Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Incorporating waveform calibration error in gravitational-wave modeling and inference for SEOBNRv4

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17168 v1 pith:4YFP3B6L submitted 2024-10-22 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords waveformmodelsbiasesincorporatingmodeluncertaintiesastrophysicalbinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

As gravitational wave (GW) detector networks continue to improve in sensitivity, the demand on the accuracy of waveform models which predict the GW signals from compact binary coalescences is becoming more stringent. At high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) discrepancies between waveform models and the true solutions of Einstein's equations can introduce significant systematic biases in parameter estimation (PE). These biases affect the inferred astrophysical properties, including matter effects, and can also lead to erroneous claims of deviations from general relativity, impacting the interpretation of astrophysical populations and cosmological parameters. While efforts to address these biases have focused on developing more precise models, we explore an alternative strategy to account for uncertainties in waveform models, particularly from calibrating an effective-one-body (EOB) model against numerical relativity (NR) data. We introduce an efficient method for modeling and marginalizing over waveform uncertainty in the SEOBNRv4 model, which captures the dominant $(2,2)$ mode for non-precessing quasi-circular binary black holes (BBHs). Our approach uses Gaussian process regression (GPR) to model amplitude and phase deviations in the Fourier domain. This method mitigates systematic biases in PE and increases posterior variance by incorporating a broader distribution of waveforms, consistent with previous findings. This study emphasizes the importance of incorporating waveform uncertainties in GW data analysis and presents a novel, practical framework to include these uncertainties in Bayesian PE for EOB models, with broad applicability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fast, accurate, and differentiable: a neural-network surrogate for NRSur7dq4 precessing binary black hole waveforms

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A piecewise MLP surrogate emulates NRSur7dq4 over its full domain at NR-faithful accuracy with ~1 ms GPU latency and a fully differentiable JAX likelihood pipeline.

  2. Impact of numerical-relativity waveform calibration on parametrized post-Einsteinian tests

    gr-qc 2026-03 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    NR late-inspiral calibration systematics in IMRPhenomD produce false ppE GR violations at O5 SNRs ≳60; an uncertainty-aware baseline restores consistency with GR up to SNR 330.

  3. A comprehensive look into the accuracy of SpEC binary black hole waveforms

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulated black-hole merger waveforms accumulate numerical error over time, but the merger stage is not intrinsically less accurate once aligned on its own, and resolution-exchanged differences show no systematic bias...

Pith tools