Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Machine Unlearning for Traditional Models and Large Language Models: A Short Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.01206 v1 pith:4CCBLKU3 submitted 2024-04-01 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords unlearningmachinemodelsfieldsurveycomprehensivedataevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

With the implementation of personal data privacy regulations, the field of machine learning (ML) faces the challenge of the "right to be forgotten". Machine unlearning has emerged to address this issue, aiming to delete data and reduce its impact on models according to user requests. Despite the widespread interest in machine unlearning, comprehensive surveys on its latest advancements, especially in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs) is lacking. This survey aims to fill this gap by providing an in-depth exploration of machine unlearning, including the definition, classification and evaluation criteria, as well as challenges in different environments and their solutions. Specifically, this paper categorizes and investigates unlearning on both traditional models and LLMs, and proposes methods for evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of unlearning, and standards for performance measurement. This paper reveals the limitations of current unlearning techniques and emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive unlearning evaluation to avoid arbitrary forgetting. This survey not only summarizes the key concepts of unlearning technology but also points out its prominent issues and feasible directions for future research, providing valuable guidance for scholars in the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GUARD: Generation-time LLM Unlearning via Adaptive Restriction and Detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GUARD performs inference-time unlearning by classifying prompts, retrieving original answers, and penalizing token matches during beam search, preserving utility but with forget quality that collapses on larger TOFU f...

  2. ForgetMe: Evaluating Selective Forgetting in Generative Models

    cs.CV 2025-04 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors propose the ForgetMe dataset and the Entangled metric to evaluate selective unlearning in diffusion models, using SAM, CLIP, GPT-4o, and LaMa to build paired original/background images.

  3. PBFT-Backed Semantic Voting for Multi-Agent Memory Pruning

    cs.DC 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The Co-Forgetting Protocol combines DistilBERT-based semantic voting, multi-scale temporal decay, and PBFT-style consensus to synchronize memory pruning in multi-agent systems, with a four-agent simulation reporting 5...

Pith tools