Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Global Existence, Hamiltonian Conservation and Vanishing Viscosity for the Surface Quasi-Geostrophic Equation

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For every zero-mean initial datum in L^{4/3}, the surface quasi-geostrophic equation has a global weak solution whose Hamiltonian norm is constant for all time.

desk verdict Genuinely new result with a sound core proof and one trivial but real typo in the mollification radius that breaks Theorem 1.1 as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01268 v2 pith:4S5MD2AS submitted 2025-09-01 math.AP

Luigi De Rosa , Mickaël Latocca , Jaemin Park This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3535Q8676B0335D30
keywords surfacequasi-geostrophicequationvanishingviscosityHamiltonianconservationanomalousdissipationweaksolutionscriticalconcentrationcompactnessequi-integrability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that every zero-mean initial datum with finite L^{4/3} norm gives rise to at least one global weak solution of the surface quasi-geostrophic (SQG) equation, and this solution conserves the Hamiltonian — the square of the H^{-1/2} norm — for all time. The solution is obtained by solving the critical dissipative SQG equation with a tiny viscosity and letting the viscosity tend to zero; the main difficulty is that the natural norms only give weak compactness, not the strong convergence needed to pass to the limit. The key idea is to propagate equi-integrability, or non-concentration, of the L^{4/3} density from the initial time to all later times, which yields strong compactness in the Hamiltonian norm. As a corollary, the vanishing-viscosity limit exhibits no anomalous dissipation of the Hamiltonian, and the paper identifies the exact frequency scales where compactness must hold.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the convex-function monotonicity of the viscous flow: for every convex C^1 function β, ∫ β(θ_ν(t)) dx ≤ ∫ β(θ_ν(0)) dx for all t≥0. This estimate, a consequence of a pointwise inequality for the fractional Laplacian, transfers the equi-integrability (non-concentration) of the initial densities {|θ_0^ν|^{4/3}} to the whole time interval. Through the De la Vallée Poussin criterion and a concentration-compactness argument, that equi-integrability upgrades weak convergence to strong convergence in H^{-1/2} at every time; strong convergence then both passes the nonlinearity to the limit and, via a separate no-anomalous-dissipation theorem, forces the Hamiltonian loss

What would settle it

Find a sequence of smooth solutions to the critical dissipative SQG equation whose zero-mean initial data are bounded in L^{4/3} with {|θ0^ν|^{4/3}} equi-integrable, but for which liminf_{ν→0} ν∫_0^T ∥θ_ν(t)∥^2_{L^2} dt > 0 for some T>0. Theorems 1.2(c) and 3.1 state that this quantity is always zero under exactly those hypotheses; an explicit or numerical example with positive dissipation would refute the no-anomalous-dissipation claim and the Hamiltonian conservation of the limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the two-dimensional torus, take any zero-mean θ0 in L^{4/3}(T^2). The main theorem constructs a global weak solution θ to the inviscid SQG equation with this initial datum such that, for every t≥0, ∥θ(t)∥_{H^{-1/2}} = ∥θ0∥_{H^{-1/2}} and ∥θ(t)∥_{L^{4/3}} ≤ ∥θ0∥_{L^{4/3}}. The solution is a vanishing-viscosity limit of smooth solutions to the critical dissipative SQG equation: the paper shows that the dissipative term contributes nothing in the limit, in the sense that ν∫_0^T ∥θ_ν(τ)∥^2_{L^2} dτ → 0, so the Hamiltonian is not anomalously dissipated even though the limiting solution has less regularity than the classical conservation threshold. The proof also gives a general criterion: stro

