pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24653 · v1 · pith:4JC4HZ36new · submitted 2026-06-23 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

The Finite Coulomb Lattice Sum: A Resolution of Conditional Convergence through Exact Shape and Size

Yang He , Zhonghan Hu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords Coulomb lattice sumsconditional convergenceperiodic boundary conditionsfinite lattice sumshape and size parameterizationboundary termsfinite-size corrections
0
0 comments X

The pith

A finite Coulomb lattice sum decomposes exactly into a periodic bulk term, a shape-dependent boundary term, and a finite-size correction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that conditionally convergent Coulomb lattice sums under periodic boundary conditions are resolved by a finite lattice sum that decomposes the series into three distinct components based on the exact geometry of the lattice. This decomposition separates a periodic bulk contribution from a non-periodic boundary term that depends on shape and a correction for finite size, all in an effective pairwise form. A sympathetic reader would care because it removes ambiguity from the order of summation and provides a rigorous parameterization of shape and size. The formulation enables direct comparison with other lattice sum methods and opens paths to new analytical and numerical applications.

Core claim

The recently developed finite lattice sum cleanly decomposes the series into three distinct components: a periodic bulk term ν_pbc, a shape-dependent non-periodic boundary term ν_b, and a finite-size correction term ν_corr. This rigorous formulation explicitly parameterizes the geometry of a finite lattice by its exact shape and size and takes an effective pairwise form.

What carries the argument

The decomposition of the finite lattice sum into the periodic bulk term, shape-dependent boundary term, and finite-size correction term, which separates contributions according to exact lattice geometry.

If this is right

  • Analytical expressions become available for Coulomb sums in crystals of arbitrary shape.
  • Mesh-type numerical algorithms for condensed matter simulations can incorporate the decomposition directly.
  • Comparisons with existing lattice sum derivations become possible through the shared pairwise form.
  • Finite-size effects in periodic calculations can be isolated and corrected systematically.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometric decomposition approach could extend to other long-range interactions that exhibit conditional convergence.
  • Simulations of non-periodic or irregularly shaped systems might gain accuracy by adopting the boundary and correction terms.
  • Explicit tests on simple shapes such as cubes or spheres could confirm whether the decomposition remains independent of any auxiliary choices.

Load-bearing premise

The split of the sum into the three terms is exact and unique for any specified finite lattice geometry.

What would settle it

Direct numerical evaluation of the Coulomb sum for a chosen finite lattice shape and size that fails to equal the sum of the three decomposed terms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24653 by Yang He, Zhonghan Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representations of two finite 2D centro-symmetric crystals. Solid lines delineate the exact crystal boundaries, and black dots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Cross-sectional views of two cubic crystals (top and middle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic of a unit cell (black box) with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Averaged electrostatic interaction from the Ewald method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work examines conditionally convergent Coulomb lattice sums under periodic boundary conditions. The recently developed finite lattice sum cleanly decomposes the series into three distinct components: a periodic bulk term $\nu_{\rm pbc}$, a shape-dependent non-periodic boundary term $\nu_{\rm b}$, and a finite-size correction term $\nu_{\rm corr}$. This rigorous formulation explicitly parameterizes the geometry of a finite lattice by its exact shape and size and takes an effective pairwise form. We analyze it in detail and compare it with various derivations of lattice sums in the literature. Perspectives on future applications are discussed, including analytical developments for arbitrarily shaped crystals and numerical mesh-type algorithms for condensed matter simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a recently developed finite lattice sum resolves conditional convergence in Coulomb series under periodic boundary conditions by providing an exact decomposition into three terms—a periodic bulk term ν_pbc, a shape-dependent non-periodic boundary term ν_b, and a finite-size correction term ν_corr—explicitly parameterized by the exact shape and size of the finite lattice in an effective pairwise form. It analyzes this formulation in detail, compares it to various literature derivations, and discusses perspectives for analytical developments and numerical mesh-type algorithms in condensed matter simulations.

