REVIEW 3 cited by
Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Despite their wide adoption, the underlying training and memorization dynamics of very large language models is not well understood. We empirically study exact memorization in causal and masked language modeling, across model sizes and throughout the training process. We measure the effects of dataset size, learning rate, and model size on memorization, finding that larger language models memorize training data faster across all settings. Surprisingly, we show that larger models can memorize a larger portion of the data before over-fitting and tend to forget less throughout the training process. We also analyze the memorization dynamics of different parts of speech and find that models memorize nouns and numbers first; we hypothesize and provide empirical evidence that nouns and numbers act as a unique identifier for memorizing individual training examples. Together, these findings present another piece of the broader puzzle of trying to understand what actually improves as models get bigger.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
What is the role of memorization in Continual Learning?
High-memorization training examples are forgotten fastest in class-incremental learning, and a cheap proxy based on learning iteration can guide buffer policies, favoring typical samples for small buffers and memorize...
-
Too Big to Think: Capacity, Memorization, and Generalization in Pre-Trained Transformers
Capacity-limited Transformers generalize on held-out single-digit arithmetic while larger models memorize facts; joint training suppresses extrapolation in all tested sizes.
-
Thinking About Thinking: SAGE-nano's Inverse Reasoning for Self-Aware Language Models
A 4B-parameter model is claimed to explain its own reasoning through inverse attention analysis, but the paper offers no consistent evidence or artifacts.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.