$Q$-shaped derived categories as derived categories of differential graded bimodules

Gustavo Jasso

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

$Q$-shaped derived categories as derived categories of differential graded bimodules

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Q-shaped derived categories are equivalent to derived categories of dg bimodules over a fixed dg category built from Q.

desk verdict Genuinely new structural result for Q-shaped derived categories; proof is convincing in the fg case, conditional on external resolutions and a sketched lemma in the flat case—worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08255 v3 pith:4JGRBHCA submitted 2025-01-14 math.RT

Gustavo Jasso This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.RT MSC 18G8018G35

keywords Q-shapedderivedcategoriesdifferentialgradedbimodulesequivalencescompactgeneratorssiltingsubcategoriestiltingcompleteprojectiveresolutions

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that $Q$-shaped derived categories—generalizations of derived categories in which ordinary cochain complexes are replaced by diagrams shaped by a small category $Q$—are, under mild hypotheses, ordinary derived categories of differential graded bimodules. Concretely, for a hereditary commutative noetherian ring $k$, a small $k$-category $Q$ satisfying the paper's Setup 2.30, and a $k$-algebra $A$ that is finitely generated or flat over $k$, there is a dg category $PSQ(k)$, depending only on $k$ and $Q$, with an equivalence of dg enhanced triangulated categories $D_Q(A) \simeq D(A \otimes PSQ(k))$. If true, this means the whole $Q$-shaped derived category is encoded by a fixed dg category built from $Q$, tensored with the algebra $A$. That description is strong enough to imply that $Q$-shaped derived categories preserve derived equivalences of algebras and that equivalences of $D_Q(k)$ for different shapes transfer uniformly to every algebra.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the small dg category $PSQ(k)$, whose objects are complete projective resolutions $P^\bullet_{S_q}$ of the stalk $Q$-modules $S_q$; each component of such a resolution is a finite direct sum of terms $P \otimes Q(-, q_{i,j})$ with $P$ a finitely generated projective $k$-module, and the defining short exact sequences are object-wise split. Tensoring these resolutions with $A$ gives complete projective resolutions $P^\bullet_{A \otimes S_q} = A \otimes P^\bullet_{S_q}$ of the distinguished compact generators of $D_Q(A)$, and these form the dg category $PSQ(A)$. The central dg functor $\varphi : A \otimes PSQ(k) \to PSQ(A)$ is defined by sending $a \otimes f$ to the family $(a \otimes f^j)_j$; its components are the canonical maps from $A \otimes \prod_j$ into $\prod_j (A \otimes -)$, which are isomorphisms when $A$ is finitely generated and only quasi-isomorphisms when $A$ is flat. The proof that $\varphi$ is a quasi-isomorphism in the flat case uses the comparison square (3.17), the quasi-isomorphism $\psi$ from Lemma 2.28, and the fact that flat base change preserves quasi-isomorphisms. The Recognition Theorem of Section 2.3 then converts the quasi-isomorphism of dg categories into the desired equivalence of derived categories.

