Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Electron-neutrino lepton number crossings: Variations with the supernova core physics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that proto-neutron-star convection shifts electron-neutrino lepton number crossings to larger radii, while muon creation moves them to smaller radii in a suite of 12 supernova models.

desk verdict Systematic 12-model post-processing study of ELN crossings, but the headline radial-shift claims sit exactly where the solver's documented νe/ν̄e number-density flip could manufacture the crossings. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13429 v2 pith:3N3USK3S submitted 2025-07-17 astro-ph.HE hep-ph

Marie Cornelius (1) , Irene Tamborra (1) , Malte Heinlein (2 , 3) , Shashank Shalgar (1) , Hans-Thomas Janka (2) ((1) Niels Bohr Institute , (2) MPI Astrophysics , (3) TUM) This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords electron-neutrinoleptonnumbercrossingsfastneutrinoflavorconversioncore-collapsesupernovaeproto-neutronstarconvectionmuoncreationtransportBoltzmannequationnuclearofstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the microphysics and hydrodynamics of the supernova core leave a measurable imprint on the angular distributions of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos, and therefore on where conditions for fast neutrino flavor conversion arise. The authors solve the Boltzmann equations on static fluid profiles from 12 spherically symmetric simulations of an 18.6 solar-mass star, varying the nuclear equation of state, the presence of muons, and a mixing-length treatment of proto-neutron-star convection. They find that convection shifts the proto-neutron-star radius outward, pushing electron-lepton-number (ELN) crossings to larger radii, while muon creation contracts the star and pulls crossings inward. These effects are mild across equations of state. A reader should care because ELN crossings are the standard diagnostic that fast flavor conversion is possible, and such conversion may influence the explosion, neutrino signals, and nucleosynthesis.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electron-neutrino lepton number (ELN) angular distribution, $d(n_{\nu_e} - n_{\bar{\nu}_e})/d\cos\theta$ as a function of propagation angle; an ELN crossing is a sign change of this distribution in $\cos\theta$, which signals favorable conditions for fast flavor conversion. The machinery is a steady-state Boltzmann transport solver in spherical symmetry, applied to static radial profiles of density, temperature, chemical potentials, and lepton fractions extracted from each supernova simulation at six post-bounce times. The solver uses 100 energy bins, 300 angular bins, and 150 radial bins, and a collision kernel inspired by an open-source neutrino radiation hydrodynamics code; the solution is compared across models with and without convection and muons. The comparison of crossing radii across models is the argument: convection changes the PNS radius and the location of the deleptonization dip, and muons change the contraction rate.

