Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a $2+1$D Lattice Gauge Theory

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Flux strings between static charges in a 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory break into mesons precisely at the resonance 2Js = d hx, and long off-resonance strings nucleate disconnected, glueball-like electric loops.

desk verdict First clear map of far-from-equilibrium string dynamics in 2+1D Z2 LGT; the patch-size caveat is real but not disqualifying. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01950 v1 pith:3WHXY7ZY submitted 2025-07-02 hep-lat cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph

Kaidi Xu , Umberto Borla , Sergej Moroz , Jad C. Halimeh This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-latcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph
keywords stringbreaking2+1DZ2latticegaugetheoryIsingmattertensornetworkstime-dependentvariationalprinciplequenchdynamicsglueballsconfinement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that string breaking has a sharp resonance condition in a 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory with dynamical matter. The authors show that when the matter mass $J_s$ and electric field $h_x$ satisfy $2J_s = d h_x$, a flux string between two static charges breaks at a characteristic timescale: at the first-order resonance $h_x = 2J_s$ it decays into two Z2 mesons (four matter particles) within $t^* \approx 0.8$, and at the second-order resonance $h_x = J_s$ it produces a single length-two meson by $t^* \approx 5$. Away from resonance, minimal strings remain confined and show coherent revivals that match a 1D free-fermion model, while a long 'snake' string nucleates disconnected electric loops that the authors argue are qualitative analogues of QCD glueballs. The work matters because it maps the far-from-equilibrium string dynamics that near-term quantum simulators can probe, and it connects a simple lattice model to a central QCD phenomenon.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the resonance condition $2J_s = d h_x$, derived by equating the cost of creating a matter pair, $4J_s$, with the electric energy $2dh_x$ released when the string shortens by $d$ links. The $h_z$ gauge-matter term converts electric energy into matter pairs at this degeneracy, the plaquette term $J_p$ moves the string among equal-length configurations, and in the deep-confinement limit $h_x \gg h_z, J_p$ the dynamics collapses onto a tiny effective Hilbert space: minimal-length strings map exactly onto free fermions hopping on a 1D chain of length equal to the Manhattan distance, while the length-14 snake string reduces to a 45-state effective Hamiltonian whose exact diagonalization gives the loop-nucleation probabilities. The diagnostic that detects all of this is $P_{\min}(t)$, the total probability of finding the evolved state in same-length string configurations within the patch spanned by the two static charges.

What would settle it

Prepare the minimal L-shaped string at $h_x = 4$, $J_s = 2$, $J_p = 1$, $h_z = 1$ on a cylinder with larger circumference ($L_y = 8$ or $10$) and measure $P_{\min}$ and the total particle number as functions of time. The claim predicts $P_{\min}$ collapses to near zero by $t^* \approx 0.8$ with four particles created inside the patch; if $P_{\min}$ stays finite, particles appear outside the patch, or the break time shifts with $L_y$, the resonance-breaking mechanism or the patch-confinement assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the confined phase of the 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory with Ising matter, the fate of an electric flux string after a quench is governed by a simple energy balance. A string of length $l$ costs $2lh_x$; breaking it into a shorter string plus a meson of length $d$ costs $4J_s + 2(l-d)h_x$, so the broken and unbroken configurations are degenerate when $2J_s = d h_x$. At that resonance the gauge-matter coupling $h_z$ can create the required pairs of Z2 charges, and the string breaks: at $h_x = 2J_s$ the break happens almost immediately ($t^* \approx 0.8$) with two length-one mesons, each a pair of Z2 charges on neighboring sites, while at $h_x = J_s$ a single length-two meson forms at $t^* \approx 5$. Off resonance, minimal strings stay unbroken and their fidelity oscillations match the exact free-fermion solution of an effective 1D chain, and a maximal-length 'snake' string of 14 links can shorten itself by nucleating gauge-invariant closed electric loops, a matter-free breaking channel the paper identifies as qualitatively glueball-like. The numerical evidence comes from TDVP tensor-network evolution on a $6\times 6$ cylinder, cross-checked against degenerate perturbation theory in the strong-field limit.

