pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17935 · v1 · pith:3STB6CUCnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· quant-ph

The problem of time: a path integral view

Juan Manuel Diaz , Alejandro Perez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 10:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph
keywords problem of timepath integralquantum gravitycosine problemtime emergencegood-clock stateloop quantum gravitytime-reversal invariance
0
0 comments X

The pith

A semiclassical clock state selects forward time propagation in otherwise timeless quantum systems through the path integral.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models a nonrelativistic closed quantum system as a simplified version of generally covariant theories like quantum gravity to examine time emergence via path integrals. It shows that Schrödinger evolution appears once a clock degree of freedom is identified and prepared in a suitable semiclassical state. This setup also accounts for the cosine problem in transition amplitudes, where both exp(iS/ℏ) and exp(-iS/ℏ) terms appear naturally from time-reversal invariance and neutral boundary conditions. The clock then breaks the symmetry to favor forward propagation without any change to the underlying dynamics. The analysis reinforces that canonical quantum gravity is fundamentally timeless, with time arising only under specific conditions.

Core claim

In the path integral formulation of a timeless nonrelativistic closed quantum system that serves as a model for generally covariant quantum theories, directed time evolution emerges when a clock degree of freedom is placed in a semiclassical good-clock state. The cosine problem, in which certain transition amplitudes take the symmetric form exp(iS/ℏ) + exp(-iS/ℏ), follows directly from the time-reversal invariance of the fundamental dynamics together with the time-neutral boundary states used in transition amplitudes. Conditioning on the good-clock state selects the forward-propagating term without requiring any modification of the basic amplitudes or dynamics.

What carries the argument

The path-integral representation of transition amplitudes, with selection of forward propagation by a clock degree of freedom prepared in a semiclassical good-clock state.

If this is right

  • Transition amplitudes in path-integral formulations of gravity naturally include both forward and backward terms due to time-reversal invariance.
  • Identifying and conditioning on a suitable clock subsystem selects the forward-propagating amplitude without altering the dynamics.
  • The canonical formulation of quantum gravity remains timeless, with time emerging only conditionally through clock degrees of freedom.
  • No modification of the basic amplitudes is needed to resolve apparent backward propagation in concrete regularizations such as spin foams.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same clock-selection mechanism may apply directly to the physical inner product in loop quantum gravity once a clock variable is isolated.
  • Analog quantum simulators of closed systems could be used to test whether time directionality appears only after preparing a semiclassical clock state.
  • This view suggests that the arrow of time in quantum cosmology is tied to the choice and state of the clock subsystem rather than to a fundamental asymmetry.
  • Extensions to relational observables in quantum gravity could clarify how classical spacetime emerges from the same path-integral structure.

Load-bearing premise

The nonrelativistic closed quantum system functions as a faithful model whose path-integral features capture the essential aspects of generally covariant quantum theories, including the form of the physical inner product.

What would settle it

An explicit evaluation of a spin-foam or other regularized path integral for a generally covariant system that continues to exhibit symmetric cosine amplitudes even after conditioning on a good-clock state for an identified clock subsystem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17935 by Alejandro Perez, Juan Manuel Diaz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Same data give rise to different spacetime developments depending on the arbitrary fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that the emergence of time evolution in an otherwise timeless nonrelativistic closed quantum system -- viewed as a poor man's model of generally covariant quantum theory -- can be understood from the perspective of the path integral representation. As often happens in the functional integral approach, this viewpoint offers a more intuitive account of features that become cumbersome in the operator/Hilbert-space formulation. We show how Schr\"odinger evolution emerges once a clock degree of freedom is identified and placed in a suitable semiclassical `good-clock state'. Our analysis has a consequence that extends to path integral formulations of generally covariant systems with action $S$ (including gravity). In such theories certain transition amplitudes take the form $\exp(iS/\hbar)+\exp(-iS/\hbar)$ rather than the expected `forward propagating' $\exp(iS/\hbar)$. This feature, known as the {\em cosine problem}, appears in concrete regularizations of the path integral, for example in the spin foam representation defining the physical inner product between spin network states in loop quantum gravity. Both formally and in explicit regularizations, this apparent difficulty has led some authors to seek modifications of the basic amplitudes to eliminate backward propagation. Our model shows that the cosine problem is instead a natural consequence of time-reversal invariance of the fundamental dynamics together with the time-neutral boundary states commonly used in transition amplitudes. When a suitable clock system is identified and placed in a semiclassical `good-clock state', it introduces a time arrow selecting the `forward propagating' $\exp(iS/\hbar)$, without modifying the fundamental dynamics. The analysis clarifies how time emerges under suitable conditions and emphasizes that, in the canonical formulation, quantum gravity is fundamentally timeless.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the emergence of time evolution in a timeless nonrelativistic closed quantum system (treated as a poor-man's model for generally covariant quantum theories) can be understood via its path-integral representation. Identifying a clock degree of freedom and placing it in a semiclassical 'good-clock state' selects the forward-propagating exp(iS/ℏ) amplitude. This mechanism is argued to explain the 'cosine problem' (appearance of exp(iS/ℏ) + exp(-iS/ℏ)) in path integrals for generally covariant systems, including spin-foam regularizations of the physical inner product in loop quantum gravity, as a natural consequence of time-reversal invariance and time-neutral boundary states rather than requiring modifications to the dynamics.

