claim is that for every such potential there exist explicit entire solutions to the difference equation, given in closed form as combinations of Nekrasov–Shatashvili defect partition functions summed over Weyl orbits. These off-shell solutions become square-integrable exactly at the discrete energies selected by the previously derived quantization conditions; for even N they describe bound states, and for odd N resonances with complex energies. At special 'Toda points' the eigenfunctions exhibit enhanced decay, producing ground-state degeneracies for even N and real resonance energies for odd N despite the unbounded potential. The construction is derived from the open topological string/spectral theory correspondence in the four-dimensional limit.

Core claim

The authors claim that the difference equation Λ^N(ψ(x+iℏ)+ψ(x−iℏ)) + V_N(x)ψ = Eψ admits an explicit entire solution for any polynomial potential V_N of degree N and generic complex energy E. The solutions are built from two 'saddles': the defect partition function Z_D and a transformed copy Z_D(−x, f(a)), each multiplied by a sum over the Weyl orbit of a specific weight vector of SU(N). The x-dependent phase factors in the summands are engineered so that the poles of each saddle cancel, yielding a function entire in x with known exponential-growth asymptotics. Imposing square-integrability forces the coefficient of the growing exponential to vanish, which is exactly the quantization condit

What carries the argument

The central object is the defect partition function Z_D(x,a,Λ,ℏ) of N=2 SU(N) gauge theory, which formally solves the difference equation but has poles at x=a_I+iℏk. The construction combines Z_D(x,a) and Z_D(−x, f(a)) with Weyl-orbit sums of the factor P_n(x,a), built from the Nekrasov–Shatashvili free energy and products of sinh and (1−e^{2π(a·e_I−x)/ℏ})^{1/2−n_I}. The x-dependent exponents in P_n make the poles cancel between the two saddles, producing an entire function; the quantization condition arises from requiring the coefficient of e^{π|x|/ℏ} in the x→+∞ asymptotics to vanish.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the pole cancellation in the linear combinations (2.25) and (2.31) holds for all values of the parameters — the paper tests it only for N=2,3,4,5,6 to third order in the Λ expansion, with no proof for general N.

What would settle it

Compute the residue of ψ_N(x) at x=a_I+iℏk for N=7 numerically to high precision in a few orders of Λ; if the residues do not vanish exactly, the off-shell eigenfunctions are not entire and the square-integrability analysis collapses. Alternatively, attempt a rigorous inductive proof of pole cancellation for arbitrary N; failure to find one would support the falsifier.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every bound-state energy of a confining even-N potential, and every resonance energy of an odd-N potential, can in principle be obtained by imposing the explicit quantization conditions (2.29)/(2.34); the corresponding eigenfunctions are given in closed form up to Nekrasov–Shatashvili data.
  • The deformed Hamiltonian violates the oscillation theorem: on-shell eigenfunctions for confining potentials can have a different number of zeros than their energy index, as shown in figure 4.
  • At Toda points, the eigenfunctions (2.25)/(2.31) vanish in the generic normalization, but an appropriate renormalization yields enhanced decay, causing spectral degeneracies for even N and real resonance energies for odd N.
  • The construction extends to a sinh(p) kinetic term and suggests that similar entire eigenfunctions exist for the corresponding difference operators.
  • The results give a rare example of a quantum spectral problem with explicit analytic eigenfunctions for arbitrary potential shape, interpolating between bound and resonant states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the entireness proof gap is closed, the same two-saddle Weyl-orbit mechanism could be applied to other SU(N)-type quantum curves (with matter, other gauge groups) to produce explicit eigenfunctions for previously intractable difference operators.
  • The Toda-point degeneracies might reflect a hidden symmetry at those loci; the explicit eigenfunctions could be used to construct the unitary transformation that diagonalizes H_N there.
  • The power-law decay of odd-N resonances at x→−∞ is reminiscent of Gamow states; the explicit formulas may allow a rigorous definition of the resonance spectrum via complex dilation directly on the analytic continuation of ψ_N.
  • Because the entireness rests on subtle cancellations, the paper implicitly predicts a family of polynomial identities among Nekrasov–Shatashvili functions; investigating these identities in isolation could yield a proof of the main theorem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the difference operator H_N = 2 cosh(p) + V_N(x) with arbitrary polynomial potential of degree N, viewed as a deformation of the standard Schr\"odinger anharmonic oscillator. The central claim is that explicit off-shell eigenfunctions, given in (2.25) for N even and (2.31) for N odd, solve the finite-difference equation (2.3) for generic parameters, are entire in x, and become L^2-normalizable exactly when the energy satisfies the quantization conditions (2.29)/(2.34) previously derived in [21]. The construction uses the open TS/ST correspondence: the two terms in each formula are identified as saddles of the open string grand potential, and their difference-equation property is inherited from the defect partition function. The paper also discusses Toda points, where the eigenfunctions display enhanced decay, leading to spectral degeneracies for even N and real energies for odd N, and it provides numerical checks for cubic and quartic potentials using complex dilation and Hamiltonian truncation. The derivation from Y_{N,0} topological string theory is presented in Section 4, with the four-dimensional limit reducing (4.18) to the proposed eigenfunctions.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a rare explicit, analytic eigenfunction construction for a family of one-dimensional finite-difference quantum-mechanical problems, extending the known Fredholm-determinant/quantization-condition results to the level of wavefunctions. The connection to SU(N) gauge theory and the open TS/ST correspondence is conceptually attractive, and the resulting formulas are concrete and testable. The authors provide substantial numerical evidence, including pole-cancellation plots and convergence in the \Lambda expansion, and they ship an ancillary Mathematica file with explicit expansions. However, the headline property of entireness is not proven; the paper explicitly states that it has been tested only up to three orders in \Lambda for N=2,...,6. Since the square-integrability analysis and the quantization conditions rely on absence of real-axis poles, the main result is currently conditional. The Toda-point vanishing identities (3.8)--(3.10) are likewise asserted without proof. These gaps, while clearly flagged, are load-bearing for the paper's central claims, so the paper needs substantial revision before the results can be accepted as e

