pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20902 · v1 · pith:4CP6BN4Lnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Coherent Feedback Cooling of an Ultracoherent Phononic-Crystal Membrane at Room Temperature

Luiz Couto Correa Pinto Filho , Yingxuan Chen , Frederik Werner Isaksen , Daniel Allepuz-Requena , Angelo Manetta , Dennis Henneberg H{\o}j , Ulrich Busk Hoff , Alexander Huck
show 1 more author
Ulrik Lund Andersen
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 05:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords optomechanicscoherent feedback coolingdynamical backaction coolingphononic crystal membraneroom temperaturephonon occupationquantum regime
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combining coherent feedback with dynamical backaction cooling reduces phonon occupation from 5.5 million to 166 in a room-temperature membrane.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that coherent feedback cooling can be paired with dynamical backaction cooling inside a narrow optical cavity to cool a high-quality phononic crystal membrane at room temperature. This combination overcomes the usual limits of backaction cooling in the sideband-unresolved regime while avoiding the noise and collapse problems of measurement-based methods. A sympathetic reader would care because reaching low phonon numbers in solid-state resonators without cryogenics opens the door to quantum behavior and precision sensing in everyday lab conditions.

Core claim

By combining CFC with strong DBC in a relatively narrow cavity, we achieve a phonon occupation reduction from 5.5×10^6 to 166±7, corresponding to a cooling factor of 3.3×10^4 at room temperature, even with current experimental limitations. Our results show the potential of CFC for approaching the ground state of high-Q membranes at room temperature.

What carries the argument

Coherent feedback cooling (CFC) loop, which supplies an optical feedback signal to damp motion without state collapse and augments dynamical backaction cooling inside the cavity.

If this is right

  • High-Q mechanical resonators can be brought closer to the quantum ground state without cryogenic cooling.
  • Precision measurements and fundamental physics experiments become feasible at room temperature.
  • The sideband-unresolved regime no longer imposes a hard limit on dynamical backaction cooling when coherent feedback is added.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same CFC+DBC approach could be tested on other membrane or string geometries to check whether the cooling factor scales with Q or cavity finesse.
  • Further narrowing the cavity or increasing the feedback gain might push final occupation below 100 phonons under the same room-temperature conditions.
  • This optical-only method may combine naturally with existing optomechanical sensors to add quantum-limited readout without extra hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The coherent feedback loop can be realized without adding enough extra noise or decoherence to prevent the observed cooling from being credited to the CFC plus DBC combination.

What would settle it

Repeat the measurement of final phonon occupation with the coherent feedback path blocked; if the occupation stays near the initial 5.5 million instead of dropping to 166, the cooling cannot be attributed to the CFC+DBC method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20902 by Alexander Huck, Angelo Manetta, Daniel Allepuz-Requena, Dennis Henneberg H{\o}j, Frederik Werner Isaksen, Luiz Couto Correa Pinto Filho, Ulrich Busk Hoff, Ulrik Lund Andersen, Yingxuan Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual scheme of CFC. (a) Experimental schematic. The probe beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The experiment. (a) Experimental setup for CFC scheme. A horizontally polarized probe beam is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Numerical calculations of CFC. (a) Phonon occupation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental results of CFC. (a) Phase-quadrature power spectral densities (PSDs) of the reflected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CFC as a function of detuning and delay. (a) Phonon occupation as a function of the probe detuning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Predicted performance gains from realistic improvements in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optomechanical systems provide a versatile platform for precision measurements and investigations of fundamental physics, where bringing macroscopic resonators into the quantum regime is a widely pursued goal. Achieving such quantum behavior of solid-state mechanical resonators at room temperature would greatly broaden their applications by removing the need for cryogenic environments. Reaching this goal requires efficient cooling of mechanical motion, among various laser cooling methods, dynamical backaction cooling (DBC) is widely utilized in experiments but fundamentally limited when operating in the sideband-unresolved regime. Coherent feedback cooling (CFC) can overcome this limitation, while avoiding state collapse and the electronic restrictions inherent to measurement-based feedback. Here, we experimentally demonstrate CFC using an ultracoherent density phononic crystal membrane. By combining CFC with strong DBC in a relatively narrow cavity, we achieve a phonon occupation reduction from $5.5\times10^{6}$ to $166\pm7$, corresponding to a cooling factor of $3.3\times10^{4}$ at room temperature, even with current experimental limitations. Our results show the potential of CFC for approaching the ground state of high-$Q$ membranes at room temperature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of coherent feedback cooling (CFC) combined with dynamical backaction cooling (DBC) on an ultracoherent phononic-crystal membrane in an optomechanical cavity at room temperature. The central quantitative claim is a reduction in phonon occupation from 5.5×10^6 to 166±7, yielding a cooling factor of 3.3×10^4 despite noted experimental limitations.

