pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17956 · v1 · pith:4FMWGIMFnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Fabless Quantum Chip Design and Commercial Production

Cai , Ling Qiao , Bin Yang , Fumin Luo , WeiGui Guo , GuoRong Zhang , XueFei Liu , Qinglang Guo
show 1 more author
Bin Wu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords fabless quantum designsuperconducting quantum chipsSPICE-Q simulationprocess design kitsparameterized cellsquantum EDAquantum IP market
0
0 comments X

The pith

Superconducting quantum chips can shift to a fabless-foundry model only when supported by certified PDKs, PCell design, SPICE-Q simulation, Q-EDA automation, and a tradable IP market.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that moving superconducting quantum chips from vertically integrated development to a fabless ecosystem requires standardized, verifiable software and process interfaces. These pillars connect process-certified quantum PDKs, parameterized device cells, traceable model cards, SPICE-Q physical modeling, unified Q-EDA flows, foundry sign-off rules, cryogenic test feedback, and reusable quantum IP. Design firms would then prepare verified tape-outs under calibrated constraints without owning fabrication, cutting repetitive debugging and layout work. A sympathetic reader would see this as adapting classical semiconductor practices to enable scalable commercial quantum hardware production. Feasibility depends on maturing the interfaces until model accuracy and test feedback support reliable outputs.

Core claim

The paper claims that a fabless quantum-chip design and production architecture centered on the SPICE-Q multiphysics simulation framework connects process-certified quantum PDKs, parameterized device cells, traceable model cards, SPICE-Q physical modeling languages, unified Q-EDA flows, foundry sign-off rules, cryogenic test feedback, and reusable quantum IP, allowing design firms to prepare verified tape-outs under standardized process constraints and moving the field toward scalable, manufacturable superconducting quantum chips.

What carries the argument

The SPICE-Q multiphysics simulation framework, which supplies cross-physics modeling and supports the full chain of standardized PDKs, PCell parameterization, Q-EDA flows, and IP reuse in the proposed ecosystem.

If this is right

  • Design firms can outsource fabrication while submitting verified tape-outs under process constraints.
  • Repetitive device debugging, process exploration, and low-level layout effort decrease across projects.
  • Economic value grows through reusable quantum IP and a functioning tradable market.
  • The overall path leads to more scalable and commercially manufacturable superconducting quantum chips.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Smaller design teams without fabrication access could enter the field more readily once the interfaces exist.
  • Smooth integration of test feedback into the models could shorten iteration times beyond what vertical integration currently allows.
  • The same interface structure might later support modular chip designs assembled from multiple IP sources.

Load-bearing premise

The pillars of certified PDKs, PCell design, accurate SPICE-Q simulation, Q-EDA automation, and a tradable IP market can be developed until model predictions match cryogenic test results reliably enough for tape-outs.

What would settle it

A completed design created with the proposed PDK and SPICE-Q models that passes foundry sign-off rules yet produces measured cryogenic performance outside the predicted range would show the interfaces are not yet sufficient.

read the original abstract

This paper proposes a fabless quantum-chip design and production architecture for superconducting quantum computing, centered on the SPICE-Q multiphysics simulation framework. The proposed ecosystem connects process-certified quantum PDKs, parameterized device cells, traceable model cards, SPICE-Q physical modeling languages, unified Q-EDA flows, foundry sign-off rules, cryogenic test feedback, and reusable quantum IP. In this model, design firms do not merely outsource fabrication; they prepare verified tape-outs under standardized process constraints and calibrated physical models. Its economic value lies in reducing repetitive device debugging, process exploration, and low-level layout effort, while its feasibility depends on PDK maturity, foundry yield, cryogenic test throughput, model-prediction accuracy, data-feedback mechanisms, and IP licensing boundaries. We argue that superconducting quantum chips can move from the current largely vertically integrated development model toward a fabless-foundry ecosystem only when hardware design is supported by standardized, verifiable, and reusable software and process interfaces. The required pillars are certified PDKs, PCell-based parameterized design, SPICE-Q cross-physics simulation, end-to-end Q-EDA automation, and a tradable quantum-IP market. By adapting lessons from the classical semiconductor industry to quantum hardware, this framework defines a path toward scalable, manufacturable, and commercially reusable superconducting quantum-chip design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a fabless quantum-chip design and production architecture for superconducting quantum computing, centered on the SPICE-Q multiphysics simulation framework. It argues that the transition from vertically integrated models to a fabless-foundry ecosystem requires certified PDKs, PCell-based parameterized design, SPICE-Q cross-physics simulation, end-to-end Q-EDA automation, and a tradable quantum-IP market. Design firms would prepare verified tape-outs under standardized constraints, with economic value in reduced debugging and layout effort; feasibility hinges on PDK maturity, yield, test throughput, model accuracy, and IP boundaries.

Significance. If the listed pillars can be realized with sufficient standardization and predictive accuracy, the framework could enable specialization, IP reuse, and cost reduction in quantum hardware development by adapting classical semiconductor practices, potentially accelerating commercial scalability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The feasibility discussion asserts that model-prediction accuracy and cryogenic test feedback can suffice for reliable tape-outs once the pillars (certified PDKs, SPICE-Q, etc.) mature, but provides no quantitative targets, error bounds, preliminary validation data, or references to existing quantum EDA efforts that would support this assumption.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that a fabless ecosystem is possible 'only when' the five pillars are in place is presented as definitional without analysis of partial implementations or existing partial progress in quantum process design kits that might test the necessity or sufficiency of all elements simultaneously.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The abstract is lengthy and repetitive in listing the pillars; condensing it would improve readability without loss of content.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our proposal. The manuscript is a conceptual architecture paper rather than an experimental validation study, which shapes our responses below. We address each major comment point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The feasibility discussion asserts that model-prediction accuracy and cryogenic test feedback can suffice for reliable tape-outs once the pillars (certified PDKs, SPICE-Q, etc.) mature, but provides no quantitative targets, error bounds, preliminary validation data, or references to existing quantum EDA efforts that would support this assumption.

    Authors: The paper is a high-level proposal outlining an ecosystem architecture and does not present new experimental data, quantitative targets, or error bounds, as these would require dedicated validation studies beyond its scope. We will revise the abstract and main text to include references to existing quantum EDA and PDK efforts (such as prior work on quantum process design kits and multiphysics simulators) and to explicitly frame the feasibility discussion as dependent on future maturation of the pillars, supported by classical semiconductor precedents. This addresses the lack of supporting references while maintaining the proposal nature of the work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that a fabless ecosystem is possible 'only when' the five pillars are in place is presented as definitional without analysis of partial implementations or existing partial progress in quantum process design kits that might test the necessity or sufficiency of all elements simultaneously.