Load-bearing premise

The results assume that all dynamically relevant physics stays inside the rectangular patch spanned by the two static charges on the 6x6 cylinder; if created particles or loops leave that patch or wrap around the cylinder, the reported probabilities and breaking timescales would be distorted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the first-order resonance $h_x = 2J_s$ the minimal string breaks within $t^* \approx 0.8$ into two length-one mesons, while at the second-order resonance $h_x = J_s$ it breaks by $t^* \approx 5$ into a single length-two meson.
  • The longer-meson breaking timescale is set by $t_{\rm br} \approx h_x^{d-1}/(l h_z^d)$, so higher-order resonances are accessible but slower, matching the observed delay between the two resonances.
  • Off-resonance minimal strings show coherent revivals that coincide with the exact free-fermion solution of a 1D chain, so that the analytic fidelity can serve as a benchmark for the 2+1D dynamics.
  • A length-14 snake string nucleates disconnected electric loops with sizable, irregularly peaked probability, demonstrating a matter-free string-breaking channel that produces gauge-invariant closed flux loops analogous to glueballs.
  • As the Higgs phase is approached, mesons created by breaking lose their restricted mobility and matter proliferates across the lattice, interpolating between confined string dynamics and string dissipation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If loop-nucleation probabilities are resolved by loop size and compared with the closed-loop spectrum of the pure Z2 gauge theory, the glueball analogy could become quantitative rather than qualitative.
  • Running the same quenches on lattices with different cylinder circumferences would test whether the patch restriction, rather than the resonance physics itself, sets the reported loop-nucleation probabilities.
  • Extending the snake-string protocol to two parallel strings could reveal loop exchange or annihilation between nucleated loops, a dynamical signature that would distinguish genuine glueball-like excitations from transient fluctuations.
  • The free-fermion revival fidelities provide an exact, parameter-free target that quantum simulators could use as an error benchmark before probing the resonance-breaking regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the far-from-equilibrium quench dynamics of electric flux strings in a 2+1D Z2 lattice gauge theory with dynamical Ising matter, using two-site TDVP tensor networks on a 6x6 cylinder. It derives the resonance condition 2Js = d hx for string breaking by matter pair creation, and reports first-order (hx=2Js, two length-one mesons) and second-order (hx=Js, one length-two meson) breaking, with the minimal-string probability Pmin dropping at t* roughly equal to 0.8 and 5. Away from resonance, minimal strings exhibit revivals matching a free-fermion description, and a long 'snake' string is predicted to nucleate disconnected electric loops, argued to be qualitative glueball analogs. The Supplemental Material provides the effective strong-coupling models, convergence tests in bond dimension and time step, and additional results on approaching the Higgs phase.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a controlled, parameter-free comparison between tensor-network simulations and effective perturbative models for a 2+1D LGT, going beyond existing short-time near-equilibrium studies. The resonance condition is transparently derived, and the free-fermion and degenerate-perturbation-theory predictions are compared directly with TDVP without fitted parameters, which is a strength. The paper also highlights the role of far-from-equilibrium initial states and suggests concrete experimental probes on digital and analog quantum simulators.

major comments (1)
  1. [Supplemental Material, 'Computational method'; Fig. 2]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'the the electric field strength' should read 'the electric field strength'.
  2. [Main text, after Eq. (2)] The phrase 'same length as the initial strength' should read 'same length as the initial string'.
  3. [Supplemental Material, Table S1] The entries such as '8102 approx 213' and '504928 approx 219' are ambiguous; they likely mean 2^13 and 2^19, and the superscript formatting has been lost in the text. Please clarify these notations.
  4. [Fig. 4(b)] The loop-nucleation probabilities in Fig. 4(b) are computed from the effective model only; a sentence clarifying that these are perturbative predictions rather than direct TDVP measurements would help avoid over-interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: resonance conditions are derived from energy balance, effective models are derived via degenerate perturbation theory, and numerical TDVP results serve as independent checks rather than fit targets.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The resonance condition 2Js = d hx is obtained directly from the energy balance 2 hx l = 4Js + 2(l - d)hx stated in the paper, and the predicted breaking timescales are then compared with TDVP simulations rather than fitted to them. The effective models for minimal strings, snake strings, and the resonant case are constructed by degenerate perturbation theory in the hx to infinity limit, with the basis built from explicit configurations in the Supplemental Material. The free-fermion mapping is attributed to the same group's Ref. [106], but the Supplemental Material restates the correspondence, writes the effective fermionic Hamiltonian, and solves it analytically; it is parameter-free and its assumptions do not include the target revival or breaking dynamics, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The statement 'To match the numerical results, we choose Jp = hz = 1 in the effective model' sets the effective-model couplings equal to the quench Hamiltonian parameters rather than tuning free parameters to the TDVP output. The remaining concerns about patch restriction and cylinder circumference are modelling or finite-size assumptions, not reductions of the prediction to its inputs. No step was found in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction or in which an equation is equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to the numerical output. The Hamiltonian couplings (hx, hz, Js, Jp) are inputs, and the resonance conditions hx=2Js and hx=Js are derived from an energy-balance argument. The effective-model comparison uses the same couplings, not best-fit values. The axioms listed are the domain assumptions and prior derivations the central claim rests on.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hamiltonian Eq. (1), the 2+1D Z2 LGT with Ising matter and Gauss's law sectors, is the model under study.
    The paper does not derive Eq. (1) from QCD; all results are statements about this toy model, with connections to QCD only qualitative.
  • domain assumption At strong electric coupling hx, Hilbert space splits into string-length sectors separated by gaps of order 2hx, so degenerate perturbation theory restricted to equal-length strings is valid.
    Invoked in the 'String breaking dynamics' section and the Supplemental Material 'Effective model'; it is exact as hx goes to infinity and used at hx=4 with hz=Jp=1, where it is an approximation.
  • standard math Minimal-string corner flips map one-to-one to non-interacting fermions on a chain (free-fermion mapping).
    Taken from Ref. [106] by the same group and restated in the Supplemental Material 'Free fermionic case'; the present paper uses it as a calculational tool and verifies it against TDVP.
  • domain assumption The patch spanned by the two static charges contains all dynamically relevant configurations in the confined phase.
    Stated in the Supplemental Material 'Computational method' and used to justify the 6x6 cylinder and chi=256; if configurations leave the patch or wrap the cylinder, the reported observables would be inaccurate.
  • domain assumption TDVP with bond dimension chi=256 and time step dt=0.05 gives converged results for the reported regimes.
    Supported by convergence tests in Supplemental Fig. S2 for selected states and parameters; convergence is not demonstrated for every curve, especially long-time loop-nucleation probabilities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a $2+1$D Lattice Gauge Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3WHXY7ZY

