Stimulated Emission from Boson Clouds

Xian-Hui Ge; Yu An; Yun-gui Gong; Yun-Long Zhang

arxiv: 2606.08220 · v1 · pith:4J3JUHOZnew · submitted 2026-06-06 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Stimulated Emission from Boson Clouds

Yu An , Xian-Hui Ge , Yun-Gui Gong , Yun-Long Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

keywords stimulated emissionsuperradiancegravitational wavesultralight bosonsblack holesgravitational atomsmaserKerr spacetime

0 comments

The pith

Bosonic clouds around rotating black holes amplify gravitational waves through stimulated emission.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Rotating black holes surrounded by superradiant clouds of ultralight bosons form gravitational atoms that can amplify incoming gravitational waves. The paper formalizes the interaction between these clouds and a stochastic gravitational-wave background to derive selection rules and threshold conditions for net amplification. The resulting emission rate depends on boson mass and can exceed spontaneous emission by several orders of magnitude. This process could bridge the sensitivity gap between ground-based interferometers and pulsar timing arrays, turning previously undetectable signals into observable ones. The mechanism thereby links superradiant boson clouds to active gravitational-wave production.

Core claim

Gravitational atoms consisting of Kerr black holes dressed with superradiant bosonic clouds function as natural amplifiers of gravitational waves via a stimulated emission mechanism analogous to astrophysical masers. Formalizing the cloud's interaction with an ambient stochastic gravitational-wave background yields rigorous selection rules and threshold conditions that govern net amplification, with the emission rate depending critically on boson mass and producing enhancements of several orders of magnitude over spontaneous processes for representative mass ranges.

What carries the argument

The stimulated emission process in the superradiant bosonic cloud, controlled by interaction selection rules and threshold conditions with a stochastic gravitational-wave background.

If this is right

Amplified signals from these clouds can connect the detection bands of ground-based interferometers and pulsar timing arrays.
Previously undetectable gravitational-wave signals become observable through the mass-dependent enhancement.
Superradiant clouds provide a new channel for probing ultralight boson fields and the Kerr spacetime environment.
The emission rate's critical dependence on boson mass allows mass-specific predictions for signal strength.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the amplification holds, targeted searches around known or candidate black holes could reveal boson masses through excess gravitational-wave power.
The mechanism might extend to other ultralight fields or non-Kerr backgrounds, though the paper focuses on the standard case.
Non-detection of expected amplified signals in pulsar timing data could constrain the existence or occupation of such clouds.
The analogy to masers suggests possible population inversion or coherence effects in the cloud that warrant further modeling.

Load-bearing premise

The bosonic cloud interacts with the gravitational-wave background such that the derived selection rules and thresholds produce net amplification rather than absorption or negligible effect.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or observation showing that the interaction between a superradiant bosonic cloud and a stochastic gravitational-wave background leads to net absorption or no enhancement above spontaneous emission for the relevant boson masses.

read the original abstract

Gravitational-waves from astrophysical sources are characterized by their extreme faintness, which remains a primary obstacle for both current and next generation detectors. While rotating black holes dressed in superradiant clouds of ultralight bosons are recognized as promising probes of physics beyond the Standard Model, their capacity to actively emit and modulate gravitational radiation remains largely unexamined. Here we demonstrate that these gravitational atoms can function as natural amplifiers of gravitational-waves via a stimulated emission mechanism analogous to astrophysical masers. By formalizing the interaction between the bosonic cloud and an ambient stochastic gravitational-wave background, we establish the rigorous selection rules and threshold conditions that govern this amplification. Our analysis reveals that the emission rate depends critically on the boson mass, potentially yielding an enhancement of several orders of magnitude over spontaneous processes. For representative mass ranges, these amplified signals bridge the sensitivity gap between ground-based interferometers and pulsar timing arrays. These findings suggest that superradiant clouds can effectively boost previously undetectable signals, offering a novel observational frontier for exploring ultralight fields and the Kerr spacetime environment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies a maser-style stimulated emission analogy to superradiant boson clouds but does not demonstrate that selection rules produce net gain over a realistic stochastic GW background.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work tries to show superradiant scalar clouds around Kerr black holes can amplify ambient gravitational waves through stimulated emission, with the rate depending on boson mass and potentially giving large boosts. That framing is the new angle they push.