    Authors: The 'only when' language is intended to highlight that a complete, standardized fabless model enabling IP trading, automated Q-EDA flows, and reduced per-design debugging requires the full set of pillars operating together, analogous to classical semiconductor ecosystems. We acknowledge that partial implementations of quantum PDKs and simulation tools already exist and deliver incremental value. We will revise the manuscript to add analysis of current partial progress in quantum process design kits, discussing how these efforts test aspects of necessity and sufficiency while noting where gaps remain relative to the full proposed ecosystem. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; architectural proposal without derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a forward-looking architectural proposal for a fabless superconducting quantum-chip ecosystem. It defines required pillars (certified PDKs, PCell-based design, SPICE-Q simulation, Q-EDA automation, tradable IP market) as necessary conditions for moving from vertical integration to a foundry model, but presents no equations, fitted parameters, empirical predictions, or derivation chain. The central claim is explicitly conditional on future development of these interfaces and is definitional rather than derived from self-referential inputs. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in a load-bearing way that reduces the argument to its own assumptions. The paper is self-contained as an outline and contains no steps that match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The proposal rests on the domain assumption that classical semiconductor practices transfer to quantum hardware and on the introduction of new entities such as SPICE-Q without independent validation.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lessons from the classical semiconductor fabless ecosystem can be directly adapted to superconducting quantum computing hardware
    The abstract explicitly invokes adaptation of classical semiconductor lessons as the foundation for the proposed pillars.
invented entities (2)
  • SPICE-Q multiphysics simulation framework no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide cross-physics modeling and simulation for quantum device design within the ecosystem
    Introduced as the central technical component without reference to prior implementation or validation data.
  • Q-EDA flows no independent evidence
    purpose: End-to-end automated design automation tailored to quantum chips
    Presented as a required standardized interface without prior existence or testing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5780 in / 1389 out tokens · 45764 ms · 2026-06-27T00:25:32.663007+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., et al. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a pro- grammablesuperconductingprocessor.Nature, 574(7779), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586- 019-1666-5; arXiv:1910.11333. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.11333

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586- 2019

  2. [2]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M., & Wallraff, A. (2021). Circuit quantum electrodynamics.Reviews of Modern Physics, 93(2), 025005. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025005; arXiv:2005.12667. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12667

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025005 2021

  3. [3]

    (2002).The theory of open quantum systems

    Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2002).The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford University Press

    2002

  4. [4]

    (2025).China Quantum Industry Brief Q4 2025

    ChinaQuantum. (2025).China Quantum Industry Brief Q4 2025. Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://www.chinaquantum.info/

    2025

  5. [5]

    (2023).A process design kit for superconducting components [Whitepaper]

    CMC Microsystems. (2023).A process design kit for superconducting components [Whitepaper]. RetrievedJune15, 2026, fromhttps://www.cmc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/WhitePaper_Superconducting_PDK_2023.pdf

    2023

  6. [6]

    and Javadi-Abhari, Ali and Alexander, Thomas and family=Beaudrap, given=Niel, prefix=de, useprefix=true and Bishop, Lev S

    Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Sheldon, S., Nation, P. D., & Gambetta, J. M. (2022). OpenQASM 3: A broader and deeper quantum assembly language.ACM Transac- tions on Quantum Computing, 3(3), Article 12, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505636; arXiv:2104.14722. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14722

    work page doi:10.1145/3505636 2022

  7. [7]

    H., & Schoelkopf, R

    Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2013). Superconducting circuits for quantum information: Anoutlook.Science, 339(6124), 1169–1174. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231930

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1231930 2013

  8. [8]

    (2024, January 8).China’s 3rd-generation superconductor quantum com- 88 puter comes online

    ECNS. (2024, January 8).China’s 3rd-generation superconductor quantum com- 88 puter comes online. RetrievedJune15, 2026, fromhttps://www.ecns.cn/news/sci-tech/2024- 01-08/detail-ihcwrpvv3803845.shtml

    2024

  9. [9]

    (2025).EDA-Q: Electronic design automation for super- conducting quantum chip[Preprint]

    EDA-Q Collaboration. (2025).EDA-Q: Electronic design automation for super- conducting quantum chip[Preprint]. arXiv:2502.15386. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15386

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    (2026).Chinese quantum computing companies

    Entangled Future. (2026).Chinese quantum computing companies. Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://entangledfuture.com/china/

    2026

  11. [11]

    Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation

    Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012). Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation.Physical Review A, 86(3), 032324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324; arXiv:1208.0928. https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0928

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032324 2012

  12. [12]

    New models for the evolution of Post-Asymptotic Giant Branch stars and Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae

    Gambetta, J. M., Chow, J. M., & Steffen, M. (2017). Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system.npj Quantum Information, 3, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0; arXiv:1512.04129. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04129

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0 2017

  13. [13]