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, Remark 1; Eqs. (2.25), (2.31), (2.21)] Entireness is asserted but not proved. Each saddle Z_D has poles at x = a_I + i\hbar k, and the paper states in Remark 1 that cancellation has been tested only 'for N=2,3,4,5,6 up to three orders in the \Lambda expansion.' This is the load-bearing property: the asymptotic expansions (2.26)--(2.28), the quantization conditions (2.29)/(2.34), and the L^2-normalizability analysis all assume the combination has no poles on the real axis (or on the contours used in the complex-dilation argument). The claim is not a trivial identity; it involves the full quantum mirror map and NS free energy, so finite-order checks cannot rule out failure at higher order. The derivation from TS/ST in Section 4 does not close this gap, since ansatz (4.18) itself is preliminary. The authors should either provide a proof of pole cancellation, or substantially strengthen the verification (e.g., exact evaluation fo
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (4.18); §4.2] The second-saddle ansatz (4.18) is the basis for the four-dimensional limit that produces (2.25) and (2.31), but it is introduced heuristically. The text says the transformation is 'natural' by analogy with local F_0 and the Toda lattice, and that only 'preliminary tests' for N=4 have been carried out. Since the main formulas inherit their structure from (4.18), the derivation is not yet a proof for generic N. In particular, the choice s=-1, k_x=k_y=1 in (4.16)--(4.18) fixes the second saddle, and a wrong choice would alter the linear combination that is supposed to cancel poles. The authors should either justify (4.18) more rigorously or clearly separate it as a conjecture that feeds into the proposed eigenfunctions.
  3. [§3, Eqs. (3.8)--(3.10)] The Toda-point behavior is presented as a finding ('we find that the following special combinations vanish identically'), but no proof or derivation is given, and the text immediately defers to a forthcoming work [48]. Moreover, the statement that the eigenfunctions vanish at Toda points, with a normalization to be introduced later, makes the claim about enhanced decay and spectral degeneracies incomplete. This does not affect the generic-parameter construction, but it is an advertised part of the results and should be either proven or clearly identified as a conjecture.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §2.3, property 1] The abstract says the solutions are 'entire in x for all generalized eigenvalues,' while the body restricts entireness to generic values of the energy and parameters. This mismatch should be corrected, especially given the unproven nature of the statement.
  2. [§2.4 and Appendix D] The numerical checks are convincing for the selected cubic and quartic examples, but the reported agreement is only for a handful of parameter choices. It would be helpful to state explicitly how many terms in the \Lambda expansion were used in each figure and to quantify the residual differences; some captions indicate red/green/blue curves but not the truncation order.
  3. [§2.3, Eq. (2.22)] The notation 'fff(a)' and 'fff_s(a)' is unusual and makes the formulas harder to read. A standard symbol such as \mathcal{F} or \tilde{a} would improve clarity, especially in the long expressions (2.25)--(2.33).
  4. [§2.3, remark 3] The violation of the oscillation theorem is stated as a fact, with a reference to [27] but no proof here. Since it is presented as one of the new spectral features, a brief argument or a precise numerical example would be useful.
  5. [§3] The relation between the Baxter equation (3.1) and the main difference equation (2.3) is only sketched. In particular, the transformation (3.3) and the claim that 'any choice of S\subset\mathbb{Z}' works would benefit from a short derivation, as it is used to contrast the Toda boundary conditions with the quantum-mechanical ones.