Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 126 references

Magnetic monopoles at quasar centers let early supermassive objects form heavy and then lose mass by catalyzing proton decay, producing a Gaussian primordial mass distribution from SDSS data.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 14:50 UTC pith:4ZS5QAAA

load-bearing objection Old monopole-catalysis equations applied to SDSS DR7 give a Gaussian primordial mass histogram, but the result is largely fixed by a self-consistent ζ ladder and post-hoc mass cut. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.04705 v1 pith:4ZS5QAAA submitted 2026-07-06 astro-ph.GA

A new model of quasar mass evolution

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords accretionaccretion disksmethods: data analysiscatalogsquasars: supermassive black holesmagnetic monopolesRubakov-Callan effect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the rapid appearance of billion-solar-mass quasars only ~700 Myr after the Big Bang is solved if those objects contain magnetic monopoles rather than classical black holes. Monopoles catalyze proton decay, so the objects radiate and lose mass over cosmic time instead of only growing by accretion. Starting from a complete SDSS subsample of quasars above 10^9 solar masses and integrating the monopole mass-loss rate backward, the authors recover an initial mass distribution that is Gaussian at ~0.47 Gyr and an initial mass function that lies systematically above the local supermassive-black-hole mass function. A sympathetic reader cares because the same mechanism simultaneously removes the early-growth problem, predicts more faint high-mass objects than standard models, and is already claimed to match several independent Galactic-center observables.

Core claim

When the magnetic-monopole catalysis mass-loss equation is integrated backward on a magnitude-complete SDSS subsample with M > 10^9 M_⊙ and a self-consistent monopole-to-baryon ratio ζ ~ 10^{-4}–10^{-5}, the primordial mass distribution at t ≈ 0.47 Gyr is Gaussian and the initial mass function lies above the observed local supermassive-black-hole mass function.

What carries the argument

The Rubakov–Callan catalytic mass-loss rate dM/dt ∝ ζ x_0 M^{1+α} (Eq. 10), with ζ taken from the discrete mass-dependent ladder of Peng & Chou (1997) and required to be self-consistent with the derived initial mass M_0.

Load-bearing premise

The monopole-to-baryon ratio is taken from an earlier theoretical ladder that is not independently measured and is tuned so that only the heaviest mass bin remains self-consistent.

What would settle it

A deep, complete census of faint quasars or intermediate-mass black holes whose number density falls below the elevated initial mass function predicted by the monopole model (especially near 10^8 M_⊙) would rule the model out.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Supermassive objects of 10^{10}–10^{12} M_⊙ can already exist at z = 10–20 without super-Eddington accretion or direct-collapse seeds.
  • Present-day quasars are lighter than their primordial masses because continuous proton-decay radiation removes mass.
  • The local mass function undercounts faint high-mass objects that future infrared telescopes should still detect.
  • The same catalytic luminosity naturally produces the observed Galactic-center positron rate, magnetic field, and far-infrared peak.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the catalytic channel dominates, the Event Horizon Telescope and future horizon-scale imaging should eventually distinguish a monopole-supported core (no true event horizon) from a classical Kerr black hole.
  • The required ζ ladder could be tested by searching for correlated monopole-catalyzed neutrino or high-energy photon excesses in the densest galactic nuclei.
  • A positive detection of even a few magnetic monopoles in cosmic-ray or collider data would immediately elevate the model from phenomenological fit to physically motivated formation channel.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that magnetic monopoles concentrated in galactic nuclei catalyze proton decay (the Rubakov–Callan effect) and thereby supply the energy of quasars while causing net mass loss. Starting from the mass-loss rate of Peng et al. (Eq. 10), the authors integrate backward from an SDSS DR7 subsample of quasars with M > 10^9 M_⊙ and a self-consistent monopole-to-baryon ratio ζ ≃ 10^{-4}–10^{-5}. They report that the reconstructed primordial mass distribution at t ≈ 0.47 Gyr is approximately Gaussian and that the corresponding initial mass function lies systematically above the local supermassive-black-hole mass function of Li et al. (2012). The model is offered as an alternative to standard seed-plus-accretion scenarios for the rapid appearance of 10^9–10^{10} M_⊙ objects at z ≳ 6.

