Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

"Why Should I Trust Interactive Learners?" Explaining Interactive Queries of Classifiers to Users

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.08578 v1 pith:4JWNWPB4 submitted 2018-05-22 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords interactiveuserlearnerqueriestrustexplanatorylearningpredictions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Although interactive learning puts the user into the loop, the learner remains mostly a black box for the user. Understanding the reasons behind queries and predictions is important when assessing how the learner works and, in turn, trust. Consequently, we propose the novel framework of explanatory interactive learning: in each step, the learner explains its interactive query to the user, and she queries of any active classifier for visualizing explanations of the corresponding predictions. We demonstrate that this can boost the predictive and explanatory powers of and the trust into the learned model, using text (e.g. SVMs) and image classification (e.g. neural networks) experiments as well as a user study.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Human-in-the-Loop User Feedback Affects Perceived Accuracy and Trust, but Task Subjectivity Matters

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Interactive feedback was associated with a more negative perceived-accuracy trend in an objective face-detection task, but no such bias appeared in two subjective text-classification studies.

Pith tools