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the eigenfunctions are a fresh combination of known gauge-theory building blocks, and the quantization conditions are derived from asymptotics rather than fitted; the main limitations are unproved analyticity and Toda identities, which are correctness gaps, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The construction of (2.25)/(2.31) does not reduce to its inputs. Each saddle Z_D P_n is a known formal solution of the difference equation, while the linear combination is new; the paper checks the difference equation order by order and compares the resulting wavefunctions with independent numerical diagonalization/complex-dilation results (Figures 2-10), so the eigenfunctions are not fitted to the energies. The quantization conditions (2.29)/(2.34) are obtained by imposing vanishing of the exponentially growing asymptotic coefficients, and the agreement with the quantization condition of [21] is an independent consistency check, not an input. The main self-citations ([21] for spectral determinants, [24-26] for the open TS/ST framework) provide scaffolding and benchmarks, but the central claim—explicit entire off-shell solutions for arbitrary polynomial potentials—has independent content even if those citations were absent. The paper itself flags the main limitation in Remark 1 (Section 2.3): entireness/pole cancellation is tested only "for N=2,3,4,5,6 up to three orders in the Λ expansion" and has no rigorous proof; this is a missing proof, not a circular definition. Similarly, the Toda-point vanishing identities (3.8)-(3.10) are asserted without proof and do not feed back into the derivation. The second-saddle ansatz (4.18) is admittedly motivated by analogy with local F_0 from [26] and by "preliminary tests for N=4"; taking an ansatz from prior work is a non-circular, though tentative, input. Overall, no quoted equation reduces to an earlier fitted parameter or to a self-citation by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central construction introduces no fitted constants: the potential coefficients h_k and parameters Λ, ℏ are inputs from the problem, and the energy E is the spectral parameter selected by the quantization condition. The main load-bearing assumptions are the conjectural open TS/ST ansatz, the (unproven) entireness of the combined saddles, and the Matone map to gauge theory parameters. No new particles or forces are invented.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Open TS/ST correspondence for Y^{N,0}: the background-independent open partition function is given by the two-saddle sum (4.15)/(4.18), with the second saddle obtained by the shift (4.16)-(4.20).
    The central eigenfunction formulas are derived from this proposal; the paper states 'We have carried out preliminary tests of (4.18) for N=4' (§4.1), so it is not an established theorem.
  • ad hoc to paper Pole cancellation/entireness of (2.25) and (2.31) for generic parameters.
    The two saddles are individually meromorphic with poles at x=a_I+iℏk; the claim that their combination is entire is load-bearing and is tested only 'for N=2,3,4,5,6 up to three orders in the Λ expansion' (§2.3, remark 1).
  • domain assumption Generalized Matone relations (C.18) relating potential coefficients h_j to Coulomb parameters a_I.
    Taken from prior work [21,40,41] and used to express the eigenfunctions in terms of the physical potential parameters; the paper reviews but does not prove these relations.
  • standard math Convergence of the instanton series for the NS free energy and defect partition function.
    Relies on cited convergence results for Nekrasov functions [75-77]; used implicitly in treating Z_D as an exact function.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28301 in / 13380 out tokens · 111846 ms · 2026-08-03T22:21:36.426293+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the spectral problems associated with the finite-difference operators $H_N = 2 \cosh(p) + V_N(x)$, where $V_N(x)$ is an arbitrary polynomial potential of degree $N$. These systems can be regarded as a solvable deformation of the standard Schr\"odinger operators $p^2 + V_N(x)$, and they arise naturally from the quantization of the Seiberg-Witten curve of four-dimensional, $\mathcal{N} = 2$, SU(N) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. Using the open topological string/spectral theory correspondence, we construct exact, generalized eigenfunctions of $H_N$, valid for arbitrary polynomial potentials and describing both bound and resonant states. We also comment on the case with a $\sinh(p)$ kinetic term. Our solutions are entire in $x$ for all generalized eigenvalues, and become square-integrable for a discrete subset of those. An interesting feature is the existence of special loci in the parameter space of the potential, where the eigenfunctions exhibit enhanced decay, leading to spectral degeneracies for confining potentials and to a real energy spectrum for unbounded ones. Our results provide a rare example of a quantum-mechanical spectral problem that is exactly solvable, admitting explicit, analytic eigenfunctions for both bound and resonant states.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Higher-Rank Connections and Deformed Schr\"odinger Operators

