REVIEW 3 cited by
Text Classification in the LLM Era -- Where do we stand?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models revolutionized NLP and showed dramatic performance improvements across several tasks. In this paper, we investigated the role of such language models in text classification and how they compare with other approaches relying on smaller pre-trained language models. Considering 32 datasets spanning 8 languages, we compared zero-shot classification, few-shot fine-tuning and synthetic data based classifiers with classifiers built using the complete human labeled dataset. Our results show that zero-shot approaches do well for sentiment classification, but are outperformed by other approaches for the rest of the tasks, and synthetic data sourced from multiple LLMs can build better classifiers than zero-shot open LLMs. We also see wide performance disparities across languages in all the classification scenarios. We expect that these findings would guide practitioners working on developing text classification systems across languages.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Truth or Twist? Optimal Model Selection for Reliable Label Flipping Evaluation in LLM-based Counterfactuals
Independent, non-fine-tuned judge models align most closely with human label-flip judgments, yet all automated judges fall well short of human evaluation.
-
Unified Semantic Modeling Framework for Large-Scale Job Understanding at LinkedIn
A GPT-4-distilled small LM plus grouped LoRA adapters improves LinkedIn's job-attribute classification over legacy models.
-
Do BERT-Like Bidirectional Models Still Perform Better on Text Classification in the Era of LLMs?
Fine-tuned BERT-like models outperform zero-shot and internal-state LLM methods on four of six challenging text classification datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.