Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What does it all mean? Capturing Semantics of Surgical Data and Algorithms with Ontologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.07747 v1 pith:4OM5DJIM submitted 2017-05-22 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords dataalgorithmssurgicalsciencecommoncontentnecessaryontology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Every year approximately 234 million major surgeries are performed, leading to plentiful, highly diverse data. This is accompanied by a matching number of novel algorithms for the surgical domain. To garner all benefits of surgical data science it is necessary to have an unambiguous, shared understanding of algorithms and data. This includes inputs and outputs of algorithms and thus their function, but also the semantic content, i.e. meaning of data such as patient parameters. We therefore propose the establishment of a new ontology for data and algorithms in surgical data science. Such an ontology can be used to provide common data sets for the community, encouraging sharing of knowledge and comparison of algorithms on common data. We hold that this is a necessary foundation towards new methods for applications such as semantic-based content retrieval and similarity measures and that it is overall vital for the future of surgical data science.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools