Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.04214 v1 pith:4HKXHIJH submitted 2024-06-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords valueorientationsvaluebenchevaluatingllmsunderstandinglanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming diverse fields and gaining increasing influence as human proxies. This development underscores the urgent need for evaluating value orientations and understanding of LLMs to ensure their responsible integration into public-facing applications. This work introduces ValueBench, the first comprehensive psychometric benchmark for evaluating value orientations and value understanding in LLMs. ValueBench collects data from 44 established psychometric inventories, encompassing 453 multifaceted value dimensions. We propose an evaluation pipeline grounded in realistic human-AI interactions to probe value orientations, along with novel tasks for evaluating value understanding in an open-ended value space. With extensive experiments conducted on six representative LLMs, we unveil their shared and distinctive value orientations and exhibit their ability to approximate expert conclusions in value-related extraction and generation tasks. ValueBench is openly accessible at https://github.com/Value4AI/ValueBench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ValueFlow: Measuring the Propagation of Value Perturbations in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

    cs.MA 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A perturbation-based framework measures how value opinions propagate through multi-agent LLM systems, revealing that susceptibility varies by value, model, and topology.

  2. Value-Action Alignment in Large Language Models under Privacy-Prosocial Conflict

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new VAAR metric finds that only a subset of LLMs show the human pattern where privacy concerns lower data-sharing acceptance and prosocial attitudes raise it.

  3. Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In multi-agent debates over everyday moral dilemmas, GPT-4.1 almost never revises in simultaneous settings but conforms strongly in sequential settings, while Claude 3.7 and Gemini 2.0 Flash revise far more often.

Pith tools