Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Study of Dynamics of D⁰ to K^- e^+ ν_(e) and D⁰toπ^- e^+ ν_(e) Decays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1508.07560 v1 pith:2VO3W5VV submitted 2015-08-30 hep-ex

Study of Dynamics of D⁰ to K^- e^+ ν_(e) and D⁰toπ^- e^+ ν_(e) Decays

BESIII Collaboration: M. Ablikim , M. N. Achasov , X. C. Ai , O. Albayrak , M. Albrecht , D. J. Ambrose , A. Amoroso , F. F. An
show 394 more authors
Q. An J. Z. Bai R. Baldini Ferroli Y. Ban D. W. Bennett J. V. Bennett M. Bertani D. Bettoni J. M. Bian F. Bianchi E. Boger I. Boyko R. A. Briere H. Cai X. Cai O. Cakir A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao S. A. Cetin J. F. Chang G. Chelkov G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen J. C. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen X. Chen X. R. Chen Y. B. Chen H. P. Cheng X. K. Chu G. Cibinetto H. L. Dai J. P. Dai A. Dbeyssi D. Dedovich Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denysenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori Y. Ding C. Dong J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong S. X. Du P. F. Duan E. E. Eren J. Z. Fan J. Fang S. S. Fang X. Fang Y. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng E. Fioravanti M. Fritsch C. D. Fu Q. Gao X. Y. Gao Y. Gao Z. Gao I. Garzia K. Goetzen W. X. Gong W. Gradl M. Greco M. H. Gu Y. T. Gu Y. H. Guan A. Q. Guo L. B. Guo Y. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Haddadi A. Hafner S. Han X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris K. L. He X. Q. He T. Held Y. K. Heng Z. L. Hou C. Hu H. M. Hu J. F. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu G. M. Huang G. S. Huang J. S. Huang X. T. Huang Y. Huang T. Hussain Q. Ji Q. P. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji L. L. Jiang L. W. Jiang X. S. Jiang X. Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao Z. Jiao D. P. Jin S. Jin T. Johansson A. Julin N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki X. L. Kang X. S. Kang M. Kavatsyuk B. C. Ke P. Kiese R. Kliemt B. Kloss O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf M. Kornicer W. Kuehn A. Kupsc J. S. Lange M. Lara P. Larin C. Leng C. Li Cheng Li D. M. Li F. Li F. Y. Li G. Li H. B. Li J. C. Li Jin Li K. Li Lei Li P. R. Li T. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. L. Li X. M. Li X. N. Li X. Q. Li Z. B. Li H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao D. X. Lin B. J. Liu C. L. Liu C. X. Liu F. H. Liu Fang Liu Feng Liu H. B. Liu H. H. Liu H. M. Liu J. Liu J. B. Liu J. P. Liu J. Y. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu L. D. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu X. Liu Y. B. Liu Z. A. Liu Zhiqing Liu H. Loehner X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu Y. Lu Y. P. Lu C. L. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo X. R. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma L. L. Ma Q. M. Ma T. Ma X. N. Ma X. Y. Ma F. E. Maas M. Maggiora Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello J. G. Messchendorp J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo Y. J. Mo C. Morales Morales K. Moriya N. Yu. Muchnoi H. Muramatsu Y. Nefedov F. Nerling I. B. Nikolaev Z. Ning S. Nisar S. L. Niu X. Y. Niu S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti P. Patteri M. Pelizaeus H. P. Peng K. Peters J. Pettersson J. L. Ping R. G. Ping R. Poling V. Prasad M. Qi S. Qian C. F. Qiao L. Q. Qin N. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu K. H. Rashid C. F. Redmer M. Ripka G. Rong Ch. Rosner X. D. Ruan V. Santoro A. Sarantsev M. Savri\'e K. Schoenning S. Schumann W. Shan M. Shao C. P. Shen P. X. Shen X. Y. Shen H. Y. Sheng W. M. Song X. Y. Song S. Sosio S. Spataro G. X. Sun J. F. Sun S. S. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. J. Sun Z. T. Sun C. J. Tang X. Tang I. Tapan E. H. Thorndike M. Tiemens M. Ullrich I. Uman G. S. Varner B. Wang D. Wang D. Y. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. S. Wang M. Wang P. Wang P. L. Wang S. G. Wang W. Wang X. F. