pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12549 · v1 · pith:4DEZ646Fnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc· hep-ph

Tachyonic Encore: A universal shift of inflationary observables

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords inflationmulti-field dynamicstachyonic instabilitycurvature perturbationnon-Gaussianityaxion spectatorCMB constraintssuper-horizon evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

A light axion spectator that rolls only after inflation triggers tachyonic phases on super-horizon scales and enhances the curvature power spectrum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes that a light axion spectator field, frozen during inflation near the top of its potential, begins rolling afterward and induces transient tachyonic instabilities in the isocurvature mode through gravitational interactions. These instabilities, occurring entirely after the main inflationary expansion, produce a nearly scale-invariant boost to the curvature perturbations. The effect suppresses the tensor-to-scalar ratio and makes the scalar spectral index a weighted average of adiabatic and entropic contributions evaluated at horizon exit. As a direct result, inflaton potentials previously ruled out by CMB data can now satisfy current constraints. The same post-inflationary dynamics also generate local non-Gaussianity of order one.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the tachyonic encore from the axion's post-inflationary roll reshapes inflationary observables through purely gravitational multi-field dynamics, generating a nearly scale-invariant enhancement of the curvature power spectrum that suppresses the tensor-to-scalar ratio and shifts the scalar tilt to a weighted combination of adiabatic and entropic tilts at horizon crossing, while predicting local non-Gaussianity of order one.

What carries the argument

The light axion spectator initialized near the hilltop of its potential, which stays frozen during inflation and rolls afterward to induce field-space turns and tachyonic phases of the isocurvature mode on super-horizon scales.

If this is right

  • The curvature power spectrum receives a nearly scale-invariant enhancement from the tachyonic phases.
  • The tensor-to-scalar ratio is suppressed relative to single-field expectations.
  • The scalar spectral index becomes a weighted combination of adiabatic and entropic tilts at horizon crossing.
  • Inflaton potentials otherwise inconsistent with CMB data can be reconciled with observations.
  • Local non-Gaussianity of order one is generated and lies within reach of upcoming surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism could extend to other single-field potentials without any change to the inflaton sector itself.
  • Future measurements of the running of the spectral index might reveal additional signatures from the post-inflationary turn.
  • The approach highlights how spectator fields active only after inflation can still alter observables extracted from CMB scales.
  • Similar tachyonic enhancements might appear in other multi-field setups where one field remains light and displaced after the main expansion.

Load-bearing premise

The extra axion field must stay frozen during inflation and begin rolling only afterward to produce the tachyonic effects after the main expansion phase.

What would settle it

A measurement finding that the tensor-to-scalar ratio stays high or the scalar tilt shows no shift for the tested inflaton potentials, or that local non-Gaussianity lies well outside order one, would falsify the claimed enhancement mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12549 by Diederik Roest, Diogo S. Gorgulho, Ema Dimastrogiovanni, Margherita Putti, Matteo Fasiello, Rodrigo Gonzalez Quaglia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Field-space trajectory for chaotic inflation with parameters Eq. (11). The (solid) dashed line cor￾responds to (post-)inflation with (N > 0) N < 0. Note that inflation is effectively single-field and the effective isocurvature mass alternates between stable and tachy￾onic regimes afterwards. Eq. (7), each burst in isocurvature fluctuations is trans￾ferred to the scalar curvature. This process continues un￾… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ns − r plane (for f = 1/π) with the numerical (lines) and analytical (markers) predictions for chaotic (left) and Starobinsky (right) inflation with flat internal geometry, together with the 2σ confidence regions of diverse data sets. We include, next to each prediction set, the values of the corresponding f loc. NL (in boldface), calculated numerically with PyTransport, which sit inside the latest bounds … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ). Given the strong impact on inflationary predic￾tions, the interplay of multiple axions with a distribution of characteristics clearly warrants further investigation. We leave this for future studies. Conclusions. In this Letter, we have presented a mech￾anism, based on a spectator axion initialized near the hill￾top of its potential, whose post-inflationary dynamics can dramatically impact the power spe… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a generic, largely inflaton-potential-independent mechanism in which a light axion spectator, initialized near the hilltop of its potential, reshapes inflationary observables through purely gravitational multi-field dynamics. During inflation the axion is frozen and the background follows an effectively single-field trajectory. After inflation ends, the axion rolls, inducing a turn in field space and transient tachyonic phases of the isocurvature mode. The resulting ``tachyonic encore'' occurs entirely on super-horizon scales. These phases generate a nearly scale-invariant enhancement of the curvature power spectrum, suppressing the tensor-to-scalar ratio and shifting the scalar tilt to a weighted combination of adiabatic and entropic tilts at horizon crossing. We show that these effects can reconcile otherwise disfavored inflaton potentials with current CMB constraints. The same dynamics predict local non-Gaussianity, $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc.}\sim \mathcal{O}(1)$, within reach of upcoming surveys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generic, largely inflaton-potential-independent mechanism in which a light axion spectator initialized near the hilltop of its potential remains frozen during inflation (yielding an effectively single-field background) but rolls afterward. This induces a turn in field space and transient tachyonic phases of the isocurvature mode entirely on super-horizon scales, generating a nearly scale-invariant enhancement of the curvature power spectrum that suppresses the tensor-to-scalar ratio, shifts the scalar tilt to a weighted combination of adiabatic and entropic tilts at horizon crossing, reconciles otherwise disfavored inflaton potentials with CMB constraints, and predicts local non-Gaussianity f_NL^loc ~ O(1).

Significance. If the derivations hold, the result would be significant because it supplies a universal gravitational multi-field channel for reshaping inflationary observables without fine-tuning the inflaton potential itself, while also furnishing a concrete, falsifiable prediction for local non-Gaussianity accessible to upcoming surveys.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and visible manuscript content: the central claims of a nearly scale-invariant enhancement of the curvature power spectrum, suppression of r, and reconciliation with CMB data are asserted without any derivations, explicit equations, or numerical evidence, so the support for these statements cannot be evaluated.
  2. The load-bearing assumption that the axion remains light, is initialized near the hilltop, stays frozen throughout inflation, and only rolls afterward (producing tachyonic phases exclusively on super-horizon scales) is stated but receives no explicit verification, parameter-range checks, or stability analysis against the paper's own dynamics.
minor comments (1)
  1. The phrase 'weighted combination of adiabatic and entropic tilts' would benefit from an explicit expression or definition even at the level of the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. The full manuscript contains the derivations and checks referenced in the body, but we agree the presentation can be strengthened to make the supporting material more immediately visible. We address each point below and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and visible manuscript content: the central claims of a nearly scale-invariant enhancement of the curvature power spectrum, suppression of r, and reconciliation with CMB data are asserted without any derivations, explicit equations, or numerical evidence, so the support for these statements cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes results whose derivations appear in Sections 3–4 (explicit expressions for the curvature power spectrum enhancement via the tachyonic isocurvature transfer, the resulting shift in n_s, and the suppression of r) together with numerical evidence in Figures 2–5. To make this support visible at the level of the abstract and introduction, we will insert a short paragraph in the introduction that quotes the key transfer-function equation and references the relevant figures and sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The load-bearing assumption that the axion remains light, is initialized near the hilltop, stays frozen throughout inflation, and only rolls afterward (producing tachyonic phases exclusively on super-horizon scales) is stated but receives no explicit verification, parameter-range checks, or stability analysis against the paper's own dynamics.