Significance. If the monopole-catalyzed mass-loss picture were independently confirmed, it would reframe the high-redshift supermassive-black-hole problem as one of mass decrease rather than mass growth and would supply a concrete, observationally testable prediction (an elevated high-mass end of the early IMF). The paper does make a falsifiable claim—that future deep surveys (e.g., JWST) should find more faint high-mass quasars than currently expected—and it attempts a quantitative confrontation with a large public catalog. Those strengths are real. However, the central numerical result is obtained only after a circular selection of ζ and a post-hoc mass cut, so the present evidence does not yet elevate the model above a speculative alternative.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (11)] Section 4 and Eq. (11): ζ is taken from the discrete mass-dependent ladder of Peng & Chou (1997) and is required to be self-consistent with the very M_0 that the integration is supposed to recover. Only the rung ζ ≃ 10^{-4}–10^{-5} (corresponding to M > 10^9 M_⊙) survives this consistency cut; all other mass intervals are discarded. Because the ladder is not independently measured, the Gaussian shape and the elevated IMF are largely consequences of the prior rather than of the SDSS data. An external constraint on ζ (or a demonstration that the result is robust when ζ is drawn from a continuous prior) is needed before the distribution can be claimed as a prediction of the model.
  2. [Section 3, Fig. 2] Section 3 and Fig. 2: the completeness cut M_i = −22.303 and the restriction M > 10^9 M_⊙ are chosen after inspecting the contour map so that only the self-consistent bin remains. This post-hoc selection, combined with the absence of error bars, Monte-Carlo realizations of the mass-loss integration, or alternative sample definitions, makes it impossible to assess whether the reported Gaussian is statistically preferred over other functional forms or is an artifact of the cut.
  3. [Eq. (10)] Eq. (10) and the surrounding text: the free parameters x_0, α and ⟨σβ⟩ are fixed by hand (x_0 ≃ 1, α = 1) with no exploration of their plausible ranges. Because the mass-loss rate scales linearly with these quantities, modest changes can shift the reconstructed M_0 by factors of several and erase or exaggerate the claimed offset relative to Li et al. (2012). A systematic sensitivity analysis is required for the IMF comparison to be credible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introduction devote substantial space to the general history and particle-physics motivation for monopoles; this material is only loosely connected to the quasar-mass calculation and could be shortened.
  2. [Fig. 4] Figure 4 caption refers to “upper limits” and “lower limits” without defining how the two histograms are constructed from the ζ range; a brief clarification would help the reader.
  3. [References] Several references appear with incomplete or non-standard formatting (e.g., “(1998). Kato S. …” and “Nautre” for Nature). A careful bibliography pass is needed.
  4. [Section 5] The comparison with Soltan’s L ∝ M^{2} relation is asserted but not shown quantitatively; a short plot or numerical check would strengthen the claim.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Backward integration of mass-loss Eq. 10 inherits a circular ζ(M0) ladder from co-author prior work and a post-hoc consistency cut that retains only the already-declared self-consistent bin, forcing the reported Gaussian and elevated IMF.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 4, Eqs. 10–11 and surrounding text]
    "In Equation 10, there is only one variable, ζ. To calculate the primordial quasar mass, we must determine the value of ζ first. A different initial mass of M0 corresponds to a different ζ. ... ζ and the initial mass (M0) are coupled with each other. Therefore, we divide the sample into different mass intervals. ... We use different values of ζ to try to calculate the initial mass (M0) ... The derived initial mass values are then compared with ζ to see if they are compatible with each other (cf. Equation 11). If the initially assumed ζ is compatible with the derived M0, then the self-consistenc"

    ζ is supplied by a ladder that is an explicit function of the very M0 the calculation is supposed to recover. The authors iterate until the input ζ and the output M0 lie on the same rung, then discard every bin that fails the test. The retained M0 values (and therefore the Gaussian histogram and the elevated IMF) are fixed by the consistency requirement rather than predicted from independent data.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 4, Eq. 11 and citations to Peng & Chou (1997, 1998, 2001); also Abstract and Introduction]
    "For quasars with different initial masses (M0), the parameter ξ is (Peng and Chou, 1997): ζ≃ {10^{-2}–10^{-3}, M0≈10^{12}M⊙; ... 10^{-5}–10^{-6}, M0≈10^9 M⊙; ...}. ... Following the work of Peng et al. (Peng and Chou, 1998, Peng et al., 1986, Peng and Chou, 2001), we can model the evolution..."