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the viscous flow never increasing any convex function of the solution's values, so that equi-integrability of the initial data propagates to every later time; if that monotonicity failed at the critical L^{4/3} level, the strong compactness in the Hamiltonian norm would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any zero-mean θ0 ∈ L^{4/3}(T^2), there is a global weak SQG solution with constant Hamiltonian; the critical integrability does not prevent Hamiltonian conservation.
  • Vanishing-viscosity limits of critical SQG conserve the Hamiltonian whenever the viscous solutions are strongly compact in L^2_loc(H^{-1/2}); proving or disproving that compactness is the real bottleneck.
  • Compactness at frequencies of order 1/ν is exactly equivalent to zero anomalous dissipation, so the relevant scales for the inviscid limit are now identified.
  • For initial data in L^p with p>4/3, the dissipation vanishes at the sharp algebraic rate ν^{(3p-4)/p}, and this rate cannot be improved.
  • Without equi-integrability of the initial data, the theorem's conclusions fail: there are explicit viscous sequences whose L^{4/3} mass concentrates and dissipates a fixed positive amount of Hamiltonian in the limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same propagation-of-equi-integrability mechanism might apply to other transport or active-scalar equations whose Hamiltonian sits at a lower regularity than conserved L^p norms, suggesting a general route to conservation in inviscid limits.
  • Because the theorem constructs one solution rather than proving uniqueness, it leaves open whether every vanishing-viscosity subsequential limit of critical SQG conserves the Hamiltonian; the paper's mechanism points to strong compactness of the sequence as the decisive condition.
  • A testable extension would be to check whether the sharp algebraic rate for p>4/3 degrades continuously as p approaches 4/3; the example in the paper shows p=4/3 is the boundary of the explicit-rate regime.
  • The frequency-scale equivalence suggests that numerical studies of SQG should monitor the spectral tail near the dissipative scale; persistent non-compactness there would indicate anomalous Hamiltonian dissipation even when initial data are equi-integrable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the inviscid surface quasi-geostrophic equation (SQG) on the two-dimensional torus. Its main result (Theorem 1.1) asserts that for every zero-mean θ0 ∈ L^{4/3}(T²) there exists a global weak solution θ ∈ C^0([0,∞); H^{-1/2}) ∩ C^0_w([0,∞); L^{4/3}) satisfying ∥θ(t)∥_{H^{-1/2}} = ∥θ0∥_{H^{-1/2}} and ∥θ(t)∥_{L^{4/3}} ≤ ∥θ0∥_{L^{4/3}}. The construction is a vanishing-viscosity limit of critical dissipative SQGν (Theorem 1.2), and the no-anomalous-dissipation mechanism is isolated in Theorems 3.1 and 3.3. The key new idea is to propagate the equi-integrability of |θ0|^{4/3} forward in time using the Córdoba–Córdoba inequality for the viscous equation; uniform weak compactness of {|θ_ν(t)|^{4/3}} then yields strong compactness in H^{-1/2} by a concentration-compactness argument (Proposition 2.3).

Significance. If established, this is a notable advance: it reaches the critical integrability p = 4/3 for which L^p embeds into H^{-1/2}, extends Marchand's L^p theory, and produces solutions that conserve the Hamiltonian. It also gives a clean criterion for absence of anomalous dissipation under Onsager-supercritical regularity, with sharp algebraic rates for p > 4/3. The proof is mostly self-contained and relies on standard tools (Córdoba–Córdoba, commutator estimates, de la Vallée Poussin). I checked the main chain: Steps 1–4 of Theorem 1.2, Theorem 3.1, and Theorem 3.3 are coherent. The method is novel and likely to be useful.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.1] The mollification parameter is set as ε_ν := ν^{-1}. With a standard mollifier this radius diverges as ν → 0, so θ0 * ρ_{ε_ν} → 0 in distributions rather than θ0; the assertion 'θ0^ν → θ0 in L^{4/3}' and the weak compactness of {|θ0^ν|^{4/3}} are false as written. This is a load-bearing step because it is the only place Theorem 1.1 connects an arbitrary L^{4/3} datum to the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2. The fix is local: take any ε_ν ↓ 0, e.g. ε_ν = ν. With that correction the proof goes through.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Proof of Theorem 1.2, first paragraph] There is a typo: 'L^{4/3}(T^3)' should be 'L^{4/3}(T^2)'.
  2. [Proposition 2.2] The final displayed estimate is slightly ambiguous: the second term should be (ε M)^{3/2}, not ε M^{3/2}; please clarify the parentheses.
  3. [Theorem 1.2, Step 2] When applying de la Vallée Poussin, the convexity/regularity of β~(r) = β(|r|^{4/3}) is asserted. This is fine, but it may help to state explicitly that β can be chosen nondecreasing so that the composition is convex.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Hamiltonian conservation is proved from independent compactness and no-anomalous-dissipation results; the mollification typo (epsilon_nu=nu^{-1}) is a correctness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. Theorem 1.1 is obtained by taking smooth viscous approximations of the initial datum and applying Theorem 1.2, whose hypotheses are: (i) smooth initial data with weakly compact {|theta0^nu|^{4/3}}, and (ii) the viscous flow property (3.8) coming from the Cordoba-Cordoba inequality (Lemma 2.1). The key equi-integrability propagation (3.13) is derived from the initial weak compactness and the independent maximum-principle-type estimate; it is not assumed as part of the conclusion. Hamiltonian conservation in Step 4 is not imported from the definition of weak solution or from the desired result; it follows from the independently proved no-anomalous-dissipation criterion (Theorem 3.1) and the viscous energy balance (2.8). The self-citations [20,21] appear only as contextual references to analogous 2D Navier-Stokes results and are not load-bearing. The load-bearing citations are external and independent: [34] for global smooth solutions, [15,16,17] for the Cordoba-Cordoba inequality, [41,44] for the weak formulation, and [35] for the De la Vallee Poussin criterion. One genuine non-circular flaw exists: in the proof of Theorem 1.1 the mollification radius is set as epsilon_nu := nu^{-1}, which tends to infinity and makes theta0^nu tend to 0 in distributions rather than theta0^nu -> theta0 in L^{4/3}. This is evidently a typo for any epsilon_nu -> 0 and breaks the proof as written, but it is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction of the theorem to its own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted and no entities are postulated. The central claim rests on cited standard results in harmonic analysis and PDE: the Córdoba-Córdoba inequality, the commutator estimate from [1], global regularity of critical SQG from [34], and classical functional analysis tools. The proof itself contributes the propagation mechanism and the sharp compactness criterion.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Córdoba-Córdoba inequality: for convex β in C^1, ∫ β'(f)(-Δ)^α f dx ≥ 0 (Lemma 2.1).
    Used to derive the monotone decay (3.8) that propagates equi-integrability from initial data to all times; without it the concentration-compactness argument for the critical case fails.
  • domain assumption Global regularity of critical dissipative SQG for smooth data (Kiselev-Nazarov-Volberg [34]).
    Provides the smooth viscous approximations used to construct the vanishing-viscosity sequence in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.
  • domain assumption Commutator estimate of Buckmaster-Shkoller-Vicol ([1, Lemma A.5]): [(-Δ)^{1/2}, ∇φ] is order zero and bounded on H^{-1/2}, giving the bilinear continuity estimate (2.6).
    Makes the weak formulation (2.4)-(2.5) well-defined and allows passing to the limit under H^{-1/2} convergence in Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 3.1.
  • standard math Sobolev embeddings: L^{4/3}(T^2) ⊂ H^{-1/2}(T^2) and H^{1/2}(T^2) ⊂ L^4(T^2).
    Justifies the critical exponent p=4/3, the tail estimate in Proposition 2.2, and the weak convergence step from L^{4/3} weak convergence to H^{-1/2} weak convergence.
  • standard math De la Vallée Poussin criterion for weak compactness in L^1 (Klenke [35]), with a C^1 convex growth function β satisfying β(r)/r → ∞.
    Converts the weak compactness assumption on {|θ_0^ν|^{4/3}} into a usable convex β, needed for Proposition 2.3 and Step 2 of Theorem 1.2.
  • domain assumption Existence of Leray solutions to (SQGν) with exact energy identity (2.8) and the auxiliary bound (2.9), proven in Proposition 2.7 via regularization, Aubin-Lions, and [34].
    Provides the class of viscous solutions for which Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 are formulated; the bound (2.9) is specifically needed in the no-anomalous-dissipation proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global Existence, Hamiltonian Conservation and Vanishing Viscosity for the Surface Quasi-Geostrophic Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4S5MD2AS

@misc{pith2026250901268,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global Existence, Hamiltonian Conservation and Vanishing Viscosity for the Surface Quasi-Geostrophic Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4S5MD2AS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01268}
}
abstract

For any initial datum $\theta_0\in L^{\frac{4}{3}}_x$ it is proved the existence of a global-in-time weak solution $\theta \in L^\infty_t L^{\frac43}_x$ to the surface quasi-geostrophic equation whose Hamiltonian, i.e. the $\dot{H}^{-\frac{1}{2}}_x$ norm, is constant in time. The solution is obtained as a vanishing viscosity limit. The main idea is to propagate in time the non-concentration of the $L^{\frac{4}{3}}_x$ norm of the initial data, from which the strong compactness in the Hamiltonian norm is deduced. Minimal Onsager supercritical conditions preventing anomalous dissipation are given.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mixed Third-Order Flux Laws for Dual Cascade in the Stochastic SQG Equation

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Establishes rigorous third-order flux laws for direct SPE and inverse Hamiltonian cascades in stochastic SQG with Onsager obstructions under weak anomalous dissipation.

  2. Weak Solutions for Inviscid SQG with Lorentz Data

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Inviscid SQG admits global Hamiltonian-conserving weak solutions for every initial datum in the critical Lorentz space L^{4/3,2} on R^2 and smooth bounded domains.