    math-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives weakest quantization conditions in terms of monodromy data for higher-order DEs tied to quantum Toda chain and proves duality predictions for deformed Schrödinger operators.

  2. Thou shalt not tunnel: Complex instantons and tunneling suppression in deformed quantum mechanics

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Deformed quantum mechanics from Seiberg-Witten curves shows phases with real or complex instantons, leading to tunneling suppression at Toda points and anomalous scaling at critical monopole points.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 62 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Mari˜ no,Spectral Theory and Mirror Symmetry, inProceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol

    M. Mari˜ no,Spectral Theory and Mirror Symmetry, inProceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 98, pp. 259–294, American Mathematical Society, 2018, DOI [1506.07757]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Mari˜ no,Les Houches lectures on non-perturbative topological strings,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2024) [2411.16211]

    M. Mari˜ no,Les Houches lectures on non-perturbative topological strings,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2024) [2411.16211]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Turbiner and A

    A. Turbiner and A. Ushveridze,Spectral singularities and quasi-exactly solvable quantal problem,Physics Letters A126(1987) 181

    1987

  4. [4]

    Aganagic, R

    M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Marino and C. Vafa,Topological strings and integrable hierarchies,Commun.Math.Phys.261(2006) 451 [hep-th/0312085]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Aganagic, M.C

    M. Aganagic, M.C. Cheng, R. Dijkgraaf, D. Krefl and C. Vafa,Quantum Geometry of Refined Topological Strings,JHEP1211(2012) 019 [1105.0630]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Mironov and A

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov,Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Sommerfeld Integrals, JHEP1004(2010) 040 [0910.5670]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    K. Ito, T. Kondo, K. Kuroda and H. Shu,WKB periods for higher order ODE and TBA equations,JHEP10(2021) 167 [2104.13680]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Yan,Exact WKB and the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve for 4d N = 2 pure SU(3) Yang-Mills

    F. Yan,Exact WKB and the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve for 4d N = 2 pure SU(3) Yang-Mills. Abelianization,JHEP03(2022) 164 [2012.15658]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Nekrasov and S.L

    N.A. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili,Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories, inXVIth International Congress On Mathematical Physics, pp. 265–289, World Scientific, 2010, DOI [0908.4052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Grassi, Y

    A. Grassi, Y. Hatsuda and M. Marino,Topological Strings from Quantum Mechanics, Annales Henri Poincar´ e17(2016) 3177 [1410.3382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Gaiotto, G.W

    D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke,Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,Adv. Math.234(2013) 239 [0907.3987]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Gaiotto,Opers and TBA,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2014) [1403.6137]

    D. Gaiotto,Opers and TBA,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2014) [1403.6137]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Grassi and J

    A. Grassi and J. Gu,Argyres-Douglas theories, Painlev´ e II and quantum mechanics,JHEP 02(2019) 060 [1803.02320]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Ito and H

    K. Ito and H. Shu,ODE/IM correspondence and the Argyres-Douglas theory,JHEP08 (2017) 071 [1707.03596]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    K. Ito, S. Koizumi and T. Okubo,Quantum Seiberg-Witten curve and Universality in Argyres-Douglas theories,Phys. Lett. B792(2019) 29 [1903.00168]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Hollands, P