    The only numerical values of ζ used in the entire derivation come from prior papers whose author list overlaps with the present paper (Q.-H. Peng). No external measurement or independent theoretical derivation of the ladder is supplied; the ladder is simply imported and then used as the consistency filter that selects the final sample and the final mass distribution.

  3. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, sample selection after Eq. 11; Figs. 4–5]
    "We then draw a horizontal line at the quasar mass of 10^9 M⊙ in Figure 2. ... we can obtain a complete sample. ... Figure 4 shows our final results. We see now that the distribution is basically a Gaussian function. ... The results are plotted in Figure 5, which shows that the initial masses are generally higher than the observed values."

    After the self-consistency filter has already restricted the sample to the single mass bin that matches the assumed ζ ladder, the authors integrate Eq. 10 backward and present the resulting histogram as a ‘prediction’ (Gaussian shape, IMF above Li et al. 2012). Because the input parameter and the sample cut were chosen precisely so that this bin is the only survivor, the reported distribution is statistically forced by the prior rather than independently recovered from the data.

full rationale

The central result (Gaussian primordial mass distribution at t≈0.47 Gyr and an IMF lying above Li et al. 2012) is obtained by integrating the monopole-catalyzed mass-loss rate (Eq. 10) backward from the observed SDSS masses. That integration requires a numerical value of the monopole-to-baryon ratio ζ. The paper supplies ζ exclusively from the discrete mass-dependent ladder of Peng & Chou (1997) (Eq. 11), which is itself a self-citation by co-author Q.-H. Peng. Because ζ and the unknown initial mass M0 are defined in terms of each other, the authors iterate over mass bins until the assumed ζ and the derived M0 fall on the same rung of the ladder, then retain only the single consistent set (ζ≃10^{-4}–10^{-5}, M>10^9 M⊙). The sample cut itself is chosen after inspecting the contour map so that only this bin survives. Consequently the shape of the recovered distribution and the elevation of the IMF are largely consequences of the prior ladder and the consistency filter rather than independent predictions of the data. Without an external, non-circular constraint on ζ the result is under-determined by construction. Minor independent content remains (the SDSS sample selection and the comparison to Li et al.), so the score is 7 rather than 8–10.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and catalytic efficiency of magnetic monopoles (an unconfirmed particle), a mass-dependent monopole fraction ladder taken from earlier Peng papers, and several fixed numerical choices (opacity, reaction cross-section, density normalization) that are not re-derived. No free parameters are fitted to the SDSS luminosities themselves, but the self-consistency filter on ζ effectively selects the data subset that supports the claim.

free parameters (4)
  • ζ (monopole-to-baryon ratio) = 10^{-4}–10^{-5} for M>10^9 M_⊙
    Taken from the discrete ladder of Peng & Chou (1997) and required to be self-consistent with derived M_0; only the 10^{-4}–10^{-5} bin is retained.
  • x_0 (central density normalization) = ≃1
    Set by hand to ≃1 in Eq. 10 with no observational constraint shown.
  • α (mass-loss power-law index) = 1
    Fixed to 1 without derivation or sensitivity test.
  • ⟨σβ⟩ (catalytic reaction rate) = 10^{-34} cm^{2}
    Adopted as 10^{-34} cm^{2} (or scaled to 10^{-27} cm^{2} inside ξ) from earlier monopole literature; not re-measured.
axioms (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Magnetic monopoles exist and catalyze nucleon decay at the Rubakov–Callan rate inside galactic nuclei.
    Invoked throughout Section 2 and Eq. 8; no laboratory confirmation is cited.
  • ad hoc to paper The monopole-to-baryon ratio ζ follows the discrete mass-dependent ladder given by Peng & Chou (1997).
    Eq. 11 is used without independent derivation or observational calibration.
  • domain assumption Quasar radiation is powered primarily by monopole-catalyzed proton decay rather than accretion.
    Stated in Section 2; required for the mass-loss (rather than mass-gain) evolutionary track.
  • domain assumption Thin-disk accretion formulas and K-corrections remain valid for sample selection even though the energy source is monopole catalysis.
    Section 3 uses Netzer (2013) thin-disk rates and SDSS i-band limits while claiming a non-accretion energy source.
  • standard math Standard flat ΛCDM cosmology (Ω_m=0.3, Ω_Λ=0.7, H_0=69.32) correctly maps redshift to cosmic time.
    Eqs. 3–4; conventional background assumption.
invented entities (2)
  • Magnetic monopoles concentrated at quasar centers no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the catalytic energy source that both powers the AGN and causes secular mass loss, thereby allowing high initial masses that later decline.
    The particles are postulated to solve the early-growth problem; laboratory searches have not confirmed them, and the paper offers only indirect astronomical consistency arguments.
  • Supermassive compact objects without event horizons or singularities no independent evidence
    purpose: Replace classical black holes so that monopoles can remain at finite density and continue catalyzing proton decay.
    Introduced in Section 2 following Peng & Chou (1998); no direct observational discriminant from black holes is provided beyond the mass-evolution track itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 16605 in / 3586 out tokens · 25108 ms · 2026-07-11T14:50:43.488797+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Magnetic monopoles have been a trending topic among physicists and astronomers since the 1930s. Researchers have been working hard to find evidence of magnetic monopoles in laboratories. The existence of magnetic monopoles can rationally explain the stability of charges, the quantization of charges, the structure of leptons, the unified composition of leptons and hadrons, and the symmetry of leptons and quarks. The presence of these mysterious particles in the universe could have significant implications for theoretical physics and astrophysics. The Grand Unified Theory has also predicted the existence of magnetic monopoles, which is interestingly implied by some astronomical observations. Noticing that the growth of supermassive black holes in the early universe is an increasingly challenging difficulty faced by astronomers, here we argue that it could be solved with the help of magnetic monopoles. As suggested by Peng et al. in A Monopole Model for Galactic Nuclei. In: Structure and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei, vol. 121, p. 663 (1986), quasars containing magnetic monopoles at the center can continuously catalyze the decay of protons to release energy. We examine this model by using quasar data from the Sloan digital sky survey. It is shown that the initial mass distribution of quasars derived from the magnetic monopole model exhibits a Gaussian distribution. At the same time, the initial mass function is also slightly higher than previously expected, which could be verified by future observations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nautre , year = 1963, month = mar, volume = 197, pages =

    3C 273 : A Star-Like Object with Large Red-Shift. Nautre , year = 1963, month = mar, volume = 197, pages =. doi:10.1038/1971040a0 , adsurl =

  2. [2]

    Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Galaxy growth in a massive halo in the first billion years of cosmic history. Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature24629 , adsurl =

  3. [3]

    AJ , eprint =

    Probing the Evolution of Infrared Properties of z \ 6 Quasars: Spitzer Observations. AJ , eprint =. doi:10.1086/508209 , adsurl =

  4. [4]

    ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Near-Infrared Spectroscopy of SDSS J0303 - 0019: A Low-luminosity, High-Eddington-Ratio Quasar at z \ 6. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/833 , adsurl =

  5. [5]

    ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Rest-frame Optical Spectra and Black Hole Masses of 3 z 6 Quasars. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/109 , adsurl =

  6. [7]

    Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    An 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at a redshift of 7.5. Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature25180 , adsurl =

  7. [8]

    ARA & A , year = 1995, volume = 33, pages =

    Inward Bound---The Search For Supermassive Black Holes In Galactic Nuclei. ARA & A , year = 1995, volume = 33, pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.003053 , adsurl =

  8. [9]

    Supermassive Black Holes in Nuclei of Galaxies

    Supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei. 20th Texas Symposium on relativistic astrophysics , year = 2001, series =. doi:10.1063/1.1419581 , adsurl =. astro-ph/0105230 , editor =

  9. [10]

    ApJ , eprint =

    Early Growth and Efficient Accretion of Massive Black Holes at High Redshift. ApJ , eprint =. doi:10.1086/379758 , adsurl =

  10. [11]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The rapid growth phase of supermassive black holes. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2489 , adsurl =

