Pith. sign in

REVIEW 71 references

A Review of YOLOv12: Attention-Based Enhancements vs. Previous Versions

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A review of YOLOv12's attention-based architecture and its benchmarks, with all performance numbers sourced from the original YOLOv12 paper rather than new experiments.

arxiv 2504.11995 v1 pith:3HAVB5MH submitted 2025-04-16 cs.CV

Rahima Khanam , Muhammad Hussain This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords yolov12computationalobjectreal-timeyoloaccuracyaggregationattention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

YOLOv12 is a computer vision model that detects objects in images in real time. Earlier YOLO versions were built almost entirely from convolutional neural networks, which are fast but struggle to look at the whole image at once. Attention mechanisms, which let the model focus on important parts of the image, are powerful but usually slow because they compare every part of the image with every other part. YOLOv12 tries to get the best of both worlds by using a cheaper form of attention called Area Attention, which splits the image into segments, and a feature-aggregation block called R-ELAN that adds short-cut connections to help training. It also uses FlashAttention, a software trick that reduces memory traffic on GPUs.

This review paper walks through those changes and reproduces tables of accuracy, speed, and computational cost from the original YOLOv12 paper. The numbers show YOLOv12 beating earlier YOLO versions and the RT-DETR family on a standard benchmark called MS COCO. But the authors of this review did not run any new experiments; they took the numbers from the original YOLOv12 authors. The review also includes some historical claims about earlier YOLO versions that are not quite accurate, and it occasionally suggests that a design choice such as FlashAttention improves accuracy directly, which is plausible but not proven by the cited results.

If you want a quick summary of what YOLOv12 is and how it compares to its predecessors, this paper is a convenient starting point. It does not, by itself, prove that YOLOv12 works as well as it claims.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central assertion is that YOLOv12, by integrating A2 (Area Attention), R-ELAN, and FlashAttention, refines the latency-accuracy trade-off and surpasses previous YOLO versions and competing detectors such as RT-DETR. If correct, YOLOv12 is a meaningful advance in real-time object detection, but this review only reports the original paper's results.

Load-bearing premise

The review's conclusions rest on the assumption that the benchmark metrics in Tables 1 and 2, taken directly from [27], are accurate, measured under comparable conditions, and free of selection bias, since the review performs no independent verification. If the original benchmarks are flawed, every comparative conclusion in the review inherits the flaw. This premise enters at Section 5, where Tables 1 and 2 are reproduced from [27].

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new parameters or entities. It depends entirely on the reliability of the original YOLOv12 paper [27] for its benchmark numbers and architectural facts.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Benchmark metrics in Tables 1 and 2 are accurate and comparable as reported in [27].
    The review performs no independent benchmarking; all numbers are copied from the original YOLOv12 paper, so any error in [27] propagates to the review. Location: Section 5, Tables 1 and 2.
  • domain assumption The architectural descriptions of A2, R-ELAN, and FlashAttention in Section 4 faithfully represent the implementation in [27].
    The review does not inspect code or run the model; it relies on the description in [27]. Location: Section 4.
  • domain assumption YOLOv12's reported improvements are causally attributable to the named architectural innovations rather than to other training details.
    The review states that A2, R-ELAN, and FlashAttention drive the gains, but it presents no ablation or analysis beyond [27]. Location: Sections 4, 6, 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Review of YOLOv12: Attention-Based Enhancements vs. Previous Versions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3HAVB5MH

@misc{pith2026250411995,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Review of YOLOv12: Attention-Based Enhancements vs. Previous Versions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3HAVB5MH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.11995}
}
read the original abstract