What would settle it

A direct calculation that would settle the claim: rerun the same twelve static fluid profiles through a Boltzmann solver with the full collision kernel and boundary conditions matched to the simulations, storing the angular distributions, and check whether convection still moves ELN crossings to larger radii and muons to smaller radii; if the relative ordering by model changes or disappears, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a systematic correlation between core physics and the location of ELN crossings in neutrino angular distributions. Across all 12 models and six post-bounce times, ELN crossings for forward directions appear in almost all snapshots except late cooling phases, but their radial locations and shapes change in a pattern: adding a mixing-length treatment of PNS convection moves the deleptonization dip in the electron-fraction profile outward and thereby shifts crossings to larger radii; including muon production softens the equation of state, speeds up PNS contraction, and makes crossings appear at smaller radii. The nuclear equation of state has only mild influence. The paper further argues that the crossings appear after neutrino decoupling in all its spherical models, contrary to an earlier conclusion based on different spherical models, and attributes the difference to the treatment of neutrino transport.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the post-processing Boltzmann solver, with its simplified collision kernel and static boundary conditions, captures the relative differences in neutrino angular distributions across models well enough that the predicted radial shifts in ELN crossings are real, despite known discrepancies with the full hydrodynamics code (number densities agree to about 10%, fluxes differ by up to 50%, and the solver can flip the $\nu_e$/ $\bar{\nu}_e$ number-density ordering at large radii for $t_{\rm pb} \ge 0.5$ s).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ELN crossings, and hence favorable conditions for fast flavor conversion, appear at almost all post-bounce times in all twelve models, so the phenomenon is not limited to a special progenitor or equation of state.
  • Models that include proto-neutron-star convection will have broader forward-peaked neutrino angular distributions and crossings at larger radii than otherwise identical models without convection.
  • Models that include muon production will have crossings at smaller radii, because faster PNS contraction shifts neutrino decoupling inward.
  • The paper supports the view that moment-based closure schemes alone are insufficient to reliably infer ELN crossings, and that locating them reliably requires solving the Boltzmann equation for the angular distributions.
  • The same microphysical effects should also affect fast-flavor conditions in neutron-star merger remnants, where similar neutrino decoupling physics operates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This is an editorial extension: if the radial shift is as systematic as reported, fast flavor conversion could ignite at different depths in supernovae with muons, potentially changing the neutrino spectra at Earth in a way the paper does not calculate.
  • A natural extension is to repeat the twelve-profile comparison with the full simulation collision kernel and time-dependent boundaries; the central claim would be strengthened if the relative ordering of crossing radii by model survives that test.
  • Another editorial inference: the paper's late-time result suggests the Kelvin-Helmholtz cooling phase may be a less promising epoch for fast flavor conversion, but the paper does not simulate the flavor conversion itself, so the observable neutrino signal could differ.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper investigates how electron-neutrino lepton number (ELN) angular crossings in core-collapse supernovae depend on nuclear equation of state, muon production, and proto-neutron-star (PNS) convection. The authors use a suite of 12 spherically symmetric neutrino-hydrodynamics simulations of an 18.6 M_sun progenitor, extract static fluid profiles at six post-bounce times, and solve the Boltzmann equation in post-processing to obtain neutrino angular distributions. ELN crossings are identified with criteria from the authors' earlier work. The central claim is that PNS convection shifts the PNS radius outward and therefore favors ELN crossings at larger radii, while muon creation contracts the PNS and favors crossings at smaller radii, with only mild dependence on the nuclear equation of state.

