Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LogicPro: Improving Complex Logical Reasoning via Program-Guided Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.12929 v3 pith:3DKNOPGJ submitted 2024-09-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningtextitdataproblemssynthesizealgorithmcomplexlogicpro
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we propose a new data synthesis method called \textbf{LogicPro}, which leverages LeetCode-style algorithm \underline{Pro}blems and their corresponding \underline{Pro}gram solutions to synthesize Complex \underline{Logic}al Reasoning data in text format. First, we synthesize complex reasoning problems through source algorithm problems and test cases. Then, standard answers and intermediate variable outputs are obtained for each problem based on standard python solutions and test cases. Finally, with the guidance of code intermediate variables, we synthesize the text reasoning process for each reasoning problems. Through this method, we can synthesize data that is difficult, scalable, effective, and comes with golden standard answers and high-quality reasoning processes. As a result, with our 540K synthesized dataset constructed solely from 2,360 algorithm problems, our approach \footnote{Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/jiangjin1999/LogicPro} achieves significant improvements in multiple models for the datasets \textit{BBH$^{27}$}, \textit{LogicBench}, \textit{DROP}, \textit{AR-LSAT}, and \textit{GSM8K}, etc. outperforming a wide range of existing reasoning datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CodeI/O: Condensing Reasoning Patterns via Code Input-Output Prediction

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training on 3.5M code input-output prediction tasks with natural-language chain-of-thought improves LLM performance on math, logic, symbolic, scientific, and commonsense reasoning benchmarks.

  2. Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of logical reasoning in large language models that organizes benchmarks, evaluations, and enhancement methods around formal and symbolic logic.

Pith tools