pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09359 · v1 · pith:444KGX2Cnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Core-edge integrated modeling of ARC: on the effect of impurity transport and detachment conditions

Marco Muraca , Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez , Nathaniel T. Howard , Joe Hall , Giovanni Tardini , Davide Silvagni , Thomas Body , Jon Hillesheim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 14:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords ARCfusion powerdivertor detachmentargon seedingneon seedingH-modeimpurity transportintegrated modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrated core-edge modeling shows ARC can reach near-GW fusion power with detached divertor using argon seeding.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts integrated modeling of ARC H-modes to evaluate scenarios that combine high fusion performance with divertor detachment. Self-consistent tracking of impurity radiation and density profiles demonstrates that argon seeding can sustain fusion powers approaching 1 GW while holding divertor temperatures below 2 eV. Sensitivity scans highlight a strong effect from separatrix density (750-1000 MW range) and weaker effects from enrichment factor and pedestal density. Argon consistently supports H-mode access and detachment, whereas neon yields lower power (600-850 MW) and risks core impurity buildup. Additional checks with reduced momentum transport and neoclassical impurity transport leave the main conclusions intact.

Core claim

Integrated modeling of ARC H-modes incorporating self-consistent impurity radiation and density profiles shows that fusion power levels approaching a GW can be achieved while maintaining divertor temperatures below 2 eV with Ar seeding. Sensitivity studies reveal a strong dependence of fusion power on the separatrix density, with performance spanning 750-1000 MW, and a weaker dependence on enrichment factor and pedestal density. Argon seeding allows consistent H-mode access with the highest fusion power and detached divertor operation, whereas neon seeding leads to lower performance (600-850 MW) and less robust H-mode access due to excessive core impurity accumulation. A small W impurity pea

What carries the argument

Self-consistent evolution of impurity radiation and density profiles within an integrated core-edge modeling code

Load-bearing premise

The impurity transport, radiation, and detachment models in the integrated core-edge code accurately capture real plasma behavior under the simulated ARC conditions.

What would settle it

Measurements on an ARC-relevant plasma showing that argon seeding cannot sustain divertor temperatures below 2 eV once fusion power approaches 1 GW, or that neon seeding achieves comparable power without core impurity accumulation preventing H-mode.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09359 by Davide Silvagni, Giovanni Tardini, Joe Hall, Jon Hillesheim, Marco Muraca, Nathaniel T. Howard, Pablo Rodriguez-Fernandez, Thomas Body.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fusion power vs: magnetic field (a), plasma current (b), pedestal top pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Global parameters for a scan of pedestal density: fusion power (a); volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Profiles of: electron density, ion temperature and electron temperature (a); [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Global parameters for a scan of separatrix density: fusion power (a); volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: top of pedestal pressure vs pedestal density for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Global parameters for a scan of enrichment factor: fusion power (a); volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fusion power (a), top of pedestal pressure (b), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fusion power (a), top of pedestal pressure (b), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fusion power (a), top of pedestal pressure (b), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Ion temperature (a) and electron density (b) profiles across nped, nsep and ϵ scans for the Ar-seeded (red) and Ne-seeded (cyan) plasmas. The solid lines are the nominal profiles, while the shaded area indicates the maximum and minimum values. The grey colored area indicates the pedestal region. ρt is the square root of the normalized toroidal flux. averaged ne and electron density peaking (νne ) are foun… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: W (a) and seeded species (b) density peaking factors, neoclassical to total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Results of TGLF standalone simulations, scanning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left: W (blue) and H (brown) radial concentration profiles for all the scans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Profiles of toroidal velocity (a) and impurity diffusivity for all the species [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Ratios between (R·) W neoclassical convection and turbulent diffusivity for several scans: the top plots show a scan in ion density gradient; the bottom left plot indicates a scan in ion temperature gradient; the bottom right plot highlights a scan in rotation. The green crosses indicate average values, while the red ones are at ρt = 0.25. ηi is the ratio between normalized ion temperature and density gra… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrated modeling of ARC H-modes has been conducted to assess the feasibility of high-performance scenarios compatible with divertor detachment. The analysis incorporates self-consistent evolution of impurity radiation and density profiles, demonstrating that fusion power levels approaching a GW can be achieved while maintaining divertor temperatures below 2 eV with Ar seeding. Sensitivity studies reveal a strong dependence of fusion power on the separatrix density, with performance spanning 750-1000 MW, and a weaker dependence on enrichment factor and pedestal density. Alternative seeding strategies using Neon have also been explored. Plasmas with Argon seeding consistently access H-mode, providing the highest fusion power and detached divertor operation, whereas Neon seeding leads to lower performance (600-850 MW) and less robust H-mode access, due to excessive core impurity accumulation. A small W impurity peaking has been found, with decreasing values at higher Zeff. Further analyses incorporate reduced momentum transport modeling, and sensitivity studies of neoclassical impurity transport, confirming the robustness of the results. Overall, these findings support the viability of high-performing H-mode operation in ARC, ensuring divertor protection, enabled through Argon and Neon impurity seeding.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper conducts core-edge integrated modeling of ARC H-modes incorporating self-consistent impurity radiation and density profile evolution. It claims that fusion powers approaching 1 GW are achievable while maintaining divertor temperatures below 2 eV using argon seeding, with sensitivity studies showing strong dependence on separatrix density (750-1000 MW range) and weaker dependence on enrichment factor and pedestal density. Neon seeding yields lower performance (600-850 MW) and less robust H-mode access due to core impurity accumulation. Additional analyses cover reduced momentum transport, neoclassical impurity transport sensitivities, and small tungsten peaking that decreases with higher Zeff, supporting overall viability of high-performance detached operation.