    L. Hollands, P. R¨ uter and R.J. Szabo,A geometric recipe for twisted superpotentials, JHEP12(2021) 164 [2109.14699]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    K. Ito, M. Mari˜ no and H. Shu,TBA equations and resurgent Quantum Mechanics,JHEP 01(2019) 228 [1811.04812]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Fucito, A

    F. Fucito, A. Grassi, J.F. Morales and R. Savelli,Partition functions of non-Lagrangian theories from the holomorphic anomaly,JHEP07(2023) 195 [2306.05141]. – 34 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Ito and J

    K. Ito and J. Yang,TBA equations and quantum periods for D-type Argyres-Douglas theories,JHEP01(2025) 047 [2408.01124]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Bonelli, A

    G. Bonelli, A. Shchechkin and A. Tanzini,Refined Painlev´ e/gauge theory correspondence and quantum tau functions,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2025) [2502.01499]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Grassi and M

    A. Grassi and M. Mari˜ no,A Solvable Deformation of Quantum Mechanics,SIGMA15 (2019) 025 [1806.01407]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Grassi, J

    A. Grassi, J. Gu and M. Mari˜ no,Non-perturbative approaches to the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve,JHEP07(2020) 106 [1908.07065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Chakrabarti and M

    S. Chakrabarti and M. Raman,Exploring T-Duality for Self-Dual Fields,Fortsch. Phys. 72(2024) 2400023 [2311.09153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Marino and S

    M. Marino and S. Zakany,Exact eigenfunctions and the open topological string,J. Phys. A50(2017) 325401 [1606.05297]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Marino and S

    M. Marino and S. Zakany,Wavefunctions, integrability, and open strings,JHEP05(2019) 014 [1706.07402]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Fran¸ cois and A

    M. Fran¸ cois and A. Grassi,On the open TS/ST correspondence,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2025) [2503.21762]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Berezin and M.A

    F.A. Berezin and M.A. Shubin,The One-dimensional Schr¨ odinger Equation, inThe Schr¨ odinger Equation, vol. 66 ofMathematics and Its Applications, (Dordrecht), pp. 50–149, Springer (1991), DOI

    1991

  28. [28]

    Gutzwiller,The quantum mechanical Toda lattice,Ann

    M.C. Gutzwiller,The quantum mechanical Toda lattice,Ann. Phys.124(1980) 347

    1980

  29. [29]

    Gutzwiller,The quantum mechanical Toda lattice, II,Ann

    M.C. Gutzwiller,The quantum mechanical Toda lattice, II,Ann. Phys.133(1981) 304

    1981

  30. [30]

    Sklyanin,The quantum Toda chain, inNonlinear Equations in Classical and Quantum Field Theory, N

    E.K. Sklyanin,The quantum Toda chain, inNonlinear Equations in Classical and Quantum Field Theory, N. Sanchez, ed., vol. 226 ofLecture Notes in Physics, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 196–233, Springer (1985), DOI

    1985

  31. [31]

    Pasquier and M

    V. Pasquier and M. Gaudin,The periodic Toda chain and a matrix generalization of the Bessel function recursion relations,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.25(1992) 5243

    1992

  32. [32]

    Kozlowski and J

    K.K. Kozlowski and J. Teschner,TBA for the Toda chain, inNew Trends in Quantum Integrable Systems, pp. 195–219, World Scientific, 2010, DOI [1006.2906]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    Laptev, L

    A. Laptev, L. Schimmer and L.A. Takhtajan,Weyl asymptotics for perturbed functional difference operators,Journal of Mathematical Physics60(2019) 103505

    2019

  34. [34]

    Laptev, L

    A. Laptev, L. Schimmer and L.A. Takhtajan,Weyl type asymptotics and bounds for the eigenvalues of functional-difference operators for mirror curves.,Geom. Funct. Anal.26 (2016) 288 [1510.00045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Yaris, J

    R. Yaris, J. Bendler, R.A. Lovett, C.M. Bender and P.A. Fedders,Resonance calculations for arbitrary potentials,Phys. Rev. A18(1978) 1816

    1978

  36. [36]