  3. Absence of local anomalous dissipation and local energy balance in 2D incompressible flows away from the boundary

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Local anomalous dissipation vanishes for 2D NS solutions bounded in L^{1+}_t L^∞_{x,loc} away from the boundary, yielding convergence to an Euler solution whose large-scale approximation satisfies local energy balance...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Buckmaster, S

    T. Buckmaster, S. Shkoller, and V. Vicol,Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the SQG equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019), 1809–1874

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Non-uniqueness up to the Onsager threshold for the forced SQG equation

    A. Bulut, M. K. Huynh, and S. Palasek,Non-uniqueness up to the Onsager threshold for the forced SQG equation (2023). Preprint available at arXiv:2310.12947

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Caffarelli and A

    L. Caffarelli and A. Vasseur,Drift diffusion equations with fractional diffusion and the quasi-geostrophic equation, Ann. Math.171 (2010), 1903–1930

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Castro, D

    Á. Castro, D. Córdoba, and J. Gómez-Serrano,Global smooth solutions for the inviscid SQG equation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc266 (2020), 89pp

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Castro, D

    Á. Castro, D. Faraco, F. Mengual, and M. Solera,Unstable vortices, sharp non-uniqueness with forcing, and global smooth solutions for the SQG equation, 2025. Preprint available at arXiv:2502.10274

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Cheskidov, M

    A. Cheskidov, M. C. Lopes Filho, H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes, and R. Shvydkoy,Energy conservation in two-dimensional incompressible ideal fluids, Comm. Math. Phys.348 (2016), no. 1, 129–143

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Constantin,Scaling exponents for active scalars, J

    P. Constantin,Scaling exponents for active scalars, J. Stat. Phys.90 (1998), 571–595

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    , Energy spectrum of quasigeostrophic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002), 184501

    work page 2002

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Constantin, A

    P. Constantin, A. J. Majda, and E. Tabak,Formation of strong fronts in the 2-d quasigeostrophic thermal active scalar, Nonlinearity 7 (1994), 1495–1533

    1994

  2. [10]

    Constantin and H

    P. Constantin and H. Q. Nguyen,Global weak solutions for SQG in bounded domains, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71 (2018), 2323–2333

    2018

  3. [11]

    D376/377 (2018), 195–203

    , Local and global strong solutions for SQG in bounded domains, Phys. D376/377 (2018), 195–203. 10This guarantees that any weak* limit of the sequence{|θν 0| 4 3}ν is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure. 17

    2018

  4. [12]

    Constantin, A

    P. Constantin, A. Tarfulea, and V. Vicol,Absence of anomalous dissipation of energy in forced two dimensional fluid equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.212 (2014), 875––903

    2014

  5. [13]

    Constantin and J

    P. Constantin and J. Wu,Behavior of solutions of 2D quasi-geostrophic equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal.30 (1999), no. 5, 937–948

    1999

  6. [14]

    , Regularity of Hölder continuous solutions of the supercritical quasi-geostrophic equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare (C) Anal. Non Lineaire25 (2008), 1103–1110

    2008

  7. [15]

    Córdoba and D

    A. Córdoba and D. Córdoba,A pointwise estimate for fractionary derivatives with applications to partial differential equations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100 (2003), no. 26, 15316–15317

    2003

  8. [16]

    , A maximum principle applied to quasi-geostrophic equations, Comm. Math. Phys.249 (2004), no. 3, 511–528

    2004

  9. [17]

    Córdoba and Á

    A. Córdoba and Á. D. Martínez,A pointwise inequality for fractional Laplacians, Adv. Math.280 (2015), 79–85

    2015

  10. [18]

    M. Dai, V. Giri, and R.-O. Radu, An Onsager-type theorem for SQG (2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2407.02582

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dai and Q

    M. Dai and Q. Peng, Non-unique stationary solutions of forced SQG (2023). Preprint available at arXiv:2302.03283

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    De Rosa and J

    L. De Rosa and J. Park,No anomalous dissipation in two-dimensional incompressible fluids(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2403.04668

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Preprint available at arXiv:2508.01440

    , Dissipation concentration in two-dimensional fluids(2025). Preprint available at arXiv:2508.01440

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Delort,Existence de nappes de tourbillon en dimension deux, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 4 (1991), no

    J.-M. Delort,Existence de nappes de tourbillon en dimension deux, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 4 (1991), no. 3, 553–586

    1991

  15. [23]

    R. J. DiPerna and A. Majda,Reduced Hausdorff dimension and concentration-cancellation for two-dimensional incompressible flow, J. Amer. Math. Soc.1 (1988), no. 1, 59–95

    1988

  16. [24]

    Elgindi, M

    T. Elgindi, M. C. Lopes Filho, and H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes,Absence of anomalous dissipation for vortex-sheets (2025). Preprint available at arXiv:2504.18523