Significance. If the nonrelativistic model faithfully captures the relevant features, the work offers an intuitive path-integral perspective on the problem of time that complements operator formulations and provides a resolution to the cosine problem without altering fundamental dynamics. It reinforces the timeless character of canonical quantum gravity and highlights how a suitable clock state introduces an arrow of time.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that the cosine problem in generally covariant path integrals (e.g., spin-foam amplitudes for the LQG physical inner product) is resolved by the same mechanism relies on the nonrelativistic closed quantum system serving as a faithful model whose path-integral features capture the essential aspects of diffeomorphism-invariant theories. However, the nonrelativistic action is not reparametrization invariant and includes an external time coordinate, so the time-neutral boundary states and explicit appearance of both exp(+iS/ℏ) and exp(-iS/ℏ) arise under different kinematic conditions; without an explicit dictionary mapping the good-clock state and time-reversal invariance to the covariant regularization, the extension to gravity remains an extrapolation. (See abstract and the section presenting the nonrelativistic model as a poor-man's version of generally covariant quantum
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract introduces the 'good-clock state' and 'time-neutral boundary states' without a brief inline definition or pointer to their precise construction in the main text; adding this would improve accessibility for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and valuable feedback on our paper. We have carefully considered the major comment and provide our response below. We believe the manuscript can be improved by addressing the points raised, particularly by clarifying the nature of the analogy used.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the cosine problem in generally covariant path integrals (e.g., spin-foam amplitudes for the LQG physical inner product) is resolved by the same mechanism relies on the nonrelativistic closed quantum system serving as a faithful model whose path-integral features capture the essential aspects of diffeomorphism-invariant theories. However, the nonrelativistic action is not reparametrization invariant and includes an external time coordinate, so the time-neutral boundary states and explicit appearance of both exp(+iS/ℏ) and exp(-iS/ℏ) arise under different kinematic conditions; without an explicit dictionary mapping the good-clock state and time-reversal invariance to the covariant regularization, the extension to gravity remains an extrapolation. (See abstract and the section presenting the nonrelativistic model as a poor-man's version of generally covariant quantum

    Authors: We acknowledge that the nonrelativistic model differs from generally covariant theories in not being reparametrization invariant and in having an external time coordinate. Our intention in using this 'poor-man's model' is to provide an intuitive setting where the path integral can be analyzed explicitly, allowing us to demonstrate how time-neutral boundary conditions combined with time-reversal invariance naturally lead to amplitudes involving both exp(iS/ℏ) and exp(-iS/ℏ). By then introducing a semiclassical clock state, we show how the forward-propagating component is selected. This mechanism does not rely on the specific kinematics of reparametrization invariance but on the shared feature of lacking a preferred time direction in the boundary conditions. In the context of loop quantum gravity and spin foams, the physical inner product is defined via a path integral over diffeomorphism-invariant histories, which similarly lacks an external time and incorporates time-reversal symmetry. Thus, we argue that the cosine problem there has the same origin. We agree that a detailed dictionary would be desirable for a complete mapping, but our paper aims to offer a conceptual resolution rather than a technical equivalence. To address this, we will revise the abstract and the introductory section on the model to more explicitly state the limitations of the analogy and highlight the transferable conceptual elements. This constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses standard time-reversal invariance and neutral boundaries as external inputs

full rationale

The paper's central argument identifies the cosine problem as arising directly from time-reversal invariance of the dynamics combined with time-neutral boundary states in the path integral, then shows how a semiclassical good-clock state selects the forward amplitude. These ingredients are presented as standard features of the formalism rather than quantities fitted or defined within the paper itself. The nonrelativistic closed-system model is explicitly labeled a poor-man's analogy whose path-integral features are intended to capture essential aspects of covariant theories; the extension is offered as an illustrative consequence, not a formal derivation that reduces the target result to the model's own inputs by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The account is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of time-reversal symmetry and boundary conditions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption of time-reversal invariance in the underlying dynamics and on the existence of semiclassical states that function as good clocks; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The fundamental dynamics are time-reversal invariant.
    Invoked to explain why transition amplitudes contain both exp(iS/ℏ) and exp(-iS/ℏ) terms.
  • domain assumption Time-neutral boundary states are the appropriate choice for transition amplitudes in timeless theories.
    Used to account for the symmetric form of the amplitudes before the clock is introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5834 in / 1539 out tokens · 49582 ms · 2026-05-20T10:03:08.330613+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Thus, expanding aroundN=τ phys we get Ac(N) = exp " i|z|2ω ∆ϕ ω −N − |z|2ω2 2 ∆ϕ ω −N 2# ,(54) which turns the integral overNin (44) into a simple Gaussian integral 3. Using thatE c =|z| 2ℏωis the mean value of the energy of the clock, and replacing the previous in (44) we get ⟨ψout c ;x out i |xin i ;ψ in c ⟩phys =⟨x out i | Z dN tp exp " i Ec ℏ ∆ϕ ω −N ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Traveling without moving

    This is due to an additional factor of 2 stemming from the double boundary condition in the path integral defining the clock states. E. Physical time evolution “Traveling without moving.”—David Lynch,Dune(1984). 4 Note that, considered as a distribution, the formal limit of the Gaussian factor in equation (67) whenϵ 1 →0 is lim ϵ1→0 s 2π ϵ1E2c exp − 1 2ϵ1...

    work page 1984

  3. [3]

    Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,

    K. V. Kuchar, “Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20(2011) 3–86

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    The Trinity of Re- lational Quantum Dynamics

    P. A. Hoehn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, “Trinity of relational quantum dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 6, 066001,arXiv:1912.00033

    work page arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Philosophical Issues in Quantum Theory,

    W. Myrvold, “Philosophical Issues in Quantum Theory,” inThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, eds. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2022 ed., 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Wald,General Relativity

    R. Wald,General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    P. A. M. Dirac,Lectures on quantum mechanics, vol. 2 ofBelfer Graduate School of Science Monographs Series. Belfer Graduate School of Science, New York, 1964. Reprinted in [?]

    work page 1964

  8. [8]

    Rovelli,in Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity

    C. Rovelli,in Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity. Birkhauser, 1991

    work page 1991

  9. [9]

    Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis,

    C. Rovelli, “Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis,” Phys. Rev. D43(Jan, 1991) 442–456

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    QUANTUM MECHANICS WITHOUT TIME: A MODEL,

    C. Rovelli, “QUANTUM MECHANICS WITHOUT TIME: A MODEL,” Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 2638–2646

    work page 1990

  11. [11]

    Partial observables

    C. Rovelli, “Partial observables,” Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 124013,arXiv:gr-qc/0110035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Partial and Complete Observables for Hamiltonian Constrained Systems

    B. Dittrich, “Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems,” Gen. Rel. Grav.39(2007) 1891–1927,arXiv:gr-qc/0411013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Partial and Complete Observables for Canonical General Relativity

    B. Dittrich, “Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 6155–6184,arXiv:gr-qc/0507106

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    IS BLACK HOLE EVAPORATION PREDICTABLE?,

    D. N. Page, “IS BLACK HOLE EVAPORATION PREDICTABLE?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 301

    work page 1980

  15. [15]

    Renormalization of the Quantum Stress Tensor Fluctuations and the Limits of Semiclassical Gravity,

    A. Perez and D. Sudarsky, “Renormalization of the Quantum Stress Tensor Fluctuations and the Limits of Semiclassical Gravity,”arXiv:2512.17789