The YOLO (You Only Look Once) series has been a leading framework in real-time object detection, consistently improving the balance between speed and accuracy. However, integrating attention mechanisms into YOLO has been challenging due to their high computational overhead. YOLOv12 introduces a novel approach that successfully incorporates attention-based enhancements while preserving real-time performance. This paper provides a comprehensive review of YOLOv12's architectural innovations, including Area Attention for computationally efficient self-attention, Residual Efficient Layer Aggregation Networks for improved feature aggregation, and FlashAttention for optimized memory access. Additionally, we benchmark YOLOv12 against prior YOLO versions and competing object detectors, analyzing its improvements in accuracy, inference speed, and computational efficiency. Through this analysis, we demonstrate how YOLOv12 advances real-time object detection by refining the latency-accuracy trade-off and optimizing computational resources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.11995 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Evolution of YOLO architectures With YOLOv12’s architectural refinements, attention mechanisms are now embedded within the YOLO framework, optimizing both computational efficiency and high-speed inference. The next section analyzes these enhancements in detail, benchmarking YOLOv12’s performance across multiple detection tasks. 3 Architectural Design of YOLOv12 The YOLO framework revolutionized object detection by i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of different local attention techniques, with the proposed Area Attention method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of CSPNet, ELAN, C3k2, and R-ELAN Architectures. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Benchmark comparison of YOLOv12 against prior models. (a) mAP vs. Latency. (b) mAP vs. FLOPs [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of YOLOv12 with other SOTA models: (a) accuracy vs. model parameters and (b) accuracy vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Deep multi-modal object detection and semantic segmentation for autonomous driving: Datasets, methods, and challenges

    Di Feng, Christian Haase-Schütz, Lars Rosenbaum, Heinz Hertlein, Claudius Glaeser, Fabian Timm, Werner Wiesbeck, and Klaus Dietmayer. Deep multi-modal object detection and semantic segmentation for autonomous driving: Datasets, methods, and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(3):1341– 1360, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    A review and comparative study on probabilistic object detection in autonomous driving

    Di Feng, Ali Harakeh, Steven L Waslander, and Klaus Dietmayer. A review and comparative study on probabilistic object detection in autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):9961– 9980, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    3d object detection for autonomous driving: A comprehensive survey

    Jiageng Mao, Shaoshuai Shi, Xiaogang Wang, and Hongsheng Li. 3d object detection for autonomous driving: A comprehensive survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 131(8):1909–1963, 2023

    work page 1909

  4. [4]

    A review on object detection based on deep convolutional neural networks for autonomous driving

    Jialin Lu, Shuming Tang, Jinqiao Wang, Haibing Zhu, and Yunkuan Wang. A review on object detection based on deep convolutional neural networks for autonomous driving. In 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), pages 5301–5308. IEEE, 2019. 14 R.K HANAM ET AL .: A R EVIEW OF YOLO V12: A TTENTION -BASED ENHANCEMENTS VS . P REVIOUS VERSIONS - APR...

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    A review of machine learning and deep learning for object detection, semantic segmentation, and human action recognition in machine and robotic vision

    Nikoleta Manakitsa, George S Maraslidis, Lazaros Moysis, and George F Fragulis. A review of machine learning and deep learning for object detection, semantic segmentation, and human action recognition in machine and robotic vision. Technologies, 12(2):15, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Object detection recognition and robot grasping based on machine learning: A survey

    Qiang Bai, Shaobo Li, Jing Yang, Qisong Song, Zhiang Li, and Xingxing Zhang. Object detection recognition and robot grasping based on machine learning: A survey. IEEE access, 8:181855–181879, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    The object detection, perspective and obstacles in robotic: a review

    Ge Xu, A Sohail Khan, Ata Jahangir Moshayedi, Xiaohong Zhang, and Yang Shuxin. The object detection, perspective and obstacles in robotic: a review. EAI Endorsed Transactions on AI and Robotics, 1(1), 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Object detection, classification and tracking methods for video surveillance: A review

    Rakesh Chandra Joshi, Mayank Joshi, Adithya Gaurav Singh, and Sanjay Mathur. Object detection, classification and tracking methods for video surveillance: A review. In 2018 4th International Conference on Computing Communication and Automation (ICCCA), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    A review on object detection and tracking in video surveillance

    Sanjeevkumar Angadi and Suvarna Nandyal. A review on object detection and tracking in video surveillance. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(9), 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    A study on video surveillance system for object detection and tracking

    Pawan Kumar Mishra and GP Saroha. A study on video surveillance system for object detection and tracking. In 2016 3rd international conference on computing for sustainable global development (INDIACom), pages 221–226. IEEE, 2016

    2016

  3. [11]

    You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection

    Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 779–788, 2016

    2016

  4. [12]

    Yolo9000: better, faster, stronger

    Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. Yolo9000: better, faster, stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7263–7271, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Yolov3: An incremental improvement

    Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection

    Alexey Bochkovskiy, Chien-Yao Wang, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934, 2020

    2004 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ultralytics yolov5, 2020

    Glenn Jocher. Ultralytics yolov5, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    Yolov6: A single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications

    Chuyi Li, Lulu Li, Hongliang Jiang, Kaiheng Weng, Yifei Geng, Liang Li, Zaidan Ke, Qingyuan Li, Meng Cheng, Weiqiang Nie, et al. Yolov6: A single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02976, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Yolov7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors

    Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. Yolov7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7464–7475, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Ultralytics yolov8, 2023

    Glenn Jocher, Ayush Chaurasia, and Jing Qiu. Ultralytics yolov8, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Yolov9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information

    Chien-Yao Wang, I-Hau Yeh, and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao. Yolov9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13616, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detection

    Ao Wang, Hui Chen, Lihao Liu, Kai Chen, Zijia Lin, Jungong Han, and Guiguang Ding. Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14458, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Ultralytics yolo11, 2024

    Glenn Jocher and Jing Qiu. Ultralytics yolo11, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Eva-02: A visual representation for neon genesis

    Yuxin Fang, Quan Sun, Xinggang Wang, Tiejun Huang, Xinlong Wang, and Yue Cao. Eva-02: A visual representation for neon genesis. Image and Vision Computing, 149:105171, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners

    Kaiming He, Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Yanghao Li, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16000–16009, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Vmamba: Visual state space model

    Yue Liu, Yunjie Tian, Yuzhong Zhao, Hongtian Yu, Lingxi Xie, Yaowei Wang, Qixiang Ye, Jianbin Jiao, and Yunfan Liu. Vmamba: Visual state space model. Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:103031– 103063, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness

    Tri Dao, Dan Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:16344–16359, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Flashattention-2: Faster attention with better parallelism and work partitioning

    Tri Dao. Flashattention-2: Faster attention with better parallelism and work partitioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08691, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Yolov12: Attention-centric real-time object detectors

    Yunjie Tian, Qixiang Ye, and David Doermann. Yolov12: Attention-centric real-time object detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12524, 2025. 15 R.K HANAM ET AL .: A R EVIEW OF YOLO V12: A TTENTION -BASED ENHANCEMENTS VS . P REVIOUS VERSIONS - APRIL 17, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A comprehensive review of convolutional neural networks for defect detection in industrial applications

    Rahima Khanam, Muhammad Hussain, Richard Hill, and Paul Allen. A comprehensive review of convolutional neural networks for defect detection in industrial applications. IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity

    Sinong Wang, Belinda Z Li, Madian Khabsa, Han Fang, and Hao Ma. Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04768, 2020

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Efficient attention: Attention with linear complexities

    Zhuoran Shen, Mingyuan Zhang, Haiyu Zhao, Shuai Yi, and Hongsheng Li. Efficient attention: Attention with linear complexities. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, pages 3531–3539, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Transformers are rnns: Fast autoregressive transformers with linear attention

    Angelos Katharopoulos, Apoorv Vyas, Nikolaos Pappas, and François Fleuret. Transformers are rnns: Fast autoregressive transformers with linear attention. In International conference on machine learning , pages 5156–5165. PMLR, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Rethinking attention with performers

    Krzysztof Choromanski, Valerii Likhosherstov, David Dohan, Xingyou Song, Andreea Gane, Tamas Sarlos, Peter Hawkins, Jared Davis, Afroz Mohiuddin, Lukasz Kaiser, et al. Rethinking attention with performers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.14794, 2020

    2009 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Nyströmformer: A nyström-based algorithm for approximating self-attention

    Yunyang Xiong, Zhanpeng Zeng, Rudrasis Chakraborty, Mingxing Tan, Glenn Fung, Yin Li, and Vikas Singh. Nyströmformer: A nyström-based algorithm for approximating self-attention. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 35, pages 14138–14148, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Low-rank bottleneck in multi-head attention models

    Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Chulhee Yun, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank Reddi, and Sanjiv Kumar. Low-rank bottleneck in multi-head attention models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 864–873. PMLR, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    Ccnet: Criss-cross attention for semantic segmentation

    Zilong Huang, Xinggang Wang, Lichao Huang, Chang Huang, Yunchao Wei, and Wenyu Liu. Ccnet: Criss-cross attention for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 603–612, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    Cswin transformer: A general vision transformer backbone with cross-shaped windows

    Xiaoyi Dong, Jianmin Bao, Dongdong Chen, Weiming Zhang, Nenghai Yu, Lu Yuan, Dong Chen, and Baining Guo. Cswin transformer: A general vision transformer backbone with cross-shaped windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pa...