@misc{pith2026250701950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a $2+1$D Lattice Gauge Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3WHXY7ZY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01950}
}
abstract

With the advent of advanced quantum processors capable of probing lattice gauge theories (LGTs) in higher spatial dimensions, it is crucial to understand string dynamics in such models to guide upcoming experiments and to make connections to high-energy physics (HEP). Using tensor network methods, we study the far-from-equilibrium quench dynamics of electric flux strings between two static charges in the $2+1$D $\mathbb{Z}_2$ LGT with dynamical matter. We calculate the probabilities of finding the time-evolved wave function in string configurations of the same length as the initial string. At resonances determined by the the electric field strength and the mass, we identify various string breaking processes accompanied with matter creation. Away from resonance strings exhibit intriguing confined dynamics which, for strong electric fields, we fully characterize through effective perturbative models. Starting in maximal-length strings, we find that the wave function enters a dynamical regime where it splits into shorter strings and disconnected loops, with the latter bearing qualitative resemblance to glueballs in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Our findings can be probed on state-of-the-art superconducting-qubit and trapped-ion quantum processors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01950 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Dynamical quantum phase diagram of the model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Minimal string probability (top) and total particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison between perturbative analytical results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Fidelity of the “snake” initial state for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Local Thermalization of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Fields on Quantum Computers

    hep-lat 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quantum hardware simulation of SU(2) lattice gauge thermalization matches classical extrapolations up to 101 plaquettes after error mitigation, establishing feasibility for chaotic quantum field systems.

  2. Neural quantum states for non-Abelian lattice gauge theories with dynamical fermions

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sign-problem-free variational Monte Carlo framework computes ground states of continuous SU(2) lattice gauge theory with dynamical fermions, matching strong-coupling perturbation theory and sketching the (g², λ) pha...

  3. Quantum Phase Diagram of the $2+1$D Untruncated SU$(2)$ Lattice Gauge Theory with Dynamical Fermions

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An untruncated variational Monte Carlo study finds a magnetic-flux transition at λ*≈−0.040 and a weak-to-strong coupling delocalization crossover in 2+1D SU(2) lattice gauge theory with staggered fermions.

  4. Nonlocal Nonstabilizerness from Holographic Schwinger Pair Production

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In holographic Schwinger pair production, the excess capacity of entanglement is √λ(d−2)/(d−1)³ — positive for d>2, zero for d=2 — so the produced pair carries nonlocal magic for d>2.

  5. Ground state preparation in $(2+1)$-dimensional pure $\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory via deterministic quantum imaginary time evolution

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Deterministic QITE with a Gauss-law-reduced Pauli pool reproduces DMRG ground-state energies of (2+1)-D pure Z2 lattice gauge theory to within 0.1% for ladders of up to 32 qubits and coupling λ ∈ [0.5, 5].