Significance. If established, the result would be a useful, falsifiable prediction: the location of fast-flavor-conversion conditions in core-collapse supernovae would depend measurably on PNS convection and on muonic microphysics. The paper is commendable for using external hydrodynamic simulations, for solving the Boltzmann equation without fitting any target quantity, and for honestly quantifying discrepancies with VERTEX, including O(10%) number-density differences, up to about 50% flux differences, and the acknowledged νe/anti-νe number-density flip at large radii for tpb ≳ 0.5 s. However, the main claims are drawn precisely from the time window and radial region in which the post-processing solver is known to disagree with VERTEX in a way that can affect ELN crossings. The significance therefore currently rests on an unresolved artifact that must be isolated before the central conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A; Sec. IV, Fig. 6] The central radial-ordering claim is made at tpb = 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 3.0 s, precisely the post-bounce times for which the Boltzmann solver produces the acknowledged νe/anti-νe number-density flip at large radii (Appendix A), while VERTEX has νe > anti-νe everywhere. Since ELN crossings are defined by sign changes of the νe − anti-νe angular distribution, this flip can create or move crossings. The paper states that the flip 'might affect the formation of ELN crossings' (Appendix A) but does not test whether the crossing radii reported in Fig. 6 lie inside or outside the flip region, nor whether the convection/muon ordering survives when the affected radii are excluded or when VERTEX angular distributions for the benchmark model are used. The assertion in Section V that relative changes are 'sufficiently reliable' is therefore not yet supported by the evidence presented.
  2. [Sec. IV, Fig. 6; Table II] For the convection models the radial integration domain starts at systematically larger rmin (e.g., 18 vs 15 km for LS220 at 0.5 s, 16 vs 13 km at 0.75 s, and 14 vs 12 km at 1.0 s; Table II). Because crossings below rmin are not computed, the reported shift of convection crossings to larger radii could partly reflect the shifted domain rather than a physical effect. The analysis should either use a common radial domain for paired runs or explicitly verify that the no-convection models have no crossings inside the convection-model domain.
  3. [Sec. V; Appendix A] Beyond the flip, the Boltzmann solver differs from VERTEX in its collisional kernel, energy range (1–100 MeV vs up to 380 MeV), and boundary conditions, with number densities differing by O(10%) and fluxes by up to about 50% (Section V). The paper's conclusions concern the locations of angular crossings, a quantity that is sensitive to the shape of the angular distributions and is not among the validated moments. The authors should demonstrate stability of the model-to-model crossing locations under these known systematic differences, for example by varying the boundary prescription, by checking sensitivity to the energy cutoff near the decoupling region, or by comparing the benchmark model against VERTEX's stored angular distributions. Without such a test, the claim that relative changes are sufficiently reliable is not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eq. (1)] The collision operator for antineutrinos is written with a bar in the second line of Eq. (1), but the text introduces only C; please define the barred operator explicitly.
  2. [Sec. III.B and Fig. 4 caption] The statement that ELN crossings appear at all post-bounce times except tpb = 3 s refers to the benchmark model only; Section IV and Fig. 5 report crossings at 3 s for some muon models. Please state the model dependence explicitly in the caption.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption lists specific radii (133.2 km, 20.8 km, 21.8 km, 22.8 km) but does not state which model each value belongs to; specify whether these are the extraction radii for the benchmark model or give the full set.
  4. [Fig. 6 and Sec. IV] The vertical lines in Fig. 6 are described as the radial range where ELN crossings are found, but the paper does not define 'crossing radius' precisely; since crossings occur in (r, cos θ) space, please define what it means for a crossing to be located at a given radius.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the ELN crossing predictions are derived from Boltzmann transport on external simulation profiles; no fit-to-target or self-citation chain forces the conclusions.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The neutrino angular distributions—and hence the ELN crossings—are obtained by numerically solving the Boltzmann equations in post-processing, using static fluid profiles extracted from 12 independently generated hydrodynamical SN models. No crossing radius, crossing depth, or radial-shift trend is used as an input or fitted parameter; the reported convection and muon effects are outputs of the transport solution compared across models. The self-citations to Refs. [37–40] supply the Boltzmann solution scheme and the crossing-selection criteria, which is methodological inheritance rather than load-bearing circular reasoning: those criteria are applied uniformly to all models and do not encode the conclusion that convection shifts crossings outward or that muons shift them inward. The Appendix A caveat that the Boltzmann solver produces a ν_e/ν̄_e number-density flip at large radii for tpb ≳ 0.5 s is an acknowledged validity limitation, not a definitional identity: crossing locations are not defined as the flip radius, and the paper explicitly flags that the flip 'might affect the formation of ELN crossings' while arguing for relative reliability. Concerns about the flip or the shifted radial domains biasing the relative trends are correctness or robustness risks, not circularity: the conclusions do not reduce to the inputs by construction. The paper therefore contains no identifiable self-definitional, fitted-as-prediction, or self-citation-forced circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. The central results rest on several domain assumptions and hand-chosen numerical criteria, but no free parameters are fitted to data.

free parameters (3)
  • ELN crossing selection criteria = from Ref [37]
    Hand-chosen criteria from the authors' previous work; they determine which crossings are counted and could affect the radial ranges reported in Fig. 6.
  • Radial solution domains [rmin, rmax] = Table II values per model and time
    Chosen to cover the decoupling region; differences across models and times could bias comparisons of crossing locations.
  • Neutrino energy range and binning = 1-100 MeV, 100 linearly spaced bins
    Truncated from the 380 MeV range in VERTEX; the 16-bin test in Appendix A shows mild effects, but high-energy contributions are excluded.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Boltzmann equations with the collisional kernel modeled after Ref [54]
    The collision operators are heavily inspired by O'Connor (2015) and differ from the VERTEX code; the paper relies on this kernel to compute angular distributions.
  • domain assumption Static fluid profiles from the SN simulations are sufficient to determine ELN crossings
    The post-processing ignores time dependence and feedback of the computed neutrino distributions on the fluid, assuming the extracted snapshots are representative.
  • domain assumption ELN crossing selection criteria from Ref [37] identify physical crossings
    The paper adopts criteria from the authors' own previous paper (Cornelius et al. 2025) to define crossings for cos theta >= 0 and avoid spurious ones.
  • domain assumption Spherical symmetry and two-flavor approximation
    The Boltzmann equations are solved in spherical symmetry with muon and tau flavors averaged; multi-dimensional effects like LESA are not included.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron-neutrino lepton number crossings: Variations with the supernova core physics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3N3USK3S

@misc{pith2026250713429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron-neutrino lepton number crossings: Variations with the supernova core physics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3N3USK3S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13429}
}
abstract