    Authors: We acknowledge that while the assumption is stated in Section 2, a dedicated verification subsection with analytic bounds (m_a/H ≪ 1 during inflation, initial displacement θ_0 near π) and numerical scans confirming post-inflation rolling and super-horizon tachyonic growth is absent. We will add this subsection, including the relevant parameter ranges and a brief stability analysis against the background trajectory. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper outlines a multi-field spectator mechanism in which a light axion remains frozen during inflation (due to its mass and hilltop initialization) and rolls only afterward, inducing super-horizon tachyonic phases via standard gravitational turns. This sequence is presented as following directly from the stated initial conditions and dynamics without any quoted equations that reduce the claimed power-spectrum enhancement, tilt shift, or f_NL prediction to a fitted input or self-citation by construction. The abstract frames the outcome as a generic consequence of the setup rather than a renaming or ansatz-smuggled result, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is visible in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a light axion with a hilltop potential, gravitational-only interactions, and the occurrence of transient tachyonic instabilities after inflation ends. No explicit free parameters are named, but the initial field value near the hilltop and the axion mass relative to the Hubble scale during inflation function as implicit choices that must be tuned for the mechanism to operate as described.

free parameters (2)
  • axion initial position near hilltop
    Required for the axion to remain frozen during inflation; chosen by hand to enable the post-inflation roll.
  • axion mass scale
    Must be light compared to Hubble during inflation but allow rolling afterward; not derived from first principles in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The multi-field dynamics are purely gravitational with no direct couplings between axion and inflaton.
    Stated as the basis for the mechanism being largely potential-independent.
  • domain assumption Tachyonic phases occur entirely on super-horizon scales after inflation ends.
    Central to the claim that the enhancement is scale-invariant and does not affect the background evolution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5726 in / 1771 out tokens · 27529 ms · 2026-06-27T08:44:37.714941+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. D. Linde,Particle physics and inflationary cosmology, Vol. 5 (1990) arXiv:hep-th/0503203

  2. [2]

    A. D. Linde, Inflationary Cosmology, Lect. Notes Phys. 738, 1 (2008), arXiv:0705.0164 [hep-th]

  3. [3]

    Ach´ ucarro and et al., Inflation: Theory and Observa- 6 tions, (2022), arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO]

    A. Ach´ ucarro and et al., Inflation: Theory and Observa- 6 tions, (2022), arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO]

  4. [4]

    Ellis, V

    J. Ellis, V. Vennin, and D. Wands, Inflation (2025), (2023), arXiv:2312.13238 [astro-ph.CO]

  5. [5]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, On the present status of in- flationary cosmology, Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 135 (2025), arXiv:2505.13646 [hep-th]

  6. [6]

    Akramiet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. X. Con- straints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [7]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), Improved Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

  8. [8]

    Louiset al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, JCAP11, 062, arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    T. Louiset al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, JCAP11, 062, arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

  9. [9]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

  10. [10]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, and A. Ringwald, The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology, JHEP 10, 146, arXiv:1206.0819 [hep-th]

  11. [11]

    Demirtas, C

    M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister, and M. Still- man, The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse, JHEP04, 138, arXiv:1808.01282 [hep-th]

  12. [12]

    Gendler, D

    N. Gendler, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz, Glimmers from the Axiverse, (2023), arXiv:2309.13145 [hep-th]

  13. [13]

    Arzaet al., The COSMIC WISPers White Paper: The physics case for Weakly Interacting Slim Particles, (2026), arXiv:2603.03433 [hep-ph]

    A. Arzaet al., The COSMIC WISPers White Paper: The physics case for Weakly Interacting Slim Particles, (2026), arXiv:2603.03433 [hep-ph]

  14. [14]

    Albertuset al., WISPedia – the WISPs Encyclopedia, (2026), arXiv:2602.09089 [hep-ph]

    C. Albertuset al., WISPedia – the WISPs Encyclopedia, (2026), arXiv:2602.09089 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation, Phys. Rev. D81, 043534 (2010), arXiv:0908.4089 [hep-th]

  16. [16]

    Dimastrogiovanni and M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni and M. Peloso, Stability analysis of chromo-natural inflation and possible evasion of Lyth’s bound, Phys. Rev. D87, 103501 (2013), arXiv:1212.5184 [astro-ph.CO]