Significance. If the decomposition is shown to be exact, unique, and independent of summation order or regularization choices, the result would address a long-standing technical issue in electrostatic lattice sums, enabling geometry-specific calculations for finite crystals without artifacts from limiting procedures. This could have direct utility in condensed-matter and chemical-physics simulations of systems with long-range interactions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 'rigorous formulation' that 'cleanly decomposes' the series into ν_pbc + ν_b + ν_corr as exact, unique, and free of hidden dependence on summation order or regularization is asserted without any derivation steps, invariance proof under alternative cutoffs (e.g., spherical vs. cubic), or error analysis. This is load-bearing for the resolution of conditional convergence.
  2. The manuscript supplies no equations, explicit construction of the three terms, or numerical validation data to confirm that the decomposition remains invariant once geometry is fixed, preventing assessment of whether the terms are obtained independently or reduce to fitted quantities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for identifying areas where the presentation of the central claims requires strengthening. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate explicit derivations, equations, and validation data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 'rigorous formulation' that 'cleanly decomposes' the series into ν_pbc + ν_b + ν_corr as exact, unique, and free of hidden dependence on summation order or regularization is asserted without any derivation steps, invariance proof under alternative cutoffs (e.g., spherical vs. cubic), or error analysis. This is load-bearing for the resolution of conditional convergence.

    Authors: We agree the abstract states the claims without accompanying steps. The decomposition arises from exact parameterization of the finite lattice by its shape and size in an effective pairwise form, which separates the sum into the three terms independently of cutoff or order. In revision we will add a concise derivation outline and invariance argument under spherical versus cubic cutoffs to the introduction, along with error bounds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript supplies no equations, explicit construction of the three terms, or numerical validation data to confirm that the decomposition remains invariant once geometry is fixed, preventing assessment of whether the terms are obtained independently or reduce to fitted quantities.

    Authors: The present version prioritizes conceptual discussion and literature comparison. We acknowledge the absence of explicit equations and numerical checks as a limitation that hinders evaluation. Revision will include the closed-form expressions for ν_pbc, ν_b, and ν_corr together with benchmark calculations on fixed geometries under multiple summation schemes to demonstrate invariance and independent derivation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation presented as independent of summation order

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a three-term decomposition of the finite lattice sum into ν_pbc, ν_b, and ν_corr as a rigorous, geometry-parameterized effective pairwise form. No equations, derivation steps, or self-citations are visible in the text that would allow identification of any reduction by construction, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claim of exactness and uniqueness once shape/size are fixed is asserted without visible internal dependence on the result itself, satisfying the requirement for self-contained content against external benchmarks. No load-bearing step reduces to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such items remain unknown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5636 in / 993 out tokens · 26534 ms · 2026-06-25T22:13:56.262471+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley,Computer Simulation of Liq- uids, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    John Singleton,Band Theory and Electronic Properties of Solids, 1st ed., Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001) p. 222

    2001

  3. [3]

    Simulation and under- standing of atomic and molecular quantum crystals,

    Claudio Cazorla and Jordi Boronat, “Simulation and under- standing of atomic and molecular quantum crystals,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035003 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Die electrostatische untersuchung des kristallgitters,

    Erwin Madelung, “Die electrostatische untersuchung des kristallgitters,” Physikalische Zeitschrift19, 524–533 (1918)

    1918

  5. [5]

    Evaluation of optical and electrostatic lattice po- tentials,

    P. P. Ewald, “Evaluation of optical and electrostatic lattice po- tentials,” Ann. Phys. Leipzig64, 253–287 (1921)

    1921

  6. [6]

    Max Born and Kun Huang,Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lat- tices(Oxford University Press, London, 1954)

    1954

  7. [7]

    The electrostatic potential in a finite ionic crystal,

    A. Redlack and J. Grindlay, “The electrostatic potential in a finite ionic crystal,” Canad. J. Phys.50, 2815–2825 (1972)

    1972

  8. [8]

    Coulombic potential lattice sums,

    A. Redlack and J. Grindlay, “Coulombic potential lattice sums,” J Phys. Chem. Solids36, 73–82 (1975)

    1975

  9. [9]

    The crystal potential and summation of diverging series,

    I. I. Tupizin and I. V . Abarenkov, “The crystal potential and summation of diverging series,” Physica Status Solidi B82, 99 (1977)

    1977

  10. [10]

    Fluctuation theorems for dielectrics with pe- riodic boundary conditions,

    B.U. Felderhof, “Fluctuation theorems for dielectrics with pe- riodic boundary conditions,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications101, 275–282 (1980)

    1980

  11. [11]

    Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. i. lattice sums and dielectric constants,

    S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, “Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. i. lattice sums and dielectric constants,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci.373, 27–56 (1980)

    1980

  12. [12]

    Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. ii. equiv- alence of boundary conditions,

    S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, “Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. ii. equiv- alence of boundary conditions,” Proc. R. Soc. London. A Math. Phys. Sci.373, 57–66 (1980)

    1980

  13. [13]

    Electrostatic energy in ionic crystals,

    E. R. Smith, “Electrostatic energy in ionic crystals,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci.375, 475 (1981)

    1981

  14. [14]

    Evaluation of lattice sums in dis- ordered ionic system,

    E. R. Smith and J. W. Perram, “Evaluation of lattice sums in dis- ordered ionic system,” inThe Physics of Superionic Conductors and Electrode Materials, edited by J. W. Perram (Plenum, New York, 1983) pp. 57–78

    1983

  15. [15]

    Molecular-dynamics simulation of coulomb system in two and three dimensions,

    Jean-Pierre Hansen, “Molecular-dynamics simulation of coulomb system in two and three dimensions,” inMolecular Dynamics Simulation of Statistical Mechanical System, Pro- ceeding of the international school of physics ”Enrico Fermi”, edited by Giovanni Ciccotti and William Graham Hoover (North-Holland Amsterdam, 1986) pp. 89–129

    1986

  16. [16]

    Electrostatic potentials for simulations of thin lay- ers,

    E. R. Smith, “Electrostatic potentials for simulations of thin lay- ers,” Mol. Phys.65, 1089–1104 (1988)

    1988

  17. [17]

    Pisani, R

    C. Pisani, R. Dovesi, and C. Roetti,Hartree–F ock Ab Initio Treatment of Crystalline Systems, Lecture Notes in Chemistry No. 48 (Springer, New York, 1988)

    1988

  18. [18]

    On the electrostatic potential in crystalline systems where the charge density is expanded in gaussian functions,

    V .R. Saunders, C. Freyria-Fava, R. Dovesi, L. Salasco, and C. Roetti, “On the electrostatic potential in crystalline systems where the charge density is expanded in gaussian functions,” Molecular Physics77, 629–665 (1992)

    1992

  19. [19]

    How the unit cell sur- face charge distribution affects the energetics of ion–solvent interactions in simulations,

    James E. Roberts and Jurgen Schnitker, “How the unit cell sur- face charge distribution affects the energetics of ion–solvent interactions in simulations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 101, 5024–5031 (1994). 10

    1994

  20. [20]

    Periodic boundary conditions in ab initio calculations,

    G. Makov and M. C. Payne, “Periodic boundary conditions in ab initio calculations,” Phys. Rev. B51, 4014–4022 (1995)

    1995

  21. [21]

    Finite-size effects and coulomb interactions in quantum monte carlo calculations for homogeneous systems with periodic boundary conditions,

    Louisa M. Fraser, W. M. C. Foulkes, G. Rajagopal, R. J. Needs, S. D. Kenny, and A. J. Williamson, “Finite-size effects and coulomb interactions in quantum monte carlo calculations for homogeneous systems with periodic boundary conditions,” Phys. Rev. B53, 1814–1832 (1996)

    1996

  22. [22]

    Lattice-sum methods for computing electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations,

    Philippe H. Hunenberger, “Lattice-sum methods for computing electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations,” AIP Con- ference Proceedings492, 17–83 (1999)

    1999

  23. [23]

    Coulomb potential inside a large finite crystal,

    L N Kantorovich and I I Tupitsyn, “Coulomb potential inside a large finite crystal,” J. Phys.: Cond. Matter11, 6159 (1999)

    1999

  24. [24]

    Combining the lattice-sum and reaction-field approaches for evaluating long- range electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations,

    Tim N. Heinz and Philippe H. Hunenberger, “Combining the lattice-sum and reaction-field approaches for evaluating long- range electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations,” J. Chem. Phys.123, 034107 (2005)

    2005

  25. [25]

    The electrostatic surface term: (i) periodic systems,

    Henry David Herce, Angel Enrique Garcia, and Thomas Dar- den, “The electrostatic surface term: (i) periodic systems,” J. Chem. Phys.126, 124106 (2007)

    2007

  26. [26]

    Electrostatic potentials in systems periodic in one, two, and three dimensions,

    E. R. Smith, “Electrostatic potentials in systems periodic in one, two, and three dimensions,” J. Chem. Phys.128, 174104 (2008)

    2008

  27. [27]

    Communication: On the origin of the surface term in the ewald formula,

    V . Ballenegger, “Communication: On the origin of the surface term in the ewald formula,” J. Chem. Phys.140, 161102 (2014)

    2014

  28. [28]

    Infinite boundary terms of ewald sums and pair- wise interactions for electrostatics in bulk and at interfaces,

    Zhonghan Hu, “Infinite boundary terms of ewald sums and pair- wise interactions for electrostatics in bulk and at interfaces,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.10, 5254–5264 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    The effect of electro- static boundaries in molecular simulations: symmetry matters,

    Cong Pan, Shasha Yi, and Zhonghan Hu, “The effect of electro- static boundaries in molecular simulations: symmetry matters,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 4861 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Infinite boundary terms and pairwise interactions: A unified framework for periodic coulomb systems,

    Yihao Zhao and Zhonghan Hu, “Infinite boundary terms and pairwise interactions: A unified framework for periodic coulomb systems,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Compu- tation21, 5916–5927 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    The madelung prob- lem of finite crystals,

    Yihao Zhao, Yang He, and Zhonghan Hu, “The madelung prob- lem of finite crystals,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Compu- tation22, 2790–2798 (2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    Fast calculation of the electrostatic potential in ionic crystals by direct summation method,

    A. Gell ´e and M.-B. Lepetit, “Fast calculation of the electrostatic potential in ionic crystals by direct summation method,” Journal of Chemical Physics128, 244716 (2008)

    2008

  33. [33]

    Leslie Greengard,The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988)

    1988

  34. [34]

    thesis, Jilin University (2017), pages 139- 140

    Cong Pan,A study on electrostatics algorithms in molecular simulations, Ph.D. thesis, Jilin University (2017), pages 139- 140

    2017

  35. [35]

    Accurate treatments of electrostatics for computer simulations of biological systems: A brief survey of developments and existing problems,

    Shasha Yi, Cong Pan, and Zhonghan Hu, “Accurate treatments of electrostatics for computer simulations of biological systems: A brief survey of developments and existing problems,” Chin. Phys. B24, 120201 (2015)

    2015

  36. [36]

    Note: A pairwise form of the ewald sum for non-neutral systems,

    Shasha Yi, Cong Pan, and Zhonghan Hu, “Note: A pairwise form of the ewald sum for non-neutral systems,” J. Chem. Phys. 147, 126101 (2017)

    2017

  37. [37]

    The electrostatic potential in the surface region of an ionic crystal,

    D. E. Parry, “The electrostatic potential in the surface region of an ionic crystal,” Surf. Sci.49, 433–440 (1975)

    1975

  38. [38]

    Molecular dy- namics computer simulation of surface properties of crystalline potassium chloride,

    D. M. Heyes, M. Barber, and J. H. R. Clarke, “Molecular dy- namics computer simulation of surface properties of crystalline potassium chloride,” J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. II: Mol. Chem. Phys.73, 1485–1496 (1977)

    1977

  39. [39]

    Electrostatic lattice sums for semi-infinite lattices,

    S. W. de Leeuw and J. W. Perram, “Electrostatic lattice sums for semi-infinite lattices,” Mol. Phys.37, 1313–1322 (1979)

    1979

  40. [40]

    Rigorous error bounds for ewald summation of electrostatics at planar interfaces,

    Cong Pan and Zhonghan Hu, “Rigorous error bounds for ewald summation of electrostatics at planar interfaces,” J. Chem. The- ory Comput.10, 534–542 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Optimized ewald sum for elec- trostatics in molecular self-assembly systems at interfaces,

    Cong Pan and Zhonghan Hu, “Optimized ewald sum for elec- trostatics in molecular self-assembly systems at interfaces,” Sci. China Chem.58, 1044–1050 (2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    Fast algorithm for quasi-2d coulomb systems,

    Zecheng Gan, Xuanzhao Gao, Jiuyang Liang, and Zhenli Xu, “Fast algorithm for quasi-2d coulomb systems,” J. Comput. Phys.524, 113733 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Accurate error estimates and optimal parameter selection in ewald summation for dielectrically confined coulomb systems,

    Xuanzhao Gao, Qi Zhou, Zecheng Gan, and Jiuyang Liang, “Accurate error estimates and optimal parameter selection in ewald summation for dielectrically confined coulomb systems,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation21, 5890–5904 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Comments on the numerical simulations of electrolytes in periodic boundary conditions,

    Jeanichel Caillol, “Comments on the numerical simulations of electrolytes in periodic boundary conditions,” J. Chem. Phys. 101, 6080–6090 (1994)

    1994

  45. [45]

    The symmetry-preserving mean field condi- tion for electrostatic correlations in bulk,

    Zhonghan Hu, “The symmetry-preserving mean field condi- tion for electrostatic correlations in bulk,” J. Chem. Phys.156, 034111 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Peri- odic mp2, rpa, and boundary condition assessment of hydrogen ordering in ice xv,

    Mauro Del Ben, Joost VandeV ondele, and Ben Slater, “Peri- odic mp2, rpa, and boundary condition assessment of hydrogen ordering in ice xv,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 5, 4122–4128 (2014)

    2014

  47. [47]

    Asymptotic behavior of the pair-correlation func- tion of a polar liquid,

    J. M. Caillol, “Asymptotic behavior of the pair-correlation func- tion of a polar liquid,” J. Chem. Phys.96, 7039–7053 (1992)

    1992

  48. [48]

    Ewald summation for systems with slab geometry,

    In-Chul Yeh and Max L. Berkowitz, “Ewald summation for systems with slab geometry,” J. Chem. Phys.111, 3155–3162 (1999)

    1999

  49. [49]

    On the proper calculation of electrostatic interactions in solid-supported bilayer systems,

    In-Chul Yeh and Anders Wallqvist, “On the proper calculation of electrostatic interactions in solid-supported bilayer systems,” J. Chem. Phys.134, 055109 (2011)

    2011

  50. [50]

    Electrostat- ics in periodic slab geometries. i,

    A Arnold, Jason de Joannis, and Christian Holm, “Electrostat- ics in periodic slab geometries. i,” J. Chem. Phys.117, 2496– 2502 (2002)

    2002

  51. [51]

    Constant potential simulations on a mesh,

    Ludwig J. V . Ahrens-Iwers and Robert H. Meißner, “Constant potential simulations on a mesh,” J. Chem. Phys.155, 104104 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    On the stability of certain heteropolar crystals,

    H. M. Evjen, “On the stability of certain heteropolar crystals,” Phys. Rev.39, 675–687 (1932)

    1932

  53. [53]

    Date of Access: Dec

    Madelung Constant for CsCl Structure, The Online Encyclo- pedia of Integer Sequences. Date of Access: Dec. 1st, 2025. http://oeis.org/A181152

    2025

  54. [54]

    On the calculation of lattice sums,

    B. R. A. Nijboer and F. W. De Wette, “On the calculation of lattice sums,” Physica23, 309–321 (1957)

    1957

  55. [55]

    Convergence of lattice sums and madelung’s constant,

    David Borwein, Jonathan M. Borwein, and Keith F. Tay- lor, “Convergence of lattice sums and madelung’s constant,” J. Math. Phys.26, 2999–3009 (1985)

    1985

  56. [56]

    Simple calculation of madelung con- stants,

    Walter A. Harrison, “Simple calculation of madelung con- stants,” Phys. Rev. B73, 212103 (2006)

    2006

  57. [57]

    Electrostatic potentials using direct-lattice summations,

    V . R. Marathe, S. Lauer, and A. X. Trautwein, “Electrostatic potentials using direct-lattice summations,” Phys. Rev. B27, 5162–5165 (1983)

    1983

  58. [58]

    Madelung fields from optimized point charges for ab initio cluster model calcu- lations on ionic systems,

    C. Sousa, J. Casanovas, J. Rubio, and F. Illas, “Madelung fields from optimized point charges for ab initio cluster model calcu- lations on ionic systems,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 14, 680–684 (1993)

    1993

  59. [59]

    Determin- ing point charge arrays that produce accurate ionic crystal fields for atomic cluster calculations,

    S. E. Derenzo, M. K. Klintenberg, and M. J. Weber, “Determin- ing point charge arrays that produce accurate ionic crystal fields for atomic cluster calculations,” Journal of Chemical Physics 112, 2074–2081 (2000)

    2074

  60. [60]

    Clifford boundary conditions: A simple direct-sum evaluation of madelung con- stants,

    Nicolas Tavernier, Gian Luigi Bendazzoli, V ´eronique Brumas, Stefano Evangelisti, and J. A. Berger, “Clifford boundary conditions: A simple direct-sum evaluation of madelung con- stants,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 7090– 7095 (2020)

    2020

  61. [61]

    Clifford boundary conditions for periodic sys- tems: the madelung constant of cubic crystals in 1, 2 and 3 11 dimensions,

    N. Tavernier, G. L. Bendazzoli, V . Brumas, S. Evangelisti, and T. Leininger, “Clifford boundary conditions for periodic sys- tems: the madelung constant of cubic crystals in 1, 2 and 3 11 dimensions,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts140, 106 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    A symmetry-preserving mean field theory for electrostatics at interfaces,

    Zhonghan Hu, “A symmetry-preserving mean field theory for electrostatics at interfaces,” Chem. Commun.50, 14397–14400 (2014)

    2014

  63. [63]

    On the connections and differences among three mean-field approxi- mations: a stringent test,

    Shasha Yi, Cong Pan, Liming Hu, and Zhonghan Hu, “On the connections and differences among three mean-field approxi- mations: a stringent test,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 18514– 18518 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    Analytic theory of finite-size effects in supercell modelling of charged interfaces,

    Cong Pan, Shasha Yi, and Zhonghan Hu, “Analytic theory of finite-size effects in supercell modelling of charged interfaces,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.21, 14858 (2019)

    2019

  65. [65]

    thesis, University of Leiden, Leiden (1873), english translation:On the Continuity of the Gaseous and Liquid States, J

    Johannes Diderik van der Waals,Over de Continuiteit van den Gas- en Vloeistoftoestand, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden, Leiden (1873), english translation:On the Continuity of the Gaseous and Liquid States, J. S. Rowlinson (Ed.), Dover, 1988

    1988

  66. [66]

    Zur theorie der elektrolyte,

    P. Debye and E. H ¨uckel, “Zur theorie der elektrolyte,” Z. Phys. 24, 185–206 (1923)

    1923

  67. [67]

