pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05406 · v1 · pith:2YCQFZSXnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ✦ hep-ph

Muon-induced di-tau production as a probe of new physics

Sudipta Das , Luke Kupari , Mary Hall Reno , Sebastian Trojanowski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords muon trident processdi-tau productionleptophilic scalardark sectorsHEMERA detectormuon beamsnew physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A compact detector on high-energy muon beams can extend bounds on leptophilic scalars by more than an order of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes using the muon trident process to produce tau pairs via coherent scattering as a probe of dark sectors. It introduces a dedicated active-target detector, HEMERA, that could run on future muon beams from individual facilities up to a full muon collider. The setup would resolve prompt signatures and thereby complement beam-dump experiments. For a leptophilic scalar with Yukawa couplings that can mediate thermal dark matter, the authors calculate that 10^18 incident TeV muons in a 10 kg silicon version would improve existing B-factory and muon g-2 limits by more than a factor of ten in coupling strength.

Core claim

With 10^18 incident TeV-scale muons, even a compact 10 kg silicon-based HEMERA will extend current B-factory and (g-2)μ bounds by over an order of magnitude in coupling strength for a leptophilic scalar with Yukawa-like couplings that can mediate thermal dark matter production.

What carries the argument

The muon trident process of coherent scattering that produces tau pairs, resolved as prompt signatures inside the HEMERA active-target detector.

If this is right

  • The channel provides an independent constraint on leptophilic scalars that can mediate thermal dark matter.
  • HEMERA could operate across a range of muon-beam facilities from preparatory beams to a muon collider.
  • The approach adds a prompt-signature capability that beam-dump searches lack.
  • It supplies additional motivation for developing high-energy muon infrastructure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar trident channels could be studied for other light mediators or dark-sector states once muon beams exist.
  • The 10 kg scale suggests that even modest detector prototypes could deliver competitive physics before a full collider runs.
  • Thermal dark matter models with scalar mediators would face tighter viable parameter space if the projected reach is realized.

Load-bearing premise

Backgrounds can be controlled and prompt signatures resolved sufficiently in the HEMERA detector to reach the projected sensitivity.

What would settle it

A measurement or simulation showing that irreducible backgrounds in a silicon active target prevent the claimed order-of-magnitude improvement in coupling sensitivity with 10^18 TeV muons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05406 by Luke Kupari, Mary Hall Reno, Sebastian Trojanowski, Sudipta Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sample dominant Feynman diagrams for muon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Differential cross section as a function of invariant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic design of the proposed HEMERA detector. An incident muon impinges on the active target, producing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Signal significance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Kinematic distributions for muon-induced di-tau production in HEMERA operating at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The projected 95% CL exclusion limit on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The muon trident process, which involves coherent scattering to produce tau pairs, is a powerful tool for constraining dark sectors. We propose to explore this channel using future high-energy muon beams with the dedicated active-target detector, High-Energy Muon Electronic Research Apparatus (HEMERA). The detector would complement muon beam-dump searches by resolving prompt signatures and could operate from preparatory facilities involving an individual muon beam to the full Muon Collider. We illustrate its capabilities for a leptophilic scalar with Yukawa-like couplings that can mediate thermal dark matter production. With $10^{18}$ incident TeV-scale muons, even a compact 10 kg silicon-based HEMERA will extend current $B$-factory and $(g-2)_\mu$ bounds by over an order of magnitude in coupling strength, providing an additional compelling motivation for the development of high-energy muon beam infrastructure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using a dedicated active-target detector (HEMERA) with future high-energy muon beams to study muon-induced di-tau production as a probe of new physics. It focuses on a leptophilic scalar with Yukawa-like couplings that can mediate thermal dark matter, claiming that 10^18 incident TeV-scale muons on a compact 10 kg silicon target would extend current B-factory and (g-2)μ bounds by over an order of magnitude in coupling strength, complementing beam-dump searches via prompt signatures.