  11. [12]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Evolution of supermassive black hole binaries and tidal disruption rates in non-spherical galactic nuclei. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz172 , adsurl =

  12. [13]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Quasar evolution derived from the Palomar bright quasar survey and other complete quasar surveys. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/161048 , adsurl =

  13. [14]

    ApJL , keywords =

    High-Energy Radiation from a Model of Quasars, Active Galactic Nuclei, and the Galactic Center with Magnetic Monopoles. ApJL , keywords =. doi:10.1086/319824 , adsurl =

  14. [15]

    6: Quasar catalog and survey parameters

    The large bright quasar survey. 6: Quasar catalog and survey parameters. AJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/117380 , adsurl =

  15. [16]

    Demographics and evolution of supermassive black holes in quasars and galaxies

  16. [17]

    Effect of the seed black hole mass

    Withdrawn as Duplicate: Theoretical reevaluations of the black hole mass - bulge mass relation - I. Effect of the seed black hole mass. MNRAS , year = 2019, month = mar, volume = 484, pages =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw125 , adsurl =

  17. [18]

    PASJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Galaxy interactions trigger rapid black hole growth: An unprecedented view from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey. PASJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psx135 , adsurl =

  18. [19]

    Subaru High-z Exploration of Low-luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). I. Discovery of 15 Quasars and Bright Galaxies at 5.7 z 6.9. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/26 , adsurl =

  19. [20]

    ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Physical Properties of 15 Quasars at z 6.5. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9185 , adsurl =

  20. [21]

    Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    An ultraluminous quasar with a twelve-billion-solar-mass black hole at redshift 6.30. Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature14241 , adsurl =

  21. [22]

    Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Two ten-billion-solar-mass black holes at the centres of giant elliptical galaxies. Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature10636 , adsurl =

  22. [23]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    An expanded M _ bh - diagram, and a new calibration of active galactic nuclei masses. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18045.x , adsurl =

  23. [24]

    ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Revisiting the Scaling Relations of Black Hole Masses and Host Galaxy Properties. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/184 , adsurl =

  24. [25]

    ARA & A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies. ARA & A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 , adsurl =

  25. [27]

    Science , eprint =

    The Formation of the First Star in the Universe. Science , eprint =. doi:10.1126/science.295.5552.93 , adsurl =

  26. [28]

    The Formation of the First Stars. I. The Primordial Star-forming Cloud. ApJ , eprint =. doi:10.1086/323947 , adsurl =

  27. [29]

    The Infrared Medium-deep Survey. IV. The Low Eddington Ratio of A Faint Quasar at z 6: Not Every Supermassive Black Hole is Growing Fast in the Early Universe. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaadae , adsurl =

  28. [30]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    SMBH growth parameters in the early Universe of Millennium and Millennium-II simulations. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1065 , adsurl =

  29. [31]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Formation of massive seed black holes via collisions and accretion. MNRAS , keywords =. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty208 , archivePrefix =. 1801.05841 , primaryClass =

  30. [32]

    The First Galaxies , year = "2013", editor =

    The Formation of the First Massive Black Holes. The First Galaxies , year = "2013", editor =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1_6 , archivePrefix =. 1203.6075 , primaryClass =

  31. [33]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Supermassive black hole formation by direct collapse: keeping protogalactic gas H _ 2 free in dark matter haloes with virial temperatures T _ vir > rsim 10 ^ 4 K. MNRAS , keywords =. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15960.x , archivePrefix =. 0906.4773 , primaryClass =

  32. [34]

    Relativistic Self-similar Dynamic Collapses of Black Holes in General Polytropic Spherical Clouds

    Relativistic self-similar dynamic collapses of black holes in general polytropic spherical clouds. MNRAS , keywords =. 2014. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2271 , archivePrefix =. 1311.5570 , primaryClass =

  33. [35]

    Kexue Tongbao , keywords =

    A monopole model for galactic nuclei. Kexue Tongbao , keywords =. 1985

  34. [37]

    1988", month =

    REVIEW ARTICLE: Monopole catalysis of proton decay. Reports on Progress in Physics , year = "1988", month = "Feb", volume =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/51/2/002 , adsurl =

  35. [38]

