REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding the $\gamma$-ray emission from the globular cluster 47 Tuc: evidence for dark matter?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
47 Tuc was the first globular cluster observed to be $\gamma$-ray bright, with the $\gamma$-rays being attributed to a population of unresolved millisecond pulsars (MSPs). Recent kinematic data, combined with detailed simulations, appears to be consistent with the presence of an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH) at the centre of 47 Tuc. Building upon this, we analyse 9 years of \textit{Fermi}-LAT observations to study the spectral properties of 47 Tuc with unprecedented accuracy and sensitivity. This 9-year $\gamma$-ray spectrum shows that 47 Tuc's $\gamma$-ray flux cannot be explained by MSPs alone, due to a systematic discrepancy between the predicted and observed flux. Rather, we find a significant preference (TS $=40$) for describing 47 Tuc's spectrum with a two source population model, consisting of an ensemble of MSPs and annihilating dark matter (DM) with an enhanced density around the IMBH, when compared to an MSP-only explanation. The best-fit DM mass of 34 GeV is essentially the same as the best-fit DM explanation for the Galactic centre "excess" when assuming DM annihilation into $b\bar{b}$ quarks. Our work constitutes the first possible evidence of dark matter within a globular cluster.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Detecting dark matter sub-halos in the Galactic plane with the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory
CTAO's Galactic Plane Survey could detect the brightest Milky Way dark matter sub-halo at 5-sigma for TeV-scale WIMPs annihilating to b-quarks with cross section about 3e-25 cm^3/s, roughly ten times the canonical the...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.