  6. Quantum Error Correction Codes for Truncated SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories

    quant-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gauss's law constraints in jmax=1/2 SU(2) lattice gauge theory are converted into stabilizer codes that correct single-qubit errors using about 9N or 12N physical qubits per N plaquettes.

  7. Confinement and String Breaking in the Compact Abelian Higgs Model

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A spin-1 qutrit lattice model with a local chemical potential yields universal linear string potentials, from which string tension, breaking length, and meson mass can be extracted by DMRG.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , Vol

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , Vol. 2: Modern Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  2. [2]

    Gattringer and C

    C. Gattringer and C. Lang, Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice: An Introductory Presentation , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2003)

    A. Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    Ellis, W

    R. Ellis, W. Stirling, and B. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    2003

  5. [5]

    Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction , EBSCO ebook academic collection (World Scientific, 2005)

    H. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction , EBSCO ebook academic collection (World Scientific, 2005)

    2005

  6. [6]

    Kogut and L

    J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975)

    1975

  7. [7]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974)

    1974

  8. [8]

    Dalmonte and S

    M. Dalmonte and S. Montangero, Lattice gauge theory simulations in the quantum informa- tion era, Contemporary Physics 57, 388 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2016.1151199

    arXiv 2016

Show all 121 references
  1. [9]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simula- tions of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 014401 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, S. Nascimbene, S. Trotzky, Y.-. A. Chen, and I. Bloch, Experimental realization of strong effective magnetic fields in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 255301 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Philos

    E. Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 380, 20210069 (2022), arXiv:2106.04609 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    N. Klco, A. Roggero, and M. J. Savage, Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 064301 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, A. B. Balantekin, T. Bhat- tacharya, M. Carena, W. A. de Jong, P. Draper, A. El-Khadra, N. Gemelke, M. Hanada, D. Kharzeev, H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Liu, M. Lukin, Y. Meurice, C. Monroe, B. Nachman, G. Pagano, J. Preskill, E. Ri- naldi, A. Roggero, D. I. ...

    2023

  6. [14]

    Di Meglio, K

    A. Di Meglio, K. Jansen, I. Tavernelli, C. Alexandrou, S. Arunachalam, C. W. Bauer, K. Borras, S. Carrazza, A. Crippa, V. Croft, R. de Putter, A. Delgado, V. Dun- jko, D. J. Egger, E. Fern´ andez-Combarro, E. Fuchs, L. Funcke, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Grossi, J. C. Hal- imeh, ...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Cheng and H

    Y. Cheng and H. Zhai, Emergent u(1) lattice gauge the- ory in rydberg atom arrays, Nature Reviews Physics 6, 566 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-024-02721-8 (2025)

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    T. D. Cohen, H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and Y. Yamauchi (NuQS), Quantum algorithms for transport coefficients in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094514 (2021), arXiv:2104.02024 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    K. Lee, F. Turro, and X. Yao, Quantum computing for energy correlators, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054514 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Turro, A

    F. Turro, A. Ciavarella, and X. Yao, Classical and quantum computing of shear viscosity for (2+1)D SU(2) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114511 (2024), arXiv:2402.04221 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    C. W. Bauer, Efficient use of quantum computers for collider physics, (2025), arXiv:2503.16602 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized ising mod- els and phase transitions without local order pa- rameters, Journal of Mathematical Physics 12, 2259 (1971), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article- pdf/12/10/2259/19106483/2259 1 online.pdf

    1971

  14. [22]

    J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979)

    1979

  15. [23]

    X. Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems:From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons , Oxford Graduate Texts (OUP Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016). 6

    2016

  17. [25]

    Calzetta and B

    E. Calzetta and B. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathemati- cal Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Smith, J

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, and R. Moessner, Disorder-free localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 266601 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Brenes, M

    M. Brenes, M. Dalmonte, M. Heyl, and A. Scardic- chio, Many-body localization dynamics from gauge in- variance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030601 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Smith, J

    A. Smith, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, and D. L. Kovrizhin, Absence of ergodicity without quenched disorder: From quantum disentangled liquids to many-body localiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 176601 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Karpov, R

    P. Karpov, R. Verdel, Y.-P. Huang, M. Schmitt, and M. Heyl, Disorder-free localization in an interacting 2D lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 130401 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    J. Sous, B. Kloss, D. M. Kennes, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Phonon-induced disorder in dynamics of op- tically pumped metals from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Nat. Commun. 12, 5803 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Chakraborty, M