    Caliceti, S

    E. Caliceti, S. Graffi and M. Maioli,Perturbation theory of odd anharmonic oscillators, Communications in Mathematical Physics75(1980) 51

    1980

  37. [37]

    Caliceti and M

    E. Caliceti and M. Maioli,Odd anharmonic oscillators and shape resonances,Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique38(1983) 175. – 35 –

    1983

  38. [38]

    Maioli,Exponential perturbations of the harmonic oscillator,Journal of Mathematical Physics22(1981) 1952

    M. Maioli,Exponential perturbations of the harmonic oscillator,Journal of Mathematical Physics22(1981) 1952

    1981

  39. [39]

    Mironov and A

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov,Nekrasov Functions from Exact BS Periods: The Case of SU(N),J. Phys. A43(2010) 195401 [0911.2396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    Gaiotto and H.-C

    D. Gaiotto and H.-C. Kim,Surface defects and instanton partition functions,JHEP10 (2016) 012 [1412.2781]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Bullimore, H.-C

    M. Bullimore, H.-C. Kim and P. Koroteev,Defects and Quantum Seiberg-Witten Geometry,JHEP05(2015) 095 [1412.6081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Matone,Instantons and recursion relations inN= 2SUSY gauge theory,Phys

    M. Matone,Instantons and recursion relations inN= 2SUSY gauge theory,Phys. Lett. B357(1995) 342 [hep-th/9506102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  43. [43]

    Flume, F

    R. Flume, F. Fucito, J.F. Morales and R. Poghossian,Matone’s relation in the presence of gravitational couplings,JHEP04(2004) 008 [hep-th/0403057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    Alday and Y

    L.F. Alday and Y. Tachikawa,Affine SL(2) conformal blocks from 4d gauge theories,Lett. Math. Phys.94(2010) 87 [1005.4469]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    Kanno and Y

    H. Kanno and Y. Tachikawa,Instanton counting with a surface operator and the chain-saw quiver,JHEP06(2011) 119 [1105.0357]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [46]

    Sciarappa,Exact relativistic Toda chain eigenfunctions from Separation of Variables and gauge theory,JHEP10(2017) 116 [1706.05142]

    A. Sciarappa,Exact relativistic Toda chain eigenfunctions from Separation of Variables and gauge theory,JHEP10(2017) 116 [1706.05142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee and N. Nekrasov,Intersecting defects in gauge theory, quantum spin chains, and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations,JHEP10(2021) 120 [2103.17186]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Work in progress

    M. Fran¸ cois, A. Grassi and T. Pedroni, “Work in progress.”

  49. [49]

    Codesido, A

    S. Codesido, A. Grassi and M. Marino,Spectral Theory and Mirror Curves of Higher Genus,Annales Henri Poincare18(2017) 559 [1507.02096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    S.H. Katz, A. Klemm and C. Vafa,Geometric engineering of quantum field theories, Nucl.Phys.B497(1997) 173 [hep-th/9609239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    Klemm, W

    A. Klemm, W. Lerche, P. Mayr, C. Vafa and N.P. Warner,Selfdual strings and N=2 supersymmetric field theory,Nucl. Phys. B477(1996) 746 [hep-th/9604034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  52. [52]

    K. Hori, S. Katz, A. Klemm, R. Pandharipande, R. Thomas, C. Vafa et al.,Mirror Symmetry, vol. 1 ofClay Mathematics Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, USA (2003)

    2003

  53. [53]

    Hatsuda and M

    Y. Hatsuda and M. Marino,Exact quantization conditions for the relativistic Toda lattice, JHEP05(2016) 133 [1511.02860]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Gavrylenko, A

    P. Gavrylenko, A. Grassi and Q. Hao,Connecting topological strings and spectral theory via non-autonomous Toda equations,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory (2023) [2304.11027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Bonelli, A

    G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini,New results inN= 2theories from non-perturbative string,Annales Henri Poincar´ e19(2018) 743 [1704.01517]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Hatsuda, M

    Y. Hatsuda, M. Marino, S. Moriyama and K. Okuyama,Non-perturbative effects and the refined topological string,JHEP09(2014) 168 [1306.1734]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    Fran¸ cois and A