Significance. If the reported phonon reduction is robustly attributable to the CFC+DBC combination, the work would demonstrate a viable path toward low-occupation operation of high-Q macroscopic resonators at room temperature, bypassing cryogenic requirements. This could broaden applications in quantum optomechanics and precision metrology. The platform choice of an ultracoherent phononic membrane is a clear experimental strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4 (phonon occupation extraction and closed-loop spectra)] The phonon occupation of 166±7 is obtained by integrating the calibrated displacement noise spectrum. Under closed-loop CFC the mechanical susceptibility is modified by the loop gain, phase, and finite bandwidth; the effective linewidth and spectral shape therefore change. The manuscript must supply the explicit closed-loop transfer function (including any electronic phase noise or bandwidth limits) and demonstrate that the integration procedure correctly maps to thermal phonon number rather than being contaminated by residual loop noise. This modeling is load-bearing for the central claim of a 3.3×10^4 cooling factor.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to “current experimental limitations” without quantifying them; a short list or cross-reference to the relevant section would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment point-by-point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 (phonon occupation extraction and closed-loop spectra)] The phonon occupation of 166±7 is obtained by integrating the calibrated displacement noise spectrum. Under closed-loop CFC the mechanical susceptibility is modified by the loop gain, phase, and finite bandwidth; the effective linewidth and spectral shape therefore change. The manuscript must supply the explicit closed-loop transfer function (including any electronic phase noise or bandwidth limits) and demonstrate that the integration procedure correctly maps to thermal phonon number rather than being contaminated by residual loop noise. This modeling is load-bearing for the central claim of a 3.3×10^4 cooling factor.

    Authors: We agree that a rigorous treatment of the closed-loop transfer function is necessary to validate the extracted phonon occupation. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit derivation of the closed-loop mechanical susceptibility, including the measured frequency-dependent loop gain, phase shift, and the finite bandwidth of the feedback electronics. We show that the modified susceptibility leads to an increased effective linewidth consistent with the observed spectral narrowing, and we quantify the residual electronic noise floor (from phase noise and amplifier contributions) to be more than an order of magnitude below the thermal displacement noise at the frequencies of interest. Integration of the calibrated spectrum after subtracting this small residual contribution yields the reported occupation of 166±7, confirming that the cooling factor of 3.3×10^4 is not inflated by loop noise. The open-loop calibration and closed-loop consistency checks are now presented in a new supplementary section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration with independent measurement chain

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental achievement of phonon cooling via CFC combined with DBC, with the central result being a measured occupation drop from 5.5×10^6 to 166±7 extracted from calibrated spectra. No derivation chain, equations, or first-principles predictions are presented that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The result is framed as a physical demonstration under stated experimental limitations rather than a theoretical prediction forced by the paper's own assumptions or prior self-referential work. The measurement protocol (spectrum integration) stands as an independent observable outside any closed logical loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no visibility into specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the experiment or analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5770 in / 1123 out tokens · 52412 ms · 2026-05-21T05:23:05.370844+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2015 , publisher=

    Quantum optomechanics , author=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    Cavity optomechanics , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Optomechanics for quantum technologies , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Nature , volume=

    Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate , author=. Nature , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Nature , volume=

    Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator , author=. Nature , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Science , volume=

    Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state , author=. Science , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Nature , volume=

    Sideband cooling beyond the quantum backaction limit with squeezed light , author=. Nature , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Nature Physics , pages=

    High-purity quantum optomechanics at room temperature , author=. Nature Physics , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Nature , volume=

    Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space , author=. Nature , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Nature , volume=

    Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature , author=. Nature , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Nature , volume=

    Squeezed light from a silicon micromechanical resonator , author=. Nature , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Strong optomechanical squeezing of light , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Quantum nondemolition measurement of a nonclassical state of a massive object , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Squeezing of quantum noise of motion in a micromechanical resonator , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Science , volume=

    Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator , author=. Science , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Mechanical squeezing via parametric amplification and weak measurement , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Multimode optomechanical system in the quantum regime , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Room-temperature optomechanical squeezing , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Nature , volume=

    Non-classical light generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics , author=. Nature , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Continuous force and displacement measurement below the standard quantum limit , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Squeezed light from a levitated nanoparticle at room temperature , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Science , volume=

    LIGO: The laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory , author=. Science , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Science , volume=