    Local supermassive black holes and relics of Active Galactic Nuclei. Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana , keywords =. 2006

  36. [39]

    ApJS , keywords =

    A Catalog of Quasar Properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7. ApJS , keywords =. 2011. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45 , archivePrefix =. 1006.5178 , primaryClass =

  37. [40]

    The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei

  38. [41]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    The anti-hierarchical growth of supermassive black holes. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08147.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0402495 , primaryClass =

  39. [42]

    ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu , keywords =

    Superheavy magnetic monopoles and decay of the proton. ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu , keywords =

  40. [43]

    V.A. Rubakov. Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and fermion-number breaking in the presence of a magnetic monopole. Nuclear Physics B. 1982. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90034-7

  41. [44]

    Rubakov and M.S

    V.A. Rubakov and M.S. Serebryakov. Anomalous baryon number non-conservation in the presence of SU(5) monopoles. Nuclear Physics B. 1983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(83)90484-4

  42. [45]

    Disappearing dyons , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1982 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2141 , url =

  43. [46]

    The Birth of the Universe , year = 1982, editor =

    10 to the -35 seconds after the big bang. The Birth of the Universe , year = 1982, editor =

  44. [47]

    doi:10.1007/978-90-277-2155-6_71 , adsurl =

    a Monopole Model for Galactic Nuclei. doi:10.1007/978-90-277-2155-6_71 , adsurl =

  45. [48]

    Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure of the Universe , year = 1998, editor =

    A Model of Quasars and AGNs with Magnetic Monopoles. Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure of the Universe , year = 1998, editor =

  46. [49]

    A & A , keywords =

    Flux- and volume-limited groups/clusters for the SDSS galaxies: catalogues and mass estimation. A & A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423585 , archivePrefix =. 1402.1350 , primaryClass =

  47. [50]

    Early SPI/INTEGRAL contraints on the morphology of the 511 keV line emission in the 4th galactic quadrant

    Early SPI/INTEGRAL constraints on the morphology of the 511 keV line emission in the 4th galactic quadrant. A & A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031437 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0309442 , primaryClass =

  48. [51]

    ApSS , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =

    A Model of Quasars and AGNs with Magnetic Monopoles. ApSS , year = 1997, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1023/A:1001145032680 , adsurl =

  49. [52]

    Nature , keywords =

    A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Galaxy. Nature , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature12499 , archivePrefix =. 1308.3147 , primaryClass =

  50. [53]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Chandra X-Ray Spectroscopic Imaging of Sagittarius A* and the Central Parsec of the Galaxy. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/375145 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0102151 , primaryClass =

  51. [54]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Accretion Disk Model of Short-Timescale Intermittent Activity in Young Radio Sources. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/840 , archivePrefix =. 0903.3940 , primaryClass =

  52. [55]

    Physics Today , year = 2009, month = jan, volume =

    Galactic Dynamics. Physics Today , year = 2009, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1063/1.3141945 , adsurl =

  53. [56]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Black hole -- galaxy co-evolution in FIRE: the importance of black hole location and mergers. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  54. [57]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    A semi-analytic model for the co-evolution of galaxies, black holes and active galactic nuclei. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13805.x , archivePrefix =. 0808.1227 , primaryClass =

  55. [58]

    Cosmological Evolution of Supermassive Black Holes. II. Evidence for Downsizing of Spin Evolution. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/187 , archivePrefix =. 1202.3516 , primaryClass =

  56. [59]

    Infrared Imaging of SDSS Quasars: Implications for the Quasar K correction

    Infrared Imaging of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasars: Implications for the Quasar K Correction. AJ , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/1799 , archivePrefix =. 0809.0521 , primaryClass =

  57. [60]

    ApJS , keywords =

    The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. ApJS , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , archivePrefix =. 0812.0649 , primaryClass =

  58. [61]

    The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog. V. Seventh Data Release. AJ , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2360 , archivePrefix =. 1004.1167 , primaryClass =

  59. [62]

    U ber die Kr \

    \"U ber die Kr \"u mmung des Raumes. Zeitschrift fur Physik , year = 1922, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1007/BF01332580 , adsurl =