    N. Chakraborty, M. Heyl, P. Karpov, and R. Moess- ner, Disorder-free localization transition in a two- dimensional lattice gauge theory, arXiv preprint (2022), arXiv:2203.06198 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. C. Halimeh, L. Homeier, H. Zhao, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and J. Knolle, Enhancing disorder-free localization through dynamically emer- gent local symmetries, (2021), arXiv:2111.08715 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simula- tors, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Desaules, D

    J.-Y. Desaules, D. Banerjee, A. Hudomal, Z. Papi´ c, A. Sen, and J. C. Halimeh, Weak ergodicity breaking in the schwinger model, Phys. Rev. B107, L201105 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Desaules, A

    J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hudomal, D. Banerjee, A. Sen, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Prominent quantum many- body scars in a truncated schwinger model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 205112 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    A. S. Aramthottil, U. Bhattacharya, D. Gonz´ alez- Cuadra, M. Lewenstein, L. Barbiero, and J. Zakrzewski, Scar states in deconfined z2 lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B 106, L041101 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Desaules, G.-X

    J.-Y. Desaules, G.-X. Su, I. P. McCulloch, B. Yang, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Ergodicity Breaking Un- der Confinement in Cold-Atom Quantum Simulators, Quantum 8, 1274 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Desaules, T

    J.-Y. Desaules, T. Iadecola, and J. C. Halimeh, Mass- assisted local deconfinement in a confined z2 lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014301 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Jeyaretnam, T

    J. Jeyaretnam, T. Bhore, J. J. Osborne, J. C. Halimeh, and Z. Papi´ c, Hilbert space fragmentation at the ori- gin of disorder-free localization in the lattice schwinger model, (2025), arXiv:2409.08320 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A. N. Ciavarella, C. W. Bauer, and J. C. Halimeh, Generic hilbert space fragmentation in kogut–susskind lattice gauge theories, (2025), arXiv:2502.03533 [quant- ph]

    2025

  33. [41]

    P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda, and M. Dal- monte, Many-body magic via pauli-markov chains— from criticality to gauge theories, PRX Quantum 4, 040317 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Hartse, L

    J. Hartse, L. Fidkowski, and N. Mueller, Stabilizer scars, (2024), arXiv:2411.12797 [quant-ph]

    2024

  35. [43]

    Smith, Z

    R. Smith, Z. Papi´ c, and A. Hallam, Nonstabilizerness in kinetically constrained rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. B 111, 245148 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    P. R. N. Falc˜ ao, P. S. Tarabunga, M. Frau, E. Tirrito, J. Zakrzewski, and M. Dalmonte, Nonstabilizerness in u(1) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081102 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Esposito, S

    G. Esposito, S. Cepollaro, L. Cappiello, and A. Hamma, Magic of discrete lattice gauge the- ories, International Journal of Geometric Meth- ods in Modern Physics 22, 2550003 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887825500033

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Na- ture 534, 516 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Mor- ris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    G¨ org, K

    F. G¨ org, K. Sandholzer, J. Minguzzi, R. Desbuquois, M. Messer, and T. Esslinger, Realization of density- dependent Peierls phases to engineer quantized gauge fields coupled to ultracold matter, Nat. Phys. 15, 1161 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Schweizer, F

    C. Schweizer, F. Grusdt, M. Berngruber, L. Barbiero, E. Demler, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Floquet approach to Z2 lattice gauge theories with ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices, Nat. Phys. 15, 1168 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    A. Mil, T. V. Zache, A. Hegde, A. Xia, R. P. Bhatt, M. K. Oberthaler, P. Hauke, J. Berges, and F. Jen- drzejewski, A scalable realization of local U(1) gauge invariance in cold atomic mixtures, Science 367, 1128 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    B. Yang, H. Sun, R. Ott, H.-Y. Wang, T. V. Zache, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, P. Hauke, and J.-W. Pan, Obser- vation of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose–Hubbard quantum simulator, Nature 587, 392 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    Z. Wang, Z.-Y. Ge, Z. Xiang, X. Song, R.-Z. Huang, P. Song, X.-Y. Guo, L. Su, K. Xu, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of emergent z2 gauge invariance in a su- perconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L022060 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    G.-X. Su, H. Sun, A. Hudomal, J.-Y. Desaules, Z.-Y. Zhou, B. Yang, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, Z. Papi´ c, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of many-body scarring in a bose-hubbard quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023010 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Zhou, G.-X

    Z.-Y. Zhou, G.-X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, R. Ott, H. Sun, P. Hauke, B. Yang, Z.-S. Yuan, J. Berges, and J.-W. Pan, Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator, Science 377, 311 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Wang, W.-Y

    H.-Y. Wang, W.-Y. Zhang, Z. Yao, Y. Liu, Z.-H. Zhu, Y.-G. Zheng, X.-K. Wang, H. Zhai, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.- W. Pan, Interrelated thermalization and quantum criti- cality in a lattice gauge simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 050401 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Zhang, Y

    W.-Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Cheng, M.-G. He, H.-Y. Wang, T.-Y. Wang, Z.-H. Zhu, G.-X. Su, Z.-Y. Zhou, Y.-G. 7 Zheng, H. Sun, B. Yang, P. Hauke, W. Zheng, J. C. Hal- imeh, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of micro- scopic confinement dynamics by a tunable topological theta-an...

