Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating the word-expert approach for Named-Entity Disambiguation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1603.04767 v1 pith:44MACN23 submitted 2016-03-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords approachdisambiguationword-expertentitymentionnamed-entitytaskwikipedia
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Named Entity Disambiguation (NED) is the task of linking a named-entity mention to an instance in a knowledge-base, typically Wikipedia. This task is closely related to word-sense disambiguation (WSD), where the supervised word-expert approach has prevailed. In this work we present the results of the word-expert approach to NED, where one classifier is built for each target entity mention string. The resources necessary to build the system, a dictionary and a set of training instances, have been automatically derived from Wikipedia. We provide empirical evidence of the value of this approach, as well as a study of the differences between WSD and NED, including ambiguity and synonymy statistics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fast End-to-End Wikification

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RedW, a context-free wikifier built on Wikipedia redirects, matches or beats heavier systems in F1 on several benchmarks while running more than an order of magnitude faster, and its SRnorm score predicts its own erro...

Pith tools