    2022

  30. [38]

    Going deeper with image transformers

    Hugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Hervé Jégou. Going deeper with image transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 32–42, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Cspnet: A new backbone that can enhance learning capability of cnn

    Chien-Yao Wang, Hong-Yuan Mark Liao, Yueh-Hua Wu, Ping-Yang Chen, Jun-Wei Hsieh, and I-Hau Yeh. Cspnet: A new backbone that can enhance learning capability of cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 390–391, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Microsoft coco: Common objects in context

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European conference, zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, proceedings...

    2014

  33. [41]

    Ultralytics Website

    Ultralytics. Ultralytics Website. Accessed: [25th Feb, 2025]

    2025

  34. [42]

    Yolov11: An overview of the key architectural enhancements

    Rahima Khanam and Muhammad Hussain. Yolov11: An overview of the key architectural enhancements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    What is yolov5: A deep look into the internal features of the popular object detector

    Rahima Khanam and Muhammad Hussain. What is yolov5: A deep look into the internal features of the popular object detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20892, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    A comprehensive review on autonomous navigation

    Saeid Nahavandi, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Darius Nahavandi, Shady Mohamed, Navid Mohajer, Mohammad Rokonuzzaman, and Ibrahim Hossain. A comprehensive review on autonomous navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12808, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Perception and navigation in autonomous systems in the era of learning: A survey

    Yang Tang, Chaoqiang Zhao, Jianrui Wang, Chongzhen Zhang, Qiyu Sun, Wei Xing Zheng, Wenli Du, Feng Qian, and Jürgen Kurths. Perception and navigation in autonomous systems in the era of learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 34(12):9604–...

    2022

  38. [46]

    Object detection in traffic videos: A survey

    Hadi Ghahremannezhad, Hang Shi, and Chengjun Liu. Object detection in traffic videos: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(7):6780–6799, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    A review on object detection in unmanned aerial vehicle surveillance

    Anitha Ramachandran and Arun Kumar Sangaiah. A review on object detection in unmanned aerial vehicle surveillance. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 2:215–228, 2021. 16 R.K HANAM ET AL .: A R EVIEW OF YOLO V12: A TTENTION -BASED ENHANCEMENTS VS . P R...

    2021

  40. [48]

    Deep learning methods for object detection in smart manufacturing: A survey

    Hafiz Mughees Ahmad and Afshin Rahimi. Deep learning methods for object detection in smart manufacturing: A survey. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64:181–196, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Comparative analysis of edge computing and edge devices: key technology in iot and computer vision applications

    M Rohith, Ajeet Sunil, et al. Comparative analysis of edge computing and edge devices: key technology in iot and computer vision applications. In 2021 International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT), pages 722–727. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    Synchronizing object detection: applications, advancements and existing challenges

    Md Tanzib Hosain, Asif Zaman, Mushfiqur Rahman Abir, Shanjida Akter, Sawon Mursalin, and Shadman Sakeeb Khan. Synchronizing object detection: applications, advancements and existing challenges. IEEE access, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    In-depth review of yolov1 to yolov10 variants for enhanced photo- voltaic defect detection

    Muhammad Hussain and Rahima Khanam. In-depth review of yolov1 to yolov10 variants for enhanced photo- voltaic defect detection. In Solar, volume 4, pages 351–386. MDPI, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Comparative performance evaluation of yolov5, yolov8, and yolov11 for solar panel defect detection

    Rahima Khanam, Tahreem Asghar, and Muhammad Hussain. Comparative performance evaluation of yolov5, yolov8, and yolov11 for solar panel defect detection. In Solar, volume 5, page 6. MDPI, 2025

    2025

  45. [53]

    Small object detection in diverse application landscapes: a survey

    Iqra, Kaisar J Giri, and Mohammed Javed. Small object detection in diverse application landscapes: a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, pages 1–36, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    An overview of machine learning within embedded and mobile devices–optimizations and applications

    Taiwo Samuel Ajani, Agbotiname Lucky Imoize, and Aderemi A Atayero. An overview of machine learning within embedded and mobile devices–optimizations and applications. Sensors, 21(13):4412, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    A review of recent hardware and software advances in gpu-accelerated edge-computing single-board computers (sbcs) for computer vision

    Umair Iqbal, Tim Davies, and Pascal Perez. A review of recent hardware and software advances in gpu-accelerated edge-computing single-board computers (sbcs) for computer vision. Sensors, 24(15):4830, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Compressing large language models using low rank and low precision decomposition