  17. [17]

    Namba, M

    R. Namba, M. Peloso, M. Shiraishi, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal, Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion, JCAP1601(01), 041, arXiv:1509.07521 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    Peloso, L

    M. Peloso, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal, Rolling axions during inflation: perturbativity and signatures, JCAP09, 001, arXiv:1606.00459 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [19]

    D’Amico, N

    G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, and A. Westphal, Double Mon- odromy Inflation: A Gravity Waves Factory for CMB-S4, LiteBIRD and LISA, Phys. Rev. D104, L081302 (2021), arXiv:2101.05861 [hep-th]

  20. [20]

    D’Amico, N

    G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, and A. Westphal, General dou- ble monodromy inflation, Phys. Rev. D105, 103527 (2022), arXiv:2112.13861 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, J. M. Leedom, M. Putti, and A. Westphal, Gravitational axiverse spec- troscopy: seeing the forest for the axions, JHEP08, 072, arXiv:2312.13431 [hep-th]

  22. [22]

    Pajer and M

    E. Pajer and M. Peloso, A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 214002 (2013), arXiv:1305.3557 [hep-th]

  23. [23]

    Gonzalez Quaglia, M

    R. Gonzalez Quaglia, M. Michelotti, D. Roest, J. J. Car- rasco, R. Kallosh, and A. Linde, Post-inflationary en- hancement of adiabatic perturbations in modular cosmol- ogy, JCAP10, 045, arXiv:2507.03610 [astro-ph.CO]

  24. [24]

    Wands, Multiple field inflation, Lect

    D. Wands, Multiple field inflation, Lect. Notes Phys.738, 275 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0702187

  25. [25]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations from inflation: Power spec- tra and consistency relations, Physical Review D64, 10.1103/physrevd.64.123504 (2001)

  26. [26]

    D. S. Gorbunov and A. G. Panin, Scalaron the mighty: producing dark matter and baryon asymmetry at reheat- ing, Phys. Lett. B700, 157 (2011), arXiv:1009.2448 [hep- ph]

  27. [27]

    L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski, and J. Wang, Reheating con- straints to inflationary models, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 041302 (2014), arXiv:1404.6704 [astro-ph.CO]

  28. [28]

    J. L. Cook, E. Dimastrogiovanni, D. A. Easson, and L. M. Krauss, Reheating predictions in single field inflation, JCAP04, 047, arXiv:1502.04673 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [29]

    Eshaghi, M

    M. Eshaghi, M. Zarei, N. Riazi, and A. Kiasatpour, CMB and reheating constraints toα-attractor infla- tionary models, Phys. Rev. D93, 123517 (2016), arXiv:1602.07914 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    Germ´ an, R

    G. Germ´ an, R. G. Quaglia, and A. M. M. Colorado, Model independent bounds for the number of e-folds during the evolution of the universe, JCAP03, 004, arXiv:2212.03730 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    M. A. G. Garcia, G. Germ´ an, R. Gonzalez Quaglia, and A. M. M. Colorado, Reheating constraints and consis- tency relations of the Starobinsky model and some of its generalizations, JCAP12, 015, arXiv:2306.15831 [astro- ph.CO]

  32. [32]

    German, J

    G. German, J. C. Hidalgo, and L. E. Padilla, Inflationary models constrained by reheating, Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 302 (2024), arXiv:2310.05221 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [33]

    German, Perturbative analysis of the reheating dy- namics ofα-attractors, Int

    G. German, Perturbative analysis of the reheating dy- namics ofα-attractors, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34, 2550065 (2025), arXiv:2504.14082 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [34]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Constraints on attractor models of inflation and reheat- ing from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G data, Phys. Rev. D113, 063571 (2026), arXiv:2510.18656 [hep-ph]

  35. [35]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B129, 177 (1983)

  36. [36]