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Rovelli,Quantum Gravity

    C. Rovelli,Quantum Gravity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity

    T. Thiemann, “Modern canonical quantum general relativity,”arXiv:gr-qc/0110034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Background Independent Quantum Gravity: A Status Report

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, “Background independent quantum gravity: A Status report,” Class. Quant. Grav.21 (2004) R53,arXiv:gr-qc/0404018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin Foams

    A. Perez, “Introduction to loop quantum gravity and spin foams,” gr-qc/0409061, published in 2nd International Conference on Fundamental Interactions (ICFI 2004) 6-12 Jun 2004. Domingos Martins, Espirito Santo, Brazil

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [20]

    The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity

    A. Perez, “The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity,” Living Rev.Rel.16(2013) 3,arXiv:1205.2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Spin Foam Models for Quantum Gravity

    A. Perez, “Spin foam models for quantum gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) R43,arXiv:gr-qc/0301113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  22. [22]

    Quantum propagation in Smolin’s weak coupling limit of 4D Euclidean gravity,

    M. Varadarajan, “Quantum propagation in Smolin’s weak coupling limit of 4D Euclidean gravity,” Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 6, 066018,arXiv:1904.02247

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Gravitational Dynamics—A Novel Shift in the Hamiltonian Paradigm,

    A. Ashtekar and M. Varadarajan, “Gravitational Dynamics—A Novel Shift in the Hamiltonian Paradigm,” Universe7 (2021), no. 1, 13,arXiv:2012.12094

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    On Propagation in Loop Quantum Gravity,

    T. Thiemann and M. Varadarajan, “On Propagation in Loop Quantum Gravity,” Universe8(2022), no. 12, 615, arXiv:2112.03992

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Anomaly free quantum dynamics for Euclidean LQG,

    M. Varadarajan, “Anomaly free quantum dynamics for Euclidean LQG,”arXiv:2205.10779

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    On the regularization ambiguities in loop quantum gravity

    A. Perez, “On the regularization ambiguities in loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 044007, arXiv:gr-qc/0509118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    A locally supersymmetric and reparametrization invariant action for the spinning string,

    L. Brink, P. Di Vecchia, and P. Howe, “A locally supersymmetric and reparametrization invariant action for the spinning string,” Physics Letters B65(1976), no. 5, 471–474

    work page 1976

  28. [28]

    J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell,Relativistic Quantum Fields. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965

    work page 1965

  29. [29]

    R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics. Chicago Lectures in Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    Dust as a Standard of Space and Time in Canonical Quantum Gravity

    J. D. Brown and K. V. Kuchar, “Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev.D51 (1995) 5600–5629,arXiv:gr-qc/9409001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  31. [31]

    Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, “Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report,” Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 213001, arXiv:1108.0893

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    Algebraic Quantum Gravity (AQG) IV. Reduced Phase Space Quantisation of Loop Quantum Gravity

    K. Giesel and T. Thiemann, “Algebraic quantum gravity (AQG). IV. Reduced phase space quantisation of loop quantum gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 175009,arXiv:0711.0119

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    Gravity quantized

    M. Domagala, K. Giesel, W. Kaminski, and J. Lewandowski, “Gravity quantized: Loop Quantum Gravity with a Scalar Field,” Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 104038,arXiv:1009.2445

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    Reduced loop quantization with four Klein–Gordon scalar fields as reference matter,

    K. Giesel and A. Vetter, “Reduced loop quantization with four Klein–Gordon scalar fields as reference matter,” Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 14, 145002,arXiv:1610.07422

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    How to switch between relational quantum clocks,

    P. A. H¨ ohn and A. Vanrietvelde, “How to switch between relational quantum clocks,” New J. Phys.22(2020), no. 12, 123048,arXiv:1810.04153

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Can quantum wormholes set $Lam$ 0

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, “Evolution without evolution: dynamics described by stationary observables,” Phys. Rev. D27(1983), no. 12, 2885–2892,arXiv:gr-qc/9304011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1983

  37. [37]

    Conditional probabilities with Dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity

    R. Gambini, R. A. Porto, J. Pullin, and S. Torterolo, “Conditional probabilities with Dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 041501,arXiv:0809.4235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitational Field,

    C. Teitelboim, “Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitational Field,” Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 3159