    (2026).From GDSII to wafer: EDA design flow and data conversion for wafer-scale superconducting quantum chip fabrication[Preprint]

    GDSII-to-Wafer Collaboration. (2026).From GDSII to wafer: EDA design flow and data conversion for wafer-scale superconducting quantum chip fabrication[Preprint]. arXiv:2604.11379. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11379

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    L., & Patterson, D

    Hennessy, J. L., & Patterson, D. A. (2019).Computer architecture: A quantita- tive approach(6th ed.). Morgan Kaufmann

    2019

  15. [15]

    (2026).The semiconductor value chain: Fabless, foundries, and IDMs

    IB Interview Questions. (2026).The semiconductor value chain: Fabless, foundries, and IDMs. RetrievedJune15, 2026, fromhttps://ibinterviewquestions.com/guides/tmt- investment-banking/semiconductor-value-chain

    2026

  16. [16]

    Kjaergaard, M., Schwartz, M.E., Braumueller, J., Krantz, P., Wang, J.I.-J., Gus- tavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2020). Superconducting qubits: Current state of play.An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 11, 369–395. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- conmatphys-031119-050605; arXiv:1905.13641. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13641

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev- 2020

  17. [17]

    Charge insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box

    Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007). Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box.Physical Review A, 76(4), 042319. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319; arXiv:cond-mat/0703002. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond- mat/0703002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 2007

  18. [18]

    (2024).KQCircuits: KLayout Python library for integrated quantum circuit design[Software documentation]

    KQCircuits Documentation. (2024).KQCircuits: KLayout Python library for integrated quantum circuit design[Software documentation]. Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://iqm-finland.github.io/KQCircuits/

    2024

  19. [19]

    Krantz, M

    Krantz, P., Kjaergaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W.D.(2019). Aquantumengineer’sguidetosuperconductingqubits.Applied Physics Re- views, 6(2), 021318. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550; arXiv:1904.06560. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06560

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5089550 2019

  20. [20]

    Litinski, D. (2019). A game of surface codes: Large-scale quantum computing with lattice surgery.Quantum, 3, 128. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-03-05-128

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2019-03-05-128 2019

  21. [21]

    T., Mowery, D

    Macher, J. T., Mowery, D. C., & Simcoe, T. S. (2008). e-Business and disintegra- 89 tion of the semiconductor industry value chain.Industry and Innovation, 15(3), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710802033872

    work page doi:10.1080/13662710802033872 2008

  22. [22]

    Mack, C. A. (2011). Fifty years of Moore’s law.IEEE Transactions on Semicon- ductor Manufacturing, 24(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2010.2096437

    work page doi:10.1109/tsm.2010.2096437 2011

  23. [23]

    McDonald, M., et al. (2022). Laser-annealing Josephson junctions for yielding scaled-up superconducting quantum processors.npj Quantum Information, 8, Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00464-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00464-5 2022

  24. [24]

    McRae, C. R. H., Wang, H., Gao, J., Vissers, M. R., Brecht, T., Dunsworth, A., Pappas, D. P., & Mutus, J. Y. (2020). Materials loss measurements using su- perconducting microwave resonators.Review of Scientific Instruments, 91(9), 091101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0017378; arXiv:2006.04718. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04718

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0017378 2020

  25. [25]

    (1980).Introduction to VLSI systems

    Mead, C., & Conway, L. (1980).Introduction to VLSI systems. Addison-Wesley

    1980

  26. [26]

    K., Shanks, W

    Minev, Z. K., Shanks, W. E., & Gambetta, J. M. (2021).Qiskit Metal: An open- source framework for quantum device design and analysis[Conference presentation]. IBM Research/APSMarchMeeting. RetrievedJune15, 2026, fromhttps://research.ibm.com/publications/a- framework-for-quantum-device-designproject-qiskit-metal

    2021

  27. [27]