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum simula- tion of su(3) lattice yang-mills theory at leading order in large- Nc expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111901 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    A. N. Ciavarella, String Breaking in the Heavy Quark Limit with Scalable Circuits, (2024), arXiv:2411.05915 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Scalable Circuits for Preparing Ground States on Dig- ital Quantum Computers: The Schwinger Model Vac- uum on 100 Qubits, PRX Quantum 5, 020315 (2024), arXiv:2308.04481 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Sav- age, Quantum simulations of hadron dynamics in the Schwinger model using 112 qubits, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114510 (2024), arXiv:2401.08044 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Z.-H. Zhu, Y. Liu, G. Lagnese, F. M. Surace, W.-Y. Zhang, M.-G. He, J. C. Halimeh, M. Dalmonte, S. C. Morampudi, F. Wilczek, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Probing false vacuum decay on a cold-atom gauge- theory quantum simulator, (2024), arXiv:2411.12565 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Ciavarella, N

    A. Ciavarella, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094501 (2021), arXiv:2101.10227 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    A. N. Ciavarella, Quantum simulation of lattice QCD with improved Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094513 (2023), arXiv:2307.05593 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    A. N. Ciavarella and I. A. Chernyshev, Preparation of the SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills vacuum with variational quantum methods, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074504 (2022), arXiv:2112.09083 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    E. J. Gustafson, H. Lamm, and F. Lovelace, Prim- itive quantum gates for an SU(2) discrete subgroup: Binary octahedral, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054503 (2024), arXiv:2312.10285 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    E. J. Gustafson, Y. Ji, H. Lamm, E. M. Murairi, S. O. Perez, and S. Zhu, Primitive quantum gates for an SU(3) discrete subgroup: Σ(36 ×3), Phys. Rev. D 110, 034515 (2024), arXiv:2405.05973 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Lamm, Y.-Y

    H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Shu, Y.-L. Wang, and B. Xu, Block encodings of discrete subgroups on a quan- tum computer, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054505 (2024), arXiv:2405.12890 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054512 (2023), arXiv:2207.01731 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. II. Single-baryon β-decay in real time, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054513 (2023), arXiv:2209.10781 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Z. Li, D. M. Grabowska, and M. J. Savage, Sequency Hi- erarchy Truncation (SeqHT) for Adiabatic State Prepa- ration and Time Evolution in Quantum Simulations, (2024), arXiv:2407.13835 [quant-ph]

    2024

  63. [71]

    N. A. Zemlevskiy, Scalable Quantum Simulations of Scattering in Scalar Field Theory on 120 Qubits, (2024), arXiv:2411.02486 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Lewis and R

    R. Lewis and R. M. Woloshyn, A qubit model for U(1) lattice gauge theory (2019) arXiv:1905.09789 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Y. Y. Atas, J. Zhang, R. Lewis, A. Jahanpour, J. F. Haase, and C. A. Muschik, SU(2) hadrons on a quantum computer via a variational approach, Nature Commun. 12, 6499 (2021), arXiv:2102.08920 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  66. [74]

    A Rahman, R

    S. A Rahman, R. Lewis, E. Mendicelli, and S. Powell, Self-mitigating Trotter circuits for SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074502 (2022), arXiv:2205.09247 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Y. Y. Atas, J. F. Haase, J. Zhang, V. Wei, S. M. L. Pfaendler, R. Lewis, and C. A. Muschik, Simulat- ing one-dimensional quantum chromodynamics on a quantum computer: Real-time evolutions of tetra- and pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033184 (2023), arXiv:2207.03473 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Mendicelli, R

