Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Harnessing Diversity for Important Data Selection in Pretraining Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16986 v2 pith:2Y53Z5MG submitted 2024-09-25 cs.AI

Harnessing Diversity for Important Data Selection in Pretraining Large Language Models

classification cs.AI
keywords datainstancesinfluenceclustersdiversityqualityapproachcluster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data selection is of great significance in pre-training large language models, given the variation in quality within the large-scale available training corpora. To achieve this, researchers are currently investigating the use of data influence to measure the importance of data instances, $i.e.,$ a high influence score indicates that incorporating this instance to the training set is likely to enhance the model performance. Consequently, they select the top-$k$ instances with the highest scores. However, this approach has several limitations. (1) Computing the influence of all available data is time-consuming. (2) The selected data instances are not diverse enough, which may hinder the pre-trained model's ability to generalize effectively to various downstream tasks. In this paper, we introduce \texttt{Quad}, a data selection approach that considers both quality and diversity by using data influence to achieve state-of-the-art pre-training results. In particular, noting that attention layers capture extensive semantic details, we have adapted the accelerated $iHVP$ computation methods for attention layers, enhancing our ability to evaluate the influence of data, $i.e.,$ its quality. For the diversity, \texttt{Quad} clusters the dataset into similar data instances within each cluster and diverse instances across different clusters. For each cluster, if we opt to select data from it, we take some samples to evaluate the influence to prevent processing all instances. To determine which clusters to select, we utilize the classic Multi-Armed Bandit method, treating each cluster as an arm. This approach favors clusters with highly influential instances (ensuring high quality) or clusters that have been selected less frequently (ensuring diversity), thereby well balancing between quality and diversity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GRACE: A Dynamic Coreset Selection Framework for Large Language Model Optimization

    cs.DB 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GRACE dynamically constructs and updates coresets for LLM training using representation diversity, gradient-based importance, and k-NN graph propagation to improve efficiency and performance.

  2. GradAlign: Gradient-Aligned Data Selection for LLM Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-02 reject novelty 6.0

    GradAlign selects RL training problems whose policy gradients align with validation-set gradients, claiming more stable and better-performing LLM post-training.