REVIEW 3 cited by
Multilingual Hallucination Gaps in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as alternatives to traditional search engines given their capacity to generate text that resembles human language. However, this shift is concerning, as LLMs often generate hallucinations, misleading or false information that appears highly credible. In this study, we explore the phenomenon of hallucinations across multiple languages in freeform text generation, focusing on what we call multilingual hallucination gaps. These gaps reflect differences in the frequency of hallucinated answers depending on the prompt and language used. To quantify such hallucinations, we used the FactScore metric and extended its framework to a multilingual setting. We conducted experiments using LLMs from the LLaMA, Qwen, and Aya families, generating biographies in 19 languages and comparing the results to Wikipedia pages. Our results reveal variations in hallucination rates, especially between high and low resource languages, raising important questions about LLM multilingual performance and the challenges in evaluating hallucinations in multilingual freeform text generation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Linguistic Nepotism: Trading-off Quality for Language Preference in Multilingual RAG
In multilingual retrieval-augmented generation, models cite English evidence more accurately than translated evidence, and this language preference can outweigh document relevance.
-
CCL-XCoT: An Efficient Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer Method for Mitigating Hallucination Generation
CCL-XCoT combines curriculum-based contrastive pretraining with cross-lingual chain-of-thought fine-tuning, lifting hallucination-free rates in low-resource QA from 1-18% to 55-74%.
-
The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs
A structured survey of LLM safety evaluation that proposes a why/what/where/how taxonomy and catalogs metrics, datasets, benchmarks, evaluators, and frameworks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.