    Rajarshi Saha, Naomi Sagan, Varun Srivastava, Andrea Goldsmith, and Mert Pilanci. Compressing large language models using low rank and low precision decomposition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:88981–89018, 2025

    2025

  49. [57]

    Memory optimization at edge for distributed convolution neural network

    Soumyalatha Naveen and Manjunath R Kounte. Memory optimization at edge for distributed convolution neural network. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 33(12):e4648, 2022

    2022

  50. [58]

    Efficient processing of convolutional neural networks on the edge: A hybrid approach using hardware acceleration and dual-teacher compression

    Azzam Alhussain. Efficient processing of convolutional neural networks on the edge: A hybrid approach using hardware acceleration and dual-teacher compression. 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Fasor: A fast tensor program optimization framework for efficient dnn deployment

    Hanxian Huang, Xin Chen, and Jishen Zhao. Fasor: A fast tensor program optimization framework for efficient dnn deployment. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 498–510, 2024

    2024

  52. [60]

    Efficient convolutional networks learning through irregular convolutional kernels

    Weiyu Guo, Jiabin Ma, Yidong Ouyang, Liang Wang, and Yongzhen Huang. Efficient convolutional networks learning through irregular convolutional kernels. Neurocomputing, 489:167–178, 2022

    2022

  53. [61]

    A survey on fpga-based sensor systems: towards intelligent and reconfigurable low-power sensors for computer vision, control and signal processing

    Gabriel J García, Carlos A Jara, Jorge Pomares, Aiman Alabdo, Lucas M Poggi, and Fernando Torres. A survey on fpga-based sensor systems: towards intelligent and reconfigurable low-power sensors for computer vision, control and signal processing. Sensors, 14(4):6247–6278, 2014

    2014

  54. [62]

    Optimizing transformers strategies for efficiency and scalability

    Shufen Mei, Xiang Yong, and Yawen Bao. Optimizing transformers strategies for efficiency and scalability. 2025

    2025

  55. [63]

    Convolutional neural networks in medical image understanding: a survey

    DR Sarvamangala and Raghavendra V Kulkarni. Convolutional neural networks in medical image understanding: a survey. Evolutionary intelligence, 15(1):1–22, 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    Self-supervised learning: A succinct review

    Veenu Rani, Syed Tufael Nabi, Munish Kumar, Ajay Mittal, and Krishan Kumar. Self-supervised learning: A succinct review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30(4):2761–2775, 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    A survey on deep semi-supervised learning

    Xiangli Yang, Zixing Song, Irwin King, and Zenglin Xu. A survey on deep semi-supervised learning. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 35(9):8934–8954, 2022

    2022

  58. [66]

    A survey on self-supervised learning methods for domain adaptation in deep neural networks focusing on the optimization problems

    GholamHassan Shirdel and Alireza Ghanbari. A survey on self-supervised learning methods for domain adaptation in deep neural networks focusing on the optimization problems. AUT Journal of Mathematics and Computing, 3(2):217–235, 2022

    2022

  59. [67]

    Neural architecture search: A survey

    Thomas Elsken, Jan Hendrik Metzen, and Frank Hutter. Neural architecture search: A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(55):1–21, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    Robotic vision: 3d object recognition and pose determination

    Andrew KC Wong, L Rong, and X Liang. Robotic vision: 3d object recognition and pose determination. In Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No. 98CH36190), volume 2, pages 1...

    1998

  61. [69]

    Transformer-based models and hardware acceleration analysis in au- tonomous driving: A survey

    Juan Zhong, Zheng Liu, and Xi Chen. Transformer-based models and hardware acceleration analysis in au- tonomous driving: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10891, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    A review of research on instance segmentation based on deep learning

    Qing Yang, Jiansheng Peng, and Dunhua Chen. A review of research on instance segmentation based on deep learning. In International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks, pages 43–53. Springer, 2023. 17 R.K HANAM ET AL .: A R EVIEW OF YOLO V12: A TTENTION -BASED ENHAN...

    2023

  63. [71]

    Panoptic segmentation: A review

    Omar Elharrouss, Somaya Al-Maadeed, Nandhini Subramanian, Najmath Ottakath, Noor Almaadeed, and Yassine Himeur. Panoptic segmentation: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10250, 2021. 18

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.