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    Implementing causality in the spin foam quantum geometry

    E. R. Livine and D. Oriti, “Implementing causality in the spin foam quantum geometry,” Nucl. Phys. B663(2003) 231–279,arXiv:gr-qc/0210064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  40. [40]

    A proposed proper EPRL vertex amplitude

    J. Engle, “Proposed proper Engle-Pereira-Rovelli-Livine vertex amplitude,” Phys. Rev. D87(2013), no. 8, 084048, 24 arXiv:1111.2865

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    A spin-foam vertex amplitude with the correct semiclassical limit

    J. Engle, “A spin-foam vertex amplitude with the correct semiclassical limit,” Phys. Lett. B724(2013) 333–337, arXiv:1201.2187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Cosine problem in EPRL/FK spinfoam model

    M. Vojinovi´ c, “Cosine problem in EPRL/FK spinfoam model,” Gen. Rel. Grav.46(2014) 1616,arXiv:1307.5352

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    The Lorentzian proper vertex amplitude: Classical analysis and quantum derivation

    J. Engle and A. Zipfel, “Lorentzian proper vertex amplitude: Classical analysis and quantum derivation,” Phys. Rev. D 94(2016), no. 6, 064024,arXiv:1502.04640

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Causal spin foams

    G. Immirzi, “Causal spin foams,”arXiv:1610.04462

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Causal structure in spin-foams

    E. Bianchi and P. Martin-Dussaud, “Causal Structure in Spin Foams,” Universe10(2024), no. 4, 181,arXiv:2109.00986

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Complete Barrett-Crane model and its causal structure,

    A. F. Jercher, D. Oriti, and A. G. A. Pithis, “Complete Barrett-Crane model and its causal structure,” Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 6, 066019,arXiv:2206.15442

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Kleinert,Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets

    H. Kleinert,Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets. World Scientific, Singapore, 5 ed., 2009

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients,

    G. Ponzano and T. Regge, “Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients,” inSpectroscopic and Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, F. Bloch, C. Cohen-Tannoudji, A. De-Shalit, S. Sambursky, and I. Talmi, eds., pp. 1–58. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968

    work page 1968

  49. [49]

    GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT COORDINATES,

    T. Regge, “GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT COORDINATES,” Nuovo Cim.19(1961) 558–571

    work page 1961

  50. [50]

    LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter

    J. Engle, E. Livine, R. Pereira, and C. Rovelli, “LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter,” Nucl.Phys.B799(2008) 136–149,arXiv:0711.0146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    Asymptotics of lowest unitary SL(2,C) invariants on graphs,

    P. Dona and S. Speziale, “Asymptotics of lowest unitary SL(2,C) invariants on graphs,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 8, 086016,arXiv:2007.09089

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude

    J. W. Barrett, R. J. Dowdall, W. J. Fairbairn, H. Gomes, and F. Hellmann, “Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude,” J. Math. Phys.50(2009) 112504,arXiv:0902.1170

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  53. [53]

    Series representation of quantum-field quasiprobabilities,

    H. Moya-Cessa and P. L. Knight, “Series representation of quantum-field quasiprobabilities,” Phys. Rev. A48(Sep,

    work page

  54. [54]

    A uniform asymptotic expansion for the incomplete gamma function,

    R. Paris, “A uniform asymptotic expansion for the incomplete gamma function,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics148(2002), no. 2, 323–339

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    The resurgence properties of the incomplete gamma function II,

    G. Nemes, “The resurgence properties of the incomplete gamma function II,” Stud. Appl. Math.135(2015), no. 1, 86–116

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Quantum gravity, shadow states, and quantum mechanics

    A. Ashtekar, S. Fairhurst, and J. L. Willis, “Quantum gravity, shadow states, and quantum mechanics,” Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 1031–1062,arXiv:gr-qc/0207106

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  57. [57]

    Three dimensional loop quantum gravity: physical scalar product and spin foam models

    K. Noui and A. Perez, “Three-dimensional loop quantum gravity: Physical scalar product and spin foam models,” Class. Quant. Grav.22(2005) 1739–1762,arXiv:gr-qc/0402110

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  58. [58]

    Singularities and Time-Asymmetry,

    R. Penrose, “Singularities and Time-Asymmetry,” inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, eds., pp. 581–638. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979

    work page 1979