A crucial ingredient affecting fast neutrino flavor conversion in core-collapse supernovae (SNe) is the shape of the angular distribution of the electron-neutrino lepton number (ELN). The presence of an ELN crossing signals favorable conditions for flavor conversion. However, the dependence of ELN crossings on the SN properties is only partially understood. We investigate a suite of 12 spherically symmetric neutrino-hydrodynamics simulations of the core collapse of a SN with a mass of $18.6 M_\odot$; each model employs different microphysics (i.e., three different nuclear equations of state, with and without muon creation) and includes or not a mixing-length treatment for proto-neutron star convection. We solve the Boltzmann equations to compute the neutrino angular distributions relying on static fluid properties extracted from each of the SN simulations in our suite for six selected post-bounce times. We explore the dependence of the ELN distributions on the SN microphysics and proto-neutron star convection. We find that the latter shifts the proto-neutron star radius outwards, favoring the appearance of ELN crossings at larger radii. On the other hand, muon creation causes proto-neutron star contraction, facilitating the occurrence of ELN crossings at smaller radii. These effects mildly depend on the nuclear equation of state. Our findings highlight the subtle impact of the SN microphysics, proto-neutron star convection, and neutrino transport on the ELN angular distributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13429 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Temporal evolution of the shock radius for our 12 SN models. Each panel represents the evolution of the shock radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Radial profiles (only shown for radii between 10 and 175 km, corresponding to the radial range of our Boltzmann [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Angular distributions of the energy-integrated dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Heatmaps of the energy-integrated ELN number density in the plane spanned by cos [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy-integrated ELN angular distributions extracted in the proximity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Radial range where ELN crossings are found in our suite of SN models for the selected post-bounce times (cf. main [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Radial profiles of the number densities of electron neutrinos (red) and antineutrinos (teal) for the benchmark SN model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. ELN differential number density for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Tamborra, L

    I. Tamborra, L. H¨ udepohl, G. G. Raffelt, and H.-T. Janka, Flavor-dependent neutrino angular distribution in core-collapse supernovae, Astrophys. J. 839, 132 (2017), arXiv:1702.00060 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [1]

    Burrows and D

    A. Burrows and D. Vartanyan, Core-Collapse Su- pernova Explosion Theory, Nature 589, 29 (2021), arXiv:2009.14157 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [2]

    Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Rev

    I. Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Rev. Phys. 7, 285 (2025), arXiv:2412.09699 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [3]

    Vitagliano, I

    E. Vitagliano, I. Tamborra, and G. G. Raffelt, Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spec- tral Components, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 045006 (2020), arXiv:1910.11878 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [4]

    Janka, Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges (2025), arXiv:2502.14836 [astro-ph.HE]

    H.-T. Janka, Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges (2025), arXiv:2502.14836 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [5]

    Burrows, D

    A. Burrows, D. Vartanyan, J. C. Dolence, M. A. Skin- ner, and D. Radice, Crucial Physical Dependencies of the Core-Collapse Supernova Mechanism, Space Sci. Rev. 214, 33 (2018), arXiv:1611.05859 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Mezzacappa, E

    A. Mezzacappa, E. Endeve, O. E. Bronson Messer, and S. W. Bruenn, Physical, numerical, and computational challenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae, Liv. Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 6, 4 (2020), arXiv:2010.09013 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [7]

    Tamborra and S

    I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar, New Developments in Flavor Evolution of a Dense Neutrino Gas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 165 (2021), arXiv:2011.01948 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    M. C. Volpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Fla- vor mechanisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new directions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025004 (2024), 13 arXiv:2301.11814 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Johns, S

    L. Johns, S. Richers, and M.-R. Wu, Neutrino Oscil- lations in Core-Collapse Supernovae and Neutron Star Mergers, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 399 (2025), arXiv:2503.05959 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Nagakura, Roles of Fast Neutrino-Flavor Conver- sion on the Neutrino-Heating Mechanism of Core- Collapse Supernova, Phys

    H. Nagakura, Roles of Fast Neutrino-Flavor Conver- sion on the Neutrino-Heating Mechanism of Core- Collapse Supernova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 211401 (2023), arXiv:2301.10785 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast Neutrino Flavor Conversions Can Help and Hinder Neutrino-Driven Explosions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 061401 (2023), arXiv:2305.11207 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino flavor conversion in core- collapse supernovae: A parametric study in 1D mod- els, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103034 (2023), arXiv:2301.11938 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [13]

