Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhancing Robustness of Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees through One-Hot Encoding and Regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.13761 v3 pith:4D5ZXTJH submitted 2023-04-26 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords robustnessgbdtregularizationencodinglinearmodelapproachcovariate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT) are widely used and highly effective machine learning approach for tabular data modeling. However, their complex structure may lead to low robustness against small covariate perturbation in unseen data. In this study, we apply one-hot encoding to convert a GBDT model into a linear framework, through encoding of each tree leaf to one dummy variable. This allows for the use of linear regression techniques, plus a novel risk decomposition for assessing the robustness of a GBDT model against covariate perturbations. We propose to enhance the robustness of GBDT models by refitting their linear regression forms with $L_1$ or $L_2$ regularization. Theoretical results are obtained about the effect of regularization on the model performance and robustness. It is demonstrated through numerical experiments that the proposed regularization approach can enhance the robustness of the one-hot-encoded GBDT models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Short Note of Comparison between Convex and Non-convex Penalized Likelihood

    stat.ME 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Lasso is convex and fast but biased; SCAD and MCP reduce bias but are non-convex and slower, so method choice depends on context.

Pith tools