Significance. If the underlying transport and radiation models hold under ARC conditions, the work is significant for compact high-field tokamak design by identifying viable impurity seeding strategies that simultaneously enable high fusion power and divertor detachment. The self-consistent impurity evolution, parameter sensitivity scans, and Ar versus Ne comparison provide concrete guidance on operational windows, while the robustness checks against variations in separatrix density and neoclassical transport add credibility within the modeling framework.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'fusion power levels approaching a GW' would be clearer if the maximum achieved value and the specific separatrix density at which it occurs were stated explicitly rather than giving only the 750-1000 MW span.
  2. Abstract: the description of 'reduced momentum transport modeling' lacks any quantitative detail on the reduction factor or its effect on the reported fusion powers and detachment conditions.
  3. Abstract: a brief statement on the integrated code framework employed and any benchmark or validation steps performed against existing experiments or other codes would help readers assess the reliability of the self-consistent impurity profiles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our core-edge integrated modeling study on ARC H-modes, as well as for recommending minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper presents results from an integrated core-edge modeling framework with self-consistent impurity evolution, radiation, and density profiles. Sensitivity studies on separatrix density, enrichment factor, pedestal density, neoclassical transport, and seeding species (Ar vs Ne) are described as exploring the model's behavior rather than deriving predictions that reduce to fitted inputs by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are referenced in the abstract or description. The central feasibility claim for GW-level power with detachment is framed as an outcome of the modeling under stated assumptions, with no quoted equations or steps showing tautological reduction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit list of free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such elements remain unidentified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5759 in / 1042 out tokens · 28589 ms · 2026-06-27T14:43:44.464274+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets

    B.N. Sorbom et al. “ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets”. In:Fusion Engineering and Design100 (Nov. 2015), pp. 378–405.issn: 09203796.doi:10 . 1016 / j . fusengdes.2015.07.008.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0920379615302337(visited on 12/02/2025)

    2015

  2. [2]

    The updated ITPA global H-mode confinement database: description and analysis

    G. Verdoolaege et al. “The updated ITPA global H-mode confinement database: description and analysis”. In:Nuclear Fusion61.7 (May 2021), p. 076006.issn: 0029-5515.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abdb91.url:https://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/1741-4326/abdb91(visited on 06/12/2023)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abdb91.url:https://dx.doi.org/10 2021

  3. [5]

    Power requirement for accessing the H-mode in ITER

    Y R Martin, T Takizuka, and the ITPA CDBM H-mode Threshold Data Group. “Power requirement for accessing the H-mode in ITER”. In:Journal of Physics: Conference Series123 (July 1, 2008), p. 012033.issn: 1742-6596.doi:10.1088/ 1742-6596/123/1/012033.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10. 1088/1742-6596/123/1/012033(visited on 08/13/2020)

    2008

  4. [7]

    Empirical scaling of the L–H threshold power for metal wall tokamaks using a multi-device database

    E. Delabie et al. “Empirical scaling of the L–H threshold power for metal wall tokamaks using a multi-device database”. In:Nuclear Fusion66.3 (Mar. 1, 2026), p. 036016.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ae39f2.url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ae39f2(visited on 04/28/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ae39f2.url: 2026

  5. [8]

    Dependence of H-mode pedestal parameters on plasma magnetic geometry

    L D Horton et al. “Dependence of H-mode pedestal parameters on plasma magnetic geometry”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion44.5 (May 1, 2002), A273–A278.issn: 07413335.doi:10.1088/0741-3335/44/5A/327.url: https : / / iopscience . iop . org / article / 10 . 1088 / 0741 - 3335 / 44 / 5A / 327 (visited on 01/26/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/44/5a/327.url: 2002

  6. [9]

    High fusion performance in Super H-mode experiments on Alcator C-Mod and DIII-D

    P.B. Snyder et al. “High fusion performance in Super H-mode experiments on Alcator C-Mod and DIII-D”. In:Nuclear Fusion59.8 (Aug. 1, 2019), p. 086017. issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10 . 1088 / 1741 - 4326 / ab235b.url:https : / / iopscience . iop . org / article / 10 . 1088 / 1741 - 4326 / ab235b(visited on 01/26/2026)