The paper does lay out an interaction between the cloud and a stochastic GW background, then states it derives selection rules and thresholds that enable amplification. If those rules hold and the thresholds are crossed for plausible masses, it would open a channel between interferometer and PTA bands. The abstract is clear that the authors see this as previously unexamined.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test flags it: the central claim needs an explicit net rate (stimulated emission minus absorption) integrated over a realistic background spectrum, and that step is not shown. The abstract asserts the enhancement follows from the rules, but without the calculation the conclusion does not follow from the formalization. No equations or numerical results appear in what is provided, so it is impossible to check whether the rules actually favor net gain or whether the mass dependence is derived or assumed.

This is aimed at people working on ultralight boson searches and GW astrophysics. A reader looking for speculative new channels might skim it, but the missing net-gain demonstration makes the main result unsupported on current evidence. I would not bring it to reading group, would not cite it, and would not send it to peer review until the explicit rate calculation is added and checked.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that superradiant boson clouds around rotating black holes function as natural amplifiers of gravitational waves through a stimulated emission mechanism analogous to astrophysical masers. By formalizing the interaction with an ambient stochastic GW background, the authors establish selection rules and threshold conditions; the emission rate depends critically on boson mass and can yield orders-of-magnitude enhancement over spontaneous processes, bridging sensitivity gaps between ground-based interferometers and pulsar timing arrays.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result would be significant for gravitational-wave astronomy and searches for ultralight bosons, as it identifies a mechanism by which otherwise undetectable signals could be boosted in the Kerr environment. The maser analogy and mass-dependent enhancement, if substantiated by explicit net-rate calculations, would constitute a novel observational channel.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract (and the formalization paragraph): the assertion that selection rules and thresholds enable net amplification requires an explicit computation of the net stimulated-emission rate (gain minus absorption) integrated over a realistic stochastic GW spectrum; without demonstrating that the threshold is crossed for astrophysically plausible spectra and boson masses, the orders-of-magnitude enhancement conclusion does not follow from the formalization alone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the formalization paragraph): the assertion that selection rules and thresholds enable net amplification requires an explicit computation of the net stimulated-emission rate (gain minus absorption) integrated over a realistic stochastic GW spectrum; without demonstrating that the threshold is crossed for astrophysically plausible spectra and boson masses, the orders-of-magnitude enhancement conclusion does not follow from the formalization alone.

Authors: We agree with the referee that the derivation of selection rules and threshold conditions alone does not automatically establish that net amplification (gain exceeding absorption) occurs for realistic stochastic backgrounds. The manuscript presents the formal interaction framework and identifies the mass-dependent thresholds, but does not perform the explicit integration of the net rate over a representative GW spectrum. To substantiate the claimed enhancement, we will add this calculation in the revised version, evaluating the net rate for plausible boson masses and ambient spectra to confirm when the threshold is crossed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation formalizes interaction to obtain selection rules

full rationale

The paper's central steps consist of formalizing the bosonic cloud–stochastic GW interaction and deriving selection rules plus threshold conditions from that formalization. No equations or claims reduce a derived quantity (e.g., net gain or mass-dependent enhancement) to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or input by construction. The amplification statement is presented as a consequence of the established rules rather than an identity or renamed empirical pattern. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the central claim rests on the unshown formalization of cloud-GW interaction, the validity of the maser analogy in curved spacetime, and the existence of stable superradiant clouds. No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are extractable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5721 in / 1181 out tokens · 17783 ms · 2026-06-27T19:21:24.187912+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

[1]

P.et al.Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Phys

Abbott, B. P.et al.Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

2016
[2]

Press, W. H. & Teukolsky, S. Floating orbits, superradiant scattering and the black-hole bomb.Nature238, 211–212 (1972)

1972
[3]

& Dubovsky, S

Arvanitaki, A. & Dubovsky, S. Exploring the string axiverse with precision black hole physics.Phys. Rev. D83, 044026 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.83.044026

2011
[4]

2010 , pages =

Arvanitaki, A., Dimopoulos, S., Dubovsky, S., Kaloper, N. & March-Russell, J. String axiverse.Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123530

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123530 2010
[5]