    M., & Shanto, S

    Levenson-Falk, E. M., & Shanto, S. A. (2025). A review of design concerns in superconducting quantum circuits.Materials for Quantum Technology, 5, 022003. arXiv:2411.16967. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16967

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    H., & Lisenfeld, J

    Mueller, C., Cole, J. H., & Lisenfeld, J. (2019). Towards understanding two- level-systems in amorphous solids: Insights from quantum circuits.Reports on Progress in Physics, 82(12), 124501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab3a7e; arXiv:1705.01108. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.01108

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab3a7e 2019

  29. [29]

    (2021).Optimizing frequency allo- cation for fixed-frequency superconducting quantum processors[Preprint]

    Murray, C.E., Calusine, G., Melville, A., etal. (2021).Optimizing frequency allo- cation for fixed-frequency superconducting quantum processors[Preprint]. arXiv:2112.01634. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01634

    arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    (2024).How to build a quantum supercomputer: Scaling challenges and opportunities[Preprint]

    National Academies. (2024).How to build a quantum supercomputer: Scaling challenges and opportunities[Preprint]. arXiv:2411.10406. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10406

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Hierarchical surface code for network quantum computing with modules of arbitrary size

    Nickerson, N. H., Li, Y., & Benjamin, S. C. (2016). Hierarchical surface code for network quantum computing with modules of arbitrary size.Nature Commu- nications, 7, Article 11185. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11185; arXiv:1509.07796. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07796

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/ncomms11185 2016

  32. [32]

    Black-box superconducting circuit quantization

    Nigg, S. E., Paik, H., Vlastakis, B., Kirchmair, G., Shankar, S., Frunzio, L., Schoelkopf, R.J., &Girvin, S.M.(2012). Black-boxsuperconductingcircuitquantization. Physical Review Letters, 108(24), 240502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.240502; arXiv:1204.0587. https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0587

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.240502 2012

  33. [33]

    (2022).OpenQASM 3 language specification and tooling[Technical specification]

    OpenQASM Working Group. (2022).OpenQASM 3 language specification and tooling[Technical specification]. Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://openqasm.com/ 90

    2022

  34. [34]

    Murray, C. E. (2021). Material matters in superconducting qubits.Materials Sci- ence and Engineering: R: Reports, 146, 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2021.100646; arXiv:2106.05919. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05919

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mser.2021.100646 2021

  35. [35]

    Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond.Quantum, 2, 79. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79; arXiv:1801.00862. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00862

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 2018

  36. [36]

    (2025).QPDK: Superconducting quantum process design kit[Softwaredocumentation]

    QPDK Documentation. (2025).QPDK: Superconducting quantum process design kit[Softwaredocumentation]. RetrievedJune15, 2026, fromhttps://gdsfactory.github.io/quantum- rf-pdk/

    2025

  37. [37]

    (2023).Co-designed superconducting architecture for lat- tice surgery of surface codes with Quantum Interface Routing Card[Preprint]

    QuIRC Collaboration. (2023).Co-designed superconducting architecture for lat- tice surgery of surface codes with Quantum Interface Routing Card[Preprint]. arXiv:2312.01246. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01246

    arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    C., Larson, J., Ostrowski, J., & Humble, T

    Shaydulin, R., Lotshaw, P. C., Larson, J., Ostrowski, J., & Humble, T. S. (2023). Parameter transfer for quantum approximate optimization of weighted MaxCut.ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 4(3), Article19, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3606246

    work page doi:10.1145/3606246 2023

  39. [39]

    (2024).Efficient frequency allocation for superconducting quan- tum processors using improved optimization techniques[Preprint]

    Shi, Y., et al. (2024).Efficient frequency allocation for superconducting quan- tum processors using improved optimization techniques[Preprint]. arXiv:2410.20283. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20283

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    (2026).10+ companies leading the quantum technologies race in China

    The Quantum Insider. (2026).10+ companies leading the quantum technologies race in China. Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://thequantuminsider.com/

    2026

  41. [41]

