pith. sign in

arxiv: 1208.1079 · v1 · pith:4SSIZHQ7new · submitted 2012-08-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Meissner response of superconductors: Quantum non-locality vs. quasi-local measurements in the conditions of the Aharonov-Bohm effect

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords currentmagneticfieldpotentialvectoreffectenergyacquiring
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Theoretical explanation of the Meissner effect involves proportionality between current density and vector potential [1], which has many deep consequences. Amongst them, one can speculate that superconductors in a magnetic field "find an equilibrium state where the sum of kinetic and magnetic energies is minimum" and this state "corresponds to the expulsion of the magnetic field" [2]. This statement still leaves an open question: from which source is superconducting current acquiring its kinetic energy? A na\"ive answer, perhaps, is from the energy of the magnetic field. However, one can consider situations (Aharonov-Bohm effect), where the classical magnetic field is absent in the space area where the current is being set up. Experiments demonstrate [3] that despite the local absence of magnetic field, current is, nevertheless, building up. From what source is it acquiring its energy then? Locally, only a vector potential is present. How does the vector potential facilitate the formation of the current? Is the current formation a result of truly non-local quantum action, or does the local action of the vector potential have experimental consequences, which are measurable quasi-locally? We discuss possible experiments with a hybrid normal-metal superconductor circuitry, which can clarify this puzzling situation. Experimental answers would be important for further theoretical developments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.