What would settle it

Compute the cohomology of $\varphi : A \otimes PSQ(k) \to PSQ(A)$ in a flat but not finitely generated example, say $k = \mathbb{Z}$ and $A = \mathbb{Z}[x]$ with a $Q$ whose stalk resolutions have infinitely many components; if any $H^i(\varphi)$ fails to be an isomorphism, Theorem 1.1 fails for that $A$. The natural place to look is the failure of $A \otimes -$ to commute with infinite products, the only step where the flat case departs from the finitely generated case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Theorem 1.1: given the stated hypotheses, the $Q$-shaped derived category $D_Q(A)$—defined as the stable category of semi-projective $(A \otimes Q)$-modules—admits a dg enhancement $PSQ(A)$ whose derived category is equivalent to $D_Q(A)$, and the paper constructs an explicit dg functor $\varphi : A \otimes PSQ(k) \to PSQ(A)$ that is an isomorphism when $A$ is finitely generated and a quasi-isomorphism when $A$ is flat. Composing with the Recognition Theorem from Section 2.3 yields $D_Q(A) \simeq D(A \otimes PSQ(k))$. The paper then proves that this presentation is functorial enough to transfer derived equivalences: if $D(A_1) \cong D(A_2)$ then $D_Q(A_1) \cong D_Q(A_2)$, and if $D_{Q_1}(k) \cong D_{Q_2}(k)$ then $D_{Q_1}(A) \cong D_{Q_2}(A)$ for every flat algebra $A$. It also shows that any compact, silting, or tilting set of generators of $D_Q(k)$ produces a corresponding set of generators of $D_Q(A)$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on the previously established existence of complete projective resolutions of the stalk $Q$-modules $S_q$ whose components are finite direct sums of finitely generated projective pieces and whose defining short exact sequences are object-wise split; if such resolutions did not exist, the dg functor $\varphi$ could not be shown to be a quasi-isomorphism, and Theorem 1.1 would not follow from this argument.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For a fixed Q, derived equivalent algebras A1 and A2 have equivalent Q-shaped derived categories D_Q(A1) and D_Q(A2).
If D_{Q1}(k) is equivalent to D_{Q2}(k), then for every flat algebra A, D_{Q1}(A) is equivalent to D_{Q2}(A); the equivalence between shapes is universal in A.
Any set of compact generators of D_Q(k) can replace the specific resolutions in PSQ(k), yielding D_Q(A) equivalent to D(A tensor P_G) for the dg category spanned by the alternative generators.
Silting subcategories of D_Q(k) lift to silting subcategories of D_Q(A), and tilting subcategories lift to tilting subcategories, recovering known descriptions such as the derived categories of periodic complexes and of N-complexes.
The equivalence holds at the dg-enhanced level, not only for the underlying triangulated categories, so higher homotopical information is preserved.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If Theorem 1.1 is accepted, the formula D_Q(A) equivalent to D(A tensor PSQ(k)) suggests defining Q-shaped derived categories for arbitrary small dg categories via the internal Hom of dg categories, a direction the paper only sketches in Remark 3.22.
A natural stress test for the flat case is an explicit computation of the map phi for k = Z, A = Z[x], and a Q whose stalk resolutions have infinitely many components; the only apparent danger is the failure of A tensor - to commute with infinite products.
The tensor-product reading in Remark 3.23, phrased in stable infinity-categories, implies that the assignment C maps to C tensor D_Q(k) should preserve limits, colimits, and good t-structures; verifying these transfers in concrete examples would go beyond the paper's statements.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the quick take: the main theorem is real and new. Jasso shows that for any small k-category Q satisfying Setup 2.30, and any k-algebra A that is fg or flat over k, the Q-shaped derived category D_Q(A) is equivalent to the derived category of dg bimodules D(A ⊗ PS_Q(k)), where PS_Q(k) is built from the canonical compact generators of D_Q(k). Previous bimodule descriptions needed special Q or a tilting object; this one is universal. The corollaries—derived invariance (3.26), shapeshifting (3.27), and the change-of-generators theorem (3.29)—are useful and new.

The proof is largely solid. The fg case is self-contained: A ⊗ – preserves products, so the dg functor φ is an isomorphism. For the flat case, the paper sandwiches φ between two quasi-isomorphisms using square (3.17), and the explicit computation there checks out. The paper also tests the result against the known periodic and N-complex descriptions, which is good practice.

The soft spots are real but manageable. First, Lemma 2.28, the claim that ψ is a quasi-isomorphism, is only sketched; the inductive step over an unbounded complex is not written out. That is exactly where a hidden hypothesis could creep in. Second, the flat case depends on [HJ24b, Prop. 5.11] for complete projective resolutions of the stalks with finitely generated projective summands and object-wise split exact sequences. That result is cited, not proved. If it fails for any Q in Setup 2.30, the flat case collapses. The stress-test note is right about the dependency; it is also right that no internal inconsistency or counterexample appears here. So this is a verification gap, not a discovered flaw.

The citation pattern is honest: the heavy lifting from [HJ24b] is flagged, and the use of Toën's internal Hom and derived Eilenberg–Watts is appropriate. The paper is not trying to hide its debts.

Who should read this: anyone working on Q-shaped derived categories, or on descriptions of derived categories as dg bimodule categories. It will also be useful for people interested in universal derived equivalences. A good referee should check Lemma 2.28 carefully and confirm that Setup 2.30 covers the examples that matter. My own verdict is conditional accept: I'd send it out, expecting a careful referee to tighten the sketch and confirm the external hypotheses.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves that, for a hereditary commutative noetherian ring k and a small k-category Q satisfying the hypotheses of [HJ24b, Setup 2.9], and for any k-algebra A whose underlying k-module is finitely generated or flat, there exists a dg category PSQ(k) depending only on k and Q such that the Q-shaped derived category D_Q(A) is equivalent, as a dg enhanced triangulated category, to the derived category D(A ⊗ PSQ(k)) of dg bimodules. The proof constructs a dg functor φ: A ⊗ PSQ(k) → PSQ(A), shows it is an isomorphism when A is finitely generated, and shows it is a quasi-isomorphism when A is flat by verifying the commutativity of square (3.17) and invoking Lemma 2.28. The paper then derives consequences including derived invariance of Q-shaped derived categories, a shapeshifting result for different Q, change-of-generators theorems, and applications to periodic complexes, N-complexes, and Yamaura's tilting objects.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.1 is a substantial structural result: it reduces the study of Q-shaped derived categories of algebras to derived categories of dg bimodules over a dg category built from Q, independent of A. The proof is largely self-contained after the cited results of Holm–Jørgensen, with explicit computations (for instance the verification of square (3.17)) and careful treatment of the finitely generated and flat cases. The consequences (Corollaries 3.26 and 3.27, Theorems 3.25 and 3.29) are elegant and unify previously known special cases such as m-periodic complexes and N-complexes. The manuscript also makes good use of modern tools (Toën's internal Hom, derived Eilenberg–Watts) and clearly identifies its reliance on [HJ24b].

major comments (1)

[Section 2.3, Lemma 2.28] The quasi-isomorphism of ψ is essential for the flat case (it is used in square (3.17) and in the proof of Theorem 1.1), but the proof is only a sketch. The two occurrences of the phrase 'the usual inductive argument using lifting and extension properties' leave the induction over the unbounded complex P•_X unspecified; since this is a load-bearing step, please either write out the induction in detail or provide a precise reference that covers this exact Frobenius category situation.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3.1, square (3.17)] The bottom row of the displayed square is written as an identity morphism between two copies of A ⊗ Hom•_Q(P•_{S_q}, S_{q'}); the surrounding discussion in (3.18) indicates that the bottom right corner should be Hom•_{A⊗Q}(P•_{A⊗S_q}, A ⊗ S_{q'}) with a vertical identification given by Lemma 3.1. Please display the square correctly so that the bottom right object and the identification are explicit.
[Proposition 3.12] The notation φ is used both for the dg functor A ⊗ PSQ(k) → GSQ(A) and for its composite with the isomorphism ρ: GSQ(A) → PSQ(A); the formula (3.14) describes the former, while the target displayed in (3.13) is the Hom complex of PSQ(A). Please disambiguate these two maps.
[Introduction, first paragraph] The phrase 'anm-periodic tilting object' should read 'an m-periodic tilting object'.
[Proof of Theorem 1.1] The sentence 'the dg functor φ is an isomorphism' should specify that this is an isomorphism of dg categories in the finitely generated case, to avoid confusion with the quasi-isomorphism statement in the flat case.
[Section 2.3, display after (2.25)] The displayed diagram for the complete projective resolution P•_X is typeset in a way that is difficult to parse; please ensure that the arrows and labels are clear in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main equivalence is proved by an independent quasi-isomorphism argument, and the cited external inputs are not authored by the present author.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The dg category PSQ(k) is built from the canonical compact generators of DQ(k) via complete projective resolutions, but the central content of Theorem 1.1 is the independent verification that the natural dg functor φ : A⊗PSQ(k) → PSQ(A) is an isomorphism for finitely generated A and a quasi-isomorphism for flat A. This verification does not invoke the conclusion; it uses Lemma 3.1 (a Yoneda and tensor-evaluation computation), the differential and composition checks in Lemmas 3.8 and 3.10, and the commutative square (3.17), where A-flatness transfers quasi-isomorphisms. The existence of the required complete projective resolutions P•_{Sq} is quoted from [HJ24b, Prop. 5.11], an external source not authored by the present author, and it is not a renamed version of the target result. Lemma 2.28 is admittedly sketched, but it is a standalone quasi-isomorphism statement with an indicated proof; any incompleteness there is a proof gap or correctness risk, not circularity. The only self-citations ([DJW21], [JKM22]) occur in illustrative remarks and examples; for instance, Example 3.33 cites [JKM22, Sec. 5.5] for an elementary isomorphism in strictly periodic complexes, and that citation is not load-bearing for Theorem 1.1 or its corollaries. Hence no step reduces to its own input by construction or by self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper builds on the established theory of dg categories and Q-shaped derived categories. No free parameters are fitted, and no new entities are introduced; the dg category PSQ(k) is explicitly constructed from Q and from projective resolutions of stalk modules. The central theorem is conditional on the assumptions of Setup 2.30 and on the cited resolution and compactness results of [HJ24b], which are external to this paper.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption k is a hereditary noetherian commutative ring and Q is a small k-category satisfying [HJ24b, Setup 2.9] (finitely generated projective morphism modules, Serre functor, locally bounded, skeletal).
This is Setup 2.30, the standing assumption for the main theorem; it is the framework of Holm-Jørgensen's Q-shaped derived categories and is not proved here.
standard math The Q-shaped derived category DQ(A) is compactly generated by the set {A⊗Sq | q∈Q} [HJ24b, Thm. D].
Used in Section 2.4 to define the canonical compact generators and to set up the dg enhancement via Keller's Recognition Theorem.
standard math The stalk modules Sq admit complete projective resolutions P•_{Sq} with components P^i_{Sq} = ⊕_{j} P^i_{q,j} ⊗ Q(−, q_{i,j}) (P^i_{q,j} finitely generated projective over k) and object-wise split short exact sequences [HJ24b, Prop. 5.11].
This is the technical backbone of Theorem 1.1: it makes the dg functor φ well-defined and the flat-case quasi-isomorphism verification possible. Cited in Section 2.4.3.
standard math Keller's Recognition Theorem: for a Frobenius exact category with a set of compact generators and chosen complete S-projective resolutions, the derived category of the dg category spanned by the resolutions is equivalent to the stable category [Kel94, Sec. 4.3].
Used in equations (2.43) to identify DQ(k) with D(PSQ(k)) and DQ(A) with D(PSQ(A)).
standard math Toën's results: Hqe is closed symmetric monoidal with internal Hom, and the derived Eilenberg-Watts isomorphism D(Aop ⊗L B) ≃ RHom_c(D(A), D(B)) holds [Toe07, Thm. 6.1, Cor. 7.6].
Used in Section 3.2 to prove the derived invariance and shapeshifting theorems (Theorem 3.25 and Corollaries 3.26-3.27).
standard math Rickard's theorem: two k-algebras are derived equivalent if and only if D(A1) ≃ D(A2) in Hqe [Ric91, Kel07, Thm. 6.1].
Invoked in Section 3.2 to connect ordinary derived equivalences with isomorphisms of derived dg categories.
domain assumption For the consequences in Section 3.2, the underlying k-module of A is assumed flat (Setup 3.24), so that A⊗− preserves quasi-isomorphisms and A⊗L B ≃ A⊗B.
Additional hypothesis for Theorem 3.25 and its corollaries; not needed for the finitely generated case of Theorem 1.1.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $Q$-shaped derived categories as derived categories of differential graded bimodules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4JGRBHCA

@misc{pith2026250108255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $Q$-shaped derived categories as derived categories of differential graded bimodules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4JGRBHCA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08255}
}

abstract

We prove that, under mild assumptions, the $Q$-shaped derived categories introduced by Holm and J{\o}rgensen are equivalent to derived categories of differential graded bimodules over differential graded categories. This yields new derived invariance results for $Q$-shaped derived categories that allow us to extend known descriptions of such categories as derived categories of differential graded bimodules over (possibly graded) algebras.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Tilting in $Q$-shaped derived categories
math.RT 2024-11 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

For each self-injective graded algebra Λ with degree-zero part of finite global dimension, the Q-shaped derived category of any algebra A is equivalent to the ordinary derived category of the endomorphism ring Γ tenso...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Silting mutation in triangulated categories

[AI12] T. Aihara and O. Iyama. “Silting mutation in triangulated categories”. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 85.3 (2012), pp. 633–668. [BK90] A. I. Bondal and M. M. Kapranov. “Framed triangulated categories”. Mat. Sb. 181.5 (1990), pp. 669–683. [Chr22] M. Christ. “Ginzburg algebras of triangulated surfaces and perverse schobers”. Forum Math. Sigma 10 (2022), Pap...

work page 2012
[24]

Generalized Brown representability in homotopy cate- gories

New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. xviii+352. [Ros05] J. Rosick´ y. “Generalized Brown representability in homotopy cate- gories”. Theory Appl. Categ. 14 (2005), no. 19, 451–479. [Sai23] S. Saito. “Tilting theory for periodic triangulated categories”. Math. Z. 304.3 (2023), p

work page 2005
[38]

Realizing stable categories as derived categories

Cam- bridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp. xiv+450. [Yam13] K. Yamaura. “Realizing stable categories as derived categories”. Adv. Math. 248 (2013), pp. 784–819. Mathematisches Institut, Universit¨at zu K¨oln, Weyertal 86-90, 50931 K¨oln, Germany Email address : gjasso@math.uni-koeln.de URL: https://gustav...

work page 2013
[46]

The Q-shaped derived category of a ring

[HJ22] H. Holm and P. Jørgensen. “The Q-shaped derived category of a ring”. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 106.4 (2022), pp. 3263–3316. [HJ24a] H. Holm and P. Jørgensen. “A Brief Introduction to the Q-Shaped Derived Category”. Triangulated Categories in Representation Theory and Beyond. Ed. by P. A. Bergh, S. Oppermann, and Ø. Solberg. Cham: Springer Nature Swit...

work page 2022
[47]

Une structure de cat´ egorie de mod` eles de Quillen sur la cat´ egorie des dg-cat´ egories

[Tab05] G. Tabuada. “Une structure de cat´ egorie de mod` eles de Quillen sur la cat´ egorie des dg-cat´ egories”.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 340.1 (2005), pp. 15–19. [Tab15] G. Tabuada. Noncommutative motives. Vol

work page 2005
[63]

The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory

University Lecture Se- ries. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015, pp. x+114. [To¨ e07] B. To¨ en. “The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory”. Invent. Math. 167.3 (2007), pp. 615–667. [Wei94] C. A. Weibel. An introduction to homological algebra . Vol

work page 2007
[87]

Tilting in $Q$-shaped derived categories

Progr. Math. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 111–195. [DJW21] T. Dyckerhoff, G. Jasso, and T. Walde. “Generalised BGP reflection functors via the Grothendieck construction”.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 20 (2021), pp. 15733–15745. [DSˇS17] I. Dell’Ambrogio, G. Stevenson, and J. ˇSˇtov ´ ıˇ cek. “Gorenstein homo- logical algebra and universal coeffi...

work page Pith review arXiv 2021
[119]

Model categories of quiver representa- tions

London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988, pp. x+208. [HJ19] H. Holm and P. Jørgensen. “Model categories of quiver representa- tions”. Adv. Math. 357 (2019), pp. 106826,

work page 2019

Show all 13 references

[148]

Morita theory for derived categories

Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001, pp. viii+449. [Ric89] J. Rickard. “Morita theory for derived categories”. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 39.3 (1989), pp. 436–456. [Ric91] J. Rickard. “Derived equivalences as derived functors”. J. Londo...

1989
[170]

Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009, pp

Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009, pp. xviii+925. [Lur17] J. Lurie. Higher Algebra. May

2009
[332]

Deriving DG categories

London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp. 49–104. 30 REFERENCES [Kel94] B. Keller. “Deriving DG categories”. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 27.1 (1994), pp. 63–102. [Lad08a] S. Ladkani. “Homological properties of finite partially ordered ...

1994
[2008]

On derived equivalences of categories of sheaves over finite posets

[Lad08b] S. Ladkani. “On derived equivalences of categories of sheaves over finite posets”. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212.2 (2008), pp. 435–451. [LRG22] W. Lowen and J. Ramos Gonz´ alez. “On the tensor product of well generated dg categories”. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 226.3 (2022), P...

2008
[2022]

Quasi-categories and Kan complexes

arXiv: 2208.14413. [Joya] A. Joyal. Notes on quasi-categories . [Joyb] A. Joyal. The Theory of Quasi-Categories and its Applications . [Joyc] A. Joyal. Theory of quasi-categories I . [Joy02] A. Joyal. “Quasi-categories and Kan complexes”. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 175.1-3 (2002), ...

2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Silting mutation in triangulated categories

[AI12] T. Aihara and O. Iyama. “Silting mutation in triangulated categories”. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 85.3 (2012), pp. 633–668. [BK90] A. I. Bondal and M. M. Kapranov. “Framed triangulated categories”. Mat. Sb. 181.5 (1990), pp. 669–683. [Chr22] M. Christ. “Ginzburg algebras of triangulated surfaces and perverse schobers”. Forum Math. Sigma 10 (2022), Pap...

work page 2012

[2] [24]

Generalized Brown representability in homotopy cate- gories

New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. xviii+352. [Ros05] J. Rosick´ y. “Generalized Brown representability in homotopy cate- gories”. Theory Appl. Categ. 14 (2005), no. 19, 451–479. [Sai23] S. Saito. “Tilting theory for periodic triangulated categories”. Math. Z. 304.3 (2023), p

work page 2005

[3] [38]

Realizing stable categories as derived categories

Cam- bridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp. xiv+450. [Yam13] K. Yamaura. “Realizing stable categories as derived categories”. Adv. Math. 248 (2013), pp. 784–819. Mathematisches Institut, Universit¨at zu K¨oln, Weyertal 86-90, 50931 K¨oln, Germany Email address : gjasso@math.uni-koeln.de URL: https://gustav...

work page 2013

[4] [46]

The Q-shaped derived category of a ring

[HJ22] H. Holm and P. Jørgensen. “The Q-shaped derived category of a ring”. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 106.4 (2022), pp. 3263–3316. [HJ24a] H. Holm and P. Jørgensen. “A Brief Introduction to the Q-Shaped Derived Category”. Triangulated Categories in Representation Theory and Beyond. Ed. by P. A. Bergh, S. Oppermann, and Ø. Solberg. Cham: Springer Nature Swit...

work page 2022

[5] [47]

Une structure de cat´ egorie de mod` eles de Quillen sur la cat´ egorie des dg-cat´ egories

[Tab05] G. Tabuada. “Une structure de cat´ egorie de mod` eles de Quillen sur la cat´ egorie des dg-cat´ egories”.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 340.1 (2005), pp. 15–19. [Tab15] G. Tabuada. Noncommutative motives. Vol

work page 2005

[6] [63]

The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory

University Lecture Se- ries. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015, pp. x+114. [To¨ e07] B. To¨ en. “The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory”. Invent. Math. 167.3 (2007), pp. 615–667. [Wei94] C. A. Weibel. An introduction to homological algebra . Vol

work page 2007

[7] [87]

Tilting in $Q$-shaped derived categories

Progr. Math. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 111–195. [DJW21] T. Dyckerhoff, G. Jasso, and T. Walde. “Generalised BGP reflection functors via the Grothendieck construction”.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 20 (2021), pp. 15733–15745. [DSˇS17] I. Dell’Ambrogio, G. Stevenson, and J. ˇSˇtov ´ ıˇ cek. “Gorenstein homo- logical algebra and universal coeffi...

work page Pith review arXiv 2021

[8] [119]

Model categories of quiver representa- tions

London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988, pp. x+208. [HJ19] H. Holm and P. Jørgensen. “Model categories of quiver representa- tions”. Adv. Math. 357 (2019), pp. 106826,

work page 2019