    K. Mori, T. Takiwaki, K. Kotake, and S. Horiuchi, Three- dimensional core-collapse supernova models with phe- nomenological treatment of neutrino flavor conversions, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 77, L9 (2025), arXiv:2501.15256 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Wang and A

    T. Wang and A. Burrows, The Effect of the Fast-flavor In- stability on Core-collapse Supernova Models, Astrophys. J. 986, 153 (2025), arXiv:2503.04896 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  8. [15]

    R. F. Sawyer, Speed-up of neutrino transformations in a supernova environment, Phys. Rev. D 72, 045003 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0503013

    2005 arXiv

  9. [16]

    R. F. Sawyer, Neutrino cloud instabilities just above the neutrino sphere of a supernova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 081101 (2016), arXiv:1509.03323 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. G. Raffelt, Collective neutrino flavor conversion: Re- cent developments, Nucl. Phys. B 908, 366 (2016), arXiv:1602.02766 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. S. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. G. Raffelt, Self-induced neutrino flavor conversion without flavor mixing, JCAP 03, 042, arXiv:1602.00698 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    Izaguirre, G

    I. Izaguirre, G. G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast Pair- wise Conversion of Supernova Neutrinos: A Dispersion- Relation Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021101 (2017), arXiv:1610.01612 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Morinaga, Fast neutrino flavor instability and neu- trino flavor lepton number crossings, Phys

    T. Morinaga, Fast neutrino flavor instability and neu- trino flavor lepton number crossings, Phys. Rev. D 105, L101301 (2022), arXiv:2103.15267 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Padilla-Gay, I

    I. Padilla-Gay, I. Tamborra, and G. G. Raffelt, Neu- trino Flavor Pendulum Reloaded: The Case of Fast Pair- wise Conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 121102 (2022), arXiv:2109.14627 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [22]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo and G. G. Raffelt, Flavor solitons in dense neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D 107, 123024 (2023), arXiv:2303.12143 [hep-ph]

    2023

  16. [24]

    T. D. Brandt, A. Burrows, C. D. Ott, and E. Livne, Results From Core-Collapse Simulations with Multi- Dimensional, Multi-Angle Neutrino Transport, Astro- phys. J. 728, 8 (2011), arXiv:1009.4654 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, On the Occurrence of Cross- ings Between the Angular Distributions of Electron Neu- trinos and Antineutrinos in the Supernova Core, Astro- phys. J. 883, 80 (2019), arXiv:1904.07236 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Sumiyoshi and S

    K. Sumiyoshi and S. Yamada, Neutrino Transfer in Three Dimensions for Core-Collapse Supernovae. I. Static Configurations, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 199, 17 (2012), arXiv:1201.2244 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Akaho, A

    R. Akaho, A. Harada, H. Nagakura, K. Sumiyoshi, W. Iwakami, H. Okawa, S. Furusawa, H. Matsufuru, and S. Yamada, Multidimensional Boltzmann Neutrino Transport Code in Full General Relativity for Core- collapse Simulations, Astrophys. J. 909, 210 (2021), arXiv:2010.10780 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Nagakura, W

    H. Nagakura, W. Iwakami, S. Furusawa, H. Okawa, A. Harada, K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, H. Matsufuru, and A. Imakura, Simulations of core-collapse supernovae in spatial axisymmetry with full Boltzmann neutrino trans- port, Astrophys. J. 854, 136 (2018), arXiv:1702.01752 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Fischer, S

    T. Fischer, S. C. Whitehouse, A. Mezzacappa, F. K. Thielemann, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Protoneutron star evolution and the neutrino driven wind in general rel- ativistic neutrino radiation hydrodynamics simulations, Astron. Astrophys. 517, A80 (2010), arXiv:0908.1871 [astro-ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Abbar, Searching for Fast Neutrino Flavor Conversion Modes in Core-collapse Supernova Simulations, JCAP 05, 027, arXiv:2003.00969 [astro-ph.HE]

    S. Abbar, Searching for Fast Neutrino Flavor Conversion Modes in Core-collapse Supernova Simulations, JCAP 05, 027, arXiv:2003.00969 [astro-ph.HE]