    2019

  7. [10]

    Theory-based integrated modelling of tungsten transport in ITER plasmas

    D Fajardo et al. “Theory-based integrated modelling of tungsten transport in ITER plasmas”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion67.1 (Jan. 31, 2025), p. 015020.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad9aca.url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6587/ad9aca(visited on 10/24/2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad9aca.url: 2025

  8. [11]

    Integrated modeling of SPARC H-mode scenarios: exploration of the impact of modeling assumptions on predicted performance

    M. Muraca et al. “Integrated modeling of SPARC H-mode scenarios: exploration of the impact of modeling assumptions on predicted performance”. In:Nuclear Fusion65.9 (Sept. 1, 2025), p. 096010.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/ 1741- 4326/adf656.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 1741-4326/adf656(visited on 12/02/2025)

    2025

  9. [12]

    Integrated core–SOL simulations for SPARC tokamak with the COREDIV code

    I. Ivanova-Stanik, P. Chmielewski, and R. Zag´ orski. “Integrated core–SOL simulations for SPARC tokamak with the COREDIV code”. In:Fusion Engineering and Design193 (Aug. 2023), p. 113698.issn: 09203796.doi:10 . 1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113698.url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0920379623002818(visited on 05/27/2025). REFERENCES26

    arXiv 2023

  10. [13]

    Impurity peaking of SPARC H-modes: a sensitivity study on physics and engineering assumptions

    Marco Muraca et al. “Impurity peaking of SPARC H-modes: a sensitivity study on physics and engineering assumptions”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (Apr. 16, 2026).issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ae60a4. url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361- 6587/ae60a4 (visited on 04/17/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ae60a4 2026

  11. [14]

    The European Integrated Tokamak Modelling (ITM) effort: achievements and first physics results

    G.L. Falchetto et al. “The European Integrated Tokamak Modelling (ITM) effort: achievements and first physics results”. In:Nuclear Fusion54.4 (Apr. 1, 2014), p. 043018.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/4/043018. url:https : / / iopscience . iop . org / article / 10 . 1088 / 0029 - 5515 / 54 / 4 / 043018(visited on 02/20/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/4/043018 2014

  12. [15]

    Progress in pedestal and edge physics: Chapter 3 of the special issue: on the path to tokamak burning plasma operation

    M.E. Fenstermacher et al. “Progress in pedestal and edge physics: Chapter 3 of the special issue: on the path to tokamak burning plasma operation”. In:Nuclear Fusion65.5 (May 1, 2025), p. 053001.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/ 1741- 4326/adb1f3.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 1741-4326/adb1f3(visited on 01/26/2026)

    2025

  13. [16]

    Elements of H-mode pedestal structure

    R J Groebner and S Saarelma. “Elements of H-mode pedestal structure”. In: Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion65.7 (July 1, 2023), p. 073001.issn: 0741- 3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/1361-6587/acd478.url:https://iopscience. iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6587/acd478(visited on 02/17/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/acd478.url:https://iopscience 2023

  14. [17]

    Modeling for ELMs and H-mode pedestal transport: MHD, gyrokinetic, neoclassical and integrated simulations

    N. Aiba. “Modeling for ELMs and H-mode pedestal transport: MHD, gyrokinetic, neoclassical and integrated simulations”. In:Nuclear Fusion65.8 (Aug. 1, 2025), p. 082003.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aded24.url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/aded24(visited on 02/17/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aded24.url: 2025

  15. [18]

    Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO

    A Kallenbach et al. “Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion55.12 (Dec. 1, 2013), p. 124041.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/0741-3335/ 55/12/124041.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741- 3335/55/12/124041(visited on 10/24/2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/ 2013

  16. [19]

    Physics of ultimate detachment of a tokamak divertor plasma

    S. I. Krasheninnikov and A. S. Kukushkin. “Physics of ultimate detachment of a tokamak divertor plasma”. In:Journal of Plasma Physics83.5 (Oct. 2017), p. 155830501.issn: 0022-3778, 1469-7807.doi:10 . 1017 / S0022377817000654. url:https : / / www . cambridge . org / core / product / identifier / S0022377817000654/type/journal_article(visited on 10/24/2025)

    2017

  17. [20]

    A review of radiative detachment studies in tokamak advanced magnetic divertor configurations

    V A Soukhanovskii. “A review of radiative detachment studies in tokamak advanced magnetic divertor configurations”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion59.6 (June 1, 2017), p. 064005.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/ 1361- 6587/aa6959.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 1361-6587/aa6959(visited on 10/24/2025). REFERENCES27

    2017

  18. [21]

    Experimental study of H–L transitions in JET

    C. F. Maggi et al. “Experimental study of H–L transitions in JET”. In:Proceedings of the 40th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics. Espoo, Finland: European Physical Society, 2013.url:https://scipub.euro-fusion.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/11/EFDC130320.pdf

    2013

  19. [22]

