Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Optimization and Generalization of Regularization-Based Continual Learning: a Loss Approximation Viewpoint

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.10974 v3 pith:3AFEC74C submitted 2020-06-19 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords approximationcontinuallearningregularization-basedviewpointtaskscatastrophicforgetting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural networks have achieved remarkable success in many cognitive tasks. However, when they are trained sequentially on multiple tasks without access to old data, their performance on early tasks tend to drop significantly. This problem is often referred to as catastrophic forgetting, a key challenge in continual learning of neural networks. The regularization-based approach is one of the primary classes of methods to alleviate catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, we provide a novel viewpoint of regularization-based continual learning by formulating it as a second-order Taylor approximation of the loss function of each task. This viewpoint leads to a unified framework that can be instantiated to derive many existing algorithms such as Elastic Weight Consolidation and Kronecker factored Laplace approximation. Based on this viewpoint, we study the optimization aspects (i.e., convergence) as well as generalization properties (i.e., finite-sample guarantees) of regularization-based continual learning. Our theoretical results indicate the importance of accurate approximation of the Hessian matrix. The experimental results on several benchmarks provide empirical validation of our theoretical findings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. To Retain or to Adapt? Generalizing Continual Learning

    stat.ML 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

    When retention induces positive stationary bias, historical knowledge becomes an optimization liability beyond a closed-form Critical Task Duration; Predictive CL with finite windows can beat both full Joint-Task and ...

  2. SAFE-Merge: Data-Free Continual Model Merging with General Knowledge Preservation

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAFE-Merge masks risk-prone parameter updates and recovers lost task information with a constrained low-rank correction, achieving the best H-score in data-free continual model merging benchmarks.

  3. Measuring Representational Shifts in Continual Learning: A Linear Transformation Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Representation discrepancy, a new metric with theoretical bounds, shows continual learning forgets features faster in deeper layers and slower in wider networks.

  4. Sequence Transferability and Task Order Selection in Continual Learning

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes two sequence-level transferability scores, TFT and TRT, that correlate with continual learning accuracy, and a greedy task-order heuristic, HCTOS, that beats random ordering in a narrow set of experiments.

Pith tools