    E. Mendicelli, R. Lewis, S. A. Rahman, and S. Powell, Real time evolution and a traveling excitation in SU(2) pure gauge theory on a quantum computer., PoS LA T- TICE2022, 025 (2023), arXiv:2210.11606 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    A. H. Z. Kavaki and R. Lewis, From square plaquettes to triamond lattices for SU(2) gauge theory, Commun. Phys. 7, 208 (2024), arXiv:2401.14570 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    A. T. Than, Y. Y. Atas, A. Chakraborty, J. Zhang, M. T. Diaz, K. Wen, X. Liu, R. Lewis, A. M. Green, C. A. Muschik, and N. M. Linke, The phase diagram of quantum chromodynamics in one dimension on a quan- tum computer, (2024), arXiv:2501.00579 [quant-ph]

    2024

  71. [79]

    Angelides, P

    T. Angelides, P. Naredi, A. Crippa, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn, I. Tavernelli, and D. S. Wang, First-order phase transi- tion of the schwinger model with a quantum computer, npj Quantum Information 11, 6 (2025)

    2025

  72. [80]

    Gyawali, T

    G. Gyawali, T. Cochran, Y. Lensky, E. Rosenberg, A. H. Karamlou, K. Kechedzhi, J. Berndtsson, T. Westerhout, A. Asfaw, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. A. Beni, T. I. An- dersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, N. Astrakhant- sev, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, A. B...

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Schuhmacher, G.-X

    J. Schuhmacher, G.-X. Su, J. J. Osborne, A. Gandon, J. C. Halimeh, and I. Tavernelli, Observation of hadron scattering in a lattice gauge theory on a quantum com- puter, (2025), arXiv:2505.20387 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Davoudi, C.-C

    Z. Davoudi, C.-C. Hsieh, and S. V. Kadam, Quantum computation of hadron scattering in a lattice gauge the- ory, (2025), arXiv:2505.20408 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Pichler, M

    T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Mon- tangero, Real-time dynamics in u(1) lattice gauge the- ories with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. X 6, 011023 (2016)

    2016

  76. [84]

    Chanda, J

    T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagli- acozzo, Confinement and lack of thermalization after quenches in the bosonic schwinger model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 180602 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    Notarnicola, M

    S. Notarnicola, M. Collura, and S. Montangero, Real-time-dynamics quantum simulation of (1 + 1)-dimensional lattice qed with rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013288 (2020)

    2020

  78. [86]

    Rigobello, S

    M. Rigobello, S. Notarnicola, G. Magnifico, and S. Mon- tangero, Entanglement generation in (1 + 1)D qed scat- tering processes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114501 (2021)

    2021

  79. [87]

    Van Damme, T

    M. Van Damme, T. V. Zache, D. Banerjee, P. Hauke, and J. C. Halimeh, Dynamical quantum phase transi- tions in spin- su(1) quantum link models, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245110 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    G.-X. Su, J. J. Osborne, and J. C. Halimeh, Cold-atom particle collider, PRX Quantum 5, 040310 (2024)

    2024

  81. [89]

    Belyansky, S

    R. Belyansky, S. Whitsitt, N. Mueller, A. Fahimniya, E. R. Bennewitz, Z. Davoudi, and A. V. Gorshkov, High- energy collision of quarks and mesons in the schwinger model: From tensor networks to circuit qed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 091903 (2024)

    2024

  82. [90]

    Calaj´ o, G

    G. Calaj´ o, G. Magnifico, C. Edmunds, M. Ringbauer, S. Montangero, and P. Silvi, Digital quantum simulation of a (1+1)d su(2) lattice gauge theory with ion qudits, PRX Quantum 5, 040309 (2024)

    2024

  83. [91]

    Calaj´ o, G

    G. Calaj´ o, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, D. Wanisch, G. Magnifico, P. Silvi, S. Montangero, and J. C. Hal- imeh, Quantum many-body scarring in a non-abelian lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013322 (2025)

    2025

  84. [92]

    Cataldi, G

    G. Cataldi, G. Calaj´ o, P. Silvi, S. Montangero, and J. C. Halimeh, Disorder-free localization and fragmen- tation in a non-abelian lattice gauge theory, (2025), arXiv:2505.04704 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Quan- tum many-body scarring in 2 + 1d gauge theories with dynamical matter, (2024), arXiv:2403.08858 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Budde, M

    T. Budde, M. Krstic Marinkovic, and J. C. Pinto Barros, Quantum many-body scars for arbitrary integer spin in 2+1D abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094506 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Disorder-free localization in 2 + 1d lattice gauge the- ories with dynamical matter, (2023), arXiv:2301.07720 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Carmen Ba˜ nuls and K

    M. Carmen Ba˜ nuls and K. Cichy, Review on novel meth- ods for lattice gauge theories, Reports on Progress in Physics 83, 024401 (2020)

    2020

  89. [97]