    Weste, N. H. E., & Harris, D. M. (2011).CMOS VLSI design: A circuits and systems perspective(4th ed.). Addison-Wesley

    2011

  42. [42]

    Y., & Clark, K

    Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000).Design rules, volume 1: The power of modularity. MIT Press

    2000

  43. [43]

    Networksandinnovationinamodular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries.Research Policy, 21(4), 297–313

    Langlois, R.N., &Robertson, P.L.(1992). Networksandinnovationinamodular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries.Research Policy, 21(4), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90030-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90030-8 1992

  44. [44]

    Sturgeon, T. J. (2002). Modular production networks: A new American model of industrialorganization.Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 451–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.451

    work page doi:10.1093/icc/11.3.451 2002

  45. [45]

    (2025).Quantum Technology Monitor 2025: The year of quantum: From concept to reality in 2025

    McKinsey & Company. (2025).Quantum Technology Monitor 2025: The year of quantum: From concept to reality in 2025. Retrieved June 16, 2026, from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/the%20year%20of%20quantum%20from%20concept%20to%20reality%20in%202025/quantum- monitor-2025.pdf

    2025

  46. [46]

    Place, A. P. M., Rodgers, L. V. H., Mundada, P., Smitham, B. M., Fitzpatrick, M., Leng, Z., Premkumar, A., Bryon, J., Vrajitoarea, A., Sussman, S., Cheng, G., Mad- havan, T., Babla, H. K., Le, X. H., Gang, Y., Jaeck, B., Gyenis, A., Yao, N., Cava, R. J., de Leon, N. P., & Houck, A. A. (2021). New material platform for superconducting trans- mon qubits wit...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22030-5 2021

  47. [47]

    D., Johnson, B

    Reed, M. D., Johnson, B. R., Houck, A. A., DiCarlo, L., Chow, J. M., Schus- ter, D. I., Frunzio, L., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2010). Fast reset and suppressing spon- taneous emission of a superconducting qubit.Applied Physics Letters, 96(20), 203110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3435463

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3435463 2010

  48. [48]

    C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A

    Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., White, T. C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Chiaro, B., Dunsworth, A., Neill, C., O’Malley, P., Roushan, P., Vainsencher, A., Wenner, J., Korotkov, A. N., Cleland, A. N., & Martinis, J. M. (2014). Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface codethresh...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13171 2014

  49. [49]

    (2020).SkyWater Open Source PDK: Open source pro- cess design kit for SkyWater Technology Foundry’s 130nm node[Software documentation]

    SkyWater PDK Authors. (2020).SkyWater Open Source PDK: Open source pro- cess design kit for SkyWater Technology Foundry’s 130nm node[Software documentation]. Retrieved June 16, 2026, from https://github.com/google/skywater-pdk

    2020

  50. [50]

    InProceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’19)

    Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency(pp. 220– 229). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596

    work page doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 2019

  51. [51]

    Scientific Data3(1), 1–9 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.Scientific Data, 3, Article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    work page doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 2016

  52. [52]

    W., & Levenson-Falk, E

    Shanto, S., Kuo, A., Miyamoto, C., Zhang, H., Maurya, V., Vlachos, E., Hecht, M., Shum, C. W., & Levenson-Falk, E. (2024). SQuADDS: A validated design database and simulation workflow for superconducting qubit design.Quantum, 8, 1465. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-09-09-1465

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2024-09-09-1465 2024

  53. [53]

    Kunasaikaran, J., Mato, K., & Wille, R. (2024). A framework for the design and realization of alternative superconducting quantum architectures. In2024 IEEE 54th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)(pp. 91–96). IEEE

    2024

  54. [54]

    R., & Fang, M

    Geller, M. R., & Fang, M. (2015). Tunable coupler for superconducting Xmon qubits: Perturbativenonlinearmodel.Physical Review A, 92(1), 012320. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.012320

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012320 2015

  55. [55]