    Pereverzev et al.ASTRA - an automatic system for transport analysis in a tokamak

    G.V. Pereverzev et al.ASTRA - an automatic system for transport analysis in a tokamak. IPP–5/42 INIS Reference Number: 23024293. Germany, 1991, p. 64

    1991

  20. [23]

    New adaptive grid plasma evolution code SPIDER

    AA Ivanov. “New adaptive grid plasma evolution code SPIDER”. 32nd EPS Conference on Plasma Physics. Tarragona, 2005. [24]freegs-plasma/freegs. original-date: 2016-11-15T11:28:29Z. Nov. 28, 2024.url: https://github.com/freegs-plasma/freegs(visited on 12/06/2024)

    2005

  21. [24]

    HYDROMAGNETIC EQUILIBRIA AND FORCE-FREE FIELDS

    Harold Grad and Hanan Rubin. “HYDROMAGNETIC EQUILIBRIA AND FORCE-FREE FIELDS”. In:Journal of Nuclear Energy7 (1958), pp. 284–285. url:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:121009637

    1958

  22. [25]

    Plasma Equilibrium in a Magnetic Field

    V. D. Shafranov. “Plasma Equilibrium in a Magnetic Field”. In:Reviews of Plasma Physics2 (Jan. 1966), p. 103

    1966

  23. [26]

    Introduction to magnetic helicity,

    F. Porcelli, D. Boucher, and M. N. Rosenbluth. “Model for the sawtooth period and amplitude”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion38.12 (Dec. 1996), p. 2163.issn: 0741-3335.doi:10.1088/0741- 3335/38/12/010.url:https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/38/12/010(visited on 06/27/2023)

    work page doi:10.1088/0741- 1996

  24. [27]

    Predictions of core plasma performance for the SPARC tokamak

    P. Rodriguez-Fernandez et al. “Predictions of core plasma performance for the SPARC tokamak”. In:Journal of Plasma Physics86.5 (Oct. 2020), p. 865860503. issn: 0022-3778, 1469-7807.doi:10 . 1017 / S0022377820001075.url:https : //www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022377820001075/type/ journal%5C_article(visited on 12/06/2024)

    2020

  25. [28]

    Verification of a quasi-linear model for gyrokinetic turbulent transport

    G.M. Staebler et al. “Verification of a quasi-linear model for gyrokinetic turbulent transport”. In:Nuclear Fusion61.11 (Nov. 1, 2021), p. 116007.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac243a.url:https://iopscience.iop. org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ac243a(visited on 02/15/2022)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac243a.url:https://iopscience.iop 2021

  26. [29]

    Plasma physics series

    Jan Weiland.Collective modes in inhomogeneous plasma: kinetic and advanced fluid theory. Plasma physics series. Bristol: Inst. of Physics Publ, 2000. 189 pp. isbn: 978-0-7503-0589-1

    2000

  27. [30]

    Comparisons and physics basis of tokamak transport models and turbulence simulations

    A. M. Dimits et al. “Comparisons and physics basis of tokamak transport models and turbulence simulations”. In:Physics of Plasmas7.3 (Mar. 1, 2000), pp. 969– 983.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10.1063/1.873896.url:https://pubs. aip.org/pop/article/7/3/969/1029781/Comparisons-and-physics-basis- of-tokamak-transport(visited on 12/06/2024). REFERENCES28

    work page doi:10.1063/1.873896.url:https://pubs 2000

  28. [31]

    Introduction to turbulent transport in fusion plasmas

    Xavier Garbet. “Introduction to turbulent transport in fusion plasmas”. In: Comptes Rendus. Physique7.6 (July 1, 2006), pp. 573–583.issn: 1878-1535.doi: 10.1016/j.crhy.2006.06.002.url:https://comptes- rendus.academie- sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2006.06.002/(visited on 12/06/2024)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2006.06.002.url:https://comptes- 2006

  29. [32]

    Predict-first experiments and modeling of perturbative cold pulses in the DIII-D tokamak

    P. Rodriguez-Fernandez et al. “Predict-first experiments and modeling of perturbative cold pulses in the DIII-D tokamak”. In:Physics of Plasmas26.6 (June 1, 2019), p. 062503.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10.1063/1.5096800. url:https://pubs.aip.org/pop/article/26/6/062503/1061751/Predict- first-experiments-and-modeling-of(visited on 12/02/2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5096800 2019

  30. [33]

    Perturbative transport modeling of cold-pulse dynamics in Alcator C-Mod Ohmic plasmas

    P. Rodriguez-Fernandez et al. “Perturbative transport modeling of cold-pulse dynamics in Alcator C-Mod Ohmic plasmas”. In:Nuclear Fusion59.6 (June 1, 2019), p. 066017.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab1575. url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741- 4326/ab1575 (visited on 12/02/2024)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab1575 2019

  31. [35]

    Turbulent transport analysis of JET H-mode and hybrid plasmas using QuaLiKiz and Trapped Gyro Landau Fluid

    B Baiocchi et al. “Turbulent transport analysis of JET H-mode and hybrid plasmas using QuaLiKiz and Trapped Gyro Landau Fluid”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion57.3 (Mar. 1, 2015), p. 035003.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/57/3/035003.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/ article/10.1088/0741-3335/57/3/035003(visited on 12/02/2024)

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/57/3/035003.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/ 2015

  32. [36]

    Validation of nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations of L- and I- mode plasmas on Alcator C-Mod

    A. J. Creely et al. “Validation of nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations of L- and I- mode plasmas on Alcator C-Mod”. In:Physics of Plasmas24.5 (May 1, 2017), p. 056104.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10.1063/1.4977466.url:https: / / pubs . aip . org / pop / article / 24 / 5 / 056104 / 991885 / Validation - of - nonlinear-gyrokinetic-simulations-of(visited on ...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4977466.url:https: 2017

  33. [37]

    Quasilinear theory and modelling of gyrokinetic turbulent transport in tokamaks

    G. Staebler et al. “Quasilinear theory and modelling of gyrokinetic turbulent transport in tokamaks”. In:Nuclear Fusion64.10 (Oct. 1, 2024), p. 103001. issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10 . 1088 / 1741 - 4326 / ad6ba5.url:https : / / iopscience . iop . org / article / 10 . 1088 / 1741 - 4326 / ad6ba5(visited on 05/12/2025)

    2024

  34. [38]

    Representation of the plasma fluid equations in “Miller equilibrium

    W. M. Stacey and Cheonho Bae. “Representation of the plasma fluid equations in “Miller equilibrium” analytical flux surface geometry”. In:Physics of Plasmas 16.8 (Aug. 1, 2009), p. 082501.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10 . 1063 / 1 . 3177613.url:https : / / pubs . aip . org / pop / article / 16 / 8 / 082501 / 316133 / Representation - of - the - plasma -...

    2009

  35. [39]

    Full-radius integrated modelling of ASDEX Upgrade L-modes including impurity transport and radiation

    D. Fajardo et al. “Full-radius integrated modelling of ASDEX Upgrade L-modes including impurity transport and radiation”. In:Nuclear Fusion64.4 (Apr. 1, 2024), p. 046021.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad29bd. url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741- 4326/ad29bd (visited on 10/24/2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad29bd 2024

  36. [40]

    Analytical model for collisional impurity transport in tokamaks at arbitrary collisionality

    D Fajardo et al. “Analytical model for collisional impurity transport in tokamaks at arbitrary collisionality”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion64.5 (May 1, 2022), p. 055017.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ac5b4d. url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361- 6587/ac5b4d (visited on 10/24/2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ac5b4d 2022

  37. [42]

    Ralph Dux.STRAHL User Manual. 10/30. IPP–10/30. Germany, 2006

    2006

  38. [44]

    ELM divertor peak energy fluence scaling to ITER with data from JET, MAST and ASDEX upgrade

    T. Eich et al. “ELM divertor peak energy fluence scaling to ITER with data from JET, MAST and ASDEX upgrade”. In:Nuclear Materials and Energy12 (Aug. 2017), pp. 84–90.issn: 23521791.doi:10 . 1016 / j . nme . 2017 . 04 . 014. url:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352179116302927 (visited on 01/30/2026)

    2017

  39. [45]

    Physics basis for the ICRF system of the SPARC tokamak

    Y. Lin, J. C. Wright, and S. J. Wukitch. “Physics basis for the ICRF system of the SPARC tokamak”. In:Journal of Plasma Physics86.5 (Oct. 2020), p. 865860506. issn: 0022-3778, 1469-7807.doi:10 . 1017 / S0022377820001269.url:https : //www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022377820001269/type/ journal%5C_article(visited on 12/06/2024)

    2020

  40. [46]

    Y Pankin et al.TRANSP integrated modeling code for interpretive and predictive analysis of tokamak plasmas

    A. Y Pankin et al.TRANSP integrated modeling code for interpretive and predictive analysis of tokamak plasmas. 2024.doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2406.07781. url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07781(visited on 11/19/2024)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07781 2024

  41. [47]

    Numerical simulation of ion cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas

    M. Brambilla. “Numerical simulation of ion cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion41.1 (Jan. 1999), p. 1.issn: 0741-3335. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/41/1/002.url:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741- 3335/41/1/002(visited on 11/19/2024)

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/41/1/002.url:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741- 1999

  42. [48]

    Fast ion studies of ion cyclotron heating in the PLT tokamak

    G W Hammett. “Fast ion studies of ion cyclotron heating in the PLT tokamak”. PhD thesis. United States: Princeton Univ.,Princeton, NJ, Jan. 1, 1986.url: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5079411. REFERENCES30

    arXiv 1986

  43. [49]