& Pani, P

Brito, R., Grillo, S. & Pani, P. Black hole superradiant instability from ultralight spin-2 fields.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 211101 (2020). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.211101

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.211101 2020
[6]

Klein-gordon equation and rotating black holes.Phys

Detweiler, S. Klein-gordon equation and rotating black holes.Phys. Rev. D22, 2323–2326 (1980). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2323

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2323 1980
[7]

& Pani, P.Superradiance:New Frontiers in Black Hole PhysicsVol

Brito, R., Cardoso, V. & Pani, P.Superradiance:New Frontiers in Black Hole PhysicsVol. 906 ofLecture Notes in Physics(Springer, Cham, 2015). URL https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6 2015
[8]

Brito, R.et al.Gravitational wave searches for ultralight bosons with ligo and lisa.Phys. Rev. D96, 064050 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 31 PhysRevD.96.064050

2017
[9]

Unruh, W. G. Separability of the neutrino equations in a kerr background.Phys. Rev. Lett.31, 1265–1267 (1973)

1973
[10]

T´ oth, G. Z. Weak cosmic censorship, dyonic kerr–newman black holes and dirac fields.Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 115012 (2016). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0264-9381/33/11/115012

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/11/115012 2016
[11]

The solution of dirac’s equation in kerr geometry.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

Chandrasekhar, S. The solution of dirac’s equation in kerr geometry.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences349, 571–575 (1976). URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1976.0090

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1976.0090 1976
[12]

Iyer, B. R. & Kumar, A. Note on the absence of massive fermion superradiance from a kerr black hole.Phys. Rev. D18, 4799–4801 (1978). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.4799

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.4799 1978
[13]

Dolan, S. R. & Dempsey, D. Bound states of the dirac equation on kerr spacetime. Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 184001 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10. 1088/0264-9381/32/18/184001

2015
[14]

URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 043

Cardoso, V.et al.Constraining the mass of dark photons and axion-like parti- cles through black-hole superradiance.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2018, 043 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 043

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 2018
[15]

& Huang, X

Arvanitaki, A., Baryakhtar, M. & Huang, X. Discovering the qcd axion with black holes and gravitational waves.Phys. Rev. D91, 084011 (2015). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084011

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.084011 2015
[16]

& Yang, H

Zhang, J. & Yang, H. Dynamic signatures of black hole binaries with superradiant clouds.Phys. Rev. D101, 043020 (2020). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.043020

2020
[17]

& Tomaselli, G

Baumann, D., Bertone, G., Stout, J. & Tomaselli, G. M. Ionization of gravita- tional atoms.Phys. Rev. D105, 115036 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.115036

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.115036 2022
[18]

S., Stout, J

Baumann, D., Chia, H. S., Stout, J. & Haar, L. t. The spectra of gravitational atoms.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019, 006 (2019). URL 32 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/006

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/006 2019
[19]

Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology

Maggiore, M. Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology. Phys. Rept.331, 283–367 (2000)

2000
[20]

& Romano, J

Allen, B. & Romano, J. D. Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities.Phys. Rev. D59, 102001 (1999). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.102001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.102001 1999
[21]

Romano, J. D. & Cornish, N. J. Detection methods for stochastic gravitational- wave backgrounds: a unified treatment.Living Rev. Rel.20, 2 (2017)

2017
[22]

Brito, R.et al.Stochastic and resolvable gravitational waves from ultralight bosons.Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 131101 (2017). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1706. 05097

2017
[23]

Astronomical masers.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 30, 75–112 (1992)

Elitzur, M. Astronomical masers.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 30, 75–112 (1992). URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.000451

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.000451 1992
[24]

Gray, M.Maser Sources in AstrophysicsCambridge Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

2012
[25]

P., Zeiger, H

Gordon, J. P., Zeiger, H. J. & Townes, C. H. Molecular microwave oscillator and new hyperfine structure in the microwave spectrum of nh 3.Phys. Rev.95, 282–284 (1954). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.95.282

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.95.282 1954
[26]

P., Zeiger, H

Gordon, J. P., Zeiger, H. J. & Townes, C. H. The maser—new type of microwave amplifier, frequency standard, and spectrometer.Phys. Rev.99, 1264–1274 (1955). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.99.1264

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.99.1264 1955
[27]

