Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Training Multilingual Pre-trained Language Model with Byte-level Subwords

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.09469 v2 pith:4YQTBXKF submitted 2021-01-23 cs.CL

Training Multilingual Pre-trained Language Model with Byte-level Subwords

classification cs.CL
keywords languagemultilingualpre-trainedmodelsbyte-levelnezhatrainingmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The pre-trained language models have achieved great successes in various natural language understanding (NLU) tasks due to its capacity to capture the deep contextualized information in text by pre-training on large-scale corpora. One of the fundamental components in pre-trained language models is the vocabulary, especially for training multilingual models on many different languages. In the technical report, we present our practices on training multilingual pre-trained language models with BBPE: Byte-Level BPE (i.e., Byte Pair Encoding). In the experiment, we adopted the architecture of NEZHA as the underlying pre-trained language model and the results show that NEZHA trained with byte-level subwords consistently outperforms Google multilingual BERT and vanilla NEZHA by a notable margin in several multilingual NLU tasks. We release the source code of our byte-level vocabulary building tools and the multilingual pre-trained language models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Roots of Performance Disparity in Multilingual Language Models: Intrinsic Modeling Difficulty or Design Choices?

    cs.CL 2026-01 accept novelty 4.0

    Performance gaps in multilingual LMs frequently arise from modeling choices such as tokenization and data exposure rather than intrinsic linguistic complexity.