Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Recurrent Chunking Mechanisms for Long-Text Machine Reading Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.08056 v2 pith:3RLKMUUR submitted 2020-05-16 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords segmentsinformationmodelanswersdocumentmechanismsrecurrenttext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study machine reading comprehension (MRC) on long texts, where a model takes as inputs a lengthy document and a question and then extracts a text span from the document as an answer. State-of-the-art models tend to use a pretrained transformer model (e.g., BERT) to encode the joint contextual information of document and question. However, these transformer-based models can only take a fixed-length (e.g., 512) text as its input. To deal with even longer text inputs, previous approaches usually chunk them into equally-spaced segments and predict answers based on each segment independently without considering the information from other segments. As a result, they may form segments that fail to cover the correct answer span or retain insufficient contexts around it, which significantly degrades the performance. Moreover, they are less capable of answering questions that need cross-segment information. We propose to let a model learn to chunk in a more flexible way via reinforcement learning: a model can decide the next segment that it wants to process in either direction. We also employ recurrent mechanisms to enable information to flow across segments. Experiments on three MRC datasets -- CoQA, QuAC, and TriviaQA -- demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed recurrent chunking mechanisms: we can obtain segments that are more likely to contain complete answers and at the same time provide sufficient contexts around the ground truth answers for better predictions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Evaluation of Large Language Models on Text Summarization Tasks Using Prompt Engineering Techniques

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad benchmark of six open-weights LLMs shows prompt design and chunking affect summarization quality more than model size alone.

  2. Personality Prediction from Life Stories using Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A two-step model, sliding-window fine-tuned RoBERTa plus an attention GRU, predicts Big Five scores from life-narrative interviews with higher R2 than several transformer baselines.

Pith tools