    M. Fran¸ cois and A. Grassi,Painlev´ e Kernels and Surface Defects at Strong Coupling, Annales Henri Poincare26(2025) 2117 [2310.09262]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Iqbal and A.-K

    A. Iqbal and A.-K. Kashani-Poor,SU(N) geometries and topological string amplitudes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.10(2006) 1 [hep-th/0306032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Iqbal, C

    A. Iqbal, C. Kozcaz and C. Vafa,The Refined topological vertex,JHEP10(2009) 069 [hep-th/0701156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  60. [60]

    Grassi, Q

    A. Grassi, Q. Hao and A. Neitzke,Exponential Networks, WKB and Topological String, SIGMA19(2023) 064 [2201.11594]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    M. Alim, L. Hollands and I. Tulli,Quantum Curves, Resurgence and Exact WKB,SIGMA 19(2023) 009 [2203.08249]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Hao,Exact WKB of solutions by Borel summation and open TBA,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2025) [2507.06922]

    Q. Hao,Exact WKB of solutions by Borel summation and open TBA,arXiv preprints: High Energy Physics - Theory(2025) [2507.06922]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Work in progress

    J. Gu and M. Mari˜ no, “Work in progress.”

  64. [64]

    Ilyin, A

    A. Ilyin, A. Laptev, L. Schimmer and A. Zernova,Eigenvalues of non-selfadjoint functional difference operators,arXiv preprints: Spectral Theory(2025) [2504.06858]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Bonelli, A

    G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini,Seiberg–Witten theory as a Fermi gas,Lett. Math. Phys.107(2017) 1 [1603.01174]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Ellegaard Andersen and R

    J. Ellegaard Andersen and R. Kashaev,A TQFT from Quantum Teichm¨ uller Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.330(2014) 887 [1109.6295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Garoufalidis and R

    S. Garoufalidis and R. Kashaev,Evaluation of state integrals at rational points,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.09(2015) 549 [1411.6062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Hatsuda and K

    Y. Hatsuda and K. Okuyama,Resummations and Non-Perturbative Corrections,JHEP09 (2015) 051 [1505.07460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Adamchik,Symbolic and numeric computations of the Barnes function,Computer Physics Communications157(2004) 181 [math/0308086]

    V.S. Adamchik,Symbolic and numeric computations of the Barnes function,Computer Physics Communications157(2004) 181 [math/0308086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  70. [70]

    Moore, N

    G.W. Moore, N. Nekrasov and S. Shatashvili,Integrating over Higgs branches,Commun. Math. Phys.209(2000) 97 [hep-th/9712241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  71. [71]

    Losev, N

    A. Losev, N. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili,Testing Seiberg-Witten Solution, inStrings, Branes and Dualities, L. Baulieu, P. Di Francesco, M. Douglas, V. Kazakov, M. Picco and P. Windey, eds., vol. 520 ofNATO ASI Series, (Dordrecht), pp. 359–372, Springer (1999), DOI [hep-th/9801061]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  72. [72]

    Nekrasov,Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.7(2004) 831 [hep-th/0206161]

    N.A. Nekrasov,Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.7(2004) 831 [hep-th/0206161]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [73]

    Flume and R

    R. Flume and R. Poghossian,An Algorithm for the microscopic evaluation of the coefficients of the Seiberg-Witten prepotential,Int. J. Mod. Phys.A18(2003) 2541 [hep-th/0208176]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  74. [74]

    Bruzzo, F

    U. Bruzzo, F. Fucito, J.F. Morales and A. Tanzini,Multiinstanton calculus and equivariant cohomology,JHEP0305(2003) 054 [hep-th/0211108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  75. [75]

    A. Its, O. Lisovyy and Y. Tykhyy,Connection problem for the sine-gordon/painlev´ e iii tau function and irregular conformal blocks,Int. Math. Res. Notices2015(2014) 8903 [1403.1235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  76. [76]

    Arnaudo, G

    P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli and A. Tanzini,On the convergence of Nekrasov functions,Ann. Henri Poincar´ e25(2024) 2389–2425 [2212.06741]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Desiraju, P

    H. Desiraju, P. Ghosal and A. Prokhorov,Proof of Zamolodchikov conjecture for semi-classical conformal blocks on the torus,arXiv preprints: Mathematical Physics(2024) [2407.05839]. – 38 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024