    2003 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Abbar, F

    S. Abbar, F. Capozzi, R. Glas, H.-T. Janka, and I. Tamborra, On the characteristics of fast neutrino fla- vor instabilities in three-dimensional core-collapse su- pernova models, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063033 (2021), arXiv:2012.06594 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Capozzi, S

    F. Capozzi, S. Abbar, R. Bollig, and H.-T. Janka, Fast neutrino flavor conversions in one-dimensional core-collapse supernova models with and without muon creation, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063013 (2021), arXiv:2012.08525 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dasgupta, A

    B. Dasgupta, A. Mirizzi, and M. Sen, Simple method of diagnosing fast flavor conversions of supernova neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103001 (2018), arXiv:1807.03322 [hep- ph]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Glas, H.-T

    R. Glas, H.-T. Janka, F. Capozzi, M. Sen, B. Das- gupta, A. Mirizzi, and G. Sigl, Fast Neutrino Fla- vor Instability in the Neutron-star Convection Layer of Three-dimensional Supernova Models, Phys. Rev. D101, 063001 (2020), arXiv:1912.00274 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  27. [35]

    Nagakura, L

    H. Nagakura, L. Johns, A. Burrows, and G. M. Fuller, Where, when, and why: Occurrence of fast-pairwise collective neutrino oscillation in three-dimensional core- collapse supernova models, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083025 (2021), arXiv:2108.07281 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Johns and H

    L. Johns and H. Nagakura, Fast flavor instabilities and the search for neutrino angular crossings, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123012 (2021), arXiv:2104.04106 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cornelius, I

    M. Cornelius, I. Tamborra, M. Heinlein, and H.-T. Janka, Diagnosing electron-neutrino lepton number crossings in core-collapse supernovae: A comparison of meth- ods, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063004 (2025), arXiv:2506.20723 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  30. [38]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Do neutrinos become flavor unstable due to collisions with matter in the supernova decoupling region?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103011 (2024), arXiv:2307.10366 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Neutrino quantum ki- netics in a core-collapse supernova, JCAP 09, 021, 14 arXiv:2406.09504 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Neutrino quantum kinetics in three flavors (2025), arXiv:2503.03835 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  33. [41]

    The Garching Core-Collapse Supernova Archive, https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/ccsnarchive/ archive.html

  34. [42]

    J. M. Lattimer and F. D. Swesty, A Generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter, Nucl. Phys. A 535, 331 (1991)

    1991

  35. [43]

    A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star ob- servations, Astrophys. J.774, 17 (2013), arXiv:1207.2184 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hempel and J

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State, Nucl. Phys. A 837, 210 (2010), arXiv:0911.4073 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Typel, G

    S. Typel, G. R¨ opke, T. Klahn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters, Phys. Rev. C 81, 015803 (2010), arXiv:0908.2344 [nucl-th]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Hempel, T

    M. Hempel, T. Fischer, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, New Equations of State in Simula- tions of Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 748, 70 (2012), arXiv:1108.0848 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bollig, H.-T

    R. Bollig, H.-T. Janka, A. Lohs, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, C. J. Horowitz, and T. Melson, Muon Creation in Su- pernova Matter Facilitates Neutrino-driven Explosions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 242702 (2017), arXiv:1706.04630 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    L. F. Roberts, G. Shen, V. Cirigliano, J. A. Pons, S. Reddy, and S. E. Woosley, Protoneutron Star Cooling with Convection: The Effect of the Symmetry Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 061103 (2012), arXiv:1112.0335 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Pascal, J

    A. Pascal, J. Novak, and M. Oertel, Proto-neutron star evolution with improved charged-current neu- trino–nucleon interactions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 511, 356 (2022), arXiv:2201.01955 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Mirizzi, I

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, N. Sa- viano, K. Scholberg, R. Bollig, L. H¨ udepohl, and S. Chakraborty, Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Os- cillations and Detection, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39, 1 (2016), arXiv:1508.00785 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Rampp and H.-T

    M. Rampp and H.-T. Janka, Radiation hydrodynamics with neutrinos: Variable Eddington factor method for core collapse supernova simulations, Astron. Astrophys. 396, 361 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0203101