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    L. C. Evans and S. Müller,Hardy spaces and the two-dimensional Euler equations with nonnegative vorticity, Journal of the American Mathematical Society7 (1994), no. 1, 199–219

    1994

  18. [26]

    Gravejat and D

    P. Gravejat and D. Smets,Smooth travelling-wave solutions to the inviscid surface quasi-geostrophic equation, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2019), 1744–1757

    2019

  19. [27]

    He and A

    S. He and A. Kiselev,Small-scale creation for solutions of the SQG equation, Duke Math. J.170 (2021), no. 5, 1027–1041

    2021

  20. [28]

    Isett and S.-Z

    P. Isett and S.-Z. Looi,A proof of Onsager’s conjecture for the SQG equation(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2407.02578

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Isett and A

    P. Isett and A. Ma,A direct approach to nonuniqueness and failure of compactness for the SQG equation, Nonlinearity 34 (2021), 3122

    2021

  22. [30]

    Isett and V

    P. Isett and V. Vicol,Hölder continuous solutions of active scalar equations, Ann. PDE1 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Jeong, J

    I.-J. Jeong, J. Kim, and H. Miura,Wellposedness of inviscid SQG in the half-plane(2025). Preprint available at arXiv:2506.06601

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    F. Jin, S. Lanthaler, M. C. Lopes Filho, and H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes,Sharp conditions for energy balance in two-dimensional incompressible ideal flow with external force(2024). Preprint available at arXiv:2404.12572

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kiselev and F

    A. Kiselev and F. Nazarov,Variation on a theme of Caffarelli and Vasseur, J. Math. Sci.166 (2010), 31–39

    2010

  26. [34]

    Kiselev, F

    A. Kiselev, F. Nazarov, and A. Volberg,Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, Invent. math.167 (2007), 445–453

    2007

  27. [35]

    Klenke,Probability theory, Universitext, Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2008

    A. Klenke,Probability theory, Universitext, Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2008. A comprehensive course, Translated from the 2006 German original

    2008

  28. [36]

    Lanthaler, S

    S. Lanthaler, S. Mishra, and C. Parés-Pulido,On the conservation of energy in two-dimensional incompressible flows, Nonlinearity 34 (2021), no. 2, 1084–1135

    2021

  29. [37]

    Lazar and L

    O. Lazar and L. Xue,Regularity results for a class of generalized surface quasi-geostrophic equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. 130 (2019), 200–250

    2019

  30. [38]

    P. G. Lemarié-Rieusset and F. Marchand,Solutions auto-similaires non-triviales pour l’équation quasi- géostrophique dissipative critique, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris341 (2005), 535–538

    2005

  31. [39]

    Lions,The Concentration-Compactness Principle in the Calculus of Variations

    P.-L. Lions,The Concentration-Compactness Principle in the Calculus of Variations. The limit case, Part 1, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana (1985), 145–201

    1985

  32. [40]

    The limit case, Part 2, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana1 (1985), no

    , The Concentration-Compactness Principle in the Calculus of Variations. The limit case, Part 2, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana1 (1985), no. 2, 45–121 (eng)

    1985

  33. [41]

    Marchand,Existence and regularity of weak solutions to the quasi-geostrophic equations in the spacesLp or H− 1 2, Comm

    F. Marchand,Existence and regularity of weak solutions to the quasi-geostrophic equations in the spacesLp or H− 1 2, Comm. Math. Phys.277 (2008), 45–67. 18

    2008

  34. [42]

    , Propagation of sobolev regularity for the critical dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, Asymptot. Anal. 46 (2006), 275–293

    2006

  35. [43]

    D 237 (2008), no

    , Weak-strong uniqueness criteria for the critical quasi-geostrophic equation, Phys. D 237 (2008), no. 10-12, 1346–1351

    2008

  36. [44]

    Resnick,Dynamical problems in nonlinear advective partial differential equations, Ph.D

    S. Resnick,Dynamical problems in nonlinear advective partial differential equations, Ph.D. Thesis., University of Chicago (1995)

    1995

  37. [45]

    Schochet,The weak vorticity formulation of the2-D Euler equations and concentration-cancellation, Comm

    S. Schochet,The weak vorticity formulation of the2-D Euler equations and concentration-cancellation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations20 (1995), no. 5-6, 1077–1104

    1995

  38. [46]

    Vecchi and S

    I. Vecchi and S. Wu,On L1-vorticity for 2-D incompressible flow, manuscripta mathematica 78 (1993), 403–412. (L. De Rosa)Gran Sasso Science Institute, viale Francesco Crispi, 7, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy Email address: luigi.derosa@gssi.it (M. Latocca) Laboratoire de Mathématiques...

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.