L., Carter, J

Weinreb, S., Meeks, M. L., Carter, J. C., Barrett, A. H. & Rogers, A. E. E. Obser- vations of polarized OH emission.Nature208, 440–441 (1965). First detection of OH maser emission toward the HII region W3

1965
[28]

Starobinskii, A. A. Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating black hole.Sov. Phys. JETP37, 28–32 (1973)

1973
[29]

R., Chrzanowski, P

Brill, D. R., Chrzanowski, P. L., Pereira, C. M., Fackerell, E. D. & Ipser, J. R. Solution of the scalar wave equation in a kerr background by separation of variables.Physical Review D5, 1913–1915 (1972). 33

1913
[30]

Rowan, D. J. & Stephenson, G. The massive scalar meson field in a schwarzschild background space.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1261–1265 (1976). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/014

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/014 1976
[31]

& Kodama, H

Yoshino, H. & Kodama, H. Bosenova collapse of axion cloud around a rotating black hole:.Progress of Theoretical Physics128, 153–190 (2012). URL https: //doi.org/10.1143/PTP.128.153

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.128.153 2012
[32]

Frolov, V. P. & Novikov, I. D.Black Hole Physics: Basic Concepts and New Developments(Springer, Dordrecht, 1998). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-94-011-5139-9

1998
[33]

Peskin, M. E. & Schroeder, D. V.An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory Frontiers in Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1995). URL https: //doi.org/10.1201/9780429503559

work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995
[34]

& Pauli, W

Fierz, M. & Pauli, W. E. On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences173, 211–232 (1939). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1098/rspa.1939.0140

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1939.0140 1939
[35]

Weinberg, S.Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972). 34

1972

[1] [1]

P.et al.Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Phys

Abbott, B. P.et al.Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

2016

[2] [2]

Press, W. H. & Teukolsky, S. Floating orbits, superradiant scattering and the black-hole bomb.Nature238, 211–212 (1972)

1972

[3] [3]

& Dubovsky, S

Arvanitaki, A. & Dubovsky, S. Exploring the string axiverse with precision black hole physics.Phys. Rev. D83, 044026 (2011). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.83.044026

2011

[4] [4]

2010 , pages =

Arvanitaki, A., Dimopoulos, S., Dubovsky, S., Kaloper, N. & March-Russell, J. String axiverse.Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123530

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123530 2010

[5] [5]

& Pani, P

Brito, R., Grillo, S. & Pani, P. Black hole superradiant instability from ultralight spin-2 fields.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 211101 (2020). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.211101

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.211101 2020

[6] [6]

Klein-gordon equation and rotating black holes.Phys

Detweiler, S. Klein-gordon equation and rotating black holes.Phys. Rev. D22, 2323–2326 (1980). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2323

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2323 1980

[7] [7]

& Pani, P.Superradiance:New Frontiers in Black Hole PhysicsVol

Brito, R., Cardoso, V. & Pani, P.Superradiance:New Frontiers in Black Hole PhysicsVol. 906 ofLecture Notes in Physics(Springer, Cham, 2015). URL https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6 2015

[8] [8]

Brito, R.et al.Gravitational wave searches for ultralight bosons with ligo and lisa.Phys. Rev. D96, 064050 (2017). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 31 PhysRevD.96.064050

2017

[9] [9]

Unruh, W. G. Separability of the neutrino equations in a kerr background.Phys. Rev. Lett.31, 1265–1267 (1973)

1973

[10] [10]

T´ oth, G. Z. Weak cosmic censorship, dyonic kerr–newman black holes and dirac fields.Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 115012 (2016). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0264-9381/33/11/115012

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/11/115012 2016

[11] [11]

The solution of dirac’s equation in kerr geometry.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

Chandrasekhar, S. The solution of dirac’s equation in kerr geometry.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences349, 571–575 (1976). URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1976.0090

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1976.0090 1976

[12] [12]

Iyer, B. R. & Kumar, A. Note on the absence of massive fermion superradiance from a kerr black hole.Phys. Rev. D18, 4799–4801 (1978). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.4799

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.4799 1978

[13] [13]

Dolan, S. R. & Dempsey, D. Bound states of the dirac equation on kerr spacetime. Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 184001 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10. 1088/0264-9381/32/18/184001

2015

[14] [14]

URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 043

Cardoso, V.et al.Constraining the mass of dark photons and axion-like parti- cles through black-hole superradiance.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2018, 043 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 043

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/ 2018

[15] [15]

& Huang, X

Arvanitaki, A., Baryakhtar, M. & Huang, X. Discovering the qcd axion with black holes and gravitational waves.Phys. Rev. D91, 084011 (2015). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084011

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.084011 2015

[16] [16]

& Yang, H

Zhang, J. & Yang, H. Dynamic signatures of black hole binaries with superradiant clouds.Phys. Rev. D101, 043020 (2020). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.043020

2020

[17] [17]

& Tomaselli, G

Baumann, D., Bertone, G., Stout, J. & Tomaselli, G. M. Ionization of gravita- tional atoms.Phys. Rev. D105, 115036 (2022). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.115036

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.115036 2022

[18] [18]

S., Stout, J

Baumann, D., Chia, H. S., Stout, J. & Haar, L. t. The spectra of gravitational atoms.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019, 006 (2019). URL 32 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/006

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/006 2019

[19] [19]

Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology

Maggiore, M. Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology. Phys. Rept.331, 283–367 (2000)

2000

[20] [20]

& Romano, J

Allen, B. & Romano, J. D. Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities.Phys. Rev. D59, 102001 (1999). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.102001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.102001 1999

[21] [21]

Romano, J. D. & Cornish, N. J. Detection methods for stochastic gravitational- wave backgrounds: a unified treatment.Living Rev. Rel.20, 2 (2017)

2017

[22] [22]

Brito, R.et al.Stochastic and resolvable gravitational waves from ultralight bosons.Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 131101 (2017). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1706. 05097

2017

[23] [23]

Astronomical masers.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 30, 75–112 (1992)

Elitzur, M. Astronomical masers.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 30, 75–112 (1992). URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.000451

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.000451 1992

[24] [24]

Gray, M.Maser Sources in AstrophysicsCambridge Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

2012

[25] [25]

P., Zeiger, H

Gordon, J. P., Zeiger, H. J. & Townes, C. H. Molecular microwave oscillator and new hyperfine structure in the microwave spectrum of nh 3.Phys. Rev.95, 282–284 (1954). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.95.282

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.95.282 1954

[26] [26]

P., Zeiger, H

Gordon, J. P., Zeiger, H. J. & Townes, C. H. The maser—new type of microwave amplifier, frequency standard, and spectrometer.Phys. Rev.99, 1264–1274 (1955). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.99.1264

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.99.1264 1955

[27] [27]

L., Carter, J

Weinreb, S., Meeks, M. L., Carter, J. C., Barrett, A. H. & Rogers, A. E. E. Obser- vations of polarized OH emission.Nature208, 440–441 (1965). First detection of OH maser emission toward the HII region W3

1965

[28] [28]

Starobinskii, A. A. Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating black hole.Sov. Phys. JETP37, 28–32 (1973)

1973

[29] [29]

R., Chrzanowski, P

Brill, D. R., Chrzanowski, P. L., Pereira, C. M., Fackerell, E. D. & Ipser, J. R. Solution of the scalar wave equation in a kerr background by separation of variables.Physical Review D5, 1913–1915 (1972). 33

1913

[30] [30]

Rowan, D. J. & Stephenson, G. The massive scalar meson field in a schwarzschild background space.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1261–1265 (1976). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/014

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/014 1976

[31] [31]

& Kodama, H

Yoshino, H. & Kodama, H. Bosenova collapse of axion cloud around a rotating black hole:.Progress of Theoretical Physics128, 153–190 (2012). URL https: //doi.org/10.1143/PTP.128.153

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.128.153 2012

[32] [32]

Frolov, V. P. & Novikov, I. D.Black Hole Physics: Basic Concepts and New Developments(Springer, Dordrecht, 1998). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-94-011-5139-9

1998

[33] [33]

Peskin, M. E. & Schroeder, D. V.An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory Frontiers in Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1995). URL https: //doi.org/10.1201/9780429503559

work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995

[34] [34]

& Pauli, W

Fierz, M. & Pauli, W. E. On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences173, 211–232 (1939). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1098/rspa.1939.0140

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1939.0140 1939

[35] [35]

Weinberg, S.Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972). 34

1972