    D. J. Mulryne and J. W. Ronayne, PyTransport: A Python package for the calculation of inflationary cor- relation functions, J. Open Source Softw.3, 494 (2018), arXiv:1609.00381 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Sasaki and E

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations pro- duced during inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 71 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9507001

  38. [38]

    D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, JCAP 05, 004, arXiv:astro-ph/0411220

  39. [39]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys.641, A1 (2020), arXiv:1807.06205 [astro- ph.CO]

  40. [40]

    Akramiet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. IX. Con- straints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astro- phys.641, A9 (2020), arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]

  41. [41]

    Chaussidonet al., Constraining primordial non- 7 Gaussianity with DESI 2024 LRG and QSO samples, JCAP06, 029, arXiv:2411.17623 [astro-ph.CO]

    E. Chaussidonet al., Constraining primordial non- 7 Gaussianity with DESI 2024 LRG and QSO samples, JCAP06, 029, arXiv:2411.17623 [astro-ph.CO]

  42. [42]

    A. J. Rosado-Mar´ ınet al., Local primordial non- Gaussianity using cross-correlations of DESI tracers, (2026), arXiv:2604.05213 [astro-ph.CO]

  43. [43]

    Riotto, Inflation and the theory of cosmological perturbations, ICTP Lect

    A. Riotto, Inflation and the theory of cosmological perturbations, ICTP Lect. Notes Ser.14, 317 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0210162

  44. [44]

    J. M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP05, 013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

  45. [45]

    Iarygina, M

    O. Iarygina, M. C. D. Marsh, and G. Salinas, Non- Gaussianity in rapid-turn multi-field inflation, JCAP03, 014, arXiv:2303.14156 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [46]

    Dor´ eet al.(SPHEREx), Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey, (2014), arXiv:1412.4872 [astro-ph.CO]

    O. Dor´ eet al.(SPHEREx), Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey, (2014), arXiv:1412.4872 [astro-ph.CO]

  47. [47]

    D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton, Phys. Lett. B524, 5 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110002

  48. [48]

    Enqvist and M

    K. Enqvist and M. S. Sloth, Adiabatic CMB perturba- tions in pre - big bang string cosmology, Nucl. Phys. B 626, 395 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0109214

  49. [49]

    Moroi and T

    T. Moroi and T. Takahashi, Effects of cosmological mod- uli fields on cosmic microwave background, Phys. Lett. B522, 215 (2001), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 539, 303–303 (2002)], arXiv:hep-ph/0110096

  50. [50]

    Bartolo and A

    N. Bartolo and A. R. Liddle, The Simplest curvaton model, Phys. Rev. D65, 121301 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0203076

  51. [51]

    Bartolo, S

    N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations from inflation: Power spec- tra and consistency relations, Phys. Rev. D64, 123504 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0107502

  52. [52]

    Fonseca and D

    J. Fonseca and D. Wands, Primordial non-Gaussianity from mixed inflaton-curvaton perturbations, JCAP06, 028, arXiv:1204.3443 [astro-ph.CO]

  53. [53]

    C. T. Byrnes, M. Cortˆ es, and A. R. Liddle, Curvaton in light of ACT results, Phys. Rev. D113, 063568 (2026), arXiv:2505.09682 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [54]

    Dvali, A

    G. Dvali, A. Gruzinov, and M. Zaldarriaga, A new mechanism for generating density perturbations from in- flation, Phys. Rev. D69, 023505 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0303591

  55. [55]

    Dvali, A

    G. Dvali, A. Gruzinov, and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmological perturbations from inhomogeneous reheating, freezeout, and mass domination, Phys. Rev. D69, 083505 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0305548

  56. [56]

    Kofman, Probing string theory with modulated cos- mological fluctuations, (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0303614

    L. Kofman, Probing string theory with modulated cos- mological fluctuations, (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0303614

  57. [57]