    2002 arXiv

  44. [52]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Heinlein, H.-T. Janka, G. G. Raf- felt, E. Vitagliano, and R. Bollig, Supernova simulations confront SN 1987A neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083040 (2023), arXiv:2308.01403 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Sigl and G

    G. Sigl and G. G. Raffelt, General kinetic description of relativistic mixed neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B 406, 423 (1993)

    1993

  46. [54]

    O’Connor, An Open-Source Neutrino Radiation Hy- drodynamics Code for Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astro- phys

    E. O’Connor, An Open-Source Neutrino Radiation Hy- drodynamics Code for Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astro- phys. J. Suppl. 219, 24 (2015), arXiv:1411.7058 [astro- ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Buras, M

    R. Buras, M. Rampp, H.-T. Janka, and K. Kifonidis, Two-dimensional hydrodynamic core-collapse supernova simulations with spectral neutrino transport. 1. Numeri- cal method and results for a 15 solar mass star, Astron. Astrophys. 447, 1049 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0507135

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Janka, K

    H.-T. Janka, K. Langanke, A. Marek, G. Mart ´ ınez- Pinedo, and B. M¨ uller, Theory of Core-Collapse Su- pernovae, Phys. Rept. 442, 38 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0612072

    2007

  49. [57]

    Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Su- pernovae, Ann

    H.-T. Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Su- pernovae, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 407 (2012), arXiv:1206.2503 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Delfan Azari, S

    M. Delfan Azari, S. Yamada, T. Morinaga, H. Nagakura, S. Furusawa, A. Harada, H. Okawa, W. Iwakami, and K. Sumiyoshi, Fast collective neutrino oscillations inside the neutrino sphere in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 101, 023018 (2020), arXiv:1910.06176 [astro- ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Akaho, A

    R. Akaho, A. Harada, H. Nagakura, W. Iwakami, H. Okawa, S. Furusawa, H. Matsufuru, K. Sumiyoshi, and S. Yamada, Protoneutron Star Convection Simulated with a New General Relativistic Boltzmann Neutrino Radiation Hydrodynamics Code, Astrophys. J. 944, 60 (2023), arXiv:2206.0167...

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Akaho, J

    R. Akaho, J. Liu, H. Nagakura, M. Zaizen, and S. Ya- mada, Collisional and fast neutrino flavor instabilities in two-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulation with Boltzmann neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. D109, 023012 (2024), arXiv:2311.11272 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Nagakura, T

    H. Nagakura, T. Morinaga, C. Kato, and S. Yamada, Fast-pairwise collective neutrino oscillations associated with asymmetric neutrino emissions in core-collapse su- pernova, The Astrophysical Journal 886, 139 (2019), arXiv:1910.04288 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Morinaga, H

    T. Morinaga, H. Nagakura, C. Kato, and S. Yamada, Fast neutrino-flavor conversion in the preshock region of core- collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012046 (2020), arXiv:1909.13131 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Harada and H

    A. Harada and H. Nagakura, Prospects of Fast Flavor Neutrino Conversion in Rotating Core-collapse Super- novae, Astrophys. J. 924, 109 (2022), arXiv:2110.08291 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Tamborra, F

    I. Tamborra, F. Hanke, H.-T. Janka, B. M¨ uller, G. G. Raffelt, and A. Marek, Self-sustained asymmetry of lepton-number emission: A new phenomenon during the supernova shock-accretion phase in three dimensions, Astrophys. J. 792, 96 (2014), arXiv:1402.5418 [astro- ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Wu and I

    M.-R. Wu and I. Tamborra, Fast neutrino conversions: Ubiquitous in compact binary merger remnants, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103007 (2017), arXiv:1701.06580 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    K. A. Lund, P. Mukhopadhyay, J. M. Miller, and G. C. McLaughlin, Angle-dependent in Situ Fast Flavor Trans- formations in Post-neutron-star-merger Disks, Astro- phys. J. Lett. 985, L9 (2025), arXiv:2503.23727 [astro- ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Mukhopadhyay, J

    P. Mukhopadhyay, J. Miller, and G. C. McLaughlin, The Time Evolution of Fast Flavor Crossings in Postmerger Disks around a Black Hole Remnant, Astrophys. J. 974, 110 (2024), arXiv:2404.17938 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.