    Magnifico, G

    G. Magnifico, G. Cataldi, M. Rigobello, P. Majcen, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Tensor net- works for lattice gauge theories beyond one dimension: a roadmap, (2024), arXiv:2407.03058 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, and C. Monroe, Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator, (2024), arXiv:2410.13815 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Liu, W.-Y

    Y. Liu, W.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, M.-G. He, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, String breaking mechanism in a lattice schwinger model simulator, (2024), arXiv:2411.15443 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Blekos, G. Polykratis, and S. K¨ uhn, Realizing string breaking dynamics in a z2 lattice gauge theory on quantum hardware, (2025), arXiv:2504.13760 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  93. [101]

    T. A. Cochran, B. Jobst, E. Rosenberg, Y. D. Lensky, G. Gyawali, N. Eassa, M. Will, A. Szasz, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. Aghababaie Beni, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Ata- laya, R. Babbush, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, A. Bengts- son, A. Bilmes, A. B...

    2025

  94. [102]

    Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaˇ ca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)d rydberg quantum simulator, Nature 642, 321 (2025)

    2025

  95. [103]

    Crippa, K

    A. Crippa, K. Jansen, and E. Rinaldi, Analysis of the confinement string in (2 + 1)-dimensional quantum elec- trodynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer, (2024), arXiv:2411.05628 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    W.-T. Xu, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Tensor-network study of the roughening transition in (2 + 1)d lattice gauge theories, (2025), arXiv:2503.19027 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2025 arXiv

  97. [105]

    F. D. Marcantonio, S. Pradhan, S. Vallecorsa, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and E. R. Ortega, Roughening and dynamics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)d lattice gauge theory, (2025), arXiv:2505.23853 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Borla, J

    U. Borla, J. J. Osborne, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String breaking in a 2 + 1d Z2 lattice gauge theory, (2025), arXiv:2501.17929 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  100. [108]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. K¨ ohler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollw¨ ock, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution meth- ods for matrix-product states, Ann. Phys. 411, 167998 (2019)

    2019

  101. [109]

    Montangero, Introduction to Tensor Network Meth- ods: Numerical simulations of low-dimensional many- body quantum systems (Springer International Publish- ing, 2018)

    S. Montangero, Introduction to Tensor Network Meth- ods: Numerical simulations of low-dimensional many- body quantum systems (Springer International Publish- ing, 2018)

    2018

  102. [110]

    Hauschild, J

    J. Hauschild, J. Unfried, S. Anand, B. Andrews, M. Bintz, U. Borla, S. Divic, M. Drescher, J. Geiger, M. Hefel, K. H´ emery, W. Kadow, J. Kemp, N. Kirchner, V. S. Liu, G. M¨ oller, D. Parker, M. Rader, A. Romen, S. Scalet, L. Schoonderwoerd, M. Schulz, T. Soejima, P. Thoma, Y....

    2024

  103. [111]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent vari- ational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  104. [112]

    Haegeman, T

    J. Haegeman, T. J. Osborne, and F. Verstraete, Post- matrix product state methods: To tangent space and beyond, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075133 (2013)

    2013

  105. [113]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and opti- mization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016)

    2016

  106. [114]

    Greensite, An Introduction to the Confinement Prob- lem, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2011)

    J. Greensite, An Introduction to the Confinement Prob- lem, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2011)

    2011

  107. [115]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979)

    1979

  108. [116]

    Trebst, P

    S. Trebst, P. Werner, M. Troyer, K. Shtengel, and C. Nayak, Breakdown of a topological phase: Quantum phase transition in a loop gas model with tension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070602 (2007)

    2007

  109. [117]

    Vidal, S

    J. Vidal, S. Dusuel, and K. P. Schmidt, Low-energy ef- fective theory of the toric code model in a parallel mag- netic field, Phys. Rev. B 79, 033109 (2009)

    2009

  110. [118]

    F. Wu, Y. Deng, and N. Prokof’ev, Phase diagram of the toric code model in a parallel magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 85, 195104 (2012)

    2012

  111. [119]

    See Supplemental Material for details on the numerical TDVP algorithm, on how to derive the effective models at strong electric coupling and on the string dissipation as the Higgs phase is approached

  112. [120]

    Video playlist for quench dynamics and breaking of flux strings in a 2 + 1D Z2 lattice gauge theory

  113. [121]

    flippable

    V. MATHIEU, N. KOCHELEV, and V. VENTO, The physics of glueballs, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics E 18, 1 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301309012124. 1 Supplemental Material: String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a2 + 1D Lattice Gauge Theory COMPUT...

    2009 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.