    Intermolecular forces and the nature of the liquid state,

    B. Widom, “Intermolecular forces and the nature of the liquid state,” Science157, 375–382 (1967)

    1967

  68. [68]

    Connecting local structure to interface forma- tion: A molecular scale van der waals theory of nonuniform liquids,

    John D. Weeks, “Connecting local structure to interface forma- tion: A molecular scale van der waals theory of nonuniform liquids,” Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.53, 533–562 (2002)

    2002

  69. [69]

    Efficient solutions of self- consistent mean field equations for dewetting and electrostatics in nonuniform liquids,

    Zhonghan Hu and John D. Weeks, “Efficient solutions of self- consistent mean field equations for dewetting and electrostatics in nonuniform liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 140602 (2010)

    2010

  70. [70]

    Short sol- vent model for ion correlations and hydrophobic association,

    Ang Gao, Richard C. Remsing, and John D. Weeks, “Short sol- vent model for ion correlations and hydrophobic association,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.117, 1293–1302 (2020)

    2020

  71. [71]

    Self-consistent determination of long-range electrostatics in neural network potentials,

    A. Gao and R. C. Remsing, “Self-consistent determination of long-range electrostatics in neural network potentials,” Nat. Commun.13, 1–11 (2022)

    2022

  72. [72]

    Modeling nuclear quantum effects on long-range electrostatics in nonuniform fluids,

    Richard C. Remsing, “Modeling nuclear quantum effects on long-range electrostatics in nonuniform fluids,” J. Chem. Phys. 159, 234101 (2023)

    2023

  73. [73]

    Hockney and J.W

    R.W. Hockney and J.W. Eastwood,Computer Simulation Using Particles(McGraw-Hill, NewYork, 1981)

    1981

  74. [74]

    Particle mesh ewald: An n log(n) method for ewald sums in large systems,

    Tom Darden, Darrin York, and Lee Pedersen, “Particle mesh ewald: An n log(n) method for ewald sums in large systems,” J. Chem. Phys.98, 10089–10092 (1993)

    1993

  75. [75]

    A smooth particle mesh ewald method,

    Ulrich Essmann, Lalith Perera, Max L. Berkowitz, Tom Dar- den, Hsing Lee, and Lee G. Pedersen, “A smooth particle mesh ewald method,” J. Chem. Phys.103, 8577–8593 (1995)

    1995

  76. [76]

    Removal of spurious self-interactions in particle–mesh methods,

    V . Ballenegger, J. J. Cerd`a, and C. Holm, “Removal of spurious self-interactions in particle–mesh methods,” Computer Physics Communications182, 1919–1923 (2011)

    1919

  77. [77]

    Fast ewald summation for electrostatic potentials with arbitrary periodic- ity,

    D. S. Shamshirgar, J. Bagge, and A.-K. Tornberg, “Fast ewald summation for electrostatic potentials with arbitrary periodic- ity,” The Journal of Chemical Physics154, 164109 (2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    Accelerating molecular dynamics simu- lations using fast ewald summation with prolates,

    Jiuyang Liang, Libin Lu, Alex Barnett, Leslie Greengard, and Shidong Jiang, “Accelerating molecular dynamics simu- lations using fast ewald summation with prolates,” (2025), arXiv:2505.09727

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Pmc-iz: A simple algorithm for the electrostatics calculation in slab geometric molecular dynamics simulations,

    Yu-Peng Huang, Yijie Xia, Lijiang Yang, and Yi Qin Gao, “Pmc-iz: A simple algorithm for the electrostatics calculation in slab geometric molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation20, 832–841 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    A screening con- dition imposed stochastic approximation for long-range electro- static correlations,

    Weihang Gao, Zhonghan Hu, and Zhenli Xu, “A screening con- dition imposed stochastic approximation for long-range electro- static correlations,” J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 4822–4827 (2023)

    2023

Showing first 80 references.