    A simple, accurate model for detachment access

    Thomas Body, Arne Kallenbach, and Thomas Eich. “A simple, accurate model for detachment access”. In:Nuclear Fusion65.8 (Aug. 1, 2025), p. 086002.issn: 0029- 5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ade4d9.url:https://iopscience. iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ade4d9(visited on 01/27/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ade4d9.url:https://iopscience 2025

  44. [50]

    How turbulence sets boundaries for tokamak operation

    Peter Manz, Thomas Eich, and Ondrej Grover. “How turbulence sets boundaries for tokamak operation”. In:Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics9.1 (Jan. 27, 2025), p. 5.issn: 2367-3192.doi:10.1007/s41614-024-00178-z.url:https: //link.springer.com/10.1007/s41614-024-00178-z(visited on 02/18/2026)

    work page doi:10.1007/s41614-024-00178-z.url:https: 2025

  45. [51]

    The separatrix electron density in JET, ASDEX upgrade and alcator C-Mod H-mode plasmas: A common evaluation procedure and correlation with engineering parameters

    D. Silvagni et al. “The separatrix electron density in JET, ASDEX upgrade and alcator C-Mod H-mode plasmas: A common evaluation procedure and correlation with engineering parameters”. In:Nuclear Materials and Energy42 (Mar. 2025), p. 101867.issn: 23521791.doi:10 . 1016 / j . nme . 2025 . 101867.url:https : //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S235217912...

    2025

  46. [52]

    SOLPS-ITER modeling of deuterium throughput impact on the ITER SOL plasma

    E. Kaveeva et al. “SOLPS-ITER modeling of deuterium throughput impact on the ITER SOL plasma”. In:Nuclear Materials and Energy35 (June 2023), p. 101424. issn: 23521791.doi:10.1016/j.nme.2023.101424.url:https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352179123000637(visited on 02/18/2026)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nme.2023.101424.url:https://linkinghub 2023

  47. [53]

    Characterisation of divertor detachment onset in JET-ILW hydrogen, deuterium, tritium and deuterium–tritium low-confinement mode plasmas

    M. Groth et al. “Characterisation of divertor detachment onset in JET-ILW hydrogen, deuterium, tritium and deuterium–tritium low-confinement mode plasmas”. In:Nuclear Materials and Energy34 (Mar. 2023), p. 101345.issn: 23521791.doi:10 . 1016 / j . nme . 2022 . 101345.url:https : / / linkinghub . elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352179122002265(visited on 01/30/2026)

    2023

  48. [54]

    Divertor enrichment of recycling impurity species (He, N 2 , Ne, Ar, Kr) in ASDEX Upgrade H-modes

    A. Kallenbach et al. “Divertor enrichment of recycling impurity species (He, N 2 , Ne, Ar, Kr) in ASDEX Upgrade H-modes”. In:Nuclear Fusion64.5 (May 1, 2024), p. 056003.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad3139. url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741- 4326/ad3139 (visited on 01/27/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad3139 2024

  49. [55]

    Minority and mode conversion heating in ( 3 He)–H JET plasmas

    D Van Eester et al. “Minority and mode conversion heating in ( 3 He)–H JET plasmas”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion54.7 (July 1, 2012), p. 074009. issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/0741-3335/54/7/074009.url:https: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/54/7/074009(visited on 11/19/2024)

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/54/7/074009.url:https: 2012

  50. [56]

    Operation above the Greenwald density limit in high performance DIII-D negative triangularity discharges

    O Sauter et al. “Operation above the Greenwald density limit in high performance DIII-D negative triangularity discharges”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion67.7 (July 31, 2025), p. 075009.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10 . 1088/1361- 6587/ade185.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10. 1088/1361-6587/ade185(visited on 02/18/2026). REFERENCES31

    2025

  51. [57]

    Real-time avoidance of the L-mode and H-mode density limit via machine-learned stability metrics

    Andrew David Maris et al. “Real-time avoidance of the L-mode and H-mode density limit via machine-learned stability metrics”. In:Nuclear Fusion(Mar. 9, 2026).issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10 . 1088 / 1741 - 4326 / ae4efe.url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ae4efe(visited on 03/28/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ae4efe(visited 2026

  52. [59]

    Neutral pressure and separatrix density related models for seed impurity divertor radiation in ASDEX Upgrade

    A. Kallenbach et al. “Neutral pressure and separatrix density related models for seed impurity divertor radiation in ASDEX Upgrade”. In:Nuclear Materials and Energy18 (Jan. 2019), pp. 166–174.issn: 23521791.doi:10 . 1016 / j . nme . 2018 . 12 . 021.url:https : / / linkinghub . elsevier . com / retrieve / pii / S2352179118301480(visited on 04/09/2026)

    2019

  53. [60]

    Silvagni et al.A predictive formula for the H-mode electron separatrix density: Bridging regression and physics-based models across C-Mod, AUG and JET tokamaks