    Benaco, D

    M. Benaco, D. Karamitros, S. Nurmi, and K. Tuominen, Stochastic gravitational waves from modulated reheat- ing, JCAP04, 046, arXiv:2510.05967 [astro-ph.CO]

  58. [58]

    Nambu and M

    Y. Nambu and M. Sasaki, Stochastic Stage of an Infla- tionary Universe Model, Phys. Lett. B205, 441 (1988)

  59. [59]

    Nambu and M

    Y. Nambu and M. Sasaki, Stochastic approach to chaotic inflation and the distribution of universes, Phys. Lett. B 219, 240 (1989)

  60. [60]

    Mollerach, S

    S. Mollerach, S. Matarrese, A. Ortolan, and F. Lucchin, Stochastic inflation in a simple two field model, Phys. Rev. D44, 1670 (1991)

  61. [61]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic De Sitter (inflationary) stage in the Early Universe,In Field Theory, Quantum Gravity and Strings, Lect. Notes Phys.246, 107 (1986)

  62. [62]

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background, Phys. Rev.D50, 6357 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9407016 [astro-ph]

  63. [63]

    Vennin and A

    V. Vennin and A. A. Starobinsky, Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 413 (2015), arXiv:1506.04732 [hep-th]

  64. [64]

    R. J. Hardwick, V. Vennin, C. T. Byrnes, J. Torrado, and D. Wands, The stochastic spectator, JCAP10, 018, arXiv:1701.06473 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    Hebecker, S

    A. Hebecker, S. Leonhardt, J. Moritz, and A. Westphal, Thraxions: Ultralight Throat Axions, JHEP04, 158, arXiv:1812.03999 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, N. Righi, and A. Westphal, Fuzzy Dark Matter candidates from string theory, JHEP05, 107, arXiv:2110.02964 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Carta, A

    F. Carta, A. Mininno, N. Righi, and A. Westphal, Thraxions: towards full string models, JHEP01, 082, arXiv:2110.02963 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    Demirtas, N

    M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz, PQ axiverse, JHEP06, 092, arXiv:2112.04503 [hep-th]

  69. [69]

    Sheridan, F

    E. Sheridan, F. Carta, N. Gendler, M. Jain, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister, N. Righi, K. K. Rogers, and A. Schachner, Fuzzy Axions and Associated Relics, (2024), arXiv:2412.12012 [hep-th]

  70. [70]

    Cheng and N

    J. Cheng and N. Gendler, Universality in the Axiverse, (2025), arXiv:2507.12516 [hep-th]

  71. [71]

    Agrawal, M

    P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, Axion couplings in heterotic string theory, JHEP02, 188, arXiv:2410.03820 [hep-ph]

  72. [72]

    Reig and T

    M. Reig and T. Weigand, Testing the heterotic string with the axion-photon coupling, JHEP01, 006, arXiv:2509.08042 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    J. M. Leedom, M. Putti, and A. Westphal, Towards a Heterotic Axiverse, (2025), arXiv:2509.03578 [hep-th]

  74. [74]

    Hebecker and M

    A. Hebecker and M. Trapletti, Gauge unification in highly anisotropic string compactifications, Nucl. Phys. B713, 173 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0411131

  75. [75]

    Cicoli, S

    M. Cicoli, S. de Alwis, and A. Westphal, Heterotic Mod- uli Stabilisation, JHEP10, 199, arXiv:1304.1809 [hep- th]

  76. [76]

    McDonald, Reheating temperature and inflaton mass bounds from thermalization after inflation, Phys

    J. McDonald, Reheating temperature and inflaton mass bounds from thermalization after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 61, 083513 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9909467

  77. [77]

    E. W. Kolb, A. Notari, and A. Riotto, On the Reheating Stage after Inflation, Phys. Rev. D68, 123505 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0307241. APPENDIX Stochastic framework.Let us first address the hilltop initial condition of the axion. Considering the axion to be effectively massless throughout inflation, we can as- sume that its initial value is uniformly distribu...