Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Counterfactual Explanations for Linear Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15431 v1 pith:4OXSZMDU submitted 2024-05-24 math.OC cs.LG

classification math.OCcs.LG
keywords optimizationlinearrelativecounterfactualdoneexplanationsproblemstrong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The concept of counterfactual explanations (CE) has emerged as one of the important concepts to understand the inner workings of complex AI systems. In this paper, we translate the idea of CEs to linear optimization and propose, motivate, and analyze three different types of CEs: strong, weak, and relative. While deriving strong and weak CEs appears to be computationally intractable, we show that calculating relative CEs can be done efficiently. By detecting and exploiting the hidden convex structure of the optimization problem that arises in the latter case, we show that obtaining relative CEs can be done in the same magnitude of time as solving the original linear optimization problem. This is confirmed by an extensive numerical experiment study on the NETLIB library.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coherent Local Explanations for Mathematical Optimization

    math.OC 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLEMO fits local linear explanations for optimization models, adding a regularizer so predicted objective values match the objective of predicted decisions and predicted decisions stay feasible.

Pith tools