Significance. If the sensitivity projections hold after validation of detector performance, the result would provide a new experimental avenue for constraining leptophilic scalars beyond existing limits and motivate development of high-energy muon infrastructure. The conceptual approach of resolving prompt di-tau signatures in an active target is a potentially useful complement to other searches, though its impact hinges on the unverified assumptions about background rejection.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline sensitivity claim (order-of-magnitude extension in Yukawa coupling with 10^18 muons on 10 kg Si) is presented as achievable by design of HEMERA, but no quantitative efficiency, background rejection factors, simulation results, or derivation of the projected reach is provided. This assumption about prompt signature resolution and background control (standard tridents, hadronic activity) is load-bearing for the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline sensitivity claim (order-of-magnitude extension in Yukawa coupling with 10^18 muons on 10 kg Si) is presented as achievable by design of HEMERA, but no quantitative efficiency, background rejection factors, simulation results, or derivation of the projected reach is provided. This assumption about prompt signature resolution and background control (standard tridents, hadronic activity) is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract states the projected sensitivity without supplying the supporting quantitative details on efficiencies, background rejection, or the derivation. The current manuscript presents a conceptual proposal and high-level estimates but does not contain the Monte Carlo studies, efficiency numbers, or background rejection factors needed to substantiate the claim. We will revise the manuscript by adding a dedicated subsection that provides these quantitative elements, including the assumed efficiencies, background rejection performance, and the explicit derivation of the reach. The abstract will also be updated to reference this new material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; proposal paper has no derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript is a detector proposal outlining the HEMERA concept for muon-induced di-tau production to constrain leptophilic scalars. It contains no equations, parameter fits, or derivations that reduce to their own inputs by construction. Sensitivity estimates are presented as order-of-magnitude projections based on external beam parameters and assumed detector capabilities, without any self-referential fitting or self-citation that bears the central claim. The work is self-contained as a conceptual study and receives the default non-finding for absence of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces a benchmark leptophilic scalar without providing independent evidence for its existence; no free parameters or axioms are detailed in the abstract.

invented entities (1)
  • leptophilic scalar no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediator for thermal dark matter production via Yukawa-like couplings to muons and taus
    Postulated new particle used as benchmark for new physics reach

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5681 in / 1109 out tokens · 25690 ms · 2026-06-28T05:03:26.004881+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 29 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansouli´ e, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, D. Schulte, A. Skrinsky, and A. Wulzer, (2019), arXiv:1901.06150 [physics.acc-ph]. 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Accetturaet al.(International Muon Collider), CERN Yellow Rep

    C. Accetturaet al.(International Muon Collider), CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.2/2024, 176 (2024), arXiv:2407.12450 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Accetturaet al.(International Muon Collider), (2025), arXiv:2504.21417 [physics.acc-ph]

    C. Accetturaet al.(International Muon Collider), (2025), arXiv:2504.21417 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Cesarotti, S

    C. Cesarotti, S. Homiller, R. K. Mishra, and M. Reece, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 071803 (2023), arXiv:2202.12302 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Cesarotti and R

    C. Cesarotti and R. Gambhir, JHEP05, 283 (2024), arXiv:2310.16110 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    H. T. Klest, Phys. Rev. D112, L051504 (2025), arXiv:2506.19301 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Calibbi, T

    L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D110, 115009 (2024), arXiv:2406.13234 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Ariga, R

    A. Ariga, R. Balkin, I. Galon, E. Kajomovitz, and Y. Soreq, Phys. Rev. D109, 035003 (2024), arXiv:2305.03102 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Mammen Abraham and M

    R. Mammen Abraham and M. Fieg, Phys. Rev. D112, 015005 (2025), arXiv:2501.09071 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Batell, H

    B. Batell, H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli, E. T. Neil, and S. Trojanowski, Phys. Rev. D110, 075039 (2024), arXiv:2407.15942 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Francener, V

    R. Francener, V. P. Goncalves, F. Kling, P. Krack, and J. Rojo, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1098 (2025), arXiv:2506.13889 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Francener, V

    R. Francener, V. P. Goncalves, and G. Rabelo-Soares, (2025), arXiv:2510.18943 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Sieber, D

    H. Sieber, D. Banerjee, P. Crivelli, E. Depero, S. N. Gni- nenko, D. V. Kirpichnikov, M. M. Kirsanov, V. Poliakov, and L. Molina Bueno, Phys. Rev. D105, 052006 (2022), arXiv:2110.15111 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Y. M. Andreevet al.(NA64), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 211803 (2024), arXiv:2401.01708 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Y. M. Andreevet al.(NA64), Phys. Rev. D110, 112015 (2024), arXiv:2409.10128 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    C.-Y. Chen, M. Pospelov, and Y.-M. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D95, 115005 (2017), arXiv:1701.07437 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, N. Tran, and A. Whitbeck, JHEP 09, 153 (2018), arXiv:1804.03144 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Grilli di Cortona and E

    G. Grilli di Cortona and E. Nardi, Phys. Rev. D105, L111701 (2022), arXiv:2204.04227 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    S. J. Brodsky and S. C. C. Ting, Phys. Rev.145, 1018 (1966)

    1966

  20. [20]

    J. D. Bjorken and M. C. Chen, Phys. Rev.154, 1335 (1966)

    1966

  21. [21]

    S. R. Kel’ner, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.5, 778 (1967)

    1967

  22. [22]

    G. R. Henry, Phys. Rev.166, 1553 (1968)

    1968

  23. [23]

    M. J. Tannenbaum, Phys. Rev.167, 1308 (1968)

    1968

  24. [24]

    Ganapathi and J

    V. Ganapathi and J. Smith, Phys. Rev. D19, 801 (1979)

    1979

  25. [25]

    V. D. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys. Rev. D20, 630 (1979)

    1979

  26. [26]

    Ganapathi and J

    V. Ganapathi and J. Smith, Phys. Rev. D20, 2213 (1979)

    1979

  27. [27]

    A. A. Akhundov, D. Y. Bardin, N. D. Gagunashvili, and N. M. Shumeiko, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31, 127 (1980)

    1980

  28. [28]

    A. A. Akhundov, D. Y. Bardin, and N. M. Shumeiko, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.32, 234 (1980)

    1980

  29. [29]

    Ganapathi and J

    V. Ganapathi and J. Smith, Phys. Rev. D23, 75 (1981)

    1981

  30. [30]

    S. R. Kelner, R. P. Kokoulin, and A. A. Petrukhin, Phys. Atom. Nucl.63, 1603 (2000)

    2000

  31. [31]

    Bulmahn and M

    A. Bulmahn and M. H. Reno, Phys. Rev. D79, 053008 (2009), arXiv:0812.5008 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    Abbiendi, E

    G. Abbiendi, E. Budassi, C. M. Carloni Calame, A. Gur- gone, and F. Piccinini, Phys. Lett. B854, 138720 (2024), arXiv:2401.06077 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    A. J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager, and L. Silvestrini, Phys. Lett. B500, 161 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0007085

    arXiv 2001

  34. [34]

    D’Ambrosio, G

    G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B645, 155 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0207036

    arXiv 2002

  35. [35]

    Cirigliano, B

    V. Cirigliano, B. Grinstein, G. Isidori, and M. B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B728, 121 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0507001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    A. P. Bulmahn,Lepton pair production in high energyµA scattering: cross sections, energy loss, and applications to underground lepton production, Ph.D. thesis, Iowa U. (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren, (2017), arXiv:1707.06453 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    C. F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.59, 694 (2007), arXiv:hep- ph/0612014

    arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    G. Lee, J. R. Arrington, and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 92, 013013 (2015), arXiv:1505.01489 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    Z. Ye, J. Arrington, R. J. Hill, and G. Lee, Phys. Lett. B777, 8 (2018), arXiv:1707.09063 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Y. M. Andreev and E. V. Bugaev, Phys. Rev. D55, 1233 (1997)

    1997

  42. [42]

    Lindner, W

    M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, JHEP03, 097 (2017), arXiv:1612.04150 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    X. Chu, J. Pradler, and L. Semmelrock, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015040 (2019), arXiv:1811.04095 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Peter Lepage, Journal of Computational Physics27, 192 (1978)

    G. Peter Lepage, Journal of Computational Physics27, 192 (1978)

    1978

  45. [45]

    Singh, G

    A. Singh, G. D’Ambrosio, and S. K. Vempati, (2026), arXiv:2604.27716 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Batell, N

    B. Batell, N. Lange, D. McKeen, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D95, 075003 (2017), arXiv:1606.04943 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Batell, A

    B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, and D. Mckeen, Phys. Rev. D98, 055026 (2018), arXiv:1712.10022 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Kinoshita and W

    T. Kinoshita and W. J. Marciano, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.7, 419 (1990)

    1990

  49. [49]

    C.-Y. Chen, H. Davoudiasl, W. J. Marciano, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D93, 035006 (2016), arXiv:1511.04715 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    C.-Y. Chen, J. Kozaczuk, and Y.-M. Zhong, JHEP10, 154 (2018), arXiv:1807.03790 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Batell, A