  60. [63]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Seeds don't sink: even massive black hole 'seeds' cannot migrate to galaxy centres efficiently. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2713 , archivePrefix =. 2101.02727 , primaryClass =

  61. [64]

    A Population of Metal-Poor Galaxies with ~L* Luminosities at Intermediate Redshifts

    A Population of Metal-Poor Galaxies with -0.5ex * Luminosities at Intermediate Redshifts. ApJL , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/L67 , archivePrefix =. 0903.3948 , primaryClass =

  62. [65]

    ApJ , keywords =

    A method for determining luminosity functions incorporating both flux measurements and flux upper limits, with applications to the average X-ray to optical luminosity ratio for quasars. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/158040 , adsurl =

  63. [66]

    Black Holes in Galaxy Mergers: Evolution of Quasars

    Black Holes in Galaxy Mergers: Evolution of Quasars. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/432438 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0504190 , primaryClass =

  64. [67]

    ApJS , keywords =

    A Unified, Merger-driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids. ApJS , keywords =. doi:10.1086/499298 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0506398 , primaryClass =

  65. [68]

    Kato S., Fukue J., Mineshige S.,

  66. [69]

    Kexue Tongbao , keywords =

    A monopole model for galactic nuclei. Kexue Tongbao , keywords =

  67. [70]

    Kato S., Fukue J., Mineshige S.,

    (1998). Kato S., Fukue J., Mineshige S., . Black-hole accretion disks

  68. [71]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy , J

    Abazajian , K. N., Adelman-McCarthy , J. K., Ag \"u eros , M. A., and others. (2009). The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey . ApJS , 182(2):543--558

  69. [72]

    L., and Norman , M

    Abel , T., Bryan , G. L., and Norman , M. L. (2002). The Formation of the First Star in the Universe . Science , 295:93--98

  70. [73]

    Avni , Y., Soltan , A., Tananbaum , H., and Zamorani , G. (1980). A method for determining luminosity functions incorporating both flux measurements and flux upper limits, with applications to the average X-ray to optical luminosity ratio for quasars. ApJ , 238:800--807

  71. [74]

    P., Mazzucchelli , C., et al

    Ba \ n ados , E., Venemans , B. P., Mazzucchelli , C., et al. (2018). An 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at a redshift of 7.5 . Nature , 553:473--476

  72. [75]

    K., Maeda , Y., Morris , M., et al

    Baganoff , F. K., Maeda , Y., Morris , M., et al. (2003). Chandra X-Ray Spectroscopic Imaging of Sagittarius A* and the Central Parsec of the Galaxy . ApJ , 591(2):891--915

  73. [76]

    Boekholt , T. C. N., Schleicher , D. R. G., Fellhauer , M., et al. (2018). Formation of massive seed black holes via collisions and accretion . MNRAS , 476(1):366--380

  74. [77]

    S., and Larson , R

    Bromm , V., Coppi , P. S., and Larson , R. B. (2002). The Formation of the First Stars. I. The Primordial Star-forming Cloud . ApJ , 564:23--51

  75. [78]

    Callan, C. G. (1982). Disappearing dyons. Phys. Rev. D , 25:2141--2146

  76. [79]

    P., Falcke , H., Karuppusamy , R., et al

    Eatough , R. P., Falcke , H., Karuppusamy , R., et al. (2013). A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Galaxy . Nature , 501(7467):391--394

  77. [80]

    Fan , X., Barth , A., Banados , E., et al. (2019). The First Luminous Quasars and Their Host Galaxies . arXiv:1903.04078

  78. [81]

    U ber die Kr \

    Friedmann , A. (1922). \"U ber die Kr \"u mmung des Raumes . Zeitschrift fur Physik , 10:377--386

  79. [82]

    D., Greene , J

    Goulding , A. D., Greene , J. E., Bezanson , R., et al. (2018). Galaxy interactions trigger rapid black hole growth: An unprecedented view from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey . PASJ , 70:S37

  80. [83]

    W., Onken , C

    Graham , A. W., Onken , C. A., Athanassoula , E., and Combes , F. (2011). An expanded M _ bh - diagram, and a new calibration of active galactic nuclei masses . MNRAS , 412:2211--2228

Showing first 80 references.