    L., Orlando, T

    Yan, F., Krantz, P., Sung, Y., Kjaergaard, M., Campbell, D. L., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2018). Tunable coupling scheme for implementing high- fidelitytwo-qubitgates.Physical Review Applied, 10(5), 054062. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.054062

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.054062 2018

  56. [56]

    (2021).Quantum Intermediate Representation (QIR) specifi- cation[Technical specification]

    QIR Alliance. (2021).Quantum Intermediate Representation (QIR) specifi- cation[Technical specification]. Retrieved June 16, 2026, from https://github.com/qir- alliance/qir-spec

    2021

  57. [57]

    (2021).P7130: Standard for Quantum Technolo- gies Definitions[Standards project]

    IEEE P7130 Working Group. (2021).P7130: Standard for Quantum Technolo- gies Definitions[Standards project]. IEEE Standards Association. Retrieved June 16, 2026, from https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/7130/10680/ 92

    2021

  58. [58]

    (2002).Reuse methodology manual for system-on-a- chip designs(3rd ed.)

    Keating, M., & Bricaud, P. (2002).Reuse methodology manual for system-on-a- chip designs(3rd ed.). Springer

    2002

  59. [59]

    A., & Lehnert, K

    Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., & Lehnert, K. W. (2008). Widely tunable paramet- ric amplifier based on a SQUID array resonator.Applied Physics Letters, 91, 083509. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2773988

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2773988 2008

  60. [60]

    Macklin , author K

    Macklin, C., O’Brien, K., Hover, D., Schwartz, M. E., Bolkhovsky, V., Zhang, X., Oliver, W. D., & Siddiqi, I. (2015). A near-quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametricamplifier.Science, 350(6258), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8525

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa8525 2015

  61. [61]

    Google Quantum AI. (2023). Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit.Nature, 614, 676–681. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1; arXiv:2207.06431. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06431

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1 2023

  62. [62]

    Elucidating Reaction Mechanisms on Quantum Computers

    Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D., & Troyer, M. (2017). Elucidat- ing reaction mechanisms on quantum computers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(29), 7555–7560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619152114; arXiv:1605.03590. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.03590

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1073/pnas.1619152114 2017

  63. [63]

    Blume-Kohout, R., & Young, K. C. (2020). A volumetric framework for quantum computer benchmarks.Quantum, 4, 362. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-11-15-362; arXiv:1904.05546. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05546

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-15-362 2020

  64. [64]

    (2014).A quantum approximate opti- mization algorithm[Preprint]

    Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014).A quantum approximate opti- mization algorithm[Preprint]. arXiv:1411.4028. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing

    Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2021). Variational quan- tum algorithms.Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 625–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254- 021-00348-9; arXiv:2012.09265. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09265

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254- 2021

  66. [66]

    The IBM Quantum Computer and the IBM Quantum Experience

    Santos, A.C.(2017). TheIBMQuantumComputerandtheIBMQuantumExpe- rience.Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica, 39(1), e1301. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806- 9126-RBEF-2016-0155; arXiv:1610.06980. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06980

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1590/1806- 2017

  67. [67]

    (2024).IBM Quantum Computers: Evolution, Performance, and Future Directions[Preprint]

    AbuGhanem, M. (2024).IBM Quantum Computers: Evolution, Performance, and Future Directions[Preprint]. arXiv:2410.00916. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00916

    arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Gidney, C., & Ekera, M. (2021). How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits.Quantum, 5, 433. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-04-15- 433; arXiv:1905.09749. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.09749

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-15- 2021

  69. [69]

    Google Quantum AI and Collaborators. (2025). Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold.Nature, 638, 920–926. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024- 08449-y; arXiv:2408.13687. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13687

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024- 2025

  70. [70]

    Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes

    McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018). Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes.Nature Communica- tions, 9, Article 4812. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4; arXiv:1803.11173. 93 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.11173 94

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 2018