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. Q. Wang Z. Wang Z. G. Wang Z. H. Wang Z. Y. Wang T. Weber D. H. Wei J. B. Wei P. Weidenkaff S. P. Wen U. Wiedner M. Wolke L. H. Wu Z. Wu L. G. Xia Y. Xia D. Xiao H. Xiao Z. J. Xiao Y. G. Xie Q. L. Xiu G. F. Xu L. Xu Q. J. Xu X. P. Xu L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan Y. H. Yan H. J. Yang H. X. Yang L. Yang Y. Yang Y. X. Yang M. Ye M. H. Ye J. H. Yin B. X. Yu C. X. Yu J. S. Yu C. Z. Yuan W. L. Yuan Y. Yuan A. Yuncu A. A. Zafar A. Zallo Y. Zeng B. X. Zhang B. Y. Zhang C. Zhang C. C. Zhang D. H. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Y. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang K. Zhang L. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. N. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Yu Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. P. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang G. Zhao J. W. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao Lei Zhao Ling Zhao M. G. Zhao Q. Zhao Q. W. Zhao S. J. Zhao T. C. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong L. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou K. Zhu K. J. Zhu S. Zhu S. H. Zhu X. L. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Y. S. Zhu Z. A. Zhu J. Zhuang L. Zotti B. S. Zou J. H. Zou
This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords formfactorsratiohadroniclatticelcsrvaluecalculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In an analysis of a 2.92~fb$^{-1}$ data sample taken at 3.773~GeV with the BESIII detector operated at the BEPCII collider, we measure the absolute decay branching fractions to be $\mathcal B(D^0 \to K^-e^+\nu_e)=(3.505\pm 0.014 \pm 0.033)\%$ and $\mathcal B(D^0 \to \pi^-e^+\nu_e)=(0.295\pm 0.004\pm 0.003)\%$. From a study of the differential decay rates we obtain the products of hadronic form factor and the magnitude of the CKM matrix element $f_{+}^K(0)|V_{cs}|=0.7172\pm0.0025\pm 0.0035$ and $f_{+}^{\pi}(0)|V_{cd}|=0.1435\pm0.0018\pm 0.0009$. Combining these products with the values of $|V_{cs(d)}|$ from the SM constraint fit, we extract the hadronic form factors $f^K_+(0) = 0.7368\pm0.0026\pm 0.0036$ and $f^\pi_+(0) = 0.6372\pm0.0080\pm 0.0044$, and their ratio $f_+^{\pi}(0)/f_+^{K}(0)=0.8649\pm 0.0112\pm 0.0073$. These form factors and their ratio are used to test unquenched Lattice QCD calculations of the form factors and a light cone sum rule (LCSR) calculation of their ratio. The measured value of $f_+^{K(\pi)}(0) |V_{cs(d)}|$ and the lattice QCD value for $f^{K(\pi)}_+(0)$ are used to extract values of the CKM matrix elements of $|V_{cs}|=0.9601 \pm 0.0033 \pm 0.0047 \pm 0.0239$ and $|V_{cd}|=0.2155 \pm 0.0027 \pm 0.0014 \pm 0.0094$, where the third errors are due to the uncertainties in lattice QCD calculations of the form factors. Using the LCSR value for $f_+^\pi(0)/f_+^K(0)$, we determine the ratio $|V_{cd}|/|V_{cs}|=0.238\pm 0.004\pm 0.002\pm 0.011$, where the third error is from the uncertainty in the LCSR normalization. In addition, we measure form factor parameters for three different theoretical models that describe the weak hadronic charged currents for these two semileptonic decays. All of these measurements are the most precise to date.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scrutinizing lepton flavor universality and transition form factor correlation from charmed meson semileptonic decay into light strange vector $K^*$ meson

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A light-cone sum-rule calculation predicts D_s^+→K^{*0} form factors and a muon/electron branching ratio R=0.950, consistent with the Standard Model.

  2. Systematic analysis of $D_{(s)}$ meson semi-leptonic decays in the covariant light-front quark model

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CLFQM calculations of D(s) to P/S/V/A form factors and branching ratios agree with data for most P and V channels but show notable discrepancies for several S and A channels.

  3. Review of experimental studies of charmed meson decays at BESIII

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review of BESIII charmed meson decay studies presents the most precise averages for |V_cs|, |V_cd|, D and D_s decay constants, and several hadronic form factors from combined experimental results.