    B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, and D. Mckeen, Phys. Rev. D100, 095020 (2019), arXiv:1812.05103 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Altmannshofer, T

    W. Altmannshofer, T. M¨ akel¨ a, S. Sarkar, S. Trojanowski, K. Xie, and B. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D110, 072018 (2024), arXiv:2406.16803 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    B. J. King, AIP Conf. Proc.435, 334 (1998), arXiv:hep- ex/9907033

    arXiv 1998

  55. [55]

    D. E. Groom, N. V. Mokhov, and S. I. Striganov, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl.78, 183 (2001)

    2001

  56. [56]

    Adhikary, K

    J. Adhikary, K. J. Kelly, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, Phys. Rev. D111, 075019 (2025), arXiv:2412.10315 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Kling, Y

    F. Kling, Y. Ma, K. M¨ akel¨ a, J. Reuter, and Z. Tabrizi, (2025), arXiv:2508.00761 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Barchetta, P

    N. Barchetta, P. Collins, and P. Riedler, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, 231 (2022), arXiv:2112.13019 [physics.ins-det]. 12

    arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Cortina Gilet al.(NA62), JHEP09, 035 (2023), arXiv:2303.08666 [hep-ex]

    E. Cortina Gilet al.(NA62), JHEP09, 035 (2023), arXiv:2303.08666 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Hamada, R

    Y. Hamada, R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, H. Takaura, and M. Yoshida, PTEP2022, 053B02 (2022), arXiv:2201.06664 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Muon accelerators for particle physics (muon),

    M. A. Palmer and K. L. (eds.), “Muon accelerators for particle physics (muon),” JINST special issue (2016– 2021), Article collection; Muon accelerator program (MAP), http://map.fnal.gov (restricted access), archived version 5 May 2021 (free access)

    2016

  62. [62]

    Neuffer and V

    D. Neuffer and V. Shiltsev, JINST13, T10003 (2018), arXiv:1811.10694 [physics.acc-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Arigaet al.(FASER), (2018), arXiv:1811.10243 [physics.ins-det]

    A. Arigaet al.(FASER), (2018), arXiv:1811.10243 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Arigaet al.(FASER), (2018), arXiv:1812.09139 [physics.ins-det]

    A. Arigaet al.(FASER), (2018), arXiv:1812.09139 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Acamporaet al.(SND@LHC), JINST19, P05067 (2024), arXiv:2210.02784 [hep-ex]

    G. Acamporaet al.(SND@LHC), JINST19, P05067 (2024), arXiv:2210.02784 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    L. A. Anchordoquiet al., Phys. Rept.968, 1 (2022), arXiv:2109.10905 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    J. L. Fenget al., J. Phys. G50, 030501 (2023), arXiv:2203.05090 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Adhikaryet al., Eur

    J. Adhikaryet al., Eur. Phys. J. C85, 430 (2025), arXiv:2411.04175 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Abreuet al.(FASER), Eur

    H. Abreuet al.(FASER), Eur. Phys. J. C80, 61 (2020), arXiv:1908.02310 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Abreuet al.(FASER), (2020), arXiv:2001.03073 [physics.ins-det]

    H. Abreuet al.(FASER), (2020), arXiv:2001.03073 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, Phys. Rev. D97, 035001 (2018), arXiv:1708.09389 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 181801 (2020), arXiv:2005.01885 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Biswaset al.(Belle), Phys

    D. Biswaset al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D109, 032002 (2024), arXiv:2207.07476 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Phys

    I. Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 121802 (2023), arXiv:2306.12294 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    J. Alda, G. Levati, P. Paradisi, S. Rigolin, and N. Se- limovic, JHEP06, 008 (2025), arXiv:2407.18296 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Schaelet al.(ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group), Phys

    S. Schaelet al.(ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group), Phys. Rept.427, 257 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0509008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [78]

    E. J. Chun and J. Kim, JHEP07, 110 (2016), arXiv:1605.06298 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [79]

    Abdallahet al.(DELPHI), Eur

    J. Abdallahet al.(DELPHI), Eur. Phys. J. C38, 1 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0410017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  80. [80]

    G. W. Bennettet al.(Muon g-2), Phys. Rev. D73, 072003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0602035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

Showing first 80 references.