    Approaching the motional ground state of a 10-kg object , author=. Science , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Nature Photonics , volume=

    Entanglement-enhanced optomechanical sensing , author=. Nature Photonics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Nature Photonics , volume=

    A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer , author=. Nature Photonics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Cavity optomechanical magnetometer , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Physical Review Applied , volume=

    Optomechanical magnetometry with a macroscopic resonator , author=. Physical Review Applied , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Nature , volume=

    Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators , author=. Nature , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Optica , volume=

    Phonon counting thermometry of an ultracoherent membrane resonator near its motional ground state , author=. Optica , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Nature , volume=

    Quantum back-action-evading measurement of motion in a negative mass reference frame , author=. Nature , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Entanglement between distant macroscopic mechanical and spin systems , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Nature communications , volume=

    Entanglement of propagating optical modes via a mechanical interface , author=. Nature communications , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    2009 , publisher=

    Quantum measurement and control , author=. 2009 , publisher=

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Advantages of coherent feedback for cooling quantum oscillators , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Cavity optomechanics assisted by optical coherent feedback , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Physical Review Applied , volume=

    Optical and mechanical squeezing with coherent feedback control beyond the resolved-sideband regime , author=. Physical Review Applied , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Optica , volume=

    Laser cooling a membrane-in-the-middle system close to the quantum ground state from room temperature , author=. Optica , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Motional sideband asymmetry of a solid-state mechanical resonator at room temperature , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Coherent quantum-noise cancellation for optomechanical sensors , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Quantum coherent feedback control for generation system of optical entangled state , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Enhancement of field squeezing using coherent feedback , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Enhancing a slow and weak optomechanical nonlinearity with delayed quantum feedback , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Enhanced entanglement of two different mechanical resonators via coherent feedback , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Quantum , volume=

    Coherent feedback in optomechanical systems in the sideband-unresolved regime , author=. Quantum , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Coherent versus measurement feedback: Linear systems theory for quantum information , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    Coherent feedback that beats all measurement-based feedback protocols , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Coherent controllers for optical-feedback cooling of quantum oscillators , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Coherent feedback cooling of a nanomechanical membrane with atomic spins , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    2024 , type =

    Guanhao Huang , title =. 2024 , type =

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Ashkin, A. , doi =. Physical Review Letters , month =

    work page

  52. [52]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Ultracoherent nanomechanical resonators based on density phononic crystal engineering , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Wineland, D. J. and Itano, Wayne M. , doi =. Physical Review A , month =

    work page

  54. [54]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Optical coherent feedback control of a mechanical oscillator , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    2011 , month = jul, journal =

    Sideband Cooling of Micromechanical Motion to the Quantum Ground State , author =. 2011 , month = jul, journal =. doi:10.1038/nature10261 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10261 2011

  56. [56]

    2018 , month = nov, journal =

    Measurement-Based Quantum Control of Mechanical Motion , author =. 2018 , month = nov, journal =. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0643-8 2018

  57. [57]

    2011 , month = oct, journal =

    Laser Cooling of a Nanomechanical Oscillator into Its Quantum Ground State , author =. 2011 , month = oct, journal =. doi:10.1038/nature10461 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10461 2011

  58. [58]

    Observing and

    Rossi, Massimiliano and Mason, David and Chen, Junxin and Schliesser, Albert , year =. Observing and. Physical Review Letters , volume =

    work page

  59. [59]

    2024 , month = feb, journal =

    Room-Temperature Quantum Optomechanics Using an Ultralow Noise Cavity , author =. 2024 , month = feb, journal =

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    2012 , month = aug, journal =

    A Hybrid On-Chip Optomechanical Transducer for Ultrasensitive Force Measurements , author =. 2012 , month = aug, journal =

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    2025 , month = oct, journal =

    Squeezing Light with Optomechanical and Spin-Light Quantum Interfaces , author =. 2025 , month = oct, journal =

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Room temperature optical cooling of a macroscopic mechanical resonator

    L. Couto Corr\^ea Pinto Filho , "Room temperature optical cooling of a macroscopic mechanical resonator" Ph.d. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Strong Interaction Between the Light Field and an Ultra-Coherent Mechanical Oscillator

    D. Allepuz-Requena, "Strong Interaction Between the Light Field and an Ultra-Coherent Mechanical Oscillator" Ph.d. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Optical coherent feedback control of a mechanical oscillator,

    M. Ernzer, M. Bosch Aguilera, M. Brunelli, et al., “Optical coherent feedback control of a mechanical oscillator,” Phys. Rev. X 13, 021023 (2023)

    work page 2023