Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

INSCIT: Information-Seeking Conversations with Mixed-Initiative Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.00746 v2 pith:3EKH2BJU submitted 2022-07-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords conversationsinformation-seekingagenteitheridentificationinscitinteractionsknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In an information-seeking conversation, a user may ask questions that are under-specified or unanswerable. An ideal agent would interact by initiating different response types according to the available knowledge sources. However, most current studies either fail to or artificially incorporate such agent-side initiative. This work presents InSCIt, a dataset for Information-Seeking Conversations with mixed-initiative Interactions. It contains 4.7K user-agent turns from 805 human-human conversations where the agent searches over Wikipedia and either directly answers, asks for clarification, or provides relevant information to address user queries. The data supports two subtasks, evidence passage identification and response generation, as well as a human evaluation protocol to assess model performance. We report results of two systems based on state-of-the-art models of conversational knowledge identification and open-domain question answering. Both systems significantly underperform humans, suggesting ample room for improvement in future studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VeriForge: Mitigating Latent Knowledge Gaps in Narrative Drafting via Mixed-Initiative Scaffolding

    cs.HC 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VeriForge demonstrates that proactive, source-traceable highlighting of potential knowledge gaps can help fiction writers discover and integrate unfamiliar domain facts during drafting.

Pith tools