REVIEW 3 cited by
A high-precision continuum limit study of the HVP short-distance window
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The separation of the hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment into Euclidean windows allows for a tailored approach to address the different dominant challenges at short, intermediate, and long distances. We present a novel approach to compute the short-distance window without the need for using perturbative QCD. We combine a quenched continuum extrapolation using 18 lattice spacings ($1.6 \,\text{GeV} \lesssim a^{-1} \lesssim 6.1\,\text{GeV}$) with a separate continuum extrapolation of the sea-quark effects. This method allows for the computationally expensive sea-quark effects to be estimated using only a smaller number of ensembles at coarser lattice spacings, while largely confining the logarithmic dependency of the continuum extrapolation to the quenched component.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Comparison of the hadronic vacuum polarization between hadronic $\tau$-decay data and lattice QCD
Lattice QCD and tau-decay dispersive calculations of isospin-one HVP generally agree, except for a significant difference in the 2π−π+π0 four-pion mode contribution to window quantities.
-
BMW/DMZ calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation for the muon magnetic moment
A hybrid lattice-QCD plus e+e- data determination of the hadronic vacuum polarisation gives a Standard Model muon g-2 prediction 0.5σ from experiment, at 0.45% precision.
-
Muon lifetime and Fermi constant: an update
Updated Δq = (−4 384 678 ± 34)×10^{-9} reduces theory error on the muon lifetime by an order of magnitude and gives G_F = 1.166 378 59(59)×10^{-5} GeV^{-2}.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.