    D. Silvagni et al.A predictive formula for the H-mode electron separatrix density: Bridging regression and physics-based models across C-Mod, AUG and JET tokamaks. 2026.doi:10 . 48550 / ARXIV . 2601 . 23140.url:https : / / arxiv . org/abs/2601.23140(visited on 02/02/2026)

    arXiv 2026

  54. [61]

    Core impurity transport in Alcator C-Mod L-, I- and H-mode plasmas

    J.E. Rice et al. “Core impurity transport in Alcator C-Mod L-, I- and H-mode plasmas”. In:Nuclear Fusion55.3 (Mar. 1, 2015), p. 033014.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/3/033014.url:https://iopscience. iop.org/article/10.1088/0029-5515/55/3/033014(visited on 03/23/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/3/033014.url:https://iopscience 2015

  55. [62]

    Critical gradient formula for toroidal electron temperature gradient modes

    F. Jenko, W. Dorland, and G. W. Hammett. “Critical gradient formula for toroidal electron temperature gradient modes”. In:Physics of Plasmas8.9 (Sept. 1, 2001), pp. 4096–4104.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10 . 1063 / 1 . 1391261.url: https://pubs.aip.org/pop/article/8/9/4096/265245/Critical-gradient- formula-for-toroidal-electron(visited on 11/19/2024)

    2001

  56. [63]

    The role of ion and electron electrostatic turbulence in characterizing stationary particle transport in the core of tokamak plasmas

    E Fable, C Angioni, and O Sauter. “The role of ion and electron electrostatic turbulence in characterizing stationary particle transport in the core of tokamak plasmas”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion52.1 (Jan. 1, 2010), p. 015007. issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/1/015007.url:https: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-33...

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/1/015007.url:https: 2010

  57. [64]

    The effects of dilution on turbulence and transport in C- Mod ohmic plasmas and comparisons with gyrokinetic simulations

    P. Ennever et al. “The effects of dilution on turbulence and transport in C- Mod ohmic plasmas and comparisons with gyrokinetic simulations”. In:Physics of Plasmas22.7 (July 1, 2015), p. 072507.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi: 10 . 1063 / 1 . 4926518.url:https : / / pubs . aip . org / pop / article / 22 / 7 / 072507/264325/The- effects- of- dilution- on- t...

    2015

  58. [65]

    Full-f XGC1 gyrokinetic study of improved ion energy confinement from impurity stabilization of ITG turbulence

    Kyuho Kim et al. “Full-f XGC1 gyrokinetic study of improved ion energy confinement from impurity stabilization of ITG turbulence”. In:Physics of Plasmas24.6 (June 1, 2017), p. 062302.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10 . 1063/1.4984991.url:https://pubs.aip.org/pop/article/24/6/062302/ 108560 / Full - f - XGC1 - gyrokinetic - study - of - improved - ion(visi...

    2017

  59. [66]

    Rodriguez-Fernandez et al.Core performance predictions in projected SPARC first-campaign plasmas with nonlinear CGYRO

    P. Rodriguez-Fernandez et al.Core performance predictions in projected SPARC first-campaign plasmas with nonlinear CGYRO. May 8, 2024.doi:10 . 48550 / arXiv.2403.15633. arXiv:2403.15633[physics].url:http://arxiv.org/ abs/2403.15633(visited on 05/29/2024)

    arXiv 2024

  60. [67]

    Self-consistent perturbed equilibrium with neoclassical toroidal torque in tokamaks

    Jong-Kyu Park and Nikolas C. Logan. “Self-consistent perturbed equilibrium with neoclassical toroidal torque in tokamaks”. In:Physics of Plasmas24.3 (Mar. 1, 2017), p. 032505.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10.1063/1.4977898.url: https : / / pubs . aip . org / pop / article / 24 / 3 / 032505 / 319136 / Self - consistent-perturbed-equilibrium-with(visited o...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4977898.url: 2017

  61. [68]

    Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX- upgrade and ITER

    Elizaveta Sytova et al. “Comparing N versus Ne as divertor radiators in ASDEX- upgrade and ITER”. In:Nuclear Materials and Energy19 (May 2019), pp. 72–78. issn: 23521791.doi:10.1016/j.nme.2019.02.019.url:https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352179118303120(visited on 02/12/2026)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nme.2019.02.019.url:https://linkinghub 2019

  62. [69]

    Neoclassical transport of heavy impurities with poloidally asymmetric density distribution in tokamaks

    C Angioni and P Helander. “Neoclassical transport of heavy impurities with poloidally asymmetric density distribution in tokamaks”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion56.12 (Dec. 1, 2014), p. 124001.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/56/12/124001.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/ article/10.1088/0741-3335/56/12/124001(visited on 10/24/2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/56/12/124001.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/ 2014

  63. [70]

    Experimental validation of momentum transport theory in the core of H-mode plasmas in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak

    C. F. B. Zimmermann et al. “Experimental validation of momentum transport theory in the core of H-mode plasmas in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak”. In: Physics of Plasmas31.4 (Apr. 1, 2024), p. 042306.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674. doi:10.1063/5.0203092.url:https://pubs.aip.org/pop/article/31/4/ 042306/3284584/Experimental-validation-of-momentum-transport(visited ...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0203092.url:https://pubs.aip.org/pop/article/31/4/ 2024

  64. [71]

    Rossi, L

    C F B Zimmermann et al. “Analysis and modelling of momentum transport based on NBI modulation experiments at ASDEX Upgrade”. In:Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion64.5 (May 1, 2022), p. 055020.issn: 0741-3335, 1361-6587.doi: 10.1088/1361- 6587/ac5ae8.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/ 10.1088/1361-6587/ac5ae8(visited on 10/28/2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2022

  65. [72]

    Neoclassical toroidal viscosity torque prediction via deep learning

    M.D. Clement, N.C. Logan, and M.D. Boyer. “Neoclassical toroidal viscosity torque prediction via deep learning”. In:Nuclear Fusion62.2 (Feb. 1, 2022), p. 026022.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac3e83.url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/ac3e83(visited on 11/04/2025). REFERENCES33

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac3e83.url: 2022

  66. [73]

    On plasma rotation with toroidal magnetic field ripple and no external momentum input

    C. Fenzi et al. “On plasma rotation with toroidal magnetic field ripple and no external momentum input”. In:Nuclear Fusion51.10 (Oct. 1, 2011), p. 103038. issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10 . 1088 / 0029 - 5515 / 51 / 10 / 103038.url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103038 (visited on 11/04/2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103038 2011

  67. [74]

    Edge radial electric field studies via charge exchange recombi- nation spectroscopy on the Alcator C-Mod Tokamak

    R. M. McDermott. “Edge radial electric field studies via charge exchange recombi- nation spectroscopy on the Alcator C-Mod Tokamak”. Thesis. Massachusetts Insti- tute of Technology, 2009.url:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/54462 (visited on 11/04/2025)

    2009

  68. [75]

    Measurement of the complete core plasma flow across the LOC–SOC transition at ASDEX Upgrade

    A. Lebschy et al. “Measurement of the complete core plasma flow across the LOC–SOC transition at ASDEX Upgrade”. In:Nuclear Fusion58.2 (Feb. 1, 2018), p. 026013.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aa9c54.url: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-4326/aa9c54(visited on 02/06/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aa9c54.url: 2018

  69. [76]

    Scaling of Spontaneous Rotation with Temperature and Plasma Current in Tokamaks

    F. I. Parra et al. “Scaling of Spontaneous Rotation with Temperature and Plasma Current in Tokamaks”. In:Physical Review Letters108.9 (Feb. 29, 2012), p. 095001.issn: 0031-9007, 1079-7114.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.095001. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.095001(visited on 04/28/2026)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.095001 2012

  70. [77]

    Impurity toroidal rotation and transport in Alcator C-Mod ohmic high confinement mode plasmas

    J. E. Rice et al. “Impurity toroidal rotation and transport in Alcator C-Mod ohmic high confinement mode plasmas”. In:Physics of Plasmas7.5 (May 1, 2000), pp. 1825–1830.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10 . 1063 / 1 . 874004. url:https://pubs.aip.org/pop/article/7/5/1825/1069448/Impurity- toroidal-rotation-and-transport-in(visited on 04/28/2026)

    2000

  71. [78]

    The ITPA disruption database

    J.E Rice et al. “Observations of impurity toroidal rotation suppression with ITB formation in ICRF and ohmic H mode Alcator C-Mod plasmas”. In:Nuclear Fusion41.3 (Mar. 2001), pp. 277–284.issn: 0029-5515.doi:10 . 1088 / 0029 - 5515/41/3/304.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0029- 5515/41/3/304(visited on 04/28/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/0029- 2001

  72. [79]

    What are we really decoding? Unveiling biases in EEG -based decoding of the spatial focus of auditory attention,

    A.R. Field et al. “Peripheral temperature gradient screening of high-Z impurities in optimised ‘hybrid’ scenario H-mode plasmas in JET-ILW”. In:Nuclear Fusion 63.1 (Jan. 1, 2023), p. 016028.issn: 0029-5515, 1741-4326.doi:10.1088/1741- 4326/aca54e.url:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741- 4326/aca54e(visited on 01/30/2026)

    work page doi:10.1088/1741- 2023

  73. [80]

    Nonlinear neoclassical transport in a rotating impure plasma with large gradients

    T. F¨ ul¨ op and P. Helander. “Nonlinear neoclassical transport in a rotating impure plasma with large gradients”. In:Physics of Plasmas6.8 (Aug. 1, 1999), pp. 3066– 3075.issn: 1070-664X, 1089-7674.doi:10 . 1063 / 1 . 873593.url:https : / / pubs.aip.org/pop/article/6/8/3066/1016115/Nonlinear- neoclassical- transport-